LIGO-G1400501-v2 Recovering Burst Injections in LIGO S5 Data Alex Cole Data Analysis Meeting May 6, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

RECOVERING HARDWARE INJECTIONS IN LIGO S5 DATA Ashley Disbrow Carnegie Mellon University Roy Williams, Michele Vallisneri, Jonah Kanner LIGO SURF 2013.
S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
Single-Channel Speech Enhancement in Both White and Colored Noise Xin Lei Xiao Li Han Yan June 5, 2002.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
Introduction To Signal Processing & Data Analysis
ALLEGRO G Z LSC, Livingston 23 March, Calibration for the ALLEGRO resonant detector -- S2 and S4 Martin McHugh, Loyola University New Orleans.
Brennan Ireland Rochester Institute of Technology Astrophysical Sciences and Technology December 5, 2013 LIGO: Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave.
LSC Meeting, 17 March 2004 Shawhan, Marka, et al.LIGO-G E Summary of E10 / S3 Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Szabolcs Márka, Bruce.
LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
New data analysis for AURIGA Lucio Baggio Italy, INFN and University of Trento AURIGA.
Acknowledgements The work presented in this poster was carried out within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC). The methods and results presented here.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Upper Limits on the Rate of Gravitational Wave Bursts from the First LIGO Science Run Edward Daw Louisiana.
Searching for gravitational radiation from Scorpius X-1: Limits from the second LIGO science run Alberto Vecchio on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Data Analysis Techniques for LIGO Laura Cadonati, M.I.T. Trento, March 1-2, 2007.
LIGO-G Z A Coherent Network Burst Analysis Patrick Sutton on behalf of Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Antony Searle, Leo Stein, Massimo.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.
LIGO- G D Burst Search Report Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting LIGO1 Plenary Session 18 August 2003 Hannover.
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
Characterization of Hardware Injections in LIGO Data
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
MODELING THE CALIBRATED RESPONSE OF THE ADVANCED LIGO DETECTORS Luke Burks 2013 LIGO Caltech SURF Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jameson Rollins Final Presentation.
LIGO- G D Gravitational Wave Observations with Interferometers: Results and Prospects Stan Whitcomb for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2 nd.
Characterization of PEM Channels Chirpiness of the Test Mass motion due to “Noise” Anthony Rizzi Staff Scientist, LIGO LIGO-G D.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
This material is based upon work supported in part by National Science Foundation Award PHY May 30-31, 2003, LIGO G Z APS NW Section Meeting.
15-18 Dec 2004Spinning Black Hole Binaries1 Search for Spinning Black Hole Binaries in LIGO/GEO data: The First Steps Speaker: Gareth Jones LSC Inspiral.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
Searching for Binary Black Holes with Spin Aligned with Orbital Angular Momentum 1 Deborah L. Hamm – Northern Arizona University LIGO SURF 2013 Mentors:
The 9th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop (December 15-18, 2004, Annecy, France) Results of the search for burst gravitational waves with the TAMA300.
LIGO-G Z Confidence Test for Waveform Consistency of LIGO Burst Candidate Events Laura Cadonati LIGO Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Generating time domain strain data (h(t)) for the ALLEGRO resonant detector or calibration of ALLEGRO data.
GWDAW91Thursday, December 16 First Comparison Between LIGO &Virgo Inspiral Search Pipelines F. Beauville on behalf of the LIGO-Virgo Joint Working Group.
LIGO: The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory Sarah Caudill Louisiana State University Physics Graduate Student LIGO Hanford LIGO Livingston.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
LIGO-G v1 Searching for Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of High Mass Black Hole Binaries 2014 LIGO SURF Summer Seminar August 21 st, 2014.
November, 2009 STAC - Data Analysis Report 1 Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi Università di Urbino and INFN Firenze for the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Introduction to QScan Shourov K. Chatterji SciMon Camp LIGO Livingston Observatory 2006 August 18.
SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
GRB triggered Inspiral Searches in the fifth Science Run of LIGO Alexander Dietz Cardiff University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi
A 2 veto for Continuous Wave Searches
Searching for gravitational-wave transients with Advanced detectors
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Virgo Status Detector Status Computing Data Analysis status and Plans
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections
An improved method for estimating the efficiency of GW detectors
On Behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and VIRGO
Bounding the strength of a Stochastic GW Background in LIGO’s S3 Data
Targeted Searches using Q Pipeline
Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO
Nicolas Rothbacher University of Puget Sound
Search for gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers:
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
Gravitational radiation from known radio pulsars using LIGO data
Search for Ringdowns in LIGO S4 Data
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G v2 Recovering Burst Injections in LIGO S5 Data Alex Cole Data Analysis Meeting May 6, 2014

LIGO-G v2 Motivation LOSC – LIGO’s commitment to open science S5 Science Run ( ) »“strain” files at 4096 Hz Injections – test the pipeline, calibrate detectors Interesting computational task of finding signal in noise Previous work on CBC injections – Ashley Disbrow LIGO Laboratory2

LIGO-G v2 LIGO Laboratory3 Injections Types: »Sine-Gaussian »Gaussian »Zwerger-Mueller »Ringdown »Cosmic string cusp »White noise burst Parameters: »GPS time, offset »Scale »Log message –Successful –Not in Science Mode –Injection Process Off –GRB-Alert –Injection Compromised

LIGO-G v2 Finding a GW Signal Matched filter »Perform weighted cross-correlation in frequency domain »Weight by inverse of noise power LIGO Laboratory4

LIGO-G v2 Matched Filter Search Generate template (and FFT) Grab PSD of noisy data LIGO Laboratory5

LIGO-G v2 Matched Filter Search – Part 2 Cross-correlate with noise weight IFFT and normalize  SNR LIGO Laboratory6

LIGO-G v2 Techniques: Templates Template generation »Many types! »Python, downsampling LIGO Laboratory7

LIGO-G v2 Techniques: Efficiency Efficiency overhaul »60,000 burst injections! (cf. 1,492 “successful” CBC injections) –4 hours vs. 1 week »Group injections (<200 seconds to next neighbor) »Groups of 3-36 LIGO Laboratory8

LIGO-G v2 Results – Successful Injections 1 LIGO Laboratory9

LIGO-G v2 Results – Successful Injections 2 LIGO Laboratory10

LIGO-G v2 Outliers Omega scans “ H1 MASTER OVERFLOW LSC ” SNR ~ 5000, expSNR much smaller Conclusion: control system overwhelmed LIGO Laboratory11 Good Bad

LIGO-G v2 Outliers 2 “Injection compromised” flag Injection process off LIGO Laboratory12

LIGO-G v2 Future Work Results: Stochastic injections Efficiency (PSDs) Work on tutorials – LOSC Release S5 bulk data Move on to S6… LIGO Laboratory13

LIGO-G v2 Acknowledgments Jonah Kanner – LIGO, Caltech Alan Weinstein – LIGO, Caltech Ashley Disbrow – Carnegie Mellon Peter Shawhan – LIGO, U. Maryland Thomas Moore – Pomona College Greg Ogin – Whitman College LIGO Laboratory14