Delayed Neurotoxicity The cumulative risk at 5 years to develop overt dementia is 24-30% (1,2). For patients aged >60 year the risk of dementia at 7 years.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLINICAL TRIALS IN CERVICAL CANCER Cancer Institute (WIA) experience.
Advertisements

Integration of Taxanes in the Management of Breast Cancer
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
13th Annual Hematology & Breast Cancer Update Update in Lymphoma
Relapse in Children with ALL By Dr Kaji Protocol for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Relapse IN LANZKOWSKY.
Metastatic Gastric Cancer
A Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial of Acupuncture for Treatment of Radiation-Induced Xerostomia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer CCOP Investigators’
Overview of Methotrexate Clinical Evaluations Malcolm Smith, MD, PhD Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program National Cancer Institute FDA Pediatric ODAC Meeting.
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Dr. Rico Liu Consultant, Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital Honorary Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Oncology, The.
Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell carcinoma.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
The Patient Undergoing Surgery: Proven Steps to Better Outcomes Ariel U. Spencer, MD Lafayette Surgical Clinic Lafayette, Indiana.
H. Koivunoro1, E. Hippelänen1, I. Auterinen2, L. Kankaanranta3, M
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Xeloda ® plus oxaliplatin: rationale in colorectal cancer (CRC)  Oxaliplatin is active in CRC, especially when combined with 5-FU/leucovorin (LV)  Superior.
Follicular & Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas. Five-year TTF and Response Duration (RD) According to FLIPI Risk Group R-CHOPCHOPP value TTF Low-risk
First Year Workshop 2014 Miriam Lafiandra
Role of PCI in Small Cell Lung Cancer Dr. Litan Naha Biswas Apollo Gleanagles Hospital, Kolkata.
Results: In the presence of PD measurements, PK data provided little additional information. By a limited PD sampling the number of patients on target.
The General Concepts of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Hartmut Derendorf, PhD University of Florida.
Validity of more than 30Gy radiation therapy for long-surviving patients with painful bone metastases E.Katayama 1,2, H.Okada 1, I.Asakawa 2, T.Tamamoto.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
CTOS, 12 th Annual Meeting, Venice 2-4 November 2006 INCIDENCE OF DELAYS IN CHEMOTHERAPY DUE TO METHOTREXATE TOXICITY IN TREATMENT OF OSTEOSARCOMA M. Perisoglou,
Adjuvant radiochemotherapy in head and neck tumors H. Christiansen and C. F. Hess Department of Radiotherapy Goettingen University.
Can cancer brain metastases be treated using humanized monoclonal antibodies: a pilot pharmacological study Guilhem BOUSQUET, Anne JANIN University Paris.
Rituximab efficacy in other haematological malignancies Christian Buske.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
Axel Grothey, MD Professor of Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota Strategies to Improve Patient Outcomes in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
Mathematical Modelling within Radiotherapy: The 5 R’s of Radiotherapy and the LQ model. Helen McAneney 1 and SFC O’Rourke 1,2 1 School Mathematics and.
Genetic Variability and Cancer Germline polymorphisms are frequent: 1 SNP every bp (> 1 per gene) Cancer has acquired mutations (some tumor “mutations”
The General Concepts of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Hormone treatment combined with radiotherapy
TDM Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer: Where are we now ? Leonard Saltz, MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Blood-Brain Barrier 강 경 태 Contents 1. BBB Fundamentals 2. Effects of Brain Penetration 3. Structure-BBB Penetration Relationships 4. Structure.
The General Concepts of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
Do We Need to Optimize Protein Binding in Drug Discovery? NEDMDG Summary Meeting Xingrong Liu, Ph.D. Genentech.
415 PHT Plasma Level – Time Curve
What Factors Predict Outcome At Relapse After Previous Esophagectomy And Adjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Esophageal Cancer? Edward Yu 1, Patricia Tai 5,
Daunorubicin VS Mitoxantrone VS Idarubicin As Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia : The EORTC and GIMEMA Groups.
WP2. Combined effect of charged particles irradiation and anticancer drugs in cultured human tumor cells (Milano and Roma 3, collaboration with CNAO and.
종양혈액내과 R4 고원진 / pf. 김시영 Rectal cancer : state of the art in 2012 Curr Opin Oncol 2012, 24:441–447.
Drug Response Relationships
RBE: open issues and next challenges Francesco Tommasino Workshop: la radiobiologia in INFN Trento, Maggio 2016.
Results from the International, Randomized Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib versus Chlorambucil in Patients 65 Years and Older with Treatment-Naïve CLL/SLL (RESONATE-2TM)1.
Summary Author: Dr. C. Tom Kouroukis, MD MSc FRCPC
Development of novel therapeutic agents for neuroblastoma through iron and cholesterol metabolisms study Sang Y. Lee, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department.
Camacho et al, Fig. S1 a c e b d f
Feasibility of hippocampal sparing radiation therapy for glioblastoma using helical Tomotherapy Dr Kamalram THIPPU JAYAPRAKASH1,2,3, Dr Raj JENA1,4 and.
Table 1 Symptoms and signs at presentation
Chapter 1 Introduction to Biopharmaceutics & Pharmacokinetics
Pharmacokinetics: Drug Distribution and Drug Reservoirs
Pharmacokinetics: Drug Distribution and Drug Reservoirs
RAT SIMULATION RESULTS HUMAN SIMULATION RESULTS
Figure 1 Underreporting of treatment-related toxicities by physicians, relative to patients with either advanced-stage lung cancer, or early-stage breast.
Stephen Ansell, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic
Figure 3 Drug cycling with collateral sensitivity
Predictive Performance of a Myelosuppression Model for Dose Individualization; Impact of Type and Amount of Information Provided Johan E. Wallin, Lena.
Pollyea DA et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6505.
Introduction to Pharmacology
高雄榮民總醫院耳鼻喉頭頸部 林陞樵 林曜祥 康柏皇 張庭碩
Radiosensitization by combined Wee1 and PARP inhibition.
Plasma concentration-time profile after oral administration of a single dose. Plasma concentration-time profile after oral administration of a single dose.
How I treat primary CNS lymphoma
Presentation transcript:

Delayed Neurotoxicity The cumulative risk at 5 years to develop overt dementia is 24-30% (1,2). For patients aged >60 year the risk of dementia at 7 years is 58% (2). Multivariate analysis shows that only radiotherapy is a significant factor related to neurotoxicity (1). By 4 years fatal neurotoxicity rate is 10% (3). (1) Omuro A.M. et al: Arch Neurol 62: , 2005 (2) O’Brien P.C. et al: Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 64:408-16, 2006 (3) Fisher B et al: J Neuro-Oncol 74: , 2005

Delayed Neurotoxicity By 4 years fatal neurotoxicity rate is 10% Modification of the RT schedule to a 25% reduction in biologically effective tumor dose (36Gy/30 fractions/3 wks) – delayed but did not eliminate fatal neurotoxicity Reduction of RT dose did not compromise treatment outcome Fisher B et al: J Neuro-Oncol 74: , 2005

Delayed Neurotoxicity O’Brien P.C. et al: Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 64:408-13, 2006

Fractional Delivery of Chemotherapeutic Agents Across the BBB and BTB Local Exposure Fraction MTX FU AZQ BCNU Drug Normal Brain Increased Permeability = 0.1 ml/g/min

Methods to Increase Drug Delivery Increase delivery of systemic drug administration (intravascular drugs) Increase drug delivery by local administration (intra-CSF; intra-parenchymal-CED)

 Manipulating the drug (chemical modifications, prodrugs)  Increasing the fraction of the drug reaching the tumor (High-dose chemotherapy, intra-arterial administration)  Manipulating the capillary permeability (osmotic BBBD, chemical modification of BBB/BTB, receptor mediated transport) Increase Delivery of Intravascular Drugs

Manipulating the drug (chemical modifications, prodrugs)

Manipulating the drug (chemical modifications, prodrugs) Increase the fraction of the drug reaching the tumor (High-dose chemotherapy, intra-arterial administration) Manipulating the capillary permeability (osmotic BBBD, chemical modification of BBB/BTB, receptor mediated transport) Increase delivery of intravascular drugs

Increase the Fraction of the Drug Reaching the Tumor: HD-Chemotherapy Increase plasma concentration with systemic rescue maneuvers  High-dose MTX + folinic acid rescue  High-dose Ara-C + granulocytic growth factor  High dose chemotherapy with stem cell support Rescue maneuvers reduce systemic toxicity and make the treatment relatively safe. Still, systemic toxicity is the major limiting factor.

Several studies tried to use intensive chemotherapy as the sole treatment for PCNSL but their limitations proved to be either:  A low response rate (25% CR) (single agent HD-MTX) (1)  A short duration of response (2)  A high rate of treatment-related death (9-10%) (3). High Dose Chemotherapy in PCNSL (1) Herrlinger U. et al: Ann Neurol 51: , 2002 (2) Abrey L..E. et al: J Clin Oncol 21: , 2003 (3) Pels H. et al: J Clin Oncol 21: , 2003

% of treatment cycles Author I.V. MTX dose with CSF MTX level (gr/m2) > 1 mmol/L Thyss % Thyss % Millot % Borsi % Pharmacokinetics of HD-MTX Human Studies

CSF MTX concentrations: marked interindividual variability. Cytotoxic concentrations are obtained with marked increment of the total dose (to 6-8 gr/m2). The mean AUC ratio (CSF/serum) MTX: % (systemic dose: gr/m2 ) reflecting the poor diffusion of MTX into the CNS.

MTX Pharmacokinetics Human studies evaluated CSF MTX. Peak CSF MTX concentrations are observed between 4-6 hrs after MTX infusion while serum levels are rapidly declining. Do CSF MTX levels reflect parenchymal drug penetration? CSF peak levels may reflect the sink effect or the washout of the drug from the brain and tumor extracellular space.

Methotrexate Pharmacokinetics in Dog After BBBD Neuwelt et al, Neurosurgery 7:36-43,1980 CSF Brain

Pharmacokinetics of MTX in the ECF of Brain Tumor Plasma total MTX Plasma free MTX ECF MTX i.v. MTX infusion Dukic et al, Pharmaceutical Res 16: ,1999 AUC ECF /AUC Plasma % ( ) AUC ECF /AUC Plasma % ( )

MTX Penetration in Brain Tumor AUC ECF /AUC Plasma i.v. bolus: % i.v. infusion: % AUC ECF /AUC Plasma i.v. bolus: % i.v. infusion: % Dukic et al, Europ J Cancer 36: ,2000 Plasma ECF Bolus

n=13 n=16 PCNSL and HD-MTX: Rapid (3 hrs) vs. Regular (6 hrs) Infusion of MTX Rapid Regular CSF MTX ConcentrationTumor VolumeRelapse-Free Survival Higara et al, J Neurosurgery 91:221-30,1999 P<0.001 Rapid Regular P<0.001