Cosmic Billiards are fully integrable: Tits Satake projections and Kac Moody extensions Talk by Pietro Frè at Corfu 2005”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Can Integrable Cosmologies fit into Gauged Supergravity? Can Integrable Cosmologies fit into Gauged Supergravity? Pietro Frè University of Torino & Embassy.
Advertisements

Theories of gravity in 5D brane-world scenarios
Analysis of QCD via Supergravity S. Sugimoto (YITP) based on hep-th/ (T. Ibaraki + S.S.) Windows to new paradigm in particle Sendai.
Type IIB Supergravity, D3 branes and ALE manifolds
Summing planar diagrams
Non-perturbative effects in string theory compactifications Sergey Alexandrov Laboratoire Charles Coulomb Université Montpellier 2 in collaboration with.
11 3d CFT and Multi M2-brane Theory on M. Ali-Akbari School of physics, IPM, Iran [JHEP 0903:148,2009] Fifth Crete regional meeting in string theory Kolymbari,
The Topological G 2 String Asad Naqvi (University of Amsterdam) (in progress) with Jan de Boer and Assaf Shomer hep-th/0506nnn.
FIRST ORDER FORMALISM FOR NON-SUPERSYMMETRIC MULTI BLACK HOLE CONFIGURATIONS A.Shcherbakov LNF INFN Frascati (Italy) in collaboration with A.Yeranyan Supersymmetry.
Pietro Fré Dubna July 2003 ] exp[ / Solv H
Hot topics in Modern Cosmology Cargèse - 10 Mai 2011.
A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting By Bruno Bertrand November 19 th 2004.
D=6 supergravity with R 2 terms Antoine Van Proeyen K.U. Leuven Dubna, 16 December 2011 collaboration with F. Coomans, E. Bergshoeff and E. Sezgin.
Exact string backgrounds from boundary data Marios Petropoulos CPHT - Ecole Polytechnique Based on works with K. Sfetsos.
The arrow of time and the Weyl group: all supergravity billiards are integrable Talk by Pietro Frè at SISSA Oct. 2007” based on work of P.F. with A.S.Sorin.
Gauge/Gravity Duality 2 Prof Nick Evans AdS/CFT Correspondence TODAY Quarks Deforming AdS Confinement Chiral Symmetry Breaking LATER Other brane games.
Mathematical Physics Seminar Notes Lecture 3 Global Analysis and Lie Theory Wayne M. Lawton Department of Mathematics National University of Singapore.
ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS AND ITS CLASSIFICATION KENTARO TANABE (UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA) based on KT, Kinoshita and Shiromizu PRD
Duality-symmetric linearized gravity in PST approach Alexei J. Nurmagambetov A.I. Akhiezer Institute for Theoretical Physics NSC KIPT Kharkov, Ukraine.
Cosimo Stornaiolo INFN-Sezione di Napoli MG 12 Paris July 2009.
Gauge/Gravity Duality 2 Prof Nick Evans AdS/CFT Correspondence TODAY Quarks Deforming AdS Confinement Chiral Symmetry Breaking LATER Other brane games.
Introduction to Gröbner Bases for Geometric Modeling Geometric & Solid Modeling 1989 Christoph M. Hoffmann.
Planar diagrams in light-cone gauge hep-th/ M. Kruczenski Purdue University Based on:
Field Theory: The Past 25 Years Nathan Seiberg (IAS) The Future of Physics October, 2004 A celebration of 25 Years of.
Full Integrability of Supergravity Billiards: the arrow of time, asymptotic states and trapped surfaces in the cosmic evolution Lecture by Pietro Frè and.
Quantum One: Lecture 8. Continuously Indexed Basis Sets.
Differential Equations
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF BRANE KINEMATICS AND DYNAMICS Introduction Strings, branes, geometric principle, background independence Brane space M (brane kinematics)
Conformally flat spacetimes and Weyl frames Carlos Romero Cargèse - 11 Mai 2010.
Higher Derivative Scalars in Supergravity Jean-Luc Lehners Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics Albert Einstein Institute Based on work with.
String solitons in the M5-brane worldvolume with a Nambu-Poisson structure and Seiberg-Witten map Tomohisa Takimi (NTU) Ref ) Kazuyuki Furuuchi, T.T JHEP08(2009)050.
“Einstein Gravity in Higher Dimensions”, Jerusalem, Feb., 2007.
A NONCOMMUTATIVE CLOSED FRIEDMAN WORLD MODEL. 1.Introduction 2.Structure of the model 3.Closed Friedman universe – Geometry and matter 4.Singularities.
Vincent Rodgers © Vincent Rodgers © A Very Brief Intro to Tensor Calculus Two important concepts:
Representation of sl(3,C) Dongseok KIM. Outline Adjoint representation of sl(3,C). Eigenspace decomposition with respect to H, the maximal abelian subalgebra.
Cosmological Backgrounds of String Theory, Solvable Algebras and Oxidation A fully algebraic machinery to generate, classify and interpret Supergravity.
AdS 4 £ CP 3 superspace Dmitri Sorokin INFN, Sezione di Padova ArXiv: Jaume Gomis, Linus Wulff and D.S. SQS’09, Dubna, 30 July 2009 ArXiv:
The embedding-tensor formalism with fields and antifields. Antoine Van Proeyen K.U. Leuven Moscow, 4th Sakharov conf., May 21, 2009.
Solvable Lie Algebras in Supergravity and Superstrings Pietro Fré Bonn February 2002 An algebraic characterization of superstring dualities.
Super Virasoro Algebras from Chiral Supergravity Ibaraki Univ. Yoshifumi Hyakutake Based on arXiv:1211xxxx + work in progress.
HIGHER SPIN SUPERGRAVITY DUAL OF KAZAMA-SUZUKI MODEL Yasuaki Hikida (Keio University) Based on JHEP02(2012)109 [arXiv: [hep-th]]; arXiv:
The Geometry of Moduli Space and Trace Anomalies. A.Schwimmer (with J.Gomis,P-S.Nazgoul,Z.Komargodski, N.Seiberg,S.Theisen)
David Renardy.  Simple Group- A nontrivial group whose only normal subgroups are itself and the trivial subgroup.  Simple groups are thought to be classified.
Expanding (3+1)-dimensional universe from a Lorentzian matrix model for superstring theory in (9+1)-dimensions Talk at KEK for String Advanced Lectures,
Generalization of the Gell-Mann decontraction formula for sl(n,R) and its applications in affine gravity Igor Salom and Đorđe Šijački.
Gaugings and other Supergravity Tools for p brane Physics Pietro Fré Lectures at the RTN School, Paris 2001 IHS.
Z THEORY Nikita Nekrasov IHES/ITEP Nagoya, 9 December 2004.
Laboratoire Charles Coulomb
2 Time Physics and Field theory
ARNOLD-BELTRAMI FLUX 2-BRANES Pietro Frè Torino University & Embassy of Italy in the Russian Federation VII Round Table November 27-th.
Maximal super Yang-Mills theories on curved background with off-shell supercharges 総合研究大学院大学 藤塚 理史 共同研究者: 吉田 豊 氏 (KEK), 本多 正純 氏 ( 総研大 /KEK) based on M.
Pietro Frè Talk at SQS 09 DUBNA arXiv: arXiv: Theory of Superdualities and the Orthosymplectic Supergroup Authors: Pietro Fré, Pietro.
Torsional heterotic geometries Katrin Becker ``14th Itzykson Meeting'' IPHT, Saclay, June 19, 2009.
1 VARIOUS ISSUES IN THE LARGE STRAIN THEORY OF TRUSSES STAMM 2006 Symposium on Trends in Applications of Mathematics to Mechanics Vienna, Austria, 10–14.
ECE-7000: Nonlinear Dynamical Systems 3. Phase Space Methods 3.1 Determinism: Uniqueness in phase space We Assume that the system is linear stochastic.
P-Term Cosmology A.C. Davis (with C. Burrage) ,
University of Oslo & Caltech
ArXiv: (hep-th) Toshiaki Fujimori (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Minoru Eto, Sven Bjarke Gudnason, Kenichi Konishi, Muneto Nitta, Keisuke Ohashi.
Lecture from Quantum Mechanics. Marek Zrałek Field Theory and Particle Physics Department. Silesian University Lecture 6.
Can Integrable Cosmologies fit into Gauged Supergravity?
Equivalence, Invariants, and Symmetry Chapter 2
Takaaki Nomura(Saitama univ)
An Introduction to Riemannian Geometry
3D (Higher Spin) Gravity Black Holes and Statistical Entropy
Hyun Seok Yang Center for Quantum Spacetime Sogang University
Introduction to linear Lie groups
ブレイン宇宙における重力波の伝播 石原 秀樹 大阪市立大学 共同研究者 田中 泉 2019/4/28.
SL(4,R) sigma model & Charged black rings
Presentation transcript:

Cosmic Billiards are fully integrable: Tits Satake projections and Kac Moody extensions Talk by Pietro Frè at Corfu 2005”

Let me begin by presenting.... THE MAIN IDEA from a D=3 viewpoint P. F.,Trigiante, Rulik, Gargiulo and Sorin 2003,2004, 2005 various papers

Starting from D=3 ( D=2 and D=1, also ) all the (bosonic) degrees of freedom are scalars The bosonic Lagrangian of any Supergravity, can be reduced in D=3, to a gravity coupled sigma model

NOMIZU OPERATOR SOLVABLE ALGEBRA U dimensional reduction Since all fields are chosen to depend only on one coordinate, t = time, then we can just reduce everything to D=3, D=2 or D=1. In these dimensions every degree of freedom (bosonic) is a scalar U U maps D>3 backgrounds into D>3 backgrounds Solutions are classified by abstract subalgebras D=3 sigma model Field eq.s reduce to Geodesic equations on D=3 sigma model D>3 SUGRA dimensional oxidation Not unique: classified by different embeddings Time dep. backgrounds Nomizu connection = LAX PAIR Representation. INTEGRATION!

With this machinery..... We can obtain exact solutions for time dependent backgrounds We can see the bouncing phenomena (=billiard) We have to extend the idea to lower supersymmetry # Q SUSY < 32 and... We do not have to stop at D=3. For time dependent backgrounds we can start from D=2 or D=1 In D=2 and D=1 we have affine and hyperbolic Kac Moody algebras, respectively.....!

The cosmic ball String Theory implies D=10 space-time dimensions. In general in dimension D A generalization of the standard cosmological metric is of the type: In the absence of matter the conditions for this metric to be Einstein are: Now comes an idea at first sight extravagant.... Let us imagine that are the coordinates of a ball moving linearly with constant velocity What is the space where this fictitious ball moves

ANSWER: The Cartan subalgebra of a rank D-1 Lie algebra. h1h1 h2h2 h D-1 What is this rank D-1 Lie algebra? It is U D=2 the Duality algebra in D=2 dimensions. This latter is the affine extension of U D=3

Now let us introduce also the roots h1h1 h2h2 h9h9 There are infinitely many, but the time-like ones are in finite number. There are as many of them as in U D=3. All the others are light-like Time like roots, correspond to the light fields of Superstring Theory different from the diagonal metric: off-diagonal components of the metric and p-form fields When we switch on the roots, the fictitious cosmic ball no longer goes on straight lines. It bounces!!

The cosmic Billiard    The Lie algebra roots correspond to off-diagonal elements of the metric, or to matter fields (the p+1 forms which couple to p-branes) Switching a root  we raise a wall on which the cosmic ball bounces Or, in frontal view

Differential Geometry = Algebra

How to build the solvable algebra Given the Real form of the algebra U, for each positive root  there is an appropriate step operator belonging to such a real form

The Nomizu Operator

Maximal Susy implies E r+1 series Scalar fields are associated with positive roots or Cartan generators

From the algebraic view point.....  Maximal SUSY corresponds to...  MAXIMALLY non-compact real forms:  i.e. SPLIT ALGEBRAS.  This means:  All Cartan generators are non compact  Step operators E  2 Solv, 8  2  +  The representation is completely real  The billiard table is the Cartan subalgebra of the isometry group!

Explicit Form of the Nomizu connection for the maximally split case The metric on the algebra The components of the connection

Let us briefly survey The use of the solvable parametrization as a machinary to obtain solutions, in the split case

The general integration formula Initial data at t=0 are –A), namely an element of the Cartan subalgebra determining the eigenvalues of the LAX operator –B), namely an element of the maximal compact subgroup Then the solution algorithm generates a uniquely defined time dependent LAX operator

Properties of the solution For each element of the Weyl group The limits of the LAX operator at t=§1 are diagonal At any instant of time the eigenvalues of the LAX operator are constant 1,..., n –where w i are the weights of the representation to which the Lax operator is assigned.

Disconnected classes of solutions Property (2) and property (3) combined together imply that the two asymptotic values L §1 of the Lax operator are necessarily related to each other by some element of the Weyl group which represents a sort of topological charge of the solution: The solution algorithm induces a map:

A plotted example with SL(4,R)/O(4) The U Lie algebra is A 3 The rank is r = 3. The Weyl group is S 4 with 4! elements The compact subgroup H = SO(4) The integration formula can be easily encoded into a computer programme and for any choice of the eigenvalues and for any choice of the group element  2 O(4) The programme CONSTRUCTS the solution

Example ( 1 =1, 2 =2, 3 =3) Indeed we have:

Plots of the (integrated) Cartan Fields along the simple roots 11 22 33 2+32+3 1+21+2  1 +  2 +  3 This solution has four bounces

Let us consider The first point: Less SUSY and non split algebras

Scalar Manifolds in Non Maximal SUGRAS and Tits Satake submanifolds WHAT are these new manifolds (split!) associated with the known non split ones....???

The Billiard Relies on Tits Satake Theory  To each non maximally non-compact real form U (non split) of a Lie algebra of rank r 1 is associated a unique subalgebra U TS ½ U which is maximally split.  U TS has rank r 2 < r 1  The Cartan subalgebra C TS ½ U TS is the true billiard table  Walls in C TS now appear painted as a memory of the parent algebra U

root system of rank r 1 Projection Several roots of the higher system have the same projection. These are painted copies of the same wall. The Billiard dynamics occurs in the rank r2 system

Two type of roots 1 2 3

The Paint Group

Why is it exciting? Since the Nomizu connection depends only on the structure constants of the Solvable Lie algebra

And now let us go the next main point.. Kac Moody Extensions

Affine and Hyperbolic algebras and the cosmic billiard We do not have to stop to D=3 if we are just interested in time dependent backgrounds We can step down to D=2 and also D=1 In D=2 the duality algebra becomes an affine Kac-Moody algebra In D=1 the duality algebra becomes an hyperbolic Kac Moody algebra Affine and hyperbolic symmetries are intrinsic to Einstein gravity (Julia, Henneaux, Nicolai, Damour)

Structure of the Duality Algebra in D=3 (P.F. Trigiante, Rulik and Gargiulo 2005) Universal, comes from Gravity Comes from vectors in D=4 Symplectic metric in d=2Symplectic metric in 2n dim

The Kac Moody extension of the D=3 Duality algebra In D=2 the duality algebra becomes the Kac Moody extension of the algebra in D=3. Why is that so?

The reason is... That there are two ways of stepping down from D=4 to D=2 The Ehlers reduction The Matzner&Misner reduction The two routes give two different lagrangians with two different finite algebra of symmetries There are non local relations between the fields of the two lagrangians The symmetries of one Lagrangian have a non local realization on the other and vice versa Together the two finite symmetry algebras provide a set of Chevalley generators for the Kac Moody algebra

Ehlers reduction of pure gravity CONFORMAL GAUGE DUALIZATION OF VECTORS TO SCALARS D=4 D=3 D=2 Liouville field SL(2,R)/O(2)  - model +

Matzner&Misner reduction of pure gravity D=4 D=3 D=2 CONFORMAL GAUGE NO DUALIZATION OF VECTORS !! Liouville field SL(2,R)/O(2)  - model DIFFERENT SL(2,R) fields non locally related

General Matzner&Misner reduction (P.F. Trigiante, Rulik e Gargiulo 2005) D=4 D=2

The reduction is governed by the embedding

Symmetries of MM Lagrangian G D=4 through pseudorthogonal embedding SL(2,R) MM through gravity reduction Local O(2) symmetry acting on the indices A,B etc [ O(2) 2 SL(2,R) MM ] Combined with G D=3 of the Ehlers reduction these symmetries generate the affine extension of G D=3 ! G Æ D=3