GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey Andria Bilich & Gerald Mader Geosciences Research Division National Geodetic Survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Geoscience Australia’s Online GPS Processing Service (AUSPOS)
Advertisements

Experimental Results from “BigAnt”, a Large Format Antenna for High Quality Geodetic Ground Stations Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver.
2013 Western Australia Surveying Conference
GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey Background Gerald L Mader 2, Andria L Bilich 1, Charles Geoghegan 3 1 National Geodetic.
BigAnt * Engineering and Experimental Results * Large Format Antenna for High Quality Geodetic Ground Stations Dmitry Tatarnikov 1, Gerald L Mader 2, Andria.
Mapping the GPS Multipath Environment Using the Signal-to- Noise Ratio (SNR) Andria Bilich*, Kristine M. Larson + * Geosciences Research Division, National.
Effects of azimuthal multipath heterogeneity and hardware changes on GPS coordinate time series Sibylle Goebell, Matt King
RTN Methodologies & Best Practices Neil D. Weston National Geodetic Survey, NOS, NOAA Silver Spring, MD March 20, 2014.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey Andria Bilich & Gerald Mader Geosciences Research Division National Geodetic Survey With.
Surveying & Mapping. GPS on Bench Marks Campaign.
1 Using CORS and OPUS for Positioning Richard Snay NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey GIS-T Charleston, West Virginia April 14, 2010.
Recent IERS Site Survey of Multiple Co-located Geodetic Techniques by NGS Kendall Fancher, Dru Smith, Steve Breidenbach, Jeff Olsen, Nagendra Paudel NOAA’s.
New Scientific Applications with Existing CGPS Capabilities Earthquakes, Soil Moisture, and Environmental Imaging Andria Bilich Geosciences Research Division.
OPUS Projects (beta) status and plans Improved solutions for simultaneous or repeated observations harvest data from multiple observers share upload &
GEODETIC INFRASTRUCTURE Walter Volkmann Manager of Technical Operations L. D. Bradley Land Surveyors Gainesville, Florida.
John Thornton, Yuriy Zakharov, David Grace
Relative vs Absolute Antenna Calibrations: How, when, and why do they differ? A Comparison of Antenna Calibration Catalogs Gerald L Mader 2, Andria L Bilich.
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Common Marks. Datasheet Basics The NGS Data Sheet See file dsdata.txt for more information about the datasheet. DATABASE = Sybase,PROGRAM = datasheet,
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Class 19 – NAVSTAR GPS, GLONASS and Galileo
Titelmaster Geometrical and Kinematical Precise Orbit Determination of GOCE Akbar Shabanloui Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn.
Recent GNSS Activities at Geoscience Australia Gary Johnston, Guorong Hu, Anna Riddell Geodesy & Seismic Monitoring Branch, Geoscience Australia.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
Antenna Techniques to Optimize Pseudorange Measurements for Ground Based Ranging Sources Jeff Dickman Ohio University Avionics Engineering Center The 29.
Network Computing Laboratory Radio Interferometric Geolocation Miklos Maroti, Peter Volgesi, Sebestyen Dora Branislav Kusy, Gyorgy Balogh, Andras Nadas.
InCORS INDIANA’S STATEWIDE GNSS-GPS REAL TIME NETWORK Presented by Derek Fuller, PLS Land & Aerial Survey Office.
Compatibility of Receiver Types for GLONASS Widelane Ambiguity Resolution Simon Banville, Paul Collins and François Lahaye Geodetic Survey Division, Natural.
OPUS : Online Positioning User Service
Direction of Arrival Estimation by Moving Antenna for Multipath GNSS Channel Characterization Mohammad Hatef Keshvadi Position, Location And Navigation.
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,
GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey Gerald L Mader 2, Andria L Bilich 1 1 National Geodetic Survey, NOAA/NOS, Boulder CO;
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
Tools to help complete “Height Mod” Surveys OPUS & OPUS Projects Joe Evjen, Geodesist, NGS Height Modernization Eastern States Regional Tuesday, March.
GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic Survey GPS Products & Services.
A Geodesist’s View of the Ionosphere Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD.
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
Airborne GPS Positioning with cm-Level Precisions at Hundreds of km Ranges Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD National Geodetic.
Making good from bad: Can we use GPS multipath to measure soil moisture? Kristine M. Larson Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences University of.
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
New Coordinates for CORS Sites & Oregon Case Study The NGS Multi-Year CORS Solution and the evolution from NAD 83(CORS96)Epoch 2002 to NAD 83(2011)Epoch.
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
Use of High-Rate CORS for Airborne Positioning Theresa M. Damiani NOAA- National Geodetic Survey, Geosciences Research Division CGSIC 2013, Nashville 1b.
IGS Workshop 2008, June 2-6, Miami Beach First activities of the IGS Antenna Working Group — Comparison of ground- and space-based satellite antenna maps.
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
January 14, 2003GPS Meteorology Workshop1 Information from a Numerical Weather Model for Improving Atmosphere Delay Estimation in Geodesy Arthur Niell.
M. Gende, C. Brunini Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. Improving Single Frequency Positioning Using SIRGAS Ionospheric Products.
Three-Method Absolute Antenna Calibration Comparison Andria Bilich (1), Martin Schmitz (2), Barbara Görres (3), Philipp Zeimetz (3), Gerald Mader (1),
Submission doc.: IEEE /1094 Overview and discussion about the next steps for ay channel modeling Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Hobart Australia March 2007Willy Bertiger Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Meeting GPS-Based Precise Orbit Determination: Jason-1 Status Willy Bertiger,
Guidelines for Positioning the Oregon Real-time GPS Network Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT 31 July 2013 NGS Real-time GPS Network Webinar.
Topcon PG-A1 antenna TPSPG_A1+GP
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
USM RTK Workshop Fugro Chance Inc. Starfix HP: High Performance GPS For Offshore Marine Survey, Navigation and Positioning Richard Barker, Dr. Dariusz.
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
GPS ANTENNA CALIBRATION AT THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY Dr. Gerald L. Mader Geosciences Research Division National Geodetic Survey, NOS/NOAA Silver Spring,
IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.
GNSS Tropospheric Products
How Does GPS Work ?. The Global Positioning System 24+ satellites 20,200 km altitude 55 degrees inclination 12 hour orbital period 5 ground control stations.
Appliance of IceCORS network 2017 by Dalia Prizginiene
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Antenna Working Group Progress on recommendations made at the 2016 IGS workshop in Sydney, Australia Presented to the IGS Governing Board and Associate.
Suggested Guidance for OPUS Projects Processing
Progress in antenna calibrations — Recommendations
Presentation transcript:

GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey Andria Bilich & Gerald Mader Geosciences Research Division National Geodetic Survey

The Antcal Team Steven Breidenbach Hong Chen Kendall Fancher Charles Geoghegan David Gietka Heeyul Han Dennis Lokken Frank Marion Jaya Neti Giovanni Sella Bruce Tran Jarir Saleh Mark Schenewerk 2

Talk Outline What is antenna calibration? Relative versus absolute Motivation for NGS absolute facility NGS methods and observation models Example results Tools for the customer 3

Where do I receive the signal? Where is the “phase center”? Antenna reference point (ARP) Antenna element Nonphysical and inconstant point floating in space?! 4

Calibration = Map of “Inconstant Point” mm of phase advance/delay Mean point being positioned … phase center offset: PCO Spatial variations about the mean … phase center variations: PCV 5 0  elev L1: 2.5 mm L2: -1 mm 20  elev L1: -0.5 mm L2: 2.0 mm PCO [ENU] PCV (elev)

PCV Azimuthal Dependence 6

Why Do I Need Calibrations? Antenna introduces several mm-cm of phase advance/delay -> range errors Input to most GNSS data processing software Omitting calibrations can cause problems: – Long baselines – Combining multiple antenna models – Height errors 7

Relative vs. Absolute RelativeAbsolute Calibration valuesRelative to a reference antenna (AOA D/M_T) Independent of reference antenna MethodStationary antennasTest antenna moves AdvantagesStraightforward mathSample full hemisphere and low elevation angles LimitationsCannot sample full patternRequires robot and rigorous accounting of angles & rotations 8 Do not combine relative and absolute calibrations!

Why Go to Absolute? Better/fuller description of phase behavior – 0-10  elevation coverage – Azimuthal variations – Multipath removed/negated The way of the future – International GNSS Service (IGS) standard – Used in OPUS – Used in CORS multiyear [IGS08 epoch and NAD 83(2011) epoch ] 9

Who Does Absolute Calibrations? Geo++TU Darmstadt MethodField with GNSS signalsAnechoic chamber with pure sine waves Robot3-axis, PCO held fixed2-axis, PCO moves InstitutionFor-profitUniversity 10 Up and coming: Australia, China

NGS Absolute Calibration Motivations and Goals Serve high precision needs of U.S. surveying and geodesy communities Multi-frequency, multi-GNSS calibrations 2-D (elevation, azimuth) phase center patterns Free calibration service w/ quick turn-around Calibration values publicly distributed via Internet Compatibility with IGS ANTEX values 11

Compatibility with IGS 12 IGS ANTEX as “truth” IGS Antenna Working Group acceptable deviations – = 10  ) – < 2 mm for low elevations (0-10  )

NGS Calibration Facility and Methods 13 Hi, I’m Pete.

Modelled Factors E N V PCO [ENU] PCV (az,el) PTU: – A priori position – Frame rotation(s) between robot and local frame – Rotation arm length Phase windup (antenna motion) GPS/PC clock offsets 14

Calibration Setup Carrier phase single differences Short baseline (5 m) Simplified multipath environment Common clock (heading receiver) Remaining factors = phase centers (ref, test), differential multipath, hardware bias 15

Time Difference of Single Differences Closely spaced time pairs + robot motion = PCO/PCV at reference antenna removed slowly varying biases (differential MP, hardware bias) minimized 16 Fixed reference antenna Test antenna

Why Robot? Introduce angle changes for TDSD Better spatial coverage 17

NGS Robot Limitations 2-axis = cannot sample full angular range Motor box limits tilt Tilt introduces change in antenna height above ground … multipath? 18

4-stage Process “holes” in coverage Each antenna run for 4 cardinal directions Combined for full coverage 19

Estimation strategy 20 North East South West

So Many Variables! Elevation cutoffs – Local frame – Antenna frame Order/degree of harmonics Data spacing/distribution Robot motion scenario (delta pan) 21

NGS Calibration Results 22

NGS Catalog to Date IGS comparison – AOA D/M_T – Topcon CR-G3 – Javad RingAnt D/M – Trimble Zephyr Geodetic (GPS) – Trimble Zephyr 2 (GNSS) – Ashtech Whopper 23 Previously uncalibrated antennas – ITT chokerings (NGA) – Topcon CR-G5 FullWave

Allen Osborne chokering rev T AOAD/M_T 24 s/n 149

Allen Osborne chokering rev T deviation 25 < 1 mm (elev > 10  ) < 2 mm (elev <= 10  ) L191%90% L297%100%

Javad RingAnt-DM JAVRINGANT_DM 26 s/n 00553

Javad RingAnt-DM deviation: shifted to IGS PCO values 27 < 1 mm (elev > 10  ) < 2 mm (elev <= 10  ) L193%96% L277%69%

Javad RingAnt-DM deviation: keeping NGS PCO values 28 < 1 mm (elev > 10  ) < 2 mm (elev <= 10  ) L1100% L290%92%

Trimble Zephyr 2 TRM s/n

Trimble Zephyr 2 deviation, S/N < 1 mm (elev > 10  ) < 2 mm (elev <= 10  ) L199% L281%67%

Trimble Zephyr 2 deviation, S/N < 1 mm (elev > 10  ) < 2 mm (elev <= 10  ) L198%97% L271%67% Different serial number, different deviations

Trimble Zephyr 2 L1 Type Mean 32 test 1: test 2: test 3: test 4: test 5: test 6: std : NGS MEAN: IGS MEAN: Diff :

Trimble Zephyr 2 L2 Type Mean 33 test 1: test 2: test 3: test 4: test 5: test 6: std : NGS MEAN: IGS MEAN: Diff

Trimble Zephyr 2 L1 Type Mean: NGS vs IGS 34

Trimble Zephyr 2 L2 Type Mean: NGS vs IGS 35

Outstanding Questions Source of histogram bias and skew towards negative residuals Misfit at < 20  Type mean – Common PCO or individual PCOs? – Statistics? – Number of antennas required? 36

Development Next Steps IGS AWG approval Permanent piers GLONASS More automated data retrieval/processing 37

NGS Calibration Services Database, website, processes and policies 38

New Website Revamped along with database Photo & drawing mouseovers for easy ID ANTINFO and ANTEX formats 39

Formal Policy Document Approved by ESC Purpose/Goal – Clear expectations – Make our jobs easier Doc contents – Calibration process and stages – Eligibility for calibration – Rights and responsibilities (both NGS and antenna provider) 40 Revisions expected with manufacturer input after calibration tracking system comes online

Antenna Intake Request calibration via web form Tracking system Customer notification s 41

Conclusions and Outlook Good agreement with IGS type means... but needs improvement Pending approval from IGS Antenna Working Group Soon to be “open for business” For more information – – or 42