Driver Behavior Models NSF DriveSense Workshop Norfolk, VA Oct 30-31 Mario Gerla UCLA, Computer Science Dept.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proactive Traffic Merging Strategies for Sensor-Enabled Cars
Advertisements

V2V applications: End to end or broadcast-based? Panel VANET 2007, Sept 10, 2007 Mario Gerla Computer Science Dept, UCLA
© Ricardo plc 2012 Eric Chan, Ricardo UK Ltd 21 st October 2012 SARTRE Demonstration System The research leading to these results.
BILL WHITE Presents… VEHICULAR NETWORKING: A SURVEY AND TUTORIAL ON REQUIREMENTS, ARCHITECTURES, CHALLENGES, STANDARDS, AND SOLUTIONS GEORGIO KARAGIANNIS.
Safe-Cyclist Project (Night-Rider)
ITS Joint Program Office 62 nd Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 24, 2013 Walton Fehr.
FGDC Coordinaton Group Connected Vehicles & Digital Infrastructure Carl K. Andersen U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 21.
G4 Apps The Impact of Connected Vehicles on Traffic Operations ISMA Traffic Expo October 1, 2014.
A Cloud-Assisted Design for Autonomous Driving Swarun Kumar Shyamnath Gollakota and Dina Katabi.
Mining Motion Sensor Data from Smartphones for Estimating Vehicle Motion Tamer Nadeem, PhD Department of Computer Science NSF Workshop on Large-Scale Traffic.
Chapter 9 Driving in Urban Traffic
THE “ JAM HANDELER ” THE “ JAM HANDELER ”. In the modern urban world, most people spend hours commuting in heavy traffic. Time and mental energy are wasted.
Human Factors Research Issues for Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems (CICAS) Vicki Neale, Ph.D. Director, Center for Vehicle-Infrastructure.
Created and Presented by Chelsea Jean Leppanen CVTC Safety Coordinator.
Partial Lesson first 20 out 65 slides 4 Lane Strategies and Rules of the Road.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
Cooperative crash prevention using human behavior monitoring Susumu Ishihara*† and Mario Gerla† (*Shizuoka University / †UCLA) Danger ! ! !
Part one: Strategies/Tactics and Rules of the Road
Vehicular Grid Communications: the role of the Internet Infrastructure Wicon 2006 Boston, August 3, 2006 Presented by Mario Gerla UCLA CSD
Vehicular Grid Communications: the role of the Internet Infrastructure Wicon 2006 Boston, August 3, 2006 Presented by Mario Gerla UCLA CSD
1 Vehicular Networks - Content distribution and data retrieval Slides are integrated from researchers at UCLA.
MODULE 3 THE HAZARDS OF DRIVING.
Odysa ® Experiences with an individual “green wave” Marcel Willekens / Arjan Bezemer / Kristiaan Langelaar.
1. NV DMV FollowupProprietary and Confidential 2 Peloton Technology Founded 2011, Menlo Park CA To dramatically improve highway safety and the efficiency.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
Safety All The Time Oyuki Ogawa Executive Vice President DENSO CORPORATION.
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
Innovative ITS services thanks to Future Internet technologies ITS World Congress Orlando, SS42, 18 October 2011.
Eric Eiswerth Safety Research Project Manager FORD AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY OFFICE 2011 AASHTO Annual Meeting The Vehicle of the Future: Greener, Safer, Smarter.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
By: Diana Ornelas.  A LAN that is inside & around the vehicle  Is a branch under VANET  4 types of communication:  Vehicle-to-vehicle  Intra-vehicular.
Mike Schagrin US Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office IntelliDrive Safety Program Overview.
The Fully Networked Car Geneva, 4-5 March Ubiquitous connectivity to improve urban mobility Hermann Meyer ERTICO.
Interacting With Other Users. Most collisions occur when two or more objects try to occupy the same space at the same time. Drivers must identify movement.
Highway Transportation Engineering ITS Case Study Component 1 – Student Guide.
IntelliDriveSM Update
Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division.
DriveSense’14 NSF Workshop on Large-Scale Traffic and Driving Activity Data DriveSense’14, Oct 30-31, Norfolk, VA.
 Since 2008, approximately 150 pedestrians have been killed annually in traffic related crashes on New Jersey roadways.  Vehicle-pedestrian collisions.
2015 Traffic Records Forum The Impact of Advanced Vehicle Technology on Traffic Records October 27, 2015 Kenneth Leonard Director, Intelligent Transportation.
Driving in City Traffic.  This chapter discusses the skills necessary to navigate driving situations in city traffic.
Modeling Drivers’ Route Choice Behavior, and Traffic Estimation and Prediction Byungkyu Brian Park, Ph.D. Center for Transportation Studies University.
© 2006 PSEN Unit - #4 Let’s Go Driving Identification Evaluation Control Monitor.
Section 3: New and Experimental Technologies
 Introduction  What is Driverless Car ?  History  Component  Action  Technology  Advantages  Disadvantages  Conclusion  Reference.
1 Vehicular Networks Slides are integrated from researchers at EPFL.
The SIPDE and Smith System “Defensive Driving Techniques”
DSRC and SPaT, SSM, SRM & MAP
Partial lesson 18 of 64 slides Other City/Suburban Strategies and Rules of the Road.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
Submitted To: Submitted By: Seminar On ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL.
VISION ZERO: Causes of Fatal Crashes VISION ZERO: Working Together to Reach This Goal Education EnforcementEngineering.
PRESENTED BY:- P.SREENIVASULU ROLL NO:-12AT5A0420 IV-B.Tech ECE.
CHAPTER 5 DEFENSIVE DRIVING. I. Preventing Accidents A. Most accidents are caused by driver error. B. Standard Accident Prevention Formula: 1. Be Alert.
Telematics derived from the Greek words “Tele” and “matos”, Tele means (far away) and matos means (derivative of Greek word machinari), Combinedly telematics.
CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES Presented by Anju.J.S. CRUISE CONTROL DEVICES.
Intelligent Transportation System
‘Adaptive Cruise Control’
ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS
NSF-GREEN CITY PROJECT ( ) Closing the loop between traffic/pollution sensing and vehicle route control using traffic lights and navigators.
Autonomous Vehicles The Implications on Urban Transportation
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
The challenges of automated and connected driving
The Importance of ADAS Technology
Anti-Collision Sensor Market
The Driving Task DRIVER EDUCATION.
Accelerating the Introduction of
TUGS Jason Higuchi && Julia Yefimenko && Raudel mayorga
Erasmus Intensive Program
Presentation transcript:

Driver Behavior Models NSF DriveSense Workshop Norfolk, VA Oct Mario Gerla UCLA, Computer Science Dept

The Challenge Safety 33,963 deaths/year (2003) 5,800,000 crashes/year Leading cause of death for ages 4 to 34 Mobility 4.2 billion hours of travel delay $78 billion cost of urban congestion Environment 2.9 billion gallons of wasted fuel 22% CO 2 from vehicles

Will Driver behavior help? Can driver reaction models help reduce accidents? Can expected driver compliance help plan optimal routes, green waves and alternate transport modes? Can the knowledge of driver habits help plan pollution reduction strategies?

Autonomous Vehicle Control How much human control? Can drivers go to sleep?

V2V for Platooning Are drivers prepared to take over in case of attacks?

V2V and cruise control to avoid Shockwave formations (INFOCOM 14) VDR = Velocity Dependent Randomization: normal drive PVS = Partial Velocity Synchronization: advanced cruise control

Intelligent navigation GPS Based Navigators Dash Express (came to market in 2008): Synergy between Navigator Server and City Transport Authority

NAVOPT – Navigator Assisted Route Optimization On Board Navigator –Interacts with the Server –Periodically transmits GPS and route –Receives route instructions Manhattan grid (10x10) –5 routes (F1~ F5) from source to destination – Link capacity: 14,925 [vehicles/h] But, will drivers comply? S … … … … … Shortest path F1 F3,4 F2 F3 F2,5 F5 F4 D

Analytic Results

V2V for Safe navigation Forward Collision Warning, Intersection Collision Warning……. Platooning (eg, trucks) Advisories to other vehicles about road perils –“Ice on bridge”, “Congestion ahead”,….

V2V communications for Safe Driving Vehicle type: Cadillac XLR Curb weight: 3,547 lbs Speed: 65 mph Acceleration: - 5m/sec^2 Coefficient of friction:.65 Driver Attention: Yes Etc. Vehicle type: Cadillac XLR Curb weight: 3,547 lbs Speed: 45 mph Acceleration: - 20m/sec^2 Coefficient of friction:.65 Driver Attention: No Etc. Vehicle type: Cadillac XLR Curb weight: 3,547 lbs Speed: 75 mph Acceleration: + 20m/sec^2 Coefficient of friction:.65 Driver Attention: Yes Etc. Vehicle type: Cadillac XLR Curb weight: 3,547 lbs Speed: 75 mph Acceleration: + 10m/sec^2 Coefficient of friction:.65 Driver Attention: Yes Etc. Alert Status: None Alert Status: Passing Vehicle on left Alert Status: Inattentive Driver on Right Alert Status: None Alert Status: Slowing vehicle ahead Alert Status: Passing vehicle on left

Existing sensors are about External Probing Radio Channels –DSRC –WiFI (V2V and V2I) –LTE; LTE Direct –White Spaces But, radio channels can be attacked! Autonomous vehicles currently use: On Board Sensor Channels –Laser, Lidar –Video Cameras –Optical sensors (reading encoded tail light signals) –GPS, accelerometer, acoustic, etc

What about probing driver in the car? Driver Behavior important for efficient and safe navigation: A- Compliance models –Will driver comply with navigator instructions? –Will driver wait for Green Wave? –Will driver accept congestion fees? –Speed limits?` B- Reaction Time models –Can driver react fast enough to shockwave alerts? –Reaction to platoon accidents? C- Autonomous Car Driver models –Can the car estimate how long it will take to regain the attention of the distracted driver? D. Physical Conditions Models –Detect sleepiness, predict medical situation etc

How to build driver behavior model? Vehicle monitors the driver: –Collects from CAN bus relevant signals (brakes, accelerate, steer, etc) –Body movements (video camera, kinect, etc) –Internal activities (music, phone calls, smoking, etc) Vehicle monitors other drivers and road traffic: –Correlation of driving behavior with external traffic Vehicle builds a model of the driver –Use machine learning techniques

How is the driver model used? Autonomous vehicle uses the model to determine best action to avoid accidents: –Wake up driver or act directly on breaks? –Mimic driver behavior in autonomous driving Traffic authorities use aggregate models for planning –Aggregate model (for given age group, profession, place of residence, etc) used to evaluate: Congestion fee policies (for example) Multimodal transport solutions Road access control –Privacy issue preserved by large number aggregation