Huichao Song The Ohio State University Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Viscous Hydro +URQMD In collaboration with S.Bass, U.Heinz, C.Shen, P.Huovinen &

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

QGP Viscosity & Elliptic Flow for Multi-strange Hadrons

Advertisements

Dynamic Modeling for Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

New Results from Viscous Hydro + URQMD (VISHNU) International School for High Energy Nuclear Collisions, Wuhan, Oct 31- Nov.5, 2011 References: Supported.

Marcus Bleicher, Berkeley, Oct Elliptic Flow in High Energetic Nuclear Collisions Marcus Bleicher & Xianglei Zhu FIAS & Institut für Theoretische.

Elliptic flow of thermal photons in Au+Au collisions at 200GeV QNP2009 Beijing, Sep , 2009 F.M. Liu Central China Normal University, China T. Hirano.

Supported by DOE 11/22/2011 QGP viscosity at RHIC and LHC energies 1 Huichao Song 宋慧超 Seminar at the Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study, USTC.

第19回Heavy Ion Café並びに第12回Heavy Ion Pub合同研究会

Effects of Bulk Viscosity on p T -Spectra and Elliptic Flow Parameter Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Japan Collaborator:

Hadronic Rescattering Effects after Hadronization of QGP Fluids Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo Workshop “Hadronization” in.

Hadronic dissipative effects on transverse dynamics at RHIC Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The Univ. of Tokyo QM2008, Feb. 4-10, 2008 TH, U.Heinz, D.Kharzeev,

Collective Flow from QGP Hydro + Hadronic Cascade Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics The Univ. of Tokyo ISMD, Aug. 4-10, 2007 TH, U.Heinz, D.Kharzeev, R.Lacey,

Mass ordering of differential elliptic flow and its violation for  mesons Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics, The Univ. of Tokyo Matsumoto, Feb ,

Measurement of v 2 and v 4 in Au+Au Collisions at different beam energy from PHENIX Shengli Huang for PHENIX Collaboration Vanderbilt University.

Phase transition of hadronic matter in a non-equilibrium approach Graduate Days, Frankfurt, , Hannah Petersen, Universität Frankfurt.

First Results From a Hydro + Boltzmann Hybrid Approach DPG-Tagung, Darmstadt, , Hannah Petersen, Universität Frankfurt.

1 Questions about sQGP Carlos Arguello Columbia University 24 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics April 10 th 2008.

What can we learn from hydrodynamic analysis at RHIC? Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics, Columbia Univ. Workshop on Quark-Gluon-Plasma Thermalization August.

Freeze-Out in a Hybrid Model Freeze-out Workshop, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Hannah Petersen.

The centrality dependence of elliptic flow Jean-Yves Ollitrault, Clément Gombeaud (Saclay), Hans-Joachim Drescher, Adrian Dumitru (Frankfurt) nucl-th/

Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro Problem: all fluids have some viscosity -- can we measure it? I. Radial flow fluctuations:

Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro Problem: all fluids have some viscosity -- can we measure it? I. Transverse flow fluctuations:

Effects of Bulk Viscosity at Freezeout Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo Collaborator: Tetsufumi Hirano Nagoya Mini-Workshop.

Viscous hydrodynamics DPF 2009 Huichao Song The Ohio State University Supported by DOE 07/30/2009 July 27-July 31, Detroit, MI with shear and bulk viscosity.

Spectra Physics at RHIC : Highlights from 200 GeV data Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez ISMD ‘02, Alushta, Ukraine Sep 9, 2002.

Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro Problem: all fluids have some viscosity -- can we measure it? I. Radial flow fluctuations:

Longitudinal de-correlation of anisotropic flow in Pb+Pb collisions Victor Roy ITP Goethe University Frankfurt In collaboration with L-G Pang, G-Y Qin,

Workshop for Particle Correlations and Femtoscopy 2011

What can we learn from hydrodynamic analysis of elliptic flow? Tetsufumi Hirano Dept. of Physics, Columbia Univ. T.H. and M.Gyulassy, nucl-th/ T.H.,

Jaipur February 2008 Quark Matter 2008 Initial conditions and space-time scales in relativistic heavy ion collisions Yu. Sinyukov, BITP, Kiev (with participation.

Dynamical Modeling of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Tetsufumi Hirano Workshop at RCNP, Nov 4, 2004 Work in partly collaboration with Y.Nara (Frankfurt),

Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo Collaborator: Tetsufumi Hirano Viscous Hydrodynamics Heavy Ion Meeting December 10.

Viscous hydrodynamics Quark Matter 2009 Huichao Song and Ulrich Heinz The Ohio State University Supported by DOE 04/02/2009 March 30-April 4, Knoxville,

Joint CATHIE/TECHQM Workshop, BNL, Dec 14-18, 2009 Huichao Song The Ohio State University Supported by DOE 12/14/2009 Lawrence Berkeley National Lab QGP.

Effects of bulk viscosity in causal viscous hydrodynamics Jianwei Li, Yugang Ma and Guoliang Ma Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, CAS 1. Motivation.

ATHIC2014, Osaka, Japan, Aug.5-Aug.8, /05/2014 The Fluid Nature & Viscosity of the QGP Huichao Song Peking University.

QM2012, Washington, DC, Aug. 13-Aug. 18, 2012 Supported by DOE 08/13/2012 QGP viscosity at RHIC and LHC energies Huichao Song Thanks for discussions with.

Flow fluctuation and event plane correlation from E-by-E Hydrodynamics and Transport Model Victor Roy Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China Collaborators.

Koichi Murase A, Tetsufumi Hirano B The University of Tokyo A, Sophia University B Hydrodynamic fluctuations and dissipation in an integrated dynamical.

Does HBT interferometry probe thermalization? Clément Gombeaud, Tuomas Lappi and J-Y Ollitrault IPhT Saclay WPCF 2009, CERN, October 16, 2009.

Masashi Kaneta, First joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of APS and JPS 1 / Masashi Kaneta LBNL

Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo Collaborator: Tetsufumi Hirano Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics for Multi-Component Systems.

ALICE Overview Ju Hwan Kang (Yonsei) Heavy Ion Meeting June 10, 2011 Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

Peter Kolb, CIPANP03, May 22, 2003what we learn from hydro1 What did we learn, and what will we learn from Hydro CIPANP 2003 New York City, May 22, 2003.

11/18/2003Tetsufumi Hirano (RBRC)1 Rapidity Dependence of Elliptic Flow from Hydrodynamics Tetsufumi Hirano RIKEN BNL Research Center (Collaboration with.

A Blast-wave Model with Two Freeze-outs Kang Seog Lee (Chonnam Nat’l Univ.)  Chemical and thermal analysis, done in a single model HIM

Elliptic flow and shear viscosity in a parton cascade approach G. Ferini INFN-LNS, Catania P. Castorina, M. Colonna, M. Di Toro, V. Greco.

Scott Pratt Michigan State University Have we seen the QGP at RHIC? Scott Pratt, Michigan State University MORE MEANINGFUL QUESTIONS: 1.Have we created.

HBT puzzle: from an ideal hydrodynamic point of view Tetsufumi Hirano RHIC/AGS user’s meeting, BNL, NY, June 21, 2005.

School of Collective Dynamics in High-Energy CollisionsLevente Molnar, Purdue University 1 Effect of resonance decays on the extracted kinetic freeze-out.

Η/s of a Relativistic Hadron Gas at RHIC: Approaching the AdS/CFT bound? Nasser Demir in collaboration with Steffen A. Bass Quark Matter 2009 : 21 st International.

Η/s of a Relativistic Hadron Gas at RHIC Nasser Demir in collaboration with Steffen A. Bass Annual 2009 RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting June 1, 2009 N. Demir.

Hydrodynamic Analysis of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions at RHIC and LHC Tetsufumi Hirano The Univ. of Tokyo & LBNL Collaborators: Pasi Huovinen and.

Spectra and Flow from a Full 3D Hydro+Cascade Model Tetsufumi Hirano Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo References: T.Hirano and M.Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys.A.

Heavy quark energy loss in hot and dense nuclear matter Shanshan Cao In Collaboration with G.Y. Qin, S.A. Bass and B. Mueller Duke University.

3-D Hydro: present and future Tetsufumi Hirano Columbia University Second RHIC II Science BNL, Probes of EOS.

Flow and Dissipation in Ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions September 16 th 2009, ECT* Italy Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of.

3 rd Joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of the APS and the JPS October 15 th 2009, Hawaii USA Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University.

Soft physics in PbPb at the LHC Hadron Collider Physics 2011 P. Kuijer ALICECMSATLAS Necessarily incomplete.

What do the scaling characteristics of elliptic flow reveal about the properties of the matter at RHIC ? Michael Issah Stony Brook University for the PHENIX.

Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo Collaborator: Tetsufumi Hirano V iscous Hydrodynamic Evolution with Non-Boost Invariant Flow.

@ Brookhaven National Laboratory April 2008 QCD Critical Point and Its Effects on Physical Observables Schematic Consideration Masayuki ASAKAWA Department.

Elliptic flow from initial states of fast nuclei. A.B. Kaidalov ITEP, Moscow (based on papers with K.Boreskov and O.Kancheli) K.Boreskov and O.Kancheli)

Anisotropic flow of charged and strange particles in PbAu collisions at 158 AGeV measured in CERES experiment J. Milošević 1),2) 1)University of Belgrade.

Experiment Review in small system collectivity and thermalization in pp, pA/dA/HeA collisions Shengli Huang.

Hydro + Cascade Model at RHIC

Summary of other reasonable theoretical ideas

Heavy-Flavour Physics in Heavy-Ion Collisions

Effects of Bulk Viscosity at Freezeout

Effects of Bulk Viscosity on pT Spectra and Elliptic Flow Coefficients

Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica, Bari (Italy)

Presentation transcript:

Huichao Song The Ohio State University Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Viscous Hydro +URQMD In collaboration with S.Bass, U.Heinz, C.Shen, P.Huovinen & T.Hirano (?) 06/14/2004 May24- July 16, INT Seattle, WA Quantifying the Properties of Hot QCD Matter Supported by DOE

Viscous hydrodynamics S.Bass Conservation laws: - Israel-Stewart eqns.

Viscous hydrodynamics S.Bass Conservation laws: - Israel-Stewart eqns. viscous hydro: near-equilibrium system pre-equilibrium dynamics + viscous hydro + hadron cascade Initial conditions viscous hydro + final conditions

Ideal/ViscousHydro + URQMD 2+1 Ideal/Viscous Hydro Hadron Cascade S.Bass MC- Particle Generator T sw Convertor: MC particle generator VIS -MC

extracting QGP viscosity from data Luzum & Romatschke, PRC 2008 GlauberCGC -Effects from highly viscous & non-chemical equilibrium hadronic stage, bulk viscosity … NOT so fast !

Effects of viscosity & chemical composition of HRG ~30% PCE vs.CE (HRG) Ideal hydro P. Huovinen 07 - Does hadronic viscosity and partially equilibrium chemistry balance each other in elliptic flow? Is it safe to neglect both of them, when extracting QGP viscosity? Ideal hydro vs ideal hydro +hadron cascade ~30%

Ideal / viscous hydro+URQMD SM-EOS Q (CE) vs. EOSL-PCE

ideal hydro vs. ideal hydro+URQMD (EOSL-PCE) - EOS L-PCE : Hadronic viscosity (URQMD) leads to ~20% viscous v 2 suppression EOS L-PCE

ideal hydro +URQMD: SM-EOSQ(CE) vs. EOSL-PCE - EOS L-PCE: Hadronic viscosity (URQMD) leads to ~20% viscous v 2 suppression - SM-EOS Q (CE): effects from hadronic viscosity and PCE (in URQMD) cancel each other in elliptic flow v 2 (Ideal hydro+URQMD) SM-EOS Q (CE)EOS L-PCE

SM-EOSQ(CE) : viscous vs. ideal hydro +URQMD - SM-EOS Q (CE): effects from hadronic viscosity and PCE (URQMD) cancel each other in elliptic flow v 2 (ideal hydro+URQMD) -This is no longer true in viscous hydro+URQMD -much larger v 2 suppression for P T >1GeV: effects from shear viscous correction / EOS SM-EOS Q (CE)

EOSL-PCE : ideal vs. viscous hydro + URQMD -EOS L-PCE: additional v 2 suppression by URQMD (ideal/viscous hydro + URQMD behave similarly) -Larger URQMD viscous v 2 suppression in ideal hydro +URQMD EOS L-PCE

Spectra: SM-EOS Q(CE) vs. EOSL-PCE -EOS L-PCE (correct chemistry below T ch ) is preferable EOS L-PCE SM-EOS Q (CE)

viscous v 2 suppression EOS L-PCE -EOS L-PCE: v 2 suppression increases from ~20% (min visc hydro) to ~30% (min visc hydro + URQMD)

viscous v 2 suppression EOS L-PCE -EOS L-PCE: v2 suppression increases from ~20% (min visc hydro) to ~30% (min visc hydro + URQMD) ---> significantly reduces the extracted QGP viscosity

ideal/viscous hydro +URQMD: mass splitting -Radial flow increases the mass splitting between pion and proton; similar behavior in ideal/ viscous hydro +URQMD EOS L-PCE

More Systematic study

Inte v 2 : hydro decouple at T sw vs. hydro+URQMD -v 2 is not fully developed at T sw ; -positive ecc. at T sw  additionally increase of v 2 in URQMD

Inte v 2 : ideal hydro, vis hydro, vis hydro+URQMD -Additional v 2 suppression in URQMD (hadronic stage is highly viscous)

viscous v 2 suppression: hydro vs. hydro+URQMD -larger URQMD viscous v 2 suppression for smaller systems -viscous hydro + URQMD: smaller URQMD viscous v 2 suppression, comparing with ideal hydro + URQMD

ideal vs viscous hydro & ideal vs viscous hydro +URQMD -Viscous v 2 suppressions are significantly reduced after a proper treatment of hadronic matter (URQMD)

: ideal Hydro + URQMD -Hadronic viscosity from URQMD increase the slope of

: ideal /Viscous Hydro + URQMD (I) -hadronic viscosity from URQMD increases the slope of

-hadronic viscosity from URQMD increase the slope of - v 2 is not fully saturated at T sw  the increase of the slope : ideal /Viscous Hydro + URQMD (II)

: experimental data Thanks for A. Tang for Exp data -Experimental data: v 2, dN/dy ; theoretical estimations: ecc. S (Glauber/CGC) -larger slope and magnitude for v 2 /ecc. for glauber initial profile GlauberCGC

A hint for min vis. liquid with CGC initialization Thanks for A. Tang for Exp data - v 2 /ecc from hydro +URQMD is not sensitive to Glauber /CGC or optical/ fluctuation initializations (need some further calculations) GlauberCGC -Theoretical curves are all from Glauber initialization (add cures in the future ) -Overlap area are different for CGC and Glauber initializations

viscous hydro+URQMD -- a try to extract the hadronic viscosity vs. viscous hydro with EOSL-PCE is an essential input for the calculations here

inte v2 from hydro +URQMD with diff. T sw -with a “perfect” and “correct” chemical components (PCE) for hadrons phase, final results from hydro +URQMD should not be sensitive to T sw - is not enough for hadronic viscosity

inte v2 from hydro +URQMD with diff. T sw - is not enough for hadronic viscosity - over suppresses v2 for T= MeV, but not enough for T<130 MeV

inte v2 from hydro +URQMD with diff. T sw - is not enough for hadronic viscosity - over suppresses v 2 for T= MeV, but not enough for T<130 MeV

extract from URQMD (a first try) a hint? - is not enough for hadronic viscosity - over suppresses v2 for T= MeV, but not enough for T<130 MeV

inte v2 from hydro +URQMD with diff. &T sw

extract from URQMD (a first try) -please do NOT take the above number too seriously -need further detailed extraction - such extraction gives a special trajectory of URQMD dynamic

A Short Summary -when extracting the QGP viscosity, one need to consider the effects of hadronic viscosity and the hadronic chemical components -with viscous hydro+URQMD become available, these two above uncertainties are naturally eliminated -with a EOS correctly describe PCE HG, it is “somewhat” safe to swtich hydro to URQMD at lower temperature ---> extract the effective URQMD viscosity at some specific dynamical trajectory by comparing hydro with and hydro+URQMD

Thank You