CLEAN-AP Update Cl utter E nvironment An alysis using A daptive P rocessing Sebastián Torres and David Warde CIMMS/The University of Oklahoma and National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radial-by-Radial Noise Power Estimation Igor Ivić and Christopher Curtis CIMMS/University of Oklahoma and NSSL/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Advertisements

Keith Brewster Radar Assimilation Workshop National Weather Center 18-Oct-2011.
Your Name Your Title Your Organization (Line #1) Your Organization (Line #2) Week 8 Update Joe Hoatam Josh Merritt Aaron Nielsen.
1 Sebastian Torres NEXRAD Range-Velocity Ambiguity Mitigation Staggered PRT and Phase Coding Algorithms on the KOUN Research Radar.
Possible Strategic Directions For the WSR-88D Doppler Weather Surveillance Radar John T Snow Chair, NEXRAD Technical Advisory Committee Chair College.
CLUTTER MITIGATION DECISION (CMD) THEORY AND PROBLEM DIAGNOSIS
NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.
Anomalous Velocity Signatures in Low Level Super Resolution Data.
Your Name Your Title Your Organization (Line #1) Your Organization (Line #2) Semester 2 Update Joe Hoatam Josh Merritt Aaron Nielsen.
Contributors to Measurement Errors (Chap. 7) *1) Widespread spatial distribution of scatterers (range ambiguities) *2) Large velocity distribution (velocity.
Evolution of the SZ-2 Algorithm Sebastian Torres CIMMS/NSSL Technical Interchange Meeting Fall 2006.
Radar-Derived Rainfall Estimation Presented by D.-J. Seo 1 Hydrologic Science and Modeling Branch Hydrology Laboratory National Weather Service Presented.
Rainfall Monitioring Using Dual-polarization Radars Alexander Ryzhkov National Severe Storms Laboratory / University of Oklahoma, USA.
Updates to the SZ-2 Algorithm Sebastián Torres CIMMS/NSSL Technical Interchange Meeting Fall 2007.
Staggered PRT Update Part I Sebastián Torres and David Warde CIMMS/The University of Oklahoma and National Severe Storms Laboratory/NOAA NEXRAD TAC Norman,
VCPs for Staggered PRT Sebastián Torres and David Warde CIMMS/NSSL Data Quality MOU – Technical Interchange Meeting Fall 2008.
New Concepts in Utilization of Polarimetric Weather Radars Alexander Ryzhkov (CIMMS) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
Improved Automation and Performance of VORTRAC Intensity Guidance Wen-Chau Lee (NCAR) Paul Harasti (NRL) Michael Bell ( U of Hawaii) Chris Landsea & Stacy.
Carlos A. Rodríguez Rivera Mentor: Dr. Robert Palmer Carlos A. Rodríguez Rivera Mentor: Dr. Robert Palmer Is Spectral Processing Important for Future WSR-88D.
Your Name Your Title Your Organization (Line #1) Your Organization (Line #2) Dual Polarization Radar Signal Processing Dr. Chandra Joe Hoatam Josh Merritt.
ASSIMILATION of RADAR DATA at CONVECTIVE SCALES with the EnKF: PERFECT-MODEL EXPERIMENTS USING WRF / DART Altuğ Aksoy National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Problem: Ground Clutter Clutter: There is always clutter in signals and it distorts the purposeful component of the signal. Getting rid of clutter, or.
Using Bragg Scattering for ZDR calibration V. Melnikov (CIMMS) and D. Zrnic (NSSL) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
Surveillance Weather Radar 2000 AD. Weather Radar Technology- Merits in Chronological Order WSR-57 WSR-88D WSR-07PD.
Considerations in the Observation of Weather Sebastian Torres CIMMS/NSSL.
The National Severe Storms Laboratory Jeff Kimpel, Director NSSL NOAA Science Advisory Board Norman, Oklahoma November 5, 2002.
Data Windowing in ORDA Technical Briefing Sebastián Torres 1,2, Chris Curtis 1,2, Rodger Brown 2, and Michael Jain 2 1 Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale.
11/18/02Technical Interchange Meeting Progress in FY-02 Research RDA –Capability to collect time series data –Control of phase shifter Phase coding –Sigmet’s.
Sebastián Torres Weather Radar Research Innovative Techniques to Improve Weather Observations.
Sebastian Torres NEXRAD Range-Velocity Ambiguity Mitigation Spring 2004 – Technical Interchange Meeting.
Similar in concept to JDOP, except with the goal to operationally demonstrate the value of the polarimetric upgrade of the 88D. Multi-seasonal to study.
25 Sept. 2006ERAD2006 Crossbeam Wind Measurements with Phased-Array Doppler Weather Radar Richard J. Doviak National Severe Storms Laboratory Guifu Zhang.
Dual-Polarization Operations Assessment Status Update on Development Process Progress on RDA work Progress on RPG work Where we are with Beta and Deployment.
Collaborating on the Development of Warn-On-Forecast Mike Foster / David Andra WFO Norman OK Feb. 18, 2010 Mike Foster / David Andra WFO Norman OK Feb.
Technical Interchange Meeting Spring 2008: Status and Accomplishments.
Noise is estimated [NEXRAD technical manual] at elevation >20  and scaled. Data with low Signal/Noise are determined and censored (black or white on PPI).
Real-time Doppler Wind Quality Control and Analysis Qin Xu National Severe Storms Laboratory/NOAA Pengfei Zhang, Shun Liu, and Liping Liu CIMMS/University.
Radar Palet e Home Dual Polarized Analysis & Diagnosis 1 Precipitation Phase – Radar Signatures Radar characteristics of precipitation types –Stratiform.
RAdio Detection And Ranging. Was originally for military use 1.Sent out electromagnetic radiation (Active) 2.Bounced off an object and returned to a listening.
1 RADAR OPERATIONS CENTER (ROC) EVALUATION OF THE WSR-88D OPEN RADAR DATA ACQUISITION (ORDA) SYSTEM SIGNAL PROCESSING WSR-88D Radar Operations Center Engineering.
Initial Implementation of Super-Resolution Data on the NEXRAD Network Dr. Sebastian Torres CIMMS/NSSL A presentation to the Data Quality Team June 15,
Updates to the SZ-2 Algorithm Sebastian Torres CIMMS/NSSL Technical Interchange Meeting Spring 2007.
NEXRAD TAC Meeting August 22-24, 2000 Norman, OK AP Clutter Mitigation Scheme Cathy Kessinger Scott Ellis Joseph VanAndel
CASA Update for MPAR Group David McLaughlin University of Massachusetts – Amherst V. Chandrasakar Colorado State University March 20, 2007 – OFCM/Silver.
What to make of this new radar technology Luke Madaus, UW Atmospheric Sciences 11/2/2011.
NOAA Hazardous Weather Test Bed (SPC, OUN, NSSL) Objectives – Advance the science of weather forecasting and prediction of severe convective weather –
1 Spectral identification & suppression of ground clutter contributions for phased array radar Spectral identification of ground clutter Spectral identification.
Sebastian Torres NEXRAD Range-Velocity Ambiguity Mitigation Fall 2004 – Technical Interchange Meeting.
Technical Interchange Meeting – ROC / NSSL / NCAR ROC / NSSL / NCAR TIM Boulder CO 11 May 2005 Real-time time-series implementation of the Radar Echo Classifier.
NCAR Activity Update John Hubbert, Cathy Kessinger, Mike Dixon, Scott Ellis, Greg Meymaris and Frank Pratte To the NEXRAD TAC October 2005 San Diego,
Radar Requirements David J. Stensrud NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory 2013 Warn-on-Forecast Workshop and Technical Guidance Meetings.
DOPPLER SPECTRA OF WEATHER SIGNALS (Chapter 5; examples from chapter 9)
1 KURT HONDL, NSSL MPAR PROJECT MANAGER OFCM MPAR WORKING GROUP MEETING 19 JUNE 2012 NOAA/NSSL Activities.
Multifunction Phased Array Radar (MPAR) Update 1ICMSSR 12/16/11 ICMSSR Meeting December 2011 Doug Forsyth, Co-chair, WG/MPAR.
NEXRAD Data Quality 25 August 2000 Briefing Boulder, CO Cathy Kessinger Scott Ellis Joe VanAndel Don Ferraro Jeff Keeler.
1 Svetlana Bachmann November 20, 2007, Norman OK Technical Interchange Meeting “Data Quality / R-v ambiguities mitigation” Staggered PRT ground clutter.
NSSL Lab Review Feb 25–27, 2015 Clutter Filtering Challenges Conventional ground clutter filters discriminate between clutter and weather based on radial.
Eye-tracking during the Forecaster Warning Decision Process: A Pilot Experiment Katie Bowden OU CIMMS/School of Meteorology, Ph.D. Student Pam Heinselman.
Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.
NEXRAD Product Improvement- Update 2008 Bob Saffle: Noblis, Inc. Mike Istok: National Weather Service Greg Cate: National Weather Service AMS 24 th IIPS.
Random signals Honza Černocký, ÚPGM.
High Resolution Weather Radar Through Pulse Compression
DUAL POLARIZATION AND ZDR CALIBRATION IMPROVEMENTS 5.2(6)
CAPS Radar QC and Remapping
A dual-polarization QPE method based on the NCAR Particle ID algorithm Description and preliminary results Michael J. Dixon1, J. W. Wilson1, T. M. Weckwerth1,
Radar Observation of Severe Weather
NEXRAD Data Quality Optimization AP Clutter Mitigation Scheme
the University of Oklahoma
An overview of real-time radar data handling and compression
Examples of spectral fields
Presentation transcript:

CLEAN-AP Update Cl utter E nvironment An alysis using A daptive P rocessing Sebastián Torres and David Warde CIMMS/The University of Oklahoma and National Severe Storms Laboratory/NOAA NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK 29 August, 2012

CLEAN-AP is a novel real-time, automatic, integrated technique for ground clutter detection and filtering that produces meteorological data with improved quality while meeting NEXRAD technical requirements. what is CLEAN-AP? 2

While CLEAN-AP can deal with normal- (NP) and anomalous-propagation (AP) clutter, it is not a mitigation technique for moving clutter such as airplanes, cars, or wind turbines. what is CLEAN-AP not? 3

Developed concept (Spring ‘08) –Filed invention disclosure with OU’s OTD Evaluated performance using simulations (Spring ‘08) Implemented in real time on the NWRT PAR (Fall ‘08) Compared with current WSR-88D clutter mitigation (Fall ‘09) –KEMX (Tucson, AZ), KTLX (Oklahoma City, OK), KABX (Albuquerque, NM), KCRI (ROC testbed) Presented at November 2009 TAC meeting –initially presented CLEAN-AP “… the technique shows potential utility…”, “… encouraged by early results…” “… [have not] shown the scientific details behind the algorithm…” “… [need] case comparisons with CMD…” Extended to dual-polarization (Spring ‘10) –KOUN (S-band) and OU’ (C-band) Developed clutter model (Spring ‘10) –Form/Function/Fit for RVP8 milestones (I) 4

Presented at fall 2010 ROC/NSSL/NCAR TIM –presented more technical details and data cases –received positive feedback from ROC eng and agency reps Delivered CLEAN-AP algorithm description (Fall ’10) –NSSL Report 14 (confidential attachment) Extended to staggered PRT (Fall ‘10) Presented at March 2011 TAC meeting –decision briefing “The TAC members agreed to move forward with conducting an engineering evaluation on CLEAN AP.” Documented CLEAN-AP performance (Winter ’11) –NSSL Report 15 Delivered SPRT CLEAN-AP algorithm description (Spring ’12) –NSSL Report 16 (confidential) milestones (II) 5

Ground Clutter Filtering Ground Clutter Detection Unfiltered data Filtered data clutter mitigation at the RDA Control CMD GMAP CLEAN-AP 6

CLEAN-AP’s core: the ASD lag-1 autocorrelation spectral density For periodic signals: F 1 (k) = F 0 (k) e j2  k/M –S 1 (k) = F 0 *(k) F 0 (k) e j2  k/M =S (k) e j2  k/M –the ASD is the PSD with linear phase sample time 10 M2M2M1M1 V0V0 V1V1 window & DFT F1F1 F0F0 S 1 (k) = F 0 * (k)F 1 (k)

MeasuredTrue v v ASD v v v PSD Ground Clutter v PSD Weather v v ASD v v Leakage nothing is ideal… Spectral leakage in the measured ASD is the basis for clutter detection in CLEAN-AP

Filtering Detection how does CLEAN-AP work? Integrated Detection and Filtering Estimate CNR Select appropriate data window Compute ASD Identify components with clutter contamination –Phase of ASD is near zero due to leakage effect Remove clutter Reconstruct weather ASD is used to estimate meteorological variables v v |ASD| zero phase DC Arg(ASD) PSD 9

Performance Summary

data window selection CLEAN-AP vs. GMAP More aggressive data windows contain spectral leakage but increase variance of estimates better suppression lower variance GMAP % 11

notch width selection CLEAN-AP vs. GMAP CLEAN-AP uses magnitude and phase for improved notch width determination better suppression lower bias NW determination magphase GMAP CLEAN-AP 12

13 CLEAN-AP has more clutter suppression and less variance of estimates Clutter Suppression Doppler Mode CLEAN-APGMAP

14 CLEAN-AP has a more robust notch width determination that results in smaller biases Reflectivity (Power) Bias Doppler Mode CLEAN-AP GMAP

Case Examples

Ground-clutter suppression –Due to the mountainous terrain close to the radar, KEMX data exhibited “hot spots” (clutter residue) after the initial release of CMD (B11). This led to a few software changes (B11 fixed) KEMX Tucson, AZ Can you see the mountains? 16

KEMX Reflectivity Unfiltered CMD+GMAP (B11 fixed) CLEAN-AP CLEAN-AP mitigates both weak and strong clutter contamination 17

KEMX Tucson, AZ CLEAN-AP Performance CLEAN-AP adapts to clutter environment 18 CLEAN-AP Power Removed CLEAN-AP Window Used

Zero-isodop loss –Weather with narrow spectrum width and near zero velocity has nearly the same spectrum as clutter KCRI Norman, OK What happened to the zero-isodop? if it looks like a duck… 19

20 KCRI Reflectivity Unfiltered CLEAN-AP CMD+GMAP (B11 fixed) CLEAN-AP better preserves the zero isodop

21 KCRI Velocity CLEAN-AP better preserves the zero isodop Unfiltered CLEAN-AP CMD+GMAP (B11)

Support implementation on the ORDA Support engineering evaluation Investigate using dual-pol information to improve detection performance Investigate using H and V channels to determine the filter’s notch width –This also applies to the current filter Future Work

CLEAN-AP is a novel real-time, automatic, integrated technique for ground clutter mitigation that produces meteorological data with improved quality while meeting NEXRAD technical requirements. In March 2011, the TAC endorsed its engineering evaluation on the WSR-88D. Summary 23

back up slides 24

CLEAN-AP is automatic –no need for user intervention –real-time ground-clutter detection –no need for clutter maps CLEAN-AP produces data with improved quality –adaptive data windowing finds a good compromise between clutter suppression and data quality CLEAN-AP meets NEXRAD requirements –improved clutter suppression –requirements (Z) met with as few as 8 samples CLEAN-AP is integrated –one algorithm for ground clutter detection and filtering –gate-by-gate operation the CLEAN-AP filter (I) 25

CLEAN-AP “sets the stage” for further spectral processing –phase provides useful information –immune to biases from circular convolution CLEAN-AP is operational on the NWRT PAR –running in real-time since Sep 2008 –performance informally evaluated by meteorologists and forecasters (PARISE experiments) CLEAN-AP is compatible with current and future upgrades –SZ-2, super resolution, dual pol., hybrid SW, –SPRT, range oversampling, etc. the CLEAN-AP filter (II) 26

KEMX Clutter Map (Pwr Rmvd > 10 dB) Clutter Map (Pwr Rmvd > 20 dB) 27

Snow event with embedded storms KTLX Oklahoma City, OK Where is the zero? 28

29 KTLX Reflectivity UnfilteredCLEAN-AP Where is the zero isodop?

30 KTLX Velocity UnfilteredCLEAN-AP No detectable zero isodop loss

KOUN What about dual polarization? Reflectivity Differential Reflectivity Correlation Coefficient Differential Phase CLEAN-AP is compatible with dual polarization 31