Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advertisements

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 L1 Configuration and Future Prospects DCZ cuts and new GLT objects L1 rate diagnosis Can an improved.
Status of DHCAL Slice Test Data Analysis Lei Xia ANL-HEP All results preliminary.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Light Dark Matter Search in B-factory O. Tajima (KEK) for Belle collaboration.
SPD commissioning Ricci, Míriam, Daniel, Edu, Hugo et al. from 1.
MDC-II LVL-1 Trigger Khaled Teilab for the MDC Trigger Team.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
DCZ status & results B A B AR Trigger Workshop, December 2004 Jamie Boyd University of Bristol for the Trigger Upgrade Group.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute for High Energy Physics Vienna Level-1 Trigger Menu Working Group CERN, 9 November 2000 Global Trigger Overview.
Jin Huang M.I.T. Hall A Analysis Workshop Dec 14, JLab.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
Prediction W. Buchmueller (DESY) arXiv:hep-ph/ (1999)
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
ICHEP 2002 First Heavy Flavor Results Using the Silicon Vertex Trigger A. Cerri.
Performance of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
Trigger and DAQ System Zhao Jing Wei Sept. 2002, BESIII review, Beijing Outline Trigger system Event rate estimation Principle of design Scheme Monte Carlo.
B.G.Cheon Mini-Trigger/DAQ workshop,OCU ECL Trigger overview ByungGu Cheon (SKKU) Outline  ECL calorimeter  ECL trigger scheme & performance.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Ted Liu, July 5,00, idea on Ztrigger L1 Trigger Strategy L1 Trigger Requirements and Trigger Lines L1 Trigger performance Background Study Improving Performance:
Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005  the 2002 data sample and available MC sets  trigger efficiency.
GLAST LAT Project CU Beam Test Workshop 3/20/2006 C. Sgro’, L. Baldini, J. Bregeon1 Glast LAT Calibration Unit Beam Test Status Report on Online Monitor.
(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Trigger Items: Overview & Midterm Results Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 11/11/2010.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Trigger System LIU Zhen’an Inst. of High Energy Physics, Beijing Sep
10-Dec-2008 / S.KunoriHCAL Noise Identification and Monitoring1 HCAL Noise Identification and Filtering (HPD behavior and noise identification) Shuichi.
1 M2-M5 Efficiency and Timing checks on 7TeV beam data Alessia, Roberta R.Santacesaria, April 23 rd, Muon Operation
HBD Status Report from Run 9 Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting July 8, 2009.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
University of Iowa Study of qq->qqH  qq ZZ Alexi Mestvirishvili November 2004, CMS PRS Workshop at FNAL.
Preliminary Design of Trigger System for BES III Zhen’an LIU Inst of High Energy Physics,Beijing Oct
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
1 J. Varela, CMS Trigger, RT09, Beijing, May 2009 J. Varela IST/LIP Lisbon CMS Trigger Project Manager 16 th IEEE NPSS Real Time Conference May 10-15,
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
M. Selen, 7/24/03 LEPP Lunch: Pg 1 The CLEO-c Trigger System: More Than Just Blinking Lights ! The CLEO-c Trigger System:
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
Mini-Trigger/DAQ workshop,OCU
Trigger, DAQ, & Online: Perspectives on Electronics
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab
Special edition: Farewell for Valerie Halyo
L1 Trigger Strategy Ted Liu, Lawrence Berkeley Lab
Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Trigger Background Experience & Predictions
DESY drift chambers efficiency and track reconstruction
The Glt Simulation Valerie Halyo.
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
New Ideas on long-term DCT upgrade: conceptual design for DOCAZ
Presentation transcript:

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition and rate projection Su Dong

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop2 Trigger Requirements and General Strategy The basic requirement of the trigger system is to select Interesting physics events with high, stable and well understood efficiency. Some implementation features: Trigger lines mostly defined by generic topology (2,3,4 particles etc.), not by specific physics source. Deploy orthogonal triggers using pure DCH or pure EMC triggers with high efficiency for affordable topologies. stability and efficiency measurability. Built in tolerance for detector inefficiencies: –Accept 3 out of 4 hits for track segment finding in a superlayer –Allow missing segments in L1 and L3 track triggers –Allow at least one signal particle is allowed to miss DCH or EMC trigger, whenever possible.

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop3 L1 Trigger System

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop4 L1 Trigger Primitives (I) DCT primitives: BLT coarse r  tracks with no Z/tan /P t info –A 16 : long track reaching SL10 (P t >180MeV) –B 16 : short track reaching SL5 (P t >120MeV) ZPD 3D tracks with Z/tan /P t info reaching SL7 –Z 16 : standard Z track (|Z| 200 MeV) –Zt 8 : tight Z cut track (|Z| 200 MeV) –Z’ 8 : high P t track (|Z| 800 MeV) –Zk 4 : moderate P t cut (|Z| 350 MeV)

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop5 L1 Trigger Primitives (II) EMT primitives: –M 20 :  strip energy sum MIP (>120MeV) –G 20 :  strip energy sum medium E (>300MeV) –E 20 :  strip energy sum high E (>800MeV) –Y 10 : Backward barrel high E (>1 GeV) IFT primitive: –U 3 : coded pattern number for various 2 muon and 1 muon barrel/endcap hit topologies

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop6 L1 Trigger Features (I) PEP-II beam essentially continuous so that L1 trigger also operates in `DC’ mode in conjunction with fully pipelined subdetector frontend electronics. There is no fast trigger detector element such as TOF but still get L1 time resolution of ~50ns. Subsystem readout work on raw waveform to calculate pulse height => decouple trigger timing from pulse heights. However, there are pathological effects in frontend electronics input to trigger or vulnerable trigger settings which can introduce gross timing shifts. Careful testing is required for changes with timing consequences.

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop7 Ghost retriggering events (from 2000) Due to EMC electronics glitch during a ramping down pulse

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop8 L1 Trigger Features (II) Low multiplicity triggers such as 1B can sometimes saturate at high background conditions so that e.g. 2B is on, but 1B may appear to be off due to lack of off->on transition. GLT trigger lines are currently optimized for best mean time alignment between lines. If we were to deliberately delay L1 as late as possible to minimize SVT ‘background hit poisoning’, we may need to try optimizing for best late edge alignment.

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop9 L1 Trigger Line Naming Conventions 3B&2A means B>3 and A>2 M* means 2 M hits back to back EM* means M and E hits back to back A+ means A>1 & A’>1 D2 means B>2 & A>1 (short hand 2 trk trg) BM means B matched by M in same  location For counting distinct objects from the  maps: Normal objects (B,A,M,E etc.) are separated by more than 1 f bin: 22.5 o for DCT tracks, 18 o for EMT hits. Back to back angles cuts for B*,M*,EM* ~120 o. DCT/EMT match objects BM ~90 o apart.

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop10 This configuration is used throughout runs. The ‘Beam/beam’ contribution can also be due to low angle Bhabha debris. Feb/02

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop11 L1 Trigger Efficiency old DCT configuration: Pure DCT Pure EMT All L1 lines BB generic 99.1% 99.8% >99.9% B->     + B->X 79.7% 99.2% 99.8% B->  + B->X 92.2% 95.5% 99.7% cc 95.3% 98.8% 99.9% uds 90.6% 95.6% 98.2% Bhabha 98.9% 99.2% >99.9%  99.1% %  80.6% 77.6% 94.5% ( Hadronic final states: all events Leptonic final states: fiducial events)

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop12 L1 Rate Projection Feb/02 Background run result suggest Possible model: L1 Rate (Hz) = 125 (cosmic) + 50*I LER (A) + 190*I HER (A) + 180*I 2 HER (A) + 70* L / *I LER *I HER at good conditions

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop13 Checking L1 Rate Projection Derived background L1 rate compared to prediction: >2*backgr 24% >3*backgr 4.6% >4*backgr 2.2% Use prediction with caution !

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop14 L1 Rate Extrapolations (Jan/04)

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop15 L1 Rate Extrapolations (Jan/04) Model-2: + 100*I her *I 2 ler + 100*L

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop16 Can we get more reduction out of DCZ ?

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop17 Backup Slides

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop18 L1 Trigger Rate Growth vs Trigger Types

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop19 New L1 Rate Extrapolations (II) Model-1: + 50*I her *I ler + 120*I her *I 2 ler + 70*L

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop20 HER background characteristics

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop21 Lumi vs beam current