Presented to PGDTF February 11, 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Second Draft of the NERC Standard PRC Disturbance Monitoring and Reporting JSIS Meeting August 10, 2010 Salt Lake City, UT.
Advertisements

NERC TPL Standard Issues TSS Meeting #146 Seattle, WA August 15-17, 2007 Chifong Thomas.
Bulk Electric System Definition Task Force Update Reliability Policy Issues Committee March 4, 2010 Brian Theaker BESDTF Chair.
NERC Footnote b / 12 – Load Loss
Acclimating to Space Weather on our Transmission Grid Don Watkins
STATUS OF BULK ELECTRIC SYSTEM DEFINITION PROJECT
Revised Event Analysis Process Event Analysis Subcommittee (EAS) Process Update Team (EUT) Hassan Hamdar – FRCC Reliability Engineer, EAS Vice-Chair FRCC.
NERC New Approved Standards
1 PER-005 Update Impact on Operators System Operator Conference April and May 1-3, 2012 Columbia, SC Margaret Stambach Manager, Training Services.
Allan Wick, CFE, CPP, PSP, PCI, CBCP Chief Security Officer WECC Joint Meeting October 8, 2014.
Steve Rueckert Director of Standards Standards Update June 5, 2014 Joint Guidance Committee Meeting Salt Lake City, UT.
Recent NERC Standards Activities RSC – Jan. 5, 2011 NSRS Update Date Meeting Title (optional)
Why TADS Is Needed No systematic transmission outage data collection effort exists for all of North America Energy Information Administration data (Schedule.
1. 11/26/2012: NERC Board of Trustees adopted CIP v5 CIP thru CIP CIP and CIP Version 5 Filing FERC requested filing by 3/31/2013.
Branden Sudduth Director, Reliability Assessment and Performance Analysis Rocky Mountain Region PA/PC Meeting March 18-19, 2014 Denver, Colorado.
WECC and NERC Protection Criteria and Standards
An Overview of Emerging Power Industry Standards for Geomagnetic Storms Adequacy Concerns.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Update Christine Hasha CIP Compliance Lead Advisor, ERCOT TAC March 27, 2014.
Averting Disaster - Grid Reliability Issues and Standards National Energy Restructuring Conference April 1, 2004 Washington, DC.
FRCC Seasonal Transmission Assessment & Operational Seasonal Study Winter 2012.
ERCOT SOL Methodology for the Planning and Operations Horizons Stephen Solis 2014 OTS 1.
Applying the Distribution System in Grid Restoration/NERC CIP-014 Risk Assessment Srijib Mukherjee, Ph.D., P.E. UC Synergetic.
Standards Update Project Geomagnetic Disturbance Mitigation Kenneth A. Donohoo, Oncor Electric Delivery Co LLC Chairperson, GMD Task Force Presentation.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
Project WECC-0100 Update Reliability Subcommittee February 2014.
Steve Rueckert Director of Standards TPL Discussion – PCC Steering Committee March 25, 2014.
December 7, 2012 ERCOT Planning Horizon SOL Methodology Update Jeff Billo RPG.
1. 2 NERC Bulk Electric System (BES) Definition (NERC Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards) FERC Order 693 FRCC Handbook Review Task Force.
Reliability Requirements Bill Blevins Manager of Operations Support ERCOT.
LAREDO PLANT RMR EXIT STRATEGY Presentation to Board of Directors March 16, 2004 Transmission Services Operations.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Project System Protection Coordination Requirement revisions to PRC (ii) Texas Reliability Entity NERC Standards Reliability Subcommittee.
Board of Directors Meeting February 26, 2013 Standards, Registration and Certification Report.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ RTP: Cascade Analysis April 21, 2015.
NERC Project S ystem Protection Coordination - PRC-027​ Presentation to the NSRS Conference Call August 17, 2015 Sam Francis Oncor Electric Delivery.
1 Planning the CREZ 345 kV System for Multi-contingencies CREZ Technical Conference January 26, 2010 Bernie Pasternack AEP Service Corporation.
A.Pulkkinen Establishing the Geomagnetic Disturbance Benchmark Event for Evaluation of the Space Weather Hazard on Power Grids.
Grid Reliability Metrics by Jim Dyer Electric Power Group, LLC January 29, 2004 Washington, DC Transmission Reliability Research Review.
Steve Rueckert Director of Standards TPL Discussion – PCC Steering Committee March 25, 2014.
Material for 10/23/2015 PGDTF Meeting Michael Juricek.
WECC-0100 Scope, Content & Status Update Rikin Shah, PAC Orlando Ciniglio, IPC WECC TSS Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT January ,
OPSTF – Issue 7 Long-term unavailability of autotransformers.
PGDTF Update to ROS November 5, 2015 Michael Juricek PGDTF Chairman 111/5/2015 ROS Meeting.
Data Requirements For Calculating Geomagnetically Induced Currents ROS Meeting March 3, 2016 Michael Juricek PGDTF Chairman 1.
Data Requirements For Calculating Geomagnetically Induced Currents PGDTF Meeting March 21, 2016 Michael Juricek PGDTF Chairman 1.
CenterPoint Energy Proprietary and Confidential Information John Brockhan Summary of NERC HILF Activities April 26, 2016.
Remedial Action Scheme Workshop RAS Workshop May 9, 2016.
Reliability Must Run Workshop RMR Study Process May 24, 2016.
Reliability Standard TPL Transmission System Planned Performance for Geomagnetic Disturbance Events September 28, 2016 TPL Standard Status.
Planning Geomagnetic Disturbance Task Force (PGDTF) Update to the ROS
NERC Published Lessons Learned Summary
GIC System Model Workshop
Planning Geomagnetic Disturbance Task Force (PGDTF) Meeting Material
GMD Research FERC Order No. 830 Research Work Plan Mark Olson, NERC
Planning Geomagnetic Disturbance Task Force (PGDTF) Update to the ROS
WECC Regional Standards Update
GIC Analysis using PSS®E
Path Operator Implementation Task Force
Compliance Report to ERCOT TAC February 2007
Phil O’Donnell, Manager Operations and Planning Audits
Merrill Brimhall – Engineer, Staff
Project WECC-0100 Update Load Modeling Task Force
GMD Data Request NERC Rules of Procedure Section 1600
Workshop Session 1: Overview
Workshop Session 1: Overview
Phil O’Donnell, Manager Operations and Planning Audits
Project WECC-0100 Update Reliability Subcommittee
GMD Research FERC Order No. 830 Research Work Plan Mark Olson, NERC
TPL Voltage Guideline Presented to TSS Baj Agrawal Arizona Public Service Co. 8/21/2017.
Project WECC-0100 Update Load Modeling Task Force
Presentation transcript:

Presented to PGDTF February 11, 2015 TPL-007-1 Standard Status Update Reliability Standard TPL-007-1 Transmission System Planned Performance for Geomagnetic Disturbance Events Presented to PGDTF February 11, 2015

TPL-007-1 Standard Status Update TPL-007-1 developed to address FERC Order 779 directives requiring to conduct initial and on-going assessments of the potential impact of benchmark GMD events on the Bulk-Power System, to identify benchmark GMD events that specify what severity GMD events applicable registered entities must assess for potential impacts on the Bulk-Power System and to develop and implement a plan to mitigate the risk of instability, uncontrolled separation, or Cascading as a result of a benchmark GMD event if the assessments identify potential impacts from benchmark GMD events. A final ballot for TPL-007-1 concluded December 16, 2014 achieved a quorum and received sufficient affirmative votes for approval. On January 21, 2015, NERC filed a petition seeking FERC approval of Proposed Reliability Standard TPL-007-1, Transmission System Planned Performance for Geomagnetic Disturbance Events. Quorum /Approval 84.27% / 78.05%

Existing Guidance for Performing GMD Analysis & Modeling Gaps The NERC GMD TF has developed general guidelines for performing GMD Vulnerability Assessments that are described in TPL-007-1 : NERC Geomagnetic Disturbance Planning Guide NERC GIC Application Guide Gaps exist in: GIC modeling Power flow studies Harmonics studies Transformer thermal analysis (to be completed by TO’s and GO’s)

Implementation Plan 6 Months 18 Months 24 Months 48 Months 60 Months Date of Approval 6 Months R1 Identify Responsibilities 18 Months R2 System Models 24 Months R5 GIC Flow Information 48 Months R6 Thermal Assessment 60 Months R3, R4, and R7 GMD Assessment Corrective Action Plan

TPL-007-1 Summary R1 requires to identify the individual and joint responsibilities of the Planning Coordinator (ERCOT) and Transmission Planners in ERCOT’s area for maintaining models and performing the study or studies needed to complete GMD Vulnerability Assessment. R2 requires to maintain System models and GIC System (DC) models of the responsible entity’s planning area for performing the studies needed to complete GMD Vulnerability Assessment Guidance for developing the GIC System model is provided in the GIC Application Guide developed by the NERC GMD Task Force and available at: http://www.nerc.com/comm/PC/Geomagnetic%20Disturbance%20Task%20Force%20GMDTF%202013/GIC%20Application%20Guide%202013_approved.pdf R3 requires to have criteria for acceptable System steady state voltage performance for its System during the benchmark GMD event described in Attachment 1.

TPL-007-1 Summary R4 requires a GMD Vulnerability Assessment of the system to determine its ability to withstand a Benchmark GMD Event without causing voltage collapse Assessment performed once every five years Applicability: Planning Coordinators, Transmission Planners R5 requires to provide GIC flow information to be used for the transformer thermal impact assessment specified in R6 to each TO and GO that owns an applicable BES power transformer in the planning area. Part 5.1 The maximum effective GIC value for the worst case geoelectric field orientation for the benchmark GMD event Part 5.2 The effective GIC time series, GIC(t), calculated using the benchmark GMD event Additional guidance is available in the Transformer Thermal Impact Assessment white paper: http://www.nerc.com/pa/Stand/Pages/Project-2013-03-Geomagnetic- Disturbance-Mitigation.aspx

GMD Assessment Process Overview Assemble model and equipment data Create dc model of the system Calculate GIC for each transformer Calculate transformer reactive losses Investigate mitigation options Standard TPL Planning GMD-specific Planning Steps GIC calculation is now available on most power system analysis software Identify voltage and system issues Run ac power flow w/ reactive losses included Conduct transformer thermal assessment

TPL-007-1 Summary R6 requires a Transformer Thermal Impact Assessment to ensure high-side, wye grounded BES transformers connected at 200kV or higher will not overheat based on the benchmark event Applies to transformers where effective GIC identified in GIC studies 75 A per phase or greater (not 75 A continuous). Effective 75 A per phase is a conservative screening criterion Approaches for conducting the assessment are presented in the Transformer Thermal Impact Assessment white paper posted on the project page http://www.nerc.com/pa/Stand/Pages/Project-2013-03-Geomagnetic-Disturbance-Mitigation.aspx Performed once every five years with GMD Vulnerability Assessment Applicability: Generator Owners, Transmission Owners

TPL-007-1 Summary R7 requires to develop a Corrective Action Plan addressing how the performance requirements will be met if through the GMD Vulnerability Assessment responsible entity determined that System does not meet the performance requirements of Table 1. Assessment performed once every five years with GMD Vulnerability Assessment Applicability: Planning Coordinators, Transmission Planners Corrective Action Plans as defined in the NERC Glossary of Terms: A list of actions and an associated timetable for implementation to remedy a specific problem.

Benchmark GMD Event Description The Benchmark GMD Event is described by: Reference geoelectric field amplitude (8V/km) 1-in-100 year amplitude determined statistically from geomagnetic field measurements for a reference earth model Used for GIC studies and load-flow simulations that account for transformer Reactive Power absorption caused by half-cycle saturation Reference geomagnetic field waveshape March 13-14, 1989 GMD event selected from recorded GMD events Used for time-domain analysis on equipment such as transformer thermal impact assessment and/or to determine local geoelectric field if alternative or multiple earth models are used in GIC studies Scaling factors for geomagnetic latitude and earth conductivity can be used to adjust geoelectric field amplitude

Epeak = Ebenchmark x α x β (in V/km) Benchmark GMD Geoelectric Field Epeak = Ebenchmark x α x β (in V/km) Epeak = Benchmark geoelectric field magnitude at System location Ebenchmark = 8 V/km Benchmark geoelectric field magnitude at reference location (60 N geomagnetic latitude, resistive ground model) α = Factor adjustment for geomagnetic latitude β = Factor adjustment for regional earth conductivity model The benchmark GMD event description is available on the project page: http://www.nerc.com/pa/Stand/Project201303GeomagneticDisturbanceMitigation/Benc hmark_GMD_Event_Dec5_clean.pdf

Questions and Answers