MODEL FOR GMO IMPURITY QUANTIFICATION IN SOY BEANS SEED PRODUCTION Lidia Esteve-Agelet 25 th April, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phosphorus and Potassium CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Advertisements

Stat 112: Lecture 7 Notes Homework 2: Due next Thursday The Multiple Linear Regression model (Chapter 4.1) Inferences from multiple regression analysis.
Precision Planting Steven Snelson. Precision  Definition of precision-  Webster’s defines precision as “the quality or state of being precise”  They.
Grazing Corn Stalk Residue With Beef Cows
Experiences with PSNT in North Carolina David H. Hardy Soil Testing Section Agronomic Division- NCDA&CS.
CONSEQUENCES OF PROPOSED EU LEGISLATION ON THRESHOLDS FOR THE ADVENTITIOUS PRESENCE OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERED (GE) SEEDS. Janet Cotter, Greenpeace Science.
5/12/20151 Reducing Harvest Losses Combine Calibration John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist North Dakota State University.
Drainage Water Management to meet Agronomic and Environmental goals University of Minnesota Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate Southwest Research and Outreach.
2005 UN report by 1300 scientists, in 95 countries says that 60 % of earth’s capacity for life: water, soil, biodiversity, is seriously degraded by human.
1 University Of Khartoum Faculty Of Engineering Department Of Agricultural Development Of an electric drive for planter seed metering AMR ALI ELMADIH FALZA.
Corn is America’s number one crop. It grows on every continent except Antarctica. In the Midwest corn is one of the leading crops grown. With our.
Jane Dever Associate Professor – Cotton Breeder Member, USDA National Genetic Resources Advisory Council Welcome to Hong Kong.
GMO in food affecting Biology Nicole Rockhold. GMO Original DNA structure has been changed Goal of genetically modified plants Aim to make plants resistant.
Soil Effects on Water Quality Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension.
TRANSGENIC:HOW THEY AFFECT ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN NORTH DAKOTA Brad Brummond NDSU Extension Service/ Walsh County 2002.
Kim Lyons WSU Energy Program All Extension Conference March 7, 2007 Biofuels in Washington.
Partial Budgeting AAE 320 Paul D. Mitchell. Goal 1.Explain purpose of partial budgets 2.Illustrate their structure and use 3.Give some examples.
NAEGA. Biotechnology In Grain Trade Practical Issues for Global Trade December 5, 2003 North American Export Grain Association.
Oklahoma State University Sorghum Headworm Sequential Sampling System Tom A. Royer Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology.
Experimental Methods for Measuring Demand. Goal: To set the optimum price for a new product Discrete choice models Assumptions – Participants must be.
The Impact of Genetically Engineered Crops on Farm Sustainability in the United States Public Briefing NAS Lecture Room April 13, 2010.
1 Texas Liquid Fertilizer Sorghum TLF Commitment to you Increase yields Lower Costs Help solve those production problems that limit profitability.
GM vs CONVENTIONAL A PRODUCTION ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE By: Dr. Duane R. Berglund Professor of Agronomy North Dakota State University.
Precision Seeding Matt Braun Soil 4213.
Yield Monitors and Their Applications to Today’s Farmer
18.3 GMO, GMF & Cloning p Read it!!! It Helps!!!!
© 2006 Jones and Bartlett Publishers Chapter 15Complex Inheritance 15.1quantitative traits 15.2gene/environment interactions 15.3artificial selection.
IP GRAINS - GROWING, HANDLING, STORAGE & MARKETING George Flaskerud NDSU Extension Economist Sept. 22, 2005
From Seed to the Supermarket By Blake Stewart. Seed Patenting  The patenting of seeds was first permitted under the Plant Patent Act of  This.
CGCI1 Marketing to the “GMO Sensitive” Lynn Clarkson Clarkson Grain Co., Inc. August Supply Chain Isolation.
The case against GM crops Alissa Cook policy officer Soil Association.
Management of Milk Thistle Quality D. Waterer J. Wahab D. Cooper.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
2002 Sunflower Survey Art Lamey Emeritus Professor North Dakota State University.
The Health Costs of Pollution. How many chemicals are out there? In the US we introduce 1,000 new chemicals every year. In the US we introduce 1,000 new.
Generalities & Qualitative Testing Plans May 8-10, 2006 Iowa State University, Ames – USA Jean-Louis Laffont Kirk Remund.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings PowerPoint ® Slides prepared by Jay Withgott and Heidi Marcum Copyright © 2008.
COEXISTENCE IN NORTH DAKOTA Brad Brummond September 2005.
PLC: Corn 2014 Payment Potential Notes: PLC payments are made on 85% of base acres. Marketing Year Price ($/bu) PLC Payment Rate ($/bu) PLC Payment ($/base.
Oilseed Workshop Mark Welch Texas AgriLife Extension Service Texas A&M University System Wichita Falls, Texas December 11, 2008.
Chapter 5: Introductory Linear Regression
Diffentiating GMOs From Non-GMOS Troy G. Schmitz Assistant Professor Morrison School of Agribusiness Charles B. Moss Andrew Schmitz Presented at: Free.
Unit 7: Tillage & Seeding
Chapter 5: Introductory Linear Regression. INTRODUCTION TO LINEAR REGRESSION Regression – is a statistical procedure for establishing the relationship.
RECENT TRENDS IN POWER SYSTEMS
Biotechnology North Carolina. Biotechnology Terms.
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering QUB 1 Phosphate removal from water using dolomites and constructed wetlands Professor Stephen Allen & Dr Gavin.
BEAN OR GENE ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PRODUCTION OF THE GLYPHOSATE RESISTANT SOYBEAN Power Point created by Shayla Kisling Georgia Agriculture Education.
PURSUIT OF SUSTAINABLE HIGH-YIELDING SOYBEANS
The Future of Family Farms By Neil E. Harl Iowa State University
Biotechnology 101 Wendy Srnic,
WORKSHOP ON CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS ISSUES SURROUNDING GMO’S
Stewardship Revision Quiz
Wheat: Harvest and Review of Steps for Good Wheat Management
Habits of Financially Resilient Farms - continued
PRINCIPLES OF CROP PRODUCTION ABT-320 (3 CREDIT HOURS)
Industrial Beet Grower Discussion
Off-Road Equipment Management TSM 262: Spring 2016
What Is Up with Soybean Yields?
Growth Stress Response (Agronomical Stress Response)
Third World Hand Planter
2013 Crop Market Outlook Grain Marketing and Risk Management Seminar
John McGillicuddy
Commodity Market Outlook
PRAB Dry Bean Research Priorities Meeting 2.19
Crop Outlook Beginning Farmer Network Meeting Ames, Iowa Oct. 4, 2010
Crop Market Outlook Town and Country Kiwanis Ames, Iowa June 25, 2016
lbs/ac Fixed N Soil N Total N Vetch Rye 57 Total 58 68
Evaluating “Ultra-Early” Corn Hybrids
Associate Professor/Crop Marketing Specialist
Presentation transcript:

MODEL FOR GMO IMPURITY QUANTIFICATION IN SOY BEANS SEED PRODUCTION Lidia Esteve-Agelet 25 th April, 2005

THE GMO IMPURITY CONCERN The adventitious presence of genetically engineered material Where do impurities come from?  Natural sources Cross pollination Segregation Residual seeds  Human handling factors

THE GMO IMPURITY CONCERN Varietal identity preservation Consumers pressure Environmental risks Health risks Lower impurity thresholds

THE GMO IMPURITY CONCERN The consequences:  Loss of market  Rejected or penalized shipments  Economic loss

OBJECTIVES Create a simple screening model for predicting the total impurity in soy bean seed production Identify the critical stages of contamination in the process

THE MODEL - STAGES- Initial Impurity Planter Combine Truck Negligible: -Cross pollination -Dormant seeds

THE MODEL -ASSUMPTIONS- 30 inches row space in field Seed rates and yield considered independent Medium seed size : seeds = 1 lb Contamination is additive Not seed losses, only replaced Germination of 90% Homogeneity/perfect mixture/isotropic

THE MODEL -VARIABLES- X1: Rate seeds/acre: – seeds/acre. X2: Seed initial impurity in %: 0.5-2%. X3: Planter impurity in %: over total planted seed. for 1 acre around 0.05% max. (Hanna, 2004) X4: Yield in bushels per acre bu/ac. X5: Combine impurity in %: 1 acre around 0.06% max. (Hanna, 2004) X6: Truck capacity in pounds: lb. X7: Impurity in trucks % over capacity: 0-0.2% (Ruiz-Diaz, 2005) Independent variables

THE MODEL -VARIABLES- Dependent variables Y1: Total impurity in truck (lb) Y2 : % impurity over the total loaded in truck Y3: weight of impurity (lb) /acre of crop

THE MODEL -MAIN EQUATIONS- Y1 =(((((X2 / 100) * X1 + (X3 /100)*X1)*0.9*X4*(60 / X1)) + + ((X5 / 100) * (X4 / 2800) * 60)) * (X7 / (X4 * 60))) + + ((X6 / 100) * X7) Y2 = (Y1 / X7) * 100 Y3 = Y1 / (X7 / (X4 * 60))

Excel Program of the model (Visual Basic macro)

CONCLUSIONS The variables required for the model have to be taken from the given ranges in order to get consequent results Results in accordance with several reports  GMO impurity about 0.1-1% (Quisel, 2004)  % impurity in oilseeds (Genetic Engineering Newsletter – Special Issue 11/12, 2003) The impurity from trucks and initial impurity in seeds are the most relevant pollution sources in the model. Impurity from combine seems to be almost negligible.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dr. Thomas J. Brumm for his advises and assessment about the topic Dr. H. Mark Hanna for the clean out information Dorivar Ruiz-Diaz for the collaboration in programming and agronomic assessments Thanks;