Alice EMCAL meeting, 15-16 July 2008 1 EMCAL jet trigger status Olivier BOURRION LPSC, Grenoble.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of the CTP O.Villalobos Baillie University of Birmingham April 23rd 2009.
Advertisements

1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.
Forward Detector Meeting, 11 Mar 2003Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Si-FMD status Forward Detector meeting, CERN, 11 March 2003 Børge Svane Nielsen Niels Bohr.
MICE Fiber Tracker Electronics AFEII for MICE (Front end readout board) Recall: AFEs mount on ether side of the VLPC cass, with fibers going to the VLPCs.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
Level-1 Topology Processor for Phase 0/1 - Hardware Studies and Plans - Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
Alice EMCAL Meeting, July 2nd EMCAL global trigger status: STU design progress Olivier BOURRION LPSC, Grenoble.
S. Silverstein For ATLAS TDAQ Level-1 Trigger updates for Phase 1.
06-Dec-2004 HCAL TriDAS 1 TriDAS Status HF Luminosity HF Trigger Slicing.
MICE Workshop Sept 2004 AFEII for MICE Recall: AFEs mount on ether side of the VLPC cass, with fibers going to the VLPCs between them. AFE has 8 identical.
Uli Schäfer JEM Status and plans Firmware Hardware status JEM1 Plans.
MICE Tracker Readout Increased Data Readout Rate VLSB Development 16 AFE II t boards 8 Visible Light Photon Counter (VLPC) cassettes 4 cryostats.
Uli Schäfer JEM Status and plans Algorithms Hardware JEM0, JEM1 Tests Plans.
Upgrade developments in Clermont-Ferrand Romeo Bonnefoy and François Vazeille Tilecal upgrade meeting (CERN, 13 June 2014) ● Handling tools ● Deported.
3/7/05A. Semenov Batch-by-Batch Intensity Monitor 1 Two-Channel Batch by Batch Intensity Monitor for Main Injector BBI.
Global Trigger H. Bergauer, K. Kastner, S. Kostner, A. Nentchev, B. Neuherz, N. Neumeister, M. Padrta, P. Porth, H. Rohringer, H. Sakulin, J. Strauss,
EMCal project TRU (Trigger Region Unit) status Sept ‘08 1 Norbert Novitzky 9/14/2015.
Proposal for the read out system for the future Si. Vertex Detector with signal processing and hit data production for a fast track trigger ? M. Pernicka.
Status and planning of the CMX Philippe Laurens for the MSU group Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger General Meeting, CERN May 24, 2012.
Leo Greiner IPHC testing Sensor and infrastructure testing at LBL. Capabilities and Plan.
M. Szelezniak1PXL Sensor and RDO review – 06/23/2010 STAR Hardware Prototyping Status.
Napoli October 2007 WG3 - Pierre Edelbruck FAZIA WG3 – Front End Electronics.
Uni-Heidelberg, KIP, V.Angelov 1 International Workshop TRDs – Present & Future September, Romania Wafer Tester, Optical Link, GTU V. Angelov Kirchhoff.
Main Board Status MB2 v1 for FATALIC & QIE 10/06/2015Roméo BONNEFOY - LPC Clermont1 Roméo BONNEFOY François Vazeille LPC Clermont-Ferrand.
Understanding Data Acquisition System for N- XYTER.
LNL 1 SLOW CONTROLS FOR CMS DRIFT TUBE CHAMBERS M. Bellato, L. Castellani INFN Sezione di Padova.
STGC Trigger Demonstrator sTGC Trigger Demonstrator ATLAS Israel Annual Meeting 30 December 2012 Lorne Levinson, Julia Narevicius, Alex Roich, Meir Shoa,
Status of Global Trigger Global Muon Trigger Sept 2001 Vienna CMS-group presented by A.Taurok.
Development of an ASIC for reading out CCDS at the vertex detector of the International Linear Collider Presenter: Peter Murray ASIC Design Group Science.
Global Trigger H. Bergauer, Ch. Deldicque, J. Erö, K. Kastner, S. Kostner, A. Nentchev, B. Neuherz, N. Neumeister, M. Padrta, P. Porth, H. Rohringer, H.
Wilco Vink 1 Outline Optical station Vertex processor board Output board Latency.
NA62 Trigger Algorithm Trigger and DAQ meeting, 8th September 2011 Cristiano Santoni Mauro Piccini (INFN – Sezione di Perugia) NA62 collaboration meeting,
1 VeLo L1 Read Out Guido Haefeli VeLo Comprehensive Review 27/28 January 2003.
8/9/2000T.Matsumoto RICH Front End RICH FEE Overview PMT to FEE signal connection Trigger Tile Summation of Current RICH LVL-1 Trigger Module1,2 What is.
Status and planning of the CMX Wojtek Fedorko for the MSU group TDAQ Week, CERN April , 2012.
1 Jyväskylä contribution to EMCal / PHOS trigger.
1 Dong Wang, Yaping Wang, Changzhou Xiang, Zhongbao Yin, Fan Zhang, Daicui Zhou (Huazhong Normal University, China) Status and planning on common readout.
Ideas about Tests and Sequencing C.N.P.Gee Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 3rd March 2001.
EMCal in ALICE Norbert Novitzky 1. Outline How Electro-Magnetic Calorimeters works ? Physics motivation – What can we measure with Emcal ? – Advantages.
ATLAS Trigger / current L1Calo Uli Schäfer 1 Jet/Energy module calo µ CTP L1.
12GeV Trigger Workshop Christopher Newport University 8 July 2009 R. Chris Cuevas Welcome! Workshop goals: 1.Review  Trigger requirements  Present hardware.
March 9, 2005 HBD CDR Review 1 HBD Electronics Preamp/cable driver on the detector. –Specification –Schematics –Test result Rest of the electronics chain.
1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Technical Design – Electronics DAQ Readout electronics split into two parts – Near the detector (ROC) – Compresses and.
HBD electronics status All the ADC and XMIT boards are installed. –Top 3 crates are for the ADC, XMIT boards –Bottom crate is for test pulse boards/future.
Sept. 7, 2004Silicon VTX Workshop - Brookhaven National Laboratory, Long Island, New York Prototype Design of the Front End Module (FEM) for the Silicon.
1 MICE Tracker Readout Update AFE IIt firmware development VLSB firmware development Hardware progress Summary Terry Hart, MICE Tracker Meeting, August.
CERN, 18 december 2003Coincidence Matrix ASIC PRR Coincidence ASIC modifications E.Petrolo, R.Vari, S.Veneziano INFN-Rome.
LKr readout and trigger R. Fantechi 3/2/2010. The CARE structure.
RICH2 support and cooling mechanics status update Massimo Benettoni July 30,
Control for CTP and LTU boards in Run
CMM++ activities at MSU Y. Ermoline et al. Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger Joint Meeting, CERN, 13 – 17 September 2010.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory September 1999Fifth Workshop on Electronics for LHC Presented by S. Quinton.
FPGA based signal processing for the LHCb Vertex detector and Silicon Tracker Guido Haefeli EPFL, Lausanne Vertex 2005 November 7-11, 2005 Chuzenji Lake,
Design of the 64-channel ASIC: update DEI - Politecnico di Bari and INFN - Sezione di Bari Meeting INSIDE, December 18, 2014, Roma Outline  Proposed solution.
May 10-14, 2010CALOR2010, Beijing, China 1 Readout electronics of the ALICE photon spectrometer Zhongbao Yin *, Lijiao Liu, Hans Muller, Dieter Rohrich,
ROD Activities at Dresden Andreas Glatte, Andreas Meyer, Andy Kielburg-Jeka, Arno Straessner LAr Electronics Upgrade Meeting – LAr Week September 2009.
Mu3e Data Acquisition Ideas Dirk Wiedner July /5/20121Dirk Wiedner Mu3e meeting Zurich.
29/05/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
2 Dec 1998F Harris LHCb Trigger Meeting L0 Trigger - ‘Real Estate’ Considerations Current thinking for the size and location of L0 trigger electronics,
The ALICE Electromagnetic Calorimeter
Kenneth Johns University of Arizona
EMCal Cosmics Run Cosmics Run Goals
Production Firmware - status Components TOTFED - status
AFE II Status First board under test!!.
EMCal – France Status report, July 2008 Manpower Technical activities
Vertex 2005 November 7-11, 2005 Chuzenji Lake, Nikko, Japan
VELO readout On detector electronics Off detector electronics to DAQ
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Front-end Electronics for the LHCb Preshower Rémi CORNAT, Gérard BOHNER, Olivier DESCHAMPS, Jacques LECOQ, Pascal PERRET LPC Clermont-Ferrand.
SVT detector electronics
Presentation transcript:

Alice EMCAL meeting, July EMCAL jet trigger status Olivier BOURRION LPSC, Grenoble

Alice EMCAL meeting, July Trigger specification : L0 trigger : OR of the 34 L0 calculated by the TRU. L1-gamma trigger: Energy summed over sliding window of 4x4 towers (2x2 fast OR) and compared to a multiplicity corrected threshold. L1-jet trigger : Energy summed over a sliding window of n*n subregions and compared to a multiplicity corrected threshold (a subregion is defined as 8x8 towers)‏ Reminder : the Summary Trigger Unit STU TRU L0 L1-gamma L1-jet 34 TRU Multiplicity from V0 4 diff pair Ethernet CAT7 cable TRU is clocked by the BC clock forwarded by STU (40.08MHz)‏ TTC link To CTP DDL DCS Put trigger data in the data stream on L2a (via DDL)‏ LVDS links

Alice EMCAL meeting, July Detector layout as understood

Alice EMCAL meeting, July EMCAL layout (1/2)‏ Region orientation / numbering? View from beam or cal frame? Mirrored SM The understanding of the layout is the key point for building the trigger algorithm

Alice EMCAL meeting, July EMCAL layout for one TRU (2/2)‏ The ADC channel number has to be known by STU, in order to compute the triggers For instance, one 4X4 window is channel 5,6,9 and 10 Confirmation of the ADC channel affectation vs geometrical position ?

Alice EMCAL meeting, July Functional simulation scenario (see R. GUERNANE talk) Overlapping 2 neighboring regions in phi 2.Overlapping 2 neighboring regions in Z 3.Overlapping 4 regions

Alice EMCAL meeting, July Current status

Alice EMCAL meeting, July DCS board modification and testing The transformer less Ethernet board was tested at LCMI in march 2008 No packet 0.53 T

Alice EMCAL meeting, July Thermal study results (work done by Julien GIRAUD : Problem: board will dissipate nearly 36 W Assumptions: –water flow 20°C, tube  =5 mm, Q= 1l/min –Hot component coupled with a 2 mm copper plate via a thermal foam hottest spot 36°C (conservative, convection neglected) 2 mm copper plate

Alice EMCAL meeting, July Actual STU board layout For TRU: Dual stacked RJ on left side, 20 on front, 10 on right side

Alice EMCAL meeting, July Summary of the STU status Work done so far –LVDS Link validation (july 07) –DCS hardware modification and qualification –Thermal study –PVSS and DCS know-how gained by G. DARGAUD on Pixel trigger –Some VHDL available (deserializer, TTCrq interface)‏ –Board layout, fabrication in progress (board received july 11th) To do –VHDL design: final VHDL degraded versions for tests (TRU link only, limited L1-gamma, L1-jet). This has to be defined –TRU link validation (to be discussed)‏ –Interfaces tests and validation (DDL, V0, TTC)‏ –PVSS driver for Emcal

Alice EMCAL meeting, July Proposed TRU-STU link validation methodology 1.An emitting buffer is loaded via the testing tools 2.A frame transfer is initiated 3.The receiving buffer is read by the testing tools Above steps have to be repeated many times with different packet contents. This scheme will exercise the link as in the final design. -This is somewhat similar to the tests performed in july 2007 on the TOR board -Has to be performed before TRU full production order (September 08??) TRU USB  LVDS USB Slow control LVDS CAT7 LVDS cable 15m Testing tools STU

Alice EMCAL meeting, July SPARES

Alice EMCAL meeting, July Available L1 processing time t interaction One or several TRU sends L0 to STU 0 ns 600 ns STU forward one L0 to CTP 700 ns L0 from CTP at RCU 1200 ns L1 reception deadline (at CTP input)‏ TRU start of transmission 1400 ns All data in STU 3155 ns 6100 ns PHOS: 112*12 bit/800Mbs+75ns=1.755µs EMCAL: 96*12 bit/800Mbs+75ns=1.515µs 75ns : estimated 15m of wire L1 emission deadline (at STU ouput)‏ 5900 ns 200ns : estimated 40m of wirePHOS: 112*12 bit/800Mbs+75ns=1.755µs EMCAL: 96*12 bit/800Mbs+75ns=1.515µs 75ns : estimated 15m of wire Available 2745 ns (PHOS)‏ Available 2985 ns (EMCAL)‏

Alice EMCAL meeting, July L1-gamma processing (1/2)‏ Now the numbers are the readout order Column are read top to bottom and then row right to left Refering to the previous slide DPRAM readout is 4,3,1,2,8,7,5,6,… A region A+1,R+1 region R region

Alice EMCAL meeting, July L1-gamma processing (2/2)‏ The trigger is computed for each region, with neighboring region inputs. Requires 4 accumulators (col size) X 2 (window size)‏ Latency is roughly 100 X 1/120MHz~900 ns

Alice EMCAL meeting, July L1-jet processing (1/2)‏ Based on P. Jacobs proposal: 6 subregions are created in each region. Numbers are the readout order and not the ADC channel number Total: 204 subregions Below subregion delimitation, 4x4 fast OR  8x8=64 towers Each subregion energy sum is computed in parallel with L1-gamma 6 accumulators (no overlapping)  latency ~900 ns

Alice EMCAL meeting, July L1-jet processing (2/2)‏ The algorithm to apply is somewhat similar to L1-gamma except that here the columns contains 12 elements  No accumulators for 1 subregion patch, direct threshold comparison 12*2 accumulators for a 2X2 subregion patch 12*3 accumulators for 3X3 subregion patch Latency: >204 clock cycles  >1.7µs (remaining margin: =385ns)‏