September 25, 2008 PROBATION ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY (PANJ) Separate alcohol from the offender... and your job will get much easier.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impaired Driving Inside and Outside the Front Gate Robert E. Weltzer, Ph.D. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

Ignition Interlock Devices: An Overview John M. Priester NHTSA/ABA Judicial Fellow Administrative Law Judge Iowa Dept. of Inspections & Appeals.
TRAFFIC INJURY RESEARCH FOUNDATION A DRIVING FORCE FOR SAFETY Status and Vision of Ignition Interlock Use Robyn Robertson, M.C.A. Traffic Injury Research.
NM Statewide Traffic Records System Ignition Interlock Data Analysis Application System Project Certification Overview Prepared by: NM-DOT Traffic Safety.
TRAFFIC SAFETY BUREAU – PROGRAMS DIVISION Ignition Interlock Data Analysis Project (IIDA) Project Closeout Presentation January 27, 2010.
Continuous Alcohol Monitoring and the SCRAM System Greater Littleton Youth Initiative September 11, 2009.
Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health Partnerships Review of projects recognizing the needs of and providing treatment supports to DUI offenders Nisha.
1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
El Paso County COMMUNITY CUSTODY PROGRAM AN OVERVIEW Originally Presented to EPC Board of County Commissioners November 14, 2002 CCP.
Ignition Interlock Devices Explained. Texas DWI Statistics  Texas was number 1 in 2003 in the number of traffic fatalities involving alcohol. California.
SCRAMx: The Story of Continuous Alcohol Monitoring Presenter Name and Date Making a Difference.
Traffic Laws – Chapter 7 Remember: Driving is a privilege, NOT A RIGHT!! The length of your suspension depends on the laws that you break!! BE RESPONSIBLE!!
By: David Salinas.  Driving while either intoxicated or drunk is dangerous and drivers with high blood alcohol content or concentration (BAC) are at.
Chapter 7 DRIVER PRIVILEGES AND PENALTIES.
879 Productions Presents Copyright 2000 Alcohol, Drugs & Driving with Officer Darin “Crash” Leonard.
 Take a Handout (Effects of Alcohol)  Using the Pages of the NJ Driver’s Manual answer the questions  We will be going over.
Misdemeanor Sanctions
Effective and Ineffective Laws To Reduce Drunk Driving Richard Roth, PhD Executive Director, Impact DWI Citizen Lobbyist and Research Consultant Supported.
An approach for the judicial system to reduce the influence of drug and alcohol abuse on crime.
THE 24/7 SOBRIETY PROJECT. Origins Created by South Dakota Created by South Dakota Has existed since 2005 Has existed since 2005 Now in use in 57 of 66.
Austin American Statesman August 21, 2007 Texas leads nation in number of drunken driving deaths WASHINGTON BUREAU Tuesday, August 21, 2007 WASHINGTON.
Why is It Difficult to Try a Drugged Driving Case in Florida? Some Brief Observations from the Bench by Senior Judge Karl Grube.
National Partnership on Alcohol Misuse and Crime Alcohol Monitoring Technologies Breath Alcohol Detection November 10, 2009.
Roth 2/22/07Minnesota Interlock Symposium1 New York Times Editorial November 25, “The initial (MADD) goal, which is backed by associations of State.
Roth 8/26/ Interlock Symposium1 New Mexico Ignition Interlock: Laws, Regulations, Utilization, Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Fairness 8.
Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.1 Regaining Control of Revoked DWI Offenders Interlocks As an Alternative To Hard License Revocation Substance.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015.
NASPA Conference March 28, 2004 Presented by: Carole W. Middlebrooks University of Georgia.
Driver Education Chapter 7: Driver Privileges and Penalties.
Iowa’s Impaired Driving Records Demonstration Project Traffic Records Forum July 16, 2003 Mary Jensen Iowa Department of Transportation Traffic Records.
Drunk Driving: A Strategy for Reducing Recidivism 12 th Annual Michigan Traffic Safety Summit Tuesday March 13, 2006 Bradley Finegood, MA, LLPC.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
Forensic Science Ch. 6 Toxicology ToxicologyAlcohol Testing for Alcohol Role of Toxicologist
Evidenced-Based Effective Strategies for Alcohol Related Injury Intermediate Injury Prevention Course Indian Health Service.
Community Sanctions in Croatia Neven Ricijaš, Ph.D. Department of Behavior Disorders Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Science University of Zagreb.
The Juvenile Justice System 4.1 – Introduction to Juvenile Justice System October 1,
Public Safety Improvement Act. Criminal Justice Initiative Work Group Process 35+ stakeholder meetings 6 meetings from July through October 2012 – Analyzed.
Blame it on the ALCOHOL. Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) amount of alcohol in your system based on a test of your breath, blood or urine. illegal to.
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
Objectives: SWBAT Analyze the impact of recidivism on society Identify key aspects of the Juvenile Justice System 1.
Justice Assistance October 6,  Management Information System (MIS) upgraded – separating all remaining FVI components.  Purchased computer system.
IGNITION INTERLOCKS How To Use Them Effectively to Reduce Drunk Driving Richard Roth, PhD ICADTS at TRB Sunday January 12, 2014.
1 An Introduction to the Minnesota Epidemiological Profile Minnesota State Epidemiological Workgroup and Minnesota Institute of Public Health Fall Forums.
DRIVING PRIVILEGES AND PENALTIES Chapter 7 The Driving Privilege Driving is a privilege NOT a right State law allows or requires an individual’s driving.
Chapter 6 Driving Privileges and Penalties. How to Lose Driving Privileges failure to appear in court or to pay fines failure to pay surcharges driving.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
IGNITION INTERLOCKS AND DRUNK DRIVING Richard Roth, PhD Lifesavers March 27, 2011 Abridged Version of Region 2 Ignition Interlock Institute Presentation.
Alcohol Interlocks and Continuous Alcohol Monitoring.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
DUI and other Drug Treatment Dockets Facts and Figures.
October 22, 2006Administrative vs Judicial1 Administrative vs. Judicial Interlock Programs A Roundtable & Debate on Pros and Cons Presenters: Robert Voas,
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
AAMVA Ignition Interlock Working Group J.T. Griffin Chief Government Affairs Officer MADD Name.
Unit 4: Forensic Toxicology Mr. Ross Brown Brooklyn School for Law and Technology.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Status and Effectiveness of Ignition Interlock Laws Richard Roth, PhD 2012 MADD National Conference September 29, 2012 Research Supported By NM TSB, NHTSA,
MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH THE IGNTION INTERLOCK Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court First Offender’s Program Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Road Safety Research Office Ministry of Transportation of Ontario
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
BCJ 3150, Probation and Parole
Reducing DWI With Interlocks The New Mexico Experience
MADD Director of State Government Affairs
A MULTI-TRACK DUI COURT SYSTEM FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS
Maureen Perkins Impaired Driving Division
Teenage Drinking and driving
Why You Need a DUI Court and How to Get Started
Chapter 7: Driver Privileges and Penalties
Chapter 7: Driver Privileges and Penalties
Mothers against drunk driving (madd)
Presentation transcript:

September 25, 2008 PROBATION ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY (PANJ) Separate alcohol from the offender... and your job will get much easier.

David Connon Mid-Atlantic Region Manager Dick Irrer Director, Northern Region Alcohol Monitoring Systems Inc.

SCRAM VIDEO

Corporate office located in Littleton, CO Company founded in years and $20+ million in R&D Privately funded Product introduction in March employees Alcohol Monitoring Systems (AMS)

AMS Reputation in the Industry CAM Market Leadership Largest provider of electronic alcohol monitoring Strong relationships with national special interest groups:  Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD)  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)  National Institutes of Health (NIH)  American Probation & Parole Association (APPA)  National Association of Drug Court Professionals (NADCP)

Alcohol – A Difficult Problem for the Criminal Justice System Legal Substance Socially Acceptable Available Almost Anywhere Driving While Intoxicated (33%) Domestic Violence (75%) Other Criminal Behavior(36%) $184,700,000,000/alcohol abuse

*Nationally – 12,998 DUI Fatalities in 2007 * New Jersey – 724 DUI Fatalities in 2007 Alcohol : A Difficult Problem for the Criminal Justice System ** New Jersey Domestic Violence Incidents, 35,589, January – June 2007 * NHTSA DWI Fatality Statistics ** 2007 NJ Uniform Crime Report ** New Jersey DWI Arrests – 13,359 January – June 2007

Alcohol – A Difficult Problem for the Criminal Justice System Some People simply should not drink alcohol Separating Alcohol from the Offender Why is it so Difficult? Rapid Metabolism (Absorption/Elimination) Need for Consistency Need for Accuracy Positive Identification Incident Reporting Manpower Intensive

Alcohol – A Difficult Problem for the Criminal Justice System Alcohol Testing Technologies Personal Breath Testers Urine Testing Remote Breath Testers Vehicle Ignition Interlock ALL ARE POINT-IN-TIME MEASUREMENTS

Alcohol metabolizes quickly  Offenders can drink around random breathalyzer tests Breathalyzer Test 7 AM Offender Starts Drinking 6 PM Breathalyzer Test 5 PM Offender Peaks Offender is Sober 6 AM Breathalyzer Test 7 AM Unless you're lucky, random point-in-time testing will miss most drinking events Why random testing does not work

Continuous offender accountability Automated 24 x 7 testing Comprehensive next-day reporting Court-supported technology What Is needed?

Alcohol metabolizes quickly  CAM monitors an offender’s alcohol consumption continuously, 24x7! CAM Testing Methods Offender Peaks Entire drinking event is recorded Offender Starts Drinking 6 PM Offender is Sober 6 AM

The Role of Continuous Alcohol Monitoring Assess  Identify/Direct Offenders to treatment and supervision Detect  Improve Supervision/Intervention  Separate Compliant from Noncompliant Offenders Deter  Offender Accountability – Stay Sober or Else  Enhance Public Safety Separate Alcohol From the Offender Assess Detect Deter

At The Core: Responsibility & Accountability Shift Responsibility/Accountability to Offender  24 x7 Testing vs. Point in Time Testing  Cannot Drink Around 24x7 Testing  Awareness of Testing Increases Successes  Long-Term Abstinence Increases Success Rates “

SCRAM – Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor Worn on the ankle 24/7 Goes where the offender goes Tests for alcohol every 30 minutes Uses transdermal technology to measure alcohol as it evaporates through the skin Automatically collects, stores, and transfers all data to the SCRAM modem on a predetermined schedule

SCRAM System Components SCRAM ankle bracelet  Secured to offenders leg SCRAM modem  Plugs into an analog telephone line  Stores alcohol readings, tamper alerts, and diagnostic data  Sends all data to SCRAMNET SCRAMNET  Web-based application managed by AMS where offender data is collected, stored, and analyzed

The SCRAM System

What Does SCRAM Detect? Alcohol Tampers/Obstructions Environmental Interferrants

Non-compliant offender: SCRAM Detected the Consumption of Alcohol SCRAM GRAPHS

Non-compliant Offender - Obstruction SCRAM GRAPHS

Environmental Interferant Detected

Transdermal Alcohol Testing A percentage of alcohol is excreted unchanged wherever water is removed from the body – breath, urine, perspiration, and saliva Unaltered alcohol excretion permits an accurate measurement using both breath and insensible skin perspiration

Transdermal Testing  Used as a screening device to determine whether a small, moderate, or large amount of alcohol has been consumed  Does not produce a specific BAC reading  Recent studies conclude that transdermal alcohol readings correlate with BAC readings  Transdermal testing has a time delay in the absorption, peak, and elimination of alcohol

Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) Transdermal Alcohol Content (TAC) Absorption and Elimination Rates

SCRAM Research NHTSA  “Evaluating Transdermal Alcohol Measuring Devices” University of Colorado Health Sciences  “Validity of Transdermal Alcohol Monitoring: Fixed and Self- Regulated Dosing” (Sakai JT (2006) Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 30:1, 26-33) Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF) Other Studies  National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (NLECTC)- NW in Alaska  Acadiana Criminalistics Laboratory, LA  Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC)

DUI Offenses Domestic Violence Family Court Underage Drinking SCRAM Usage in the Criminal Justice System Prison Overcrowding Condition of Bail Probation/Parole Sanction/Sentence

AMS-Supported Court Hearings SCRAM technology is upheld in court hearings and challenges across the country  50 evidentiary hearings in 19 States  19 hearings resulted in Frye/Daubert rulings  18 of 19 courts determined that evidence was admissible

Program Efficiency 14,8881, %8.2%.0033% of non-compliant offenders

SCRAM TODAY* 155,151,236 tests performed 73,533 offenders monitored SCRAM programs in 46 states Over 1650 courts and agencies using SCRAM * As of August 31, 2008

SCRAM Program Objectives Ensure participants maintain sobriety Increase accountability of participants through continuous monitoring Provide alternatives to court system Reduce recidivism by addressing root cause of the problem and modifying behavior Decrease impact of DUI and alcohol-related cases on the system Provide evidence-based program statistics

SCRAM Program Summary Proven Product & Technology Peer Reviewed Court Validated National Acceptance Addresses Root Cause of Alcohol Problem Assesses the offender’s alcohol problem Places compliance responsibility on the offender Provides for rapid intervention upon violation Provides constant awareness – deterrence Successful Program Implementations Across a broad spectrum of criminal-justice applications

Questions and Answers? Thank you for your time