Getting on the MOVES: Using Dynameq and the US EPA MOVES Model to Measure the Air Pollution Emissions TRPC – Smart Corridors Project Chris Breiland Fehr.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A PERSPECTIVE ON APPLICATION OF A PAIR OF PLANNING AND MICRO SIMULATION MODELS: EXPERIENCE FROM I-405 CORRIDOR STUDY PROGRAM Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani.
Advertisements

THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National.
ISTEA is Now 20 Years Old and We are Still Searching for the Land Use-Transportation Connection. Actually, Analysis of that Connection Has Been Sought.
EMME User’s Conference Project Experience of a DYNAMEQ Simulation Model : TRPC – Smart Corridors Project October 4, 2010 Natarajan JANA Janarthanan PhD,
ARC’s Strategic Thoroughfare Plan Bridging the Gap from Travel Demand Model to Micro-Simulation GPA Conference Fall 2012 Presented By: David Pickworth,
Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Integrating Dynameq into Long Range Planning Studies Model City 2011 – Portland, Oregon Richard Walker - Portland Metro Scott.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
1 Travel Model Application for Highway Vehicle Emission Estimation Ho-Chuan Chen, Ph.D., P.E. King County Department of Transportation Seattle, Washington.
California Energy Commission Medium and Heavy Vehicles and Movement of Light and Heavy Vehicles Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Operational Effect of Allowing Single Occupant Hybrid Vehicles into High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Chris Breiland Fehr & Peers Associate Lianyu Chu, Hamed.
TransCAD Network Settings 2017/4/17.
A National County-Level Long Distance Travel Model Mike Chaney, AICP Tian Huang, PE, AICP, PTOE Binbin Chen, AICP 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning.
Microsimulation for Rural and Exurban Regions: Lake County, California David Gerstle (presenting) & Zheng Wei Caliper Corporation.
An Experimental Procedure for Mid Block-Based Traffic Assignment on Sub-area with Detailed Road Network Tao Ye M.A.Sc Candidate University of Toronto MCRI.
BETTER AIR QUALITY 2004 SPECIFIC TRANSPORT MEASURES TO REDUCE EMISSIONS IN HYDERABAD, INDIA Yash Sachdeva, RITES Ltd Viresh Goel, RITES Ltd D.S.Chari,
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas and Erin Morrow DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model Travel Management Subcommittee May 26, 2009 MOVES: Motor.
©2009 Proprietary and Confidential DTA in practice: Modeling dynamic networks in the real world Michael Mahut, Ph.D. INRO Montreal, Canada.
The ARTEMIS tools for estimating the transport pollutant emissions Artemis project - EC DG Tren COST346 - Heavy duty vehicles emissions M. André, INRETS,
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation Combining Macro Scopic and Meso Scopic Models in Toll and Traffic Revenue Forecasting SR 167 Corridor Completion.
From EMME to DYNAMEQ in the city of MALMÖ. THE COMPANY Founded in early 2011 Currently located in Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö Small company (currently.
Analysis of a Multimodal Light Rail Corridor using an Activity-Based Microsimulation Framework S. Ellie Volosin & Ram M. Pendyala, Arizona State University,
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Harikishan Perugu, Ph.D. Heng Wei, Ph.D. PE
May 1, 2014 East Gude Drive Pedestrian Road Safety Audit Stakeholder Pedestrian Safety Meeting.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Abstract Transportation sustainability is of increasing concern to professionals and the public. This project describes the modeling and calculation of.
2007 TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Daytona Beach, Florida Pseudo Dynamic Traffic Assignment A Duration Based Static Assignment.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
EMME Users’ Group Meeting NSW Modelling Guidelines - Highway Assignment 27 May 2011.
THE ISSUE Workshop on Air Quality in Cities M. Petrelli - Roma Tre University February 2014 The evaluation of road traffic emissions.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY DTA Anyway: Code Base & Network Development Lisa Zorn DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th, 2012.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
MATRIX ADJUSTMENT MACRO (DEMADJ.MAC AND DEMADJT.MAC) APPLICATIONS: SEATTLE EXPERIENCE Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Sunil Kumar and Eulalie Lucas MOVES Task Force Meeting MWCOG August 18, 2009 Development of Inputs, Outputs, and Procedures for EPA’s Draft MOVES2009 Model.
It’s Easy to Quantify Changes in GHG Emissions from Cars and Light Trucks – Right? Presented to: SACOG Panel Discussion April 16, 2009 Presented by: Bob.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Easy Breezy Beautiful DTA: Modeling of the Geary Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project Elizabeth Sall, Michalis.
Bharath Paladugu TRPC Clyde Scott Independent Consultant
an Iowa State University center SIMPCO Traffic Modeling Workshop Presented by: Iowa Department of Transportation and Center for Transportation Research.
A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks Qi Yang Caliper Corporation TRB Planning Application Conference Houston, May 20, 2009.
SHRP2 Project C05: Final Report to TCC Understanding the Contribution of Operations, Technology, and Design to Meeting Highway Capacity Needs Wayne Kittelson.
Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College 1 Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Which Produces the Most Environmental Benefit and/or the Least Environmental.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
Semi-Automated Approach to Develop Focus Area Forecasts from a Statewide Model 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 17-21,
1 Assessing Travel Demand for Exclusive Truck Facilities Matthew Roorda, University of Toronto Michael Hain, University of Toronto Glareh Amirjamshidi,
1 Toll Modeling Analysis for the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 19 th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference October 19-21, 2005 Presented.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Third International Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling presented by Thomas Rossi Cambridge.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
METRO Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Action COST Presentation ODOT Region 4 April 1,
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
WSDOT’s Dynameq Projects
Mesoscopic Modeling Approach for Performance Based Planning
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
Karen Tsang Bureau of Transport Statistics Department of Transport
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Developing a Real-Time Energy and Environmental Monitoring System
Sensitivity Analysis Update
Presented By: George Noel – Volpe Mark Glaze - FHWA 1/13/2014
Presentation transcript:

Getting on the MOVES: Using Dynameq and the US EPA MOVES Model to Measure the Air Pollution Emissions TRPC – Smart Corridors Project Chris Breiland Fehr & Peers September 16, 2011

Outline Project Overview, Background and Objectives Dynameq Model Development Estimating Air Pollution Emissions Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) Comparison Conclusions Q&A

TRPC - intergovernmental board made up of local government jurisdictions County area sq miles population - 245,300 The county’s population is expected to be 373,000 in 2030 The county is the home of the State’s Capitol, City of Olympia Overview

Project Background Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) grant Options to reduce PM10 through ITS deployment – coordinated signal timing and optimization – transit signal priority (TSP) Two strategic corridors were chosen from the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) that are problematic for Intercity Transit’s on-time performance goals

Study Corridors

To improve multi-modal transportation operations on the two corridors To evaluate signal coordination and optimization To evaluate transit signal priority options To reduce PM10 (particulate matter) emissions in the corridors. Project Objectives

NETWORK –Entire network brought into DTA model from EMME Travel Demand Model –Refined the Dynameq network to add missing intersections on the corridors –Modified all centroid connectors for the zones around two corridors to reflect field conditions –Verified link attributes –Network properties in DTA model: – 800 centroids – 2,500 regular nodes – 8,000 links – 20 transit lines TRIP TABLES –Trip tables brought from EMME Travel Demand Model –The modes are SOV, HOV & Truck Model Development

INTERSECTION CONTROLS –Focused on corridors and a several-block buffer –81 signals & 67 stop controlled intersections INTERSECTION GEOMETRY –Approaches to the intersections were modified to reflect field conditions –Added right and left turn lane pockets where needed

Model Development Validation / Calibration –Validated and calibrated the existing year model (study corridors and I-5 primarily) Based on link counts Based on turn move counts Based on travel time on corridors –Queuing at hot spots

Model Validation

Air Pollution Emissions and Model Detail Air Pollution Highly Sensitive to: VMT Speed Vehicle Type Drive Cycle DTA versus Static Models

How are Emissions Estimated? Air Quality Analysis tools – EMFAC, Mobile6, MOVES

Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) State-of-art tool for estimating emission from highway vehicles developed by US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Highly detailed Perfect for Dynameq

MOVES Input Data Data needs from Dynameq DTA Model Link

MOVES Input Data Data needs from Dynameq DTA Model Fleet Mix Source Type IDSource Type Name 11Motorcycle 21Passenger Car 31Passenger Truck 32Light Commercial Truck 41Intercity Bus 42Transit Bus 43School Bus 51Refuse Truck 52Single Unit Short-haul Truck 53Single Unit Long-haul Truck 54Motor Home 61Combination Short-haul Truck 62Combination Long-haul Truck

MOVES Input Data Data needs from Dynameq DTA Model Operating Mode Distribution –for each link, source type and pollutant opModeIDopModeName 0Braking 1Idling 11Low Speed Coasting; VSP< 0; 1<=Speed<25 12Cruise/Acceleration; 0<=VSP< 3; 1<= Speed<25 13Cruise/Acceleration; 3<=VSP< 6; 1<=Speed<25 14Cruise/Acceleration; 6<=VSP< 9; 1<=Speed<25 15Cruise/Acceleration; 9<=VSP<12; 1<=Speed<25 16Cruise/Acceleration; 12<=VSP; 1<=Speed<25 21Moderate Speed Coasting; VSP< 0; 25<=Speed<50 22Cruise/Acceleration; 0<=VSP< 3; 25<=Speed<50 23Cruise/Acceleration; 3<=VSP< 6; 25<=Speed<50 24Cruise/Acceleration; 6<=VSP< 9; 25<=Speed<50 25Cruise/Acceleration; 9<=VSP<12; 25<=Speed<50 26Cruise/Acceleration; 12<=VSP; 25<=Speed<50 27Cruise/Acceleration; 12<=VSP<18; 25<=Speed<50 28Cruise/Acceleration; 18<=VSP<24; 25<=Speed<50 29Cruise/Acceleration; 24<=VSP<30; 25<=Speed<50 30Cruise/Acceleration; 30<=VSP; 25<=Speed<50 33Cruise/Acceleration; VSP< 6; 50<=Speed 35Cruise/Acceleration; 6<=VSP<12; 50<=Speed 36Cruise/Acceleration; 12 <= VSP; 50<=Speed 37Cruise/Acceleration; 12<=VSP<18; 50<=Speed 38Cruise/Acceleration; 18<=VSP<24; 50<=Speed 39Cruise/Acceleration; 24<=VSP<30; 50<=Speed 40Cruise/Acceleration; 30<=VSP; 50<=Speed

OpMode Uh-oh!

OpMode Uh-oh!

New Component for Dynameq to Extract the Necessary MOVES Input Data

OpMode 300,000 rows

Emissions Calculation Comparisons 2010 Base VMTPM 10 (g)CO 2 (g) EMME + EMFAC 25,2101,30912,420,539 EMFAC 30,029 2,22417,883,106 Mobile61,28216,591,022 MOVES99717,051,387

Concluding Thoughts MOVES is new standard MOVES is built for a tool like Dynameq INRO Dynameq-MOVES component enables analysis MOVES very difficult to run

Thank You! Chris Breiland