BASICS OF GAME THEORY. Recap Decision Theory vs. Game Theory Rationality Completeness Transitivity What’s in a game? Players Actions Outcomes Preferences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to Game Theory Part V: Extensive Games with Perfect Information Bernhard Nebel.
Advertisements

The Basics of Game Theory
5. Combining simultaneous and sequential moves.
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 3.1.Dynamic Games of Complete but Imperfect Information Lecture
Basics on Game Theory Class 2 Microeconomics. Introduction Why, What, What for Why Any human activity has some competition Human activities involve actors,
ECON 100 Tutorial: Week 9 office: LUMS C85.
Clicker Question-A Chicken Game 0, 0 0, 1 1, 0 -10, -10 Swerve Hang Tough Swerve Hang Tough Player 2 Pllayer 1 Does either player have a dominant strategy?
This Segment: Computational game theory Lecture 1: Game representations, solution concepts and complexity Tuomas Sandholm Computer Science Department Carnegie.
1 Game Theory. 2 Definitions Game theory -- formal way to analyze interactions among a group of rational agents behaving strategically Agents – players.
Extensive and Strategic Form Games Econ 171. Reminder: Course requirements Class website Go to economics department home page. Under Links, find Class.
3. Basic Topics in Game Theory. Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Outline 3.1 What is a Game ? The elements of a Game The Rules of the.
Oligopoly and Game Theory ETP Economics 101. Imperfect Competition  Imperfect competition refers to those market structures that fall between perfect.
© 2009 Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University Game theory The study of multiperson decisions Four types of games Static games.
Non-Cooperative Game Theory To define a game, you need to know three things: –The set of players –The strategy sets of the players (i.e., the actions they.
Chapter 10 Game Theory and Strategic Behavior
Chapter 6 Game Theory © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
1 Game Theory. 2 Agenda Game Theory Matrix Form of a Game Dominant Strategy and Dominated Strategy Nash Equilibrium Game Trees Subgame Perfection.
EC941 - Game Theory Lecture 7 Prof. Francesco Squintani
EKONOMSKA ANALIZA PRAVA. Game Theory Outline of the lecture: I. What is game theory? II. Elements of a game III. Normal (matrix) and Extensive (tree)
Short introduction to game theory 1. 2  Decision Theory = Probability theory + Utility Theory (deals with chance) (deals with outcomes)  Fundamental.
Game-theoretic analysis tools Necessary for building nonmanipulable automated negotiation systems.
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 3.1.Dynamic Games of Complete but Imperfect Information Lecture
Lecture 2A Strategic form games
Games What is ‘Game Theory’? There are several tools and techniques used by applied modelers to generate testable hypotheses Modeling techniques widely.
GAME THEORY.
Sep. 5, 2013 Lirong Xia Introduction to Game Theory.
Slide 1 of 13 So... What’s Game Theory? Game theory refers to a branch of applied math that deals with the strategic interactions between various ‘agents’,
A camper awakens to the growl of a hungry bear and sees his friend putting on a pair of running shoes, “You can’t outrun a bear,” scoffs the camper. His.
1 1 Lesson overview BA 592 Lesson I.10 Sequential and Simultaneous Move Theory Chapter 6 Combining Simultaneous and Sequential Moves Lesson I.10 Sequential.
Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Oligopoly LUBS1940: Topic 7.
Basics on Game Theory For Industrial Economics (According to Shy’s Plan)
Extensive and Strategic Form Games Econ 171. Reminder: Course requirements Class website Go to economics department home page. Under Links, find Class.
1 Introduction APEC 8205: Applied Game Theory. 2 Objectives Distinguishing Characteristics of a Game Common Elements of a Game Distinction Between Cooperative.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Bargaining and Negotiation Review.
Game Applications Chapter 29. Nash Equilibrium In any Nash equilibrium (NE) each player chooses a “best” response to the choices made by all of the other.
EC941 - Game Theory Francesco Squintani Lecture 3 1.
This Week’s Topics  Review Class Concepts -Sequential Games -Simultaneous Games -Bertrand Trap -Auctions  Review Homework  Practice Problems.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Bargaining and Negotiation Review.
Today: Some classic games in game theory
Extensive and Strategic Form Games Econ 171. Reminder: Course requirements Class website Go to economics department home page. Under Links, find Class.
Reading Osborne, Chapters 5, 6, 7.1., 7.2, 7.7 Learning outcomes
Chapter 9 Games with Imperfect Information Bayesian Games.
Chapter 12 Choices Involving Strategy Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Game representations, solution concepts and complexity Tuomas Sandholm Computer Science Department Carnegie Mellon University.
Dynamic Games of complete information: Backward Induction and Subgame perfection - Repeated Games -
EC941 - Game Theory Prof. Francesco Squintani Lecture 5 1.
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 4.1.Dynamic Games of Incomplete Information Lecture
Dynamic Games & The Extensive Form
Game-theoretic analysis tools Tuomas Sandholm Professor Computer Science Department Carnegie Mellon University.
Chapters 29 and 30 Game Theory and Applications. Game Theory 0 Game theory applied to economics by John Von Neuman and Oskar Morgenstern 0 Game theory.
Chapter 5 Game Theory and the Tools of Strategic Business Analysis.
Extensive Games with Imperfect Information
Frank Cowell: Microeconomics Game Theory: Basics MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell March 2004.
1 What is Game Theory About? r Analysis of situations where conflict of interests is present r Goal is to prescribe how conflicts can be resolved 2 2 r.
Game theory 2 Lukáš Lehotský
Subgames and Credible Threats (with perfect information) Econ 171.
Normal Form Games, Normal Form Games, Rationality and Iterated Rationality and Iterated Deletion of Dominated Strategies Deletion of Dominated Strategies.
Chapters 29 and 30 Game Theory and Applications. Game Theory 0 Game theory applied to economics by John Von Neuman and Oskar Morgenstern 0 Game theory.
Intermediate Microeconomics Game Theory. So far we have only studied situations that were not “strategic”. The optimal behavior of any given individual.
Lec 23 Chapter 28 Game Theory.
전략적 선택모델: 게임이론 동시적 게임 죄수의 딜레마 비겁자 게임 전개형(순차적) 게임 농부와 호랑이 오사카 성의 해자
Now that we have set of pure strategies for each player, we need to find the payoffs to put the game in strategic form. Random payoffs. The actual outcome.
Chapter 12 Game Theory Presented by Nahakpam PhD Student 1Game Theory.
Q 2.1 Nash Equilibrium Ben
Strategic Decision Making in Oligopoly Markets
Game Theory M.Pajhouh Niya M.Ghotbi
5. Combining simultaneous and sequential moves.
16 Oligopoly.
Learning 6.2 Game Theory.
Game Theory.
Presentation transcript:

BASICS OF GAME THEORY

Recap Decision Theory vs. Game Theory Rationality Completeness Transitivity What’s in a game? Players Actions Outcomes Preferences Beliefs Constraints

Defining a Game Are moves simultaneous or sequential? Normal/strategic form Extensive form or game tree

Normal Form Game Normal (Strategic) Form More general than extensive form Less information that extensive form game All finite extensive form games can be transformed into normal form games Reduces each player’s choice to the selection of a complete plan (strategy) for playing the game

Elements of Normal Form Players Strategies for each players Strategy: complete plan of action for entire game that includes assignment of one move to each of i’s information sets n-dimensional array of players’ pure strategies Players’ payoffs given all players’ strategies

Normal Form s1s1 s2s2 s3s3 S1S1 1, 1-2, 04,-1 S2S2 0, 33, 15, 4 S3S3 1, 54, 25, 2

Dominance A strategy S 1 strictly dominates another strategy S 2 for Player 1 iff M 1 (S 1 ;s j ) > M 1 (S 2 ;s j ) for all s j. A strategy S 1 weakly dominates another strategy S 2 for Player 1 iff M 1 (S 1 ;s j ) ≥ M 1 (S 2 ;s j ) for all s j and M 1 (S 1 ;s j ) > M 1 (S 2 ;s j ) for some s j.

Dominance (in English) A strategy, K, strictly dominates another strategy, L, for Player 1 iff the payoff from playing K is greater than the payoff from playing L for all strategies of Player 2. A strategy, K, weakly dominates another strategy, L, for Player 1 iff the payoff from playing K is at least equal to the payoff from playing L for all strategies of Player 2 and greater than the payoff from playing L for some strategy of Player 2.

Exercises s1s1 s2s2 s3s3 S1S1 0, 1-2, 34,-1 S2S2 0, 33, 16, 4 S3S3 1, 54, 25, 2 CD C3, 31, 4 D4, 12, 2 LR L1, 10, 0 R -1, -1 LR L1, 10, 0 R 1, -1 LR U2, 2 D0, 03, 1

Prisoner’s Dilemma Player 2 CooperateDefect Player 1 Cooperate3,31,4 Defect4,12,2

Prisoner’s Dilemma: OPEC--Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries Suppose Iran and Iraq choose whether to produce 2 mil barrels/day OR 4 mil barrels/day Market price/barrel is $25/barrel if total output=4 mil barrels $15/barrel if total output=6 mil barrels $10/barrel if total output=8 mil barrels Extraction costs Iran $2 mil/barrel Iraq $4 mil/barrel Profits U = output(price – cost)

IRAN-IRAQ oil cartel Iraq 2 mil barrels (cooperate) 4 mil barrels (defect) Iran 2 mil barrels (cooperate) $46 million $42 million $26 million $44 million 4 mil barrels (defect) $52 million $22 million $32 million $24 million

Arms Race Rank four outcomes Both freeze (3,3) Both arm (2,2) 1 freezes, 2 arms (1,4) 2 freezes, 1 arms (4,1) Country 2 Freeze ArmsArm Country 1 Freeze Arms3,31,4 Arm4,12,2

Chicken Game Outcomes Both swerve (3,3) Both Straight (1,1) C1 swerves, C2 straight (2,4) C1 straight, C2 swerves (4,2) Example Cuban Missile Crisis Country 2 SwerveStraight Country 1 Swerve3,32,4 Straight4,21,1

Chicken key points The game of chicken has no dominant strategy If P2 goes straight, P1 would rather swerve. If P2 swerves, P1 would rather go straight Main objective: If P1 wants to “win,” she must convince P2 that she is going to go straight. But P2 will also be trying to convince P1 that he will go straight How can P1 convince P2 that she is going to go straight?

Tiger by the Tail Game Preferences Boy most prefers to let go and not get bitten and least prefers to let go and get bitten. Tiger most prefers that the boy lets go and so he can bite the boy. He least prefers the boy holding on forever. Example Foreign aid Bear BiteNot Bite Boy Hold the tail2,1 Cease holding the tail 1,44,2

Tiger by the tail: key points Bite is always a dominant strategy for the tiger if it receives a move. Because tiger cannot commit NOT to bite, the boy will never let go and the tiger gets its worst outcome. A credible commitment NOT to bite would make both the tiger and the boy better off. How can the tiger commit NOT to bite? To consider commitments, we need to understand sequential moves and extensive form games.

Sequential moves -- Extensive Form Whose choice (move) is it at any particular point in time? What alternative actions are available to each person at any particular move? What does each player know about other players’ prior choices? What are the alternative states of nature and their likelihood? What are each player’s preferences (utilities) over outcomes?

Elements of Extensive Form Game tree: representation of extensive form Nodes: decision and terminal Branches: extend from each node representing alternatives Chance: nature makes each choice by chance from a specified lottery over the alternative states Information sets: represents what players know at decision nodes Set of outcomes Set of utility functions Common knowledge: each player knows and expects the other players to know all details of the situation that the game presents (each players knows that the others know that he knows the tree, and so forth)

Game Tree

Solution: Backward Induction Looking forward in time and reasoning backward to determine the optimal move sequence.

PD Sequential Game Extensive Form P1 C D P2 (3,3) (1,4) (4,1) (2,2) D D C C

Backwards Induction P1 C D P2 (3,3) (1,4) (4,1) (2,2) D D C C

Some important points Because actors are strategic, they do not always try to obtain their most preferred outcome. Rather, they try to obtain the most preferred outcome they believe is possible In order for a conflict to be resolved peacefully two things must occur: 1. A settlement must be found that all actors prefer to fighting 2. A way must be found to make the agreements self- enforcing

Information Perfect Information: if all information sets are singletons (know the history of the game) Complete information: if all players’ payoffs are known to all players

Game with imperfect information

PD Simultaneous Move Game Extensive Form P1 C D P2 (3,3) (1,4) (4,1) (2,2) D D C C

Chicken Sequential Game Extensive Form P1 Swerve Straight P2 (3,3) (2,4) (4,2) (1,1) Swerve Straight Swerve Straight

Chicken Sequential Game Extensive Form P1 Swerve Straight P2 (3,3) (2,4) (4,2) (1,1) Swerve Straight Swerve Straight