FRCC Fall Compliance Workshop October , 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Compliance Report WECC Board of Directors Meeting December 7-8, 2006 Steve Rueckert Director, Standards and Compliance.
Advertisements

Interchange Authority Recommendations Board of Directors Meeting December 7, 2007.
Jerry Rust Chair - Underfrequency Load Shedding Criterion Team
STATUS OF BULK ELECTRIC SYSTEM DEFINITION PROJECT
PER
PER Update & Compliance Lessons Learned
Project Disturbance and Sabotage Reporting (Event Reporting) Project Webinar July 30, 2012.
Allan Wick, CFE, CPP, PSP, PCI, CBCP Chief Security Officer WECC Joint Meeting October 8, 2014.
COM Operating Personnel Communications Protocols
Recent NERC Standards Activities RSC – Jan. 5, 2011 NSRS Update Date Meeting Title (optional)
Why TADS Is Needed No systematic transmission outage data collection effort exists for all of North America Energy Information Administration data (Schedule.
[ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification for [RELATED ENTITIES] [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [ Presenter Name, Title] Closing Presentation.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO] [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [Presenter Name,
Cyber Security 2005 ERCOT COMPLIANCE ROLLOUT Lane Robinson Reliability Analyst.
Notice of Compliance Audit
Date Texas RE Board Update to TAC November 5, 2009 Susan Vincent Director, Legal Affairs.
Physical Security CIP NERC Standing Committees December 9-10, 2014.
June 6, 2007 TAC Meeting NERC Registration Issues Andrew Gallo, Assistant General Counsel, Litigation and Business Operations ERCOT Legal Dept.
1 FRCC Compliance Organization and Entity Registration 2008 FRCC Compliance Workshop.
Audit & Compliance Tips Jagan Mandavilli Senior Compliance Engineer.
Nuclear Power Plant “Bright-Line” NERC:. Tim Roxey and Jim Hughes NRC:
GOP and QSE Relationship Jeff Whitmer Manager, Compliance Assessments Talk with Texas RE June 25, 2012.
ERCOT SOL Methodology for the Planning and Operations Horizons Stephen Solis 2014 OTS 1.
City of Leesburg Electric Department Internal Compliance Program (ICP)
1 Texas Regional Entity Report December Performance Highlights ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for October – Initial.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June Cyber Security and Reliability Standards Regis F. Binder Director, Division of Logistics & Security Federal.
APPA RELIABILITY STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE SYMPOSIUM Case Study: City Utilities of Springfield, MO January 11, 2007.
Implementing the New Reliability Standards Status of Draft Cyber Security Standards CIP through CIP Larry Bugh ECAR Standard Drafting Team.
January 2008 Texas Regional Entity Report. 2 Performance Highlights ●ERCOT’s Control Performance Standard (NERC CPS1) score for November – ●Scores.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program Background Information.
Texas Regional Entity Update Sam Jones Interim CEO and President Board of Directors July 18, 2006.
NERC Data Collection & Coordination. Rules of Procedure: Section 1600 Overview  NERC’s authority to issue a mandatory data request in the U.S. is contained.
Assessing Compliance. 2 NERC Compliance Workshop 11/02/07 Documentation of Compliance with NERC Reliability Standards Jeff Whitmer.
Effective Communications and Declaring EEAs 2016 System Operator Seminar.
1. 2 NERC Bulk Electric System (BES) Definition (NERC Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards) FERC Order 693 FRCC Handbook Review Task Force.
Project System Protection Coordination Requirement revisions to PRC (ii) Texas Reliability Entity NERC Standards Reliability Subcommittee.
Project (COM-001-3) Interpersonal Communications Capabilities Michael Cruz-Montes, CenterPoint Energy Senior Consultant, Policy & Compliance, SDT.
Project Real-time Monitoring and Analysis Capabilities Mark Olson, Senior Standards Developer Texas RE NSRS October 5, 2015.
Bill Lewis, Compliance Team Lead NERC Reliability Working Group May 16, 2013 Texas RE Update Talk with Texas RE April 25, 2013.
Paragraph 81 Project. 2RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY Background FERC March 15, 2012 Order regarding the Find, Fix, Track and Report (FFT) process  Paragraph.
Problem Areas Updates Penalties FRCC Compliance Workshop September / October
NERC Project S ystem Protection Coordination - PRC-027​ Presentation to the NSRS Conference Call August 17, 2015 Sam Francis Oncor Electric Delivery.
COMPLIANCE ROLLOUT Vann Weldon Compliance Training Administrator March 23, 2005 NERC FUNCTIONAL MODEL REVIEW.
NERC Project S ystem Protection Coordination - PRC-027​ Presentation to the NSRS Conference Call April 20, 2015 Sam Francis Oncor Electric Delivery.
Overview of Texas RE Reliability Standards Process and 2008 Year in Review Judith James Manager, Reliability Standards.
Texas Regional Entity Report Mark Henry June 6, 2008.
RSC An Overview of Fill-In-the-Blanks (FIB) Reliability Standards Farzaneh Tafreshi Manager, Reliability Standards Texas Regional Entity
Texas Regional Entity ROS Presentation January 15, 2009 T EXAS RE ROS P RESENTATION J ANUARY 2009.
Projects System Protection Coordination Draft 2 of TOP Texas Reliability Entity NERC Standards Reliability Subcommittee November 2, 2015.
SAR 001 DT Presentation Texas RE Presentation to SAR-001 Drafting Team Farzaneh Tafreshi Manager, Reliability Standards Texas Regional Entity.
1 Power System Restoration. 2 Not Active 3 4 Compliance Audit Process APPA E&O Technical Conference – Atlanta April 16, 2007.
October 29, 2012 RARF Workshop 2 Introduction to ERCOT Modeling Process Jay Teixeira Manager, Model Administration.
FRCC Regional Entity Webinar NERC Reliability Standard Development Projects and Situational Awareness and Event Analysis October 30, 2013, 1:00 p.m. –
System Restoration & Blackstart Standards Drafting Team Presentation to Texas RE Reliability Standards Committee March 4, 2009 Rick Terrill Confidential.
NOGRR-169 OWG discussion Bill Blevins June 28, 2017.
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
Updated ERO Enterprise Guide for Internal Controls
NERC Entity Registration and Certification in the ERCOT Region
COM Operating Personnel Communications Protocols
ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 2, 2005
NERC AWARENESS TRAINING
Background (history, process to date) Status of CANs
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
Project Disturbance and Sabotage Reporting (Event Reporting) Project Webinar July 30, 2012.
Compliance Open Webinar
Workshop Session 1: Overview
Coordinate Operations Standard
Workshop Session 1: Overview
Nuclear Power Plant “Bright-Line” NERC:. Tim Roxey and Jim Hughes NRC:
Compliance Open Webinar
Presentation transcript:

EOP-004-2 (Event Reporting) FRCC Fall Compliance Workshop October 15 - 17, 2013 Why do you have to report events under Event Analysis Process when you have to report events under the EOP-004-2? The EOP-004-2 is a mandatory NERC Reliability Standards which require you to report certain events within specific timelines, Different from that is the Event Analysis Process, it is a voluntary process that is focus on learning, focus on helping everyone get better thru lesson learn, focus on what really happened and draw information learning mitigation strategies, Risk management strategies in response to a particular entity experienced in an event They are two different process with different objectives and entities are free to consolidate those processes inside their organizations. That is up to them is they wish to pursue that

Background NERC established a Standard Authorization Request (SAR) Team in 2009 to investigate and propose revisions to the CIP-001 and EOP-004 Reliability Standards. The team was asked to consider the following: CIP-001 could be merged with EOP-004 to eliminate redundancies Acts of sabotage have to be reported to the Department of Energy (DOE) as part of EOP-004 Specific references to the DOE form need to be eliminated EOP-004 had some ‘fill-in-the-blank’ components to eliminate

Purpose To improve the reliability of the Bulk Electric System by requiring the reporting of events by Responsible Entities

Applicability Functional Entities: For the purpose of the Requirements and the EOP-004 Attachment 1 of this standard, the following functional entities will be collectively referred to as “Responsible Entity.” Reliability Coordinator (RC) Balancing Authority (BA) Transmission Owner (TO) Transmission Operator (TOP) Generator Owner (GO) Generator Operator (GOP) Distribution Provider (DP)

Distribution Provider Applicability The Distribution Provider (DP) as an applicable entity has been included under this standard. Not all DPs will own Bulk Electric System (BES) Facilities and will not meet the “Threshold for Reporting” for any event listed in Attachment 1. These DPs will not have any reports to submit under Requirement R2. However, these DPs will be responsible for meeting Requirements R1 and R3.

Distribution Provider Applicability (cont) It is not intended for the DPs to have a detailed Operating Plan to address events that are not applicable to them. It is intended for the DP to have a very simple Operating Plan that includes a statement that there are no applicable events in Attachment 1 (to meet R1) and that the DP will review the list of events in Attachment 1 each year (to meet R3). The SDT does not think this will be a burden on any entity as the development and annual validation of the Operating Plan should not take more that 30 minutes on an annual basis. If a DP discovers applicable events during the annual review, it is expected that the DP will develop a more detailed Operating Plan to comply with the requirements of the standard.

Enforcement Date EOP-004-2 becomes effective and enforceable January 1, 2014 Standards retire effective December 31, 2013 EOP-004-1 CIP-001-2a

Compliance Approach R1 R1. Each Responsible Entity shall have an event reporting Operating Plan in accordance with EOP-004-2 Attachment 1 that includes the protocol(s) for reporting to the Electric Reliability Organization and other organizations (e.g., the Regional Entity, company personnel, the Responsible Entity’s Reliability Coordinator, law enforcement, or governmental authority). M1. Entity must have a dated event reporting Operating Plan that includes but not limited to: protocol(s) and each organization identified to receive an event report for the event types specified in EOP-004-2 Attachment 1 During the development of concepts, the DSR SDT considered the FERC directive to “further define sabotage”. There was concern among stakeholders that a definition may be ambiguous and subject to interpretation. Consequently, the DSR SDT decided to eliminate the term sabotage from the standard. The team felt that it was almost impossible to determine if an act or event was sabotage or vandalism without the intervention of law enforcement. The DSR SDT felt that attempting to define sabotage would result. in further ambiguity with respect to reporting events. The term “sabotage” is no longer included in the standard. The events listed in EOP-004 Attachment 1 were developed to provide guidance for reporting both actual events as well as events which may have an impact on the Bulk Electric System. The DSR SDT believes that this is an equally effective and efficient means of addressing the FERC Directive.   The types of events that are required to be reported are contained within EOP-004 Attachment 1. The DSR SDT has coordinated with the NERC Events Analysis Working Group to develop the list of events that are to be reported under this standard. EOP-004 Attachment 1 pertains to those actions or events that have impacted the Bulk Electric System. These events were previously reported under EOP-004-1, CIP-001-1 or the Department of Energy form OE-417. EOP-004 Attachment 1 covers similar items that may have had an impact on the Bulk Electric System or has the potential to have an impact and should be reported. The DSR SDT wishes to make clear that the proposed Standard does not include any real-time operating notifications for the events listed in EOP-004 Attachment 1. Real-time communication is achieved is covered in other standards.The proposed standard deals exclusively with after-the-fact reporting.

Compliance Approach R2 R2. Each Responsible Entity shall report events per their Operating Plan within 24 hours of recognition of meeting an event type threshold for reporting or by the end of the next business day if the event occurs on a weekend (which is recognized to be 4 PM local time on Friday to 8 AM Monday local time) Did you have a reportable event? Evidence of reporting an event (copy of the completed EOP-004-2 Attachment 2 form or a DOE-OE-417 form) Evidence of submittal of event reporting documentation within the time frame of R2 This is an event driven requirement with timing requirements The requirements of EOP-004-1 require that entities “promptly analyze Bulk Electric System disturbances on its system or facilities” (Requirement R2). The requirements of EOP-004-2 specify that certain types of events are to be reported but do not include provisions to analyze events. Events reported under EOP-004-2 may trigger further scrutiny by the ERO Events Analysis Program. If warranted, the Events Analysis Program personnel may request that more data for certain events be provided by the reporting entity or other entities that may have experienced the event. Entities are encouraged to become familiar with the Events Analysis Program and the NERC Rules of Procedure to learn more about with the expectations of the program.

Compliance Approach R3 R3. Each Responsible Entity shall validate all contact information contained in the Operating Plan pursuant to Requirement R1 each calendar year. Dated evidence that all contact information contained in the Operating Plan pursuant to R1 was validated each calendar year Such evidence may include, but not limited to, dated voice recordings and operating logs or other communication documentation

Example of Reporting Process

Questions or Comments?