Design and Implementation of Low- Cost Optical Telemetry to Support Radiometric Analysis of the Atmosphere University of Colorado at Boulder Alexandra.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trackmate Nathan Beste, Justin Flair, Arzhang Badiozamani, Evan Graves ECE 189 A/B Spring 2013.
Advertisements

Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Autonomous Helicopter: James Lyden Harris Okazaki EE 496 A project to create a system that would allow a remote- controlled helicopter to fly without user.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
Cornell University Space Systems Design Studio AIAA GNC Conference - 8/11/2009 Violet: A High-Agility Nanosatellite for Demonstrating Small Control-Moment.
TEAM kkkkk Conceptual Design Review Saad Alqahtani, Charles MacCraiger, Alexa Warly, Connor Jacobson, Kyle Skjerven, Matt Busby 09/19/11 Fall 2011 Rev.
S.W.A.T (Security Watching All the Time) Jeff Shin Tyler Stubbs Paul Kasemir Pavel Mayyak.
Super Fast Camera System Performed by: Tokman Niv Levenbroun Guy Supervised by: Leonid Boudniak.
Motion Tracking Recorder 360 (MTR-360) Group #1 Lee Estep Philip Robertson Andy Schiestl Robert Tate.
Acknowledgements Steve Beyerlein- Faculty Advisor David Atkinson- Faculty Advisor Greg Swanson- Graduate Advisor Tye Ried- Graduate Advisor Justin Schlee-
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn October 17, 2006.
RockSat-C 2011 ISTR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
Team Impact Intelligent Helmet Impact System Preliminary Design Review January 29 th, 2008 Amanda Brodbeck Wei-Chu Liao Wei-Shen Liao Chris Mintle.
Cube Root Georgia Institute of Technology Matt Bigelow, Gregory Hansen, Sarah McNeese, Luke Walker.
Team Garlic Armageddon BioSat Project Conceptual Design Review Lauren Persons, Ryder Whitmire, Lenny Komow, Kirstyn Johnson, Jon Pfohl, Dave Borncamp 9/22/09.
Super Fast Camera System Performed by: Tokman Niv Levenbroun Guy Supervised by: Leonid Boudniak.
Critical Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani October 17, 2006.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
Engineering 1040: Mechanisms & Electric Circuits Fall 2011 Introduction to Embedded Systems.
Critical Design Review 27 February 2007 Black Box Car System (BBCS) ctrl + z: Benjamin Baker, Lisa Furnish, Chris Klepac, Benjamin Mauser, Zachary Miers.
S1.6 Requirements: KnightSat C&DH RequirementSourceVerification Source Document Test/Analysis Number S1.6-1Provide reliable, real-time access and control.
RO400FC Forced convection hot air reflow oven. In a flexible production, what do you need for soldering of  Complex PCB’s  Soldering of fine pitch on.
KUMU A’O CUBESAT Amy Blas. Background 2 What is CubeSat?  10x10x10 centimeter cube  Launched in lower earth orbit (LEO)  The project started last.
Jonathan Yitzchaki David Michaeli Instructor: Ina Rivkin Spring
AT91RM9200 Boot strategies This training module describes the boot strategies on the AT91RM9200 including the internal Boot ROM and the U-Boot program.
Team 3D Erik Lorhammer Christopher BermelJosh Cornelius Electrical Computer Engineering Electrical EngineerElectrical Engineer.
Solar Telematics System ECE 477 Design Review, Team 8, Spring 2012 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Craig Lechlitner,
Zach Molden Shamlan Al-Roomi NJ Purevsuren Raied Farash Aadiel Rizvi C ritical D esign R eview.
MinnRock Design and Canister Layout Team members Bryce Schaefer (team coordinator)- AEM Cameron Japuntich- AEM Liz Sefkow- ME Mitch Andrus-
DINO PDR 23 October 2015 DINO Systems Team Jeff Parker Anthony Lowrey.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 Instrument Interface Board Dorothy Gordon CINEMA - EE Team Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Stevens Institute of Technology 2/13/2012.
By: Eric Backman Advisor: Dr. Malinowski.  Introduction  Goals  Project Overview and Changes  Work Completed  Updated Schedule.
1. Hardware: each component on the microcontroller will need to be tested individually using multi-meters, logic analyzers, and circuit probe analysis.
Senior Design Project “ MP3 Player ” Brian P. Allen Zeeshan A. Khan Jerry T. Koshy.
ECE477 Midterm Design Review: Team #
Team SSCSC Critical Design Review Nick Brennan, Kier Fortier, Tom Johnson, Shannon Martin, Dylan Stewart, and Adam Wright October 05, 2010 Fall 2010 Rev.
Critical Design Review The University of Northern Colorado GoGreenSAT Jessica Gage, Max Woods, Brent Hill, Ryan Marshall, Zach Sears Feb
Instrumented Football Helmet
Midterm Presentation Senior Design II February 28, 2012.
Prox-0.3 Georgia Institute of Technology Kiichiro DeLuca Richard Zappulla Matt Uhlman Ian Chen 1.
GLAST LAT Project LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT System Engineering Pat Hascall SLAC System Engineering Manager
Treasure Chess ECE 477 Team 2 - Spring 2013 Parul Schroff, Brock Caley, Sidharth Malik, Jeremy Stork Design Review.
Prox-0.3 Georgia Institute of Technology Kiichiro DeLuca Richard Zappulla Ian Chen Matt Uhlman 1.
 The wireless module must sustain a transmission rate that allows for image data to be transferred in real-time.  The camera must be able to capture.
ECE4006 Senior Design Project Linda Milor and Jay Schlag
Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin Wong 05 October 2010.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
1 3 Computing System Fundamentals 3.2 Computer Architecture.
ARISSat-1 Critical Design Review Orlando, Feb 15, 2010 IHU Joseph Julicher
Information Systems Design and Development Technical Implications (Storage) Computing Science.
Full Mission Simulation Test Report RocketSat CU Boulder
Self-Sustainable Electric Golf Bag Final Presentation Group 19 Jon Kinney, Cory Edwards, Harrison Kantner 30 April 2013.
The entire system was tested in a small swimming pool. The fully constructed submarine is shown in Fig. 14. The only hardware that was not on the submarine.
Inertial Measurement Unit. Project Advisor: Dr. Basart Client: Matt Nelson Team Members (491): Matt Ulrich Luis Garcia Amardeep Jawandha Julian Currie.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Microcontroller Evolution
Monitoring Robot Prepared by: Hanin Mizyed ,Abdalla Melhem
ECE477 MIDTERM DESIGN REVIEW: TEAM #08
ECE 477 Design Review Team 8  Spring 2007
Ruggedized Camera Encoder
CSU DemoSAT-B 2010 DemoSat V: Colorado State University April 9, 2011
Microcontroller Evolution
Command and Data Handling
Introduction to Arduino
Panoramic Rays Critical Design Review
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

Design and Implementation of Low- Cost Optical Telemetry to Support Radiometric Analysis of the Atmosphere University of Colorado at Boulder Alexandra Hickey, Evan Schomer, Rocky Marcus, and Frank Erdesz 3/14/2013

Mission Overview Mini Cam Subsystem on Polar Cube Low Cost Data confirmation – Through goe tagging – Contextual image comparison Provides simplified means for post launch recalibration 2

Design overview Three Subsystems – Structures – CDH – Power Goal – Compact – Easy to interface – Durable

This Semester Worked toward balloon launch Not met due to technical difficulties that will be talked about later by the different subsystems

Structures

Requirements/Overview fit with in a 1.4in x 1.2in x 1.14in volume Weigh under 200g Easily integrate into Polar Cube Withstand at least 20g’s with a factor of safety of two Maintain all components within operating temperatures 6

The Design PCB structural members Stand offs Nylon washers – Prevent moment about the stand offs Reinforced holes for stand offs

Command and Data Handling (CDH)

Overview/Requirements CDH is handled with an AVR ATmega1284P microcontroller. CDH shall be able to handle image data streaming up 1Mbps from the image sensor as well as interfacing with memory and temperature sensors. CDH shall write any event or peripheral settings data to nv memory. CDH shall be able to locally store all data for an extended period. CDH shall be able to function as a satellite subsystem or standalone system.

Microcontroller and Peripherals Microcontroller ATmega1284P Microcontroller ATmega1284P Camera Module Aptina MT9T111 Camera Module Aptina MT9T111 NV Memory JPEG Data Stream 8-bit parallel Command Interface I2C Memory Interface SPI Temperature Sensors (x3) Temperature Sensors (x3) OneWire Interface

Image Capture Flow Picture Trigger Check memory requirements Prep buffer Find address location of nv memory Create image entry/start headers Set camera settings if necessary Gather timestamp and other data Check memory requirements Prep buffer Find address location of nv memory Create image entry/start headers Set camera settings if necessary Gather timestamp and other data Send Camera Capture Command Load buffer into non-volatile memory Finish EOF headers on nv memory Set low power mode on camera/memory Increment photo ID Add flight log data (time,settings,name) Finish EOF headers on nv memory Set low power mode on camera/memory Increment photo ID Add flight log data (time,settings,name) Return Receive camera data and store into vram buffer Check Camera EOF

Data Storage Images with a maximum size of 1.0 MB per photo at full color resolution will be collected. The camera may cycle through various modes affecting data output size up to 1.0 MB throughout the mission. With a 256MB memory module, up to 254 images and supporting mission log data can be stored locally until uploaded to the main computer memory allowing for a data transfer to be postponed for an extended period. Image SizeJPG100JPG MP 2048x MB504.4KB

Learned Processor bus read optimization for large data transfers. Find sufficient documentation for camera before purchasing. Interfacing with a complex and micro sized camera system and changing various settings through a command interface.

Power

Power Subsystem Requirements Will provide 5V to the microcontroller. Will use 3.3V from PolarCube to power the voltage regulator, DC-DC converter, and memory module. Will provide 2.8V and 1.8V to the camera module.

Functional Block Diagram

Schematics Voltage Regulation

Microcontroller – Camera Interface

Lessons Learned Improvements on PCB design process Learned more circuit debugging strategies

Schedule

Mini Cam BurnDown ListKey Met In Progress Test Over Due The Whip Test25-Feb Drop Test25-Feb The Stair Pitch Test25-Feb Day in the Life/ Cooler Test12-MarCANCELED Day in the life/Cooler Test 22-Apr Day in the Life/Vacuum Test2-Apr Mechanical ItemDate Solid Works Model Finalized14-Feb Parts Order for Prototype ordered15-Feb14-Feb Prototype built25-Feb24-Feb Whip test25-Feb Drop Test25-Feb The Stair Pitch Test25-Feb Design Revisions4-Mar27-Feb Retesting11-Mar Design Finalized12-Mar11-Mar Final Balloon sat Structure constructed8-Apr

Electrical ItemDateDate metStatus 1st board & parts ordered14-Feb board and testing setup assembled22-Feb Testing: electrical, microcontroller, camera27-Feb28-Feb Board v2 designed27-Mar Board v2 ordered & parts ordered27-Mar Board v2 assembled8-Apr Board v2 electrical testing9-Apr CDH ItemDate SD Card/Temperature Working23-Feb Last Day to get camera interface board for reasonable testing time22-Feb13-Feb Camera Working2-Apr Last Software Revision for testing5-Apr Deadline for software revision5-Apr Data anlyzation19-Apr

Conclusion Will provide a contextual image for geo tagging and general data confirmation Allows for easier resolution of anomalous readings Lowers overall Polar Cube mission risk