S1,N1 Counters RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa. 4/15 ~ 4/29 S1,N1 Counters in MuID square hole. Lay down on the bottom of garage shielding.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.

Advertisements

magneticnon-magnetic Magnets have a north pole and a south pole. What do you think will happen if we put the north pole of one magnet next to.

Write the words written in RED on your foldable

Works done in 2003 ( Minutes and presentations of the RHIC Experiment Shielding Working Group are kept at :

PHENIX local RUN9 RHIC meeting Manabu Togawa for the PHENIX 1.

Here Comes the Sun!.

E.C. Aschenauer Phil Pile Meeting 2012/03/202 polarisation at injection Blue and Yellow Caveat: only first round of cleaning up noise in polarimeters.

Run 9 polarized proton Log 9 Jan begin 45 degree cool down from room temp (3 MW-NEW) 2 Feb, Cool-down to 4.5 degrees begins 5 Feb, Blue ring cold but still.

ConcepTest 19.3 Magnetic Field xy A proton beam enters into a magnetic field region as shown below. What is the direction of the magnetic field B? 1) +

Identifying and Modeling Coronal Holes Observed by SDO/AIA, STEREO /A and B Using HMI Synchronic Frames X. P. Zhao, J. T. Hoeksema, Y. Liu, P. H. Scherrer.

Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.

Magnet rotated by 5.9 degree Distance from entrance point to magnet right bottom corner m.

Lenz’s Law: B-fields form to produce a frictional resistance against the changes that create them. Generated current creates B-fields which OPPOSE the.

Optical Alignment System (OASys) Masters Thesis of Yuki Ikeda Rikkyo University Presented by Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC 1.

Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.

Status Report on Mk.II Pepperpot Simon Jolly Imperial College 13 th June 2007.

Lecture 29: WED 25 MAR Magnetic Fields Due to Currents II

PHENIX Status, 2/22/11 VTX commissioning on beam Local polarimeter in service 9.6% in blue, -16.6% Residual transverse component for longitudinal beam.

Status of W analysis in PHENIX Central Arm Kensuke Okada (RBRC) For the PHENIX collaboration RHIC Spin Collaboration meeting November 21, /21/20091K.Okada.

By: Caleb VanderWal.  Mix cement  Dig hole at least 24” into the ground  Poor cement in ground with poles  Wait 2-3 days (if you don’t wait that long.

Andrew Glenn 4/21/02 Commissioning and Performance of the. Muon Identifier Andrew Glenn (University of Tennessee), for the PHENIX collaboration April APS.

Run11 MuTrig-FEE Summary RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.

V.Dzhordzhadze1 The Tunnel Background Source Study Vasily Dzhordzhadze University of Tennessee Trigger Upgrade Meeting BNL, April 12, 2004.

The Polar Fields Seen in 17 GHz Microwave Flux and with Magnetographs Leif Svalgaard Stanford University 6 January, 2012.

1 S1,N1 Counters RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa. 2 Paddle right next to beam pipe.

PHENIX Local Polarimeter PSTP 2007 at BNL September 11, 2007 Yuji Goto (RIKEN/RBRC)

Run13 MUID Hit Efficiency RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.

The standard way that runways are named and referred to in aviation

RHIC Experiment Shielding Working Group Status Report Minutes and presentations are kept at :

Magnetism Key Question: Investigation 17A

Aim: How do we use latitude and longitude to find locations?  Topic: Unit 1  Main Idea: Latitude and Longitude.

At the scale of the Milky Way Galaxy, distances are described in terms of Light-years, which is the distance light travels in one year.

Copyright © 2007, Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley. Magnets and the magnetic field Electric currents create magnetic fields.

MuID LL1 Study (update) 09/02/2003 Muon Trigger Upgrade Meeting.

Instrument Calibration.  As previously discussed the principle of measurement is comparing a component against a known standard therefore any equipment.

Performance of the PHENIX Muon Identifier Introduction Calibration with cosmic rays Performance in Au+Au collisions Summary Hiroki Sato, Kyoto University.

Activation around dump shielding, and design of beam line mask Mathieu Baudin, RP Genevieve Steele, EN-STI Helmut Vincke, RP.

Diffractive W/Z Bosons Andrew Brandt UTA Run I Diffractive W/Z Boson Production Recap Run II Preliminary Search for Diffractive Z Bosons (Courtesy of Tamsin.

PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.

STAR pp Run Summary Carl Gagliardi March 11, 2008.

Insert date here Presentation to 4 th PANI 3 Management Committee PANI 3 Results – Ultrasonic Results.

E.C. Aschenauer STAR Spin PWG 2012/03/222  Known complications:  100 GeV: o noise due to pickup especially at injection less significant at flat top.

versus Proton spin vector Double-spin helicity asymmetry: N ++ / L ++  N +  / L +  N ++ / L ++ + N +  / L +  1 P1P2P1P2P1P2P1P2 A LL  Single-spin.

UNIT FIVE: Electricity and Magnetism  Chapter 16 Electricity  Chapter 17 Magnetism.

1 EMCAL Reconstruction in Pass pp 900 GeV 29/03/2010 Gustavo Conesa Balbastre.

MuID Efficiency Study RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa This analysis has been done by Sarah Caussin (ENSICAEN) 1.

Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.

Muon Arm Physics Program Past, Present + Future Patrick L. McGaughey Los Alamos National Laboratory Santa Fe June 17, 2003.

Jamaica 11 Jan.8, 2009 Muon Trigger Upgrade at PHENIX RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa.

1.How much longer does it take for object B to travel 40 yards than it takes for object A? 2.How much further has object A traveled in 10 seconds than.

Possible Improvement of MUID Performance Itaru Nakagawa, Seyoung Han (RIKEN, Ewha/RIKEN)

Status of RHIC Polarization Studies. Summary of Polarization Studies during Run09 Tune scans: – Nearby 0.7 – Near integer tune Polarization ramp measurement.

E.C. Aschenauer RSC - Meeting 2012/03/232  Known complications:  100 GeV: o noise due to pickup especially at injection less significant at flat top.

NEAR DETECTOR SPECTRA AND FAR NEAR RATIOS Amit Bashyal August 4, 2015 University of Texas at Arlington 1.

(Towards a) Luminosity model for LHC and HL-LHC F. Antoniou, M. Hostettler, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Papotti Acknowledgements: Beam-Beam and Luminosity studies.

Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.

Preparation for Run10 RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa. TLD badges (to be replaced every two weeks) Location of dosimeters in MuTr.S St.1 TK361 TK362 TK363 TK364.

1 Single spin asymmetry of forward neutron at PHENIX. 2005/06/02 RBRC workshop "Single-Spin Asymmetries" Manabu Togawa Kyoto-University, RIKEN.

 Grid Systems -how to locate places on a map. Alphanumeric Grid  This type of grid system uses letters and numbers to identify squares in a grid pattern.

Validation of Geant4 against the TARC benchmark: Testing neutron production, transportation and interaction TARC – experimental set-up and aims Geant4.

The PrimEx-I Beam line.

Latitude and Longitude

Latitude and Longitude

LEAST – SQUARES REGRESSION

Common examples:- Sound, slinky springs seismic p waves

Latitude and Longitude

Transformations Review

p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX

SR Update for JLEIC June 8, 2017

Presentation transcript:

S1,N1 Counters RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa

4/15 ~ 4/29 S1,N1 Counters in MuID square hole. Lay down on the bottom of garage shielding.

S1,N1 Ratio to S4,N4 S1 N1 S4 N4 S4/S1N4/N1 Ratio102

1 week sample (South) S4/S1 ~ 10, Consistently

1 week sample (North) N4/N1 ~ 2, Consistently

4/29 ~ S1,N1 Counters are vertically standing right next to the beam pipe N1

S1,N1 Ratio to S4, N4 After blue noise problem resolved South North S4/S1N4/N1 Ratio75

After Access (South) Post Blue Noise Problem Resolved

After Access (North) Post Blue Noise Problem Resolved

Before/After Access (South) Before Access After Access Don’t see drastic change in S1 counter rate

Before/After Access (North) Before Access After Access Obvious rate change in N1 counter rate

So what we learn form it? N1 counter rate trends is comprehensive in terms of the distance from the beam pipe S1 counter cannot be understood by the radial dependence of backgrounds. –Somehow locally hot? –Parallel flux traveling outside beam pipe happen to have weak radial dependence? –Background components with transverse momemtum? –…

Correlation with MuID (Before Access) S1 N1 S4 N4

Correlation with MuID (After Access) South North

Summary MuID background condition is stable before/after access. (simply scales with lumi) North & South MuID currents show different behavior –South background: Gap0>>Gap1, Gap4> Gap3, Gap2 –North background: Gap4, Gap0>>Gap1,Gap2,Gap3 -> suffered from BG from upstream beam line –Gap0 (South) > Gap0 (North) –Gap4 (North) > Gap4 (South) Is the high current in South gap-0 correlated with high rates S1 observed below beam pipe? –Not sure. At least z-position is around gap4.

Outlook Compare with Run08, 500 GeV. Investigate further about South backgrounds. Gap0 and high rates away from beam pipe in MuID square hole. The interesting candidate of next S1 counter condition is –Move as close as possible to Gap-0 in z. –Rotate paddle by 90 degrees to face beam pipe. (Presently facing DX magnet) to measure transverse component of backgrounds.