A comparison of R1 and R4 IVS networks S.B. Lambert, Royal Observatory of Belgium, formerly at NVI, Inc./US Naval Observatory A.-M. Gontier, Paris Observatory.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

03/000 First geodetic results from the AuScope VLBI network Oleg Titov Australian Government Geoscience Australia UTAS, Hobart, 20 June 2012.

Advertisements

Dennis D. McCarthy Elements of Prediction. Why are we here? IERS Working Group on Predictions IERS Working Group on Predictions Definitive user requirements.

Processing of VLBI observation in St. Petersburg University Kudryashova Maria Astronomical Institute of Saint Petersburg University.

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.

Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research

VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Vie_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.

Seasonal Position Variations and Regional Reference Frame Realization Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.

VLBA Astrometry Workshop, Socorro, NM Global Astrometry with the VLBA Outline VLBI astrometry/geodesy overview Applications of global VLBI astrometry Contributions.

2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.

Institut for Geodesy Research Unit Earth Rotation and Global Dynamic Processes Earth Orientation Parameters from Lunar Laser Ranging Liliane Biskupek Jürgen.

VieVS User Workshop 14 – 21 September, 2011 Vienna Reprocessing the complete history of VLBI observations with VieVS Sigrid Böhm.

VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna High frequency EOP estimated from the CONT campaigns Tobias Nilsson.

Laser Ranging Contributions to Earth Rotation Studies Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109–8099,

VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.

2012 DiFX user’s meeting, Sydney, Australia USNO Software Correlator: Status Report Outline USNO/WACO Background USNO Prototype Software Correlator (UPSC)

03/000 Cosmologic astrometry Australian Government Geoscience Australia Yonsei University, Seoul 18 October 2010.

SRI Seminar 2005 Time series of GPS stations For reference, monitoring and geophysics Günter Stangl Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying.

NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.

The Future of the VLBA Workshop, Charlottesville, VA Earth Orientation and GPS Outline Geodetic VLBI background Applications of Geodetic VLBI VLBI for.

IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.

Geodetic Networks: The Supporting Framework Terrestrial Reference Frame is ‘Critical Infrastructure’ for all Earth science research and applications. Global.

Determination of seasonal geocenter variations from DORIS, GPS and SLR data.

Athanasios Dermanis and Dimitrios Tsoulis Numerical evidence for the inconsistent separation of the ITRF-ICRF transformation into precession-nutation,

An improved and extended GPS derived velocity field of the postglacial adjustment in Fennoscandia Martin Lidberg 1,3, Jan M. Johansson 1, Hans-Georg Scherneck.

AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.

The ICRF, ITRF and VLBA Chopo Ma NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center.

SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT

Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.

Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.

1/16 ITRF2008-P: Some evaluation elements and impact on IGS RF products Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, 16 April 2010 ITRF2008-P: SOME EVALUATION ELEMENTS.

Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.

Application of a North America reference frame to the Pacific Northwest Geodetic Array (PANGA) M M Miller, V M Santillan, Geodesy Laboratory, Central Washington.

3D representation of the Non-Rotating Origin Olivier de Viron and Veronique Dehant Royal Observatory of Belgium Scientific adviser: Nicole Capitaine.

Global VLBI Solution IGG05R01 1 Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG), Vienna, Austria 2 German Geodetic Research Institute (DGFI), Munich, Germany.

NATO Workshop Veszprem 2004 Recent Monitoring of Crustal Movements in the Eastern Mediterranean The Usage of GPS Measurements G. Stangl, Federal Office.

Calc - Updating for IERS Conventions (2010): Precession/Nutation – change to use IAU2006 precession model. Makes a difference of ~0.5 µas/yr from

LLR Analysis – Relativistic Model and Tests of Gravitational Physics James G. Williams Dale H. Boggs Slava G. Turyshev Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.

03/000 Effect of the reference radiosource instability on the TRF solution Australian Government Geoscience Australia 4 th General IVS Meeting, 9-13, January,

03/000 VLBI network design Australian Government Geoscience Australia NGRS Workshop, 1-2 February, Canberra.

Geodetic Networks: The Supporting Framework Terrestrial Reference Frame is ‘Critical Infrastructure’ for all Earth science research and applications. Global.

Workshop, Miami, June 2008 IGS Contribution to ITRF Zuheir Altamimi & Xavier Collilieux IGN, France.

03/000 Statistical properties of CRF solution from VLBI data analysis Oleg Titov Australian Government Geoscience Australia GAIA-2005, Dresden, 15-16,

12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences

IVS High Accuracy Products for the Maintenance of the Global Reference Frames as a Contribution to GGOS VLBI provides high accuracy and unique products.

Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.

Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.

IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.

Importance of SLR in the Determination of the ITRF Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Geoscience Australia, Canberra, August 29, 2005 SLR Strength: its contribution.

Determination of the SLR station coordinates and velocities on the basis of laser observations of low satellites Paweł Lejba, Stanisław Schillak Space.

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.

IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.

IERS Directing Board Meeting No.39, BIPM Paris, September 23, 2004 IERS2005: Plan “Integrated Earth orientation parameters, Radio sources, and Site coordinates.

Reference Frames Global Continental Local -- may be self-defined

Aurore Sibois and Shailen Desai

Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan

Vertical Land Movements in the Canary Island using Continuous GPS Time Series Analysis: First Results García-Cañada, Laura(1), Teferle, F. Norman(2),

Reference Frames Global Continental Local -- may be self-defined

NRCan Velocity Fields & Comparisons to Some Plate Motion Estimates

IVS contribution to the ITRF2014

Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm

Troposphere and Clock Parameterization During Continuous VLBI Campaigns Kamil Teke1, 2, Johannes Boehm1, Hana Spicakova1, Andrea Pany1, Harald Schuh1 1.

X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.

VLBI Estimates of Vertical Crustal Motion in Europe

Correlation coefficients

Numerical evidence for the inconsistent separation

Absolute Location - the absolute location of a place is its exact set of coordinates on the planet, frequently expressed in degrees of longitude and.

Diurnal and Semi-Diurnal Earth Rotation from 37 Years of VLBI Data

Presentation transcript:

A comparison of R1 and R4 IVS networks S.B. Lambert, Royal Observatory of Belgium, formerly at NVI, Inc./US Naval Observatory A.-M. Gontier, Paris Observatory

Two parallel networks running since 2002 Overview of the networks R1 (Mondays), 13 sitesR4 (Thursdays), 10 sites

Overview of the networks R1 (Mondays), 13 sitesR4 (Thursdays), 10 sites Question: are the networks consistent? Can they realize identically EOP and reference systems?

Overview of the networks R1 (Mondays), 13 sitesR4 (Thursdays), 10 sites > 10,000GILCHARTMATENYALONSATSUKWESTWETTGILCKOKEMATETSUKWESTWETTGILCNYALTSUKWESTWETTGILCTSUKWESTWETT 5, ,000ALGOKOKEHARTSESHTIGOHARTKOKEMEDISESHTIGOHARTHOBAKOKEMEDIONSATIGO < 5,000MEDI TIGO HOBA MEDI NYAL HOBA ONSA NYAL SESH SVET > 10,000ALGOGILCKOKENYALWETTALGOFORTGILCKOKEMATENYALWETTALGOGILCKOKENYALSVETWETTALGOFORTGILCKOKENYALSVETWETT 5, ,000FORTFORT < 5,000HOBA MATE SESH ONSA SVET TIGO TSUK MEDI ONSA TIGO HART MEDI TIGO

Sensitivity of a baseline to Earth orientation, where X, Y and Z are the station coordinates: “permanent” network all sites EOP and baseline geometry x y UT1

Description of the solution Solution run with R1 sessions only, then with R4 sessions only Global: site positions and velocities, antenna axes, source positions Arc: polar motion and rate, UT1-UTC and rate, nutation offsets NNR and NNT on all sites except MEDICINA and GILCREEK (known episodic motions) NNR on 212 ICRF defining sources Made with CALC/SOLVE software Compared against IERS Bulletin A (USNO combined solution)

Comparison of EOP solutions Difference to IERS Bulletin A, mean standard error about 300  as

Comparison of TRF 7-parameter Helmert transformation to compare individual TRF against ITRF Number of sites R1R4

What shows up in operational series? Difference to IERS Bulletin A, standard error about 300  as

Conclusion Compares the 2 parallel 24-hour R1 and R4 networks run by the IVS Looks at the possible influence of geometry, EOP and TRF realizations Evolution of R1 between 2002 and 2005 greatly improved the R1 series : sites in the southern hemisphere after 2003 Current R1 and R4 residuals against IERS Bulletin A have same standard deviation R1 network more extended than R4 but with a reduced East-West “permanent” network R4 smaller but “permanent” R1-derived TRF closer to ITRF than R4-derived TRF but with larger uncertainties Inconsistencies show up in operational series (drift of 30  as per year)