September 5, 2000D. Acosta -- USCMS Physics Meeting1 Muon PRS Group Darin Acosta (“Muon Guy”) University of Florida.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS ATLAS PESA Meeting 25/04/02 B-Trigger Working Group Work-plan This talk:
Advertisements

Level-1 Trigger CMS Week, Brussels 14 Sep C.-E. Wulz Deputy Trigger Project Manager Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna Prepared with slides/material.
H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
Welcome to SCEN101 Physics for Poets George Watson Sharp Lab 232
Resources for the ATLAS Offline Computing Basis for the Estimates ATLAS Distributed Computing Model Cost Estimates Present Status Sharing of Resources.
Slice Test DAQ. Two Systems Underway There are essentially two systems being designed concurrently: Trackfinder test, and EMU slicetest. Goals of the.
B triggering Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa Consorzio CMS Italia Firenze 7 Sept
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
CMS Physics Meeting, Dec. 6, Analysis Note on the Validation of the ORCA Simulation of the Endcap Muon CSC Front-end Electronics S. Durkin -- Ohio.
US Test beam data analysis & validation of OSCAR/ORCA Tim Cox, UC Davis Nikolai Terentiev*, CMU CMS Physics Week Fermilab Apr , 2005.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
UCSB CDF Group, DOE Site visit, Jan 18, J. Incandela 1 Top Physics at CDF ++ Top Quark and New Physics with an eye toward the LHC Work completed.
Standalone Muon Seeding Rick Wilkinson. 2 One Problem Solved: Bad Seed Efficiency in Cracks ORCA PTDR Standalone Muon CMSSW.
Software Parallel Intro 1M.Ellis - CM23 - Harbin - 15th January 2009  Focus this CM continues to be on needs for analysis of data and use of G4MICE online.
Current plans FTK meeting 2/23/06 F. Crescioli, P.Giannetti, M. Dell’Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, + Cheng-Ju Lin.
US News from the LPC Muon Group E. James, M. Mulders, N. Terentiev* CMS EMU Meeting University of California, Davis Feb , 2005.
Status of PRS/Muon Activities D. Acosta University of Florida Work toward the “June” HLT milestones US analysis environment.
ATLAS-Specific Activity in GridPP EDG Integration LCG Integration Metadata.
The Track-Finding Processor for the Level-1 Trigger of the CMS Endcap Muon System D.Acosta, A.Madorsky, B.Scurlock, S.M.Wang University of Florida A.Atamanchuk,
Hadron Calorimeter Readout Electronics Calibration, Hadron Calorimeter Scintillator Upgrade, and Missing Transverse Momentum Resolution due to Pileup Zishuo.
Claudio Grandi INFN Bologna CMS Operations Update Ian Fisk, Claudio Grandi 1.
Mark Thomson Timing, Tungsten and High Energy Jets.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
Finnish DataGrid meeting, CSC, Otaniemi, V. Karimäki (HIP) DataGrid meeting, CSC V. Karimäki (HIP) V. Karimäki (HIP) Otaniemi, 28 August, 2000.
Efficiency of the CMS Level-1 Trigger to Selected Physics Channels by: Corey Sulkko Faculty Mentor: prof. Darin Acosta Funded by: National Science Foundation.
Extra Dimensions and Compositeness in μ + μ - Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida Florida Contribution to Physics TDR SUSY/BSM Review, CMS Week, September.
H->bb Weekly Meeting Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) HSG5 H->bb Weekly Meeting, 26 April 2011.
September 30, 2004FTK meeting1 Making the FTK Physics Case M. Shochet 9/30/04.
Fabiola Gianotti, 31/8/’99 PHYSICS and SOFTWARE ATLAS Software Week 31/8/’99 Fabiola Gianotti Software requirements of physics groups What should Detector.
Muon LPC Meeting, 14 Sep Overview of Muon PRS Activities Darin Acosta University of Florida.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
Physics Validation. Validations 18/12/13: DC14 (1) 5 validation tasks for this week: Several DC14 simulation tests, grouped into 3 tasks 2 tasks on IBL/ITK.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
June 29, 2000DOE/NSF USCMS Computing and Software Report. HLT Studies D. Acosta1 High-Level Trigger Studies Darin Acosta University of Florida DOE/NSF.
28 July 2006 CERN REU Status Report 1 Lindsey Gray, University of Florida RCT Trigger Supervisor and Database Project Status Lindsey Gray Advisors: Dr.
Diffractive Higgs studies with CMS and TOTEM: Status, plans and possibilities for Torino Monika Grothe TO-CMS meeting October
Friday the 18th of May, 2001US CMS Physics J.G. Branson1 Physics in (US) CMS James G. Branson UC San Diego US CMS Collaboration Meeting Riverside CA.
23/2/2000Status of GAUDI 1 P. Mato / CERN Computing meeting, LHCb Week 23 February 2000.
FTKSim Status and plans FTK Meeting 07/13/2006 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, P. Giannetti.
Claudio Grandi INFN-Bologna CHEP 2000Abstract B 029 Object Oriented simulation of the Level 1 Trigger system of a CMS muon chamber Claudio Grandi INFN-Bologna.
Tridas Week, November 2000Darin Acosta1 Status of the CSC Track-Finder D.Acosta, A.Madorsky, S.M.Wang University of Florida B.Cousins, J.Hauser, J.Mumford,
USCMS Physics, May 2001Darin Acosta1 Status Report of PRS/  D.Acosta University of Florida Current U.S. activities PRS/  Activities New PRS organization.
Physics Results from CDF and Prospects for a FY 2011 Run Kevin Pitts / University of Illinois DOE S&T Review of Scientific User Facilities June 30 – July.
L1 Global Muon Trigger Simulation Status URL of this presentation:
January 18, 2000DOE/NSF USCMS Computing and Software Review. HLT Studies D. Acosta1 High-Level Trigger Studies Darin Acosta University of Florida DoE/NSF.
L1Calo EM Efficiencies Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Joint Meeting, Stockholm 29/06/2011.
Object Oriented reconstruction of the CMS muon chambers CHEP February, Padova Annalina Vitelli - INFN Torino.
CMS week1 Agenda Sarah Eno: Status of project Volker Drollinger: jet energy scale and top mass Ritua Kinnunen: Higgs mass resolution E. Doroshkevic:
Alain Romeyer - Sept Light Higgs search in SUSY cascades Introduction (Previous studies) Plans for this analysis Simulation chain Reconstruction.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
USCMS May 2002Jim Branson 1 Physics in US CMS US CMS Annual Collaboration Meeting May 2002 FSU Jin Branson.
H->bb Note Plans for Summer Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) on behalf of the HSG5 H->bb group Higgs Working Group Meeting, 9 June 2011.
CMS Trigger Upgrades Phase-I (1) Muon Trigger Upgrades: – CSCTF (CSC TrackFinder) – MPC (Muon Port Card) Calorimeter Trigger Upgrades: – HCAL TPG – Calorimeter.
Overview of EMU Software Rick Wilkinson. Slice Test DAQ We succeeded in using Slice Test DAQ code to take test beam data, combining chamber and trigger.
Effects of Endcap Staging/Descoping D.Acosta University of Florida.
AliRoot survey: Reconstruction P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
Some topics for discussion 31/03/2016 P. Hristov 1.
Status of Digitization, Testbeam Simulation, and Production ATLAS Muon Week -CERN, February 18th 2005 Daniela Rebuzzi – Pavia University and INFN.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Muon Reconstruction and Vertex Constraint Giovanni Abbiendi Bologna CMS meeting, 20 November 2007.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
MICE Collaboration Meeting Saturday 22nd October 2005 Malcolm Ellis
Status of Full Simulation for Muon Trigger at SLHC
Changes in Level 1 CSC Trigger in ORCA by Jason Mumford and Slava Valuev University of California Los Angeles June 11,
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Update on LHCb Level-1 trigger
Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago
Presentation transcript:

September 5, 2000D. Acosta -- USCMS Physics Meeting1 Muon PRS Group Darin Acosta (“Muon Guy”) University of Florida

September 5, 2000D. Acosta -- USCMS Physics Meeting2 Who’s Involved? l In Europe: è Ugo Gasparini et al. – Generator studies, L2 è Norbert Neumeister – DB prodn, L1, L2 è Anna Vitelli – DB prodn, barrel muon reconstruction è Several others with lesser involvement l In the U.S. (Endcap Muon group): è D. Acosta, S.M. Wang (UFlorida) – L1 è R. Breedon, T. Cox (UCD) – geometry, endcap recon. è B. Tannenbaum (UCLA) – L1 è R. Wilkinson (Caltech) – endcap recon., general guru

September 5, 2000D. Acosta -- USCMS Physics Meeting3 HLT Milestones l November 1999 è EMU missed completely. Insufficient time to develop code for geometry, digitization, persistence, and L1 from scratch in 6 months l July 2000 è EMU sort of met it. All pieces were in place, and preliminary results shown, but not enough time for tuning (P T assignment), debugging, and optimization (code was too slow for out-of-time pile-up). l September 2000 è Close to having all above issues resolved for dedicated L1 studies for the L1 TDR (due by Nov.) è But, goal line keeps moving: more demands on L1 trigger threshold definition (90% effic. vs. 50%)

September 5, 2000D. Acosta -- USCMS Physics Meeting4 U.S. Experience (1) l EMU group works well together è Lots of exchanges, video conferences, and meetings to keep everyone informed and on-track è A real user group where you can post a message (even dumb ones) and get help l EMU code development for ORCA is entirely a U.S. effort, with only minor consultation from Anna, Norbert, Vincenzo,… l We are heartened by Sarah’s comments: è “US muon has this [ORCA experience], which is one of the reasons I think they are so successful!” Because…

September 5, 2000D. Acosta -- USCMS Physics Meeting5 U.S. Experience (2) l This development has been painful: è Large C++/ORCA/SCRAM learning curve to climb (makes it hard for newcomers to contribute) è ORCA is a moving target: p Version doesn’t stay stable long enough to finish bug fixes, tuning, and collect results. p e.g. ORCA3  ORCA4 was a major switch after the November 1999 HLT meeting. It took many months before basic code was ready, which left little time for L1 developers to complete their work. We still had to rush for the July HLT meeting despite it being 8 months later! p ORCA 4.2  ORCA 4.3 has also been frustrating. Objectivity schema changed after July meeting, and it took a while before it was made backward compatible with previous DBs so that studies could continue to prepare for L1 TDR studies p Clearly development must occur, but it would help users if the underlying architecture would stay stable

September 5, 2000D. Acosta -- USCMS Physics Meeting6 U.S. Experience (3) l Some of this pain stems from none of the EMU developers being based at CERN è Attending the weekly RPROM meeting is not enough. Must have a door to knock on to get advice. l Long distance code development is slow, but most of us have no other choice. è Teaching duties, other active experiments, etc. l Thus, EMU is not 100% ready at time of milestones è Preliminary results shown by European colleagues (using our code) mislead CMS Collaboration p i.e. Poor L1 efficiency in DT/CSC overlap, poor L1 P T resolution – lots of bad PR that demoralizes group l Having a larger U.S. base of users and developers would improve efficiency of ORCA development

September 5, 2000D. Acosta -- USCMS Physics Meeting7 Recent Results Nevertheless, we have obtained some results on L1 performance: 95% Good efficiency in DT/CSC overlap region

September 5, 2000D. Acosta -- USCMS Physics Meeting8 More Work Needed L1 P T resolution shows difference between  + and  - ++ --

September 5, 2000D. Acosta -- USCMS Physics Meeting9 Near-Term L1 & HLT Goals l Must get Endcap Muon code perfected so that we can prepare efficiency and rate plots for the L1 TDR that are representative of the system performance è Last few bugs must be fixed l HLT Muon databases will be re-made with latest code è No new MC needs to be produced in U.S. right now p Caltech, UCD, UFlorida have contributed CMSIM samples in the past è Objectivity database formatting & Ntuple production done at CERN without U.S. EMU involvement p Norbert and Anna have done a lot of work on this, and have prepared the Ntuples used by the Muon groups. We should be doing more of this, particularly in preparing standard analysis jobs and Ntuples

September 5, 2000D. Acosta -- USCMS Physics Meeting10 Long-Term Plans l It would be nice to get the underlying EMU and L1 code finished so that we can move on to physics and HLT algorithms! è Hasn’t happened in parallel because the EMU users are also the developers l My personal selection of topics: è A fast L2 muon reconstruction package p Between that used by L1 and that used in offline analysis è A study of the reconstruction of muons in b-jets p Many important signals couple to b’s: Higgs, SUSY, … p Accompanying punch-through debris will deteriorate performance è Studies of your favorite physics topic that couples to muons: p Higgs: H  4l, H , WH  bb, ZH  bb p SUSY:  +  0  3l + MET

September 5, 2000D. Acosta -- USCMS Physics Meeting11 Summary l Clearly the Muon PRS group could use more involvement from people in the U.S. è Current members are over-stressed with demands è Many more things we could be doing but haven’t p L2 algorithms, physics studies, … è Might be a good training ground for new students before they commit to an analysis on CDF/D0 l But there is a significant learning curve to overcome to become effective è Requires a lot of time, a lot of patience l We’ve started a good collaboration in the U.S. è Future members shouldn’t have to suffer as much as we did!