Estimates of Arctic Wetland Extent Using Ground Penetrating Radar Stefan Schultheiss 1 ; Christoph E. Geiss 2 ; Phil Camill 5 ; Mark B. Edlund 4 ; Charles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M.H Young 1, C.J. Abolt 1,2, T.G. Caldwell 1, T.E. Larson 2 High-Resolution Carbon Inventory and Dynamics in Permafrost Soils: North Slope, Alaska 1 Bureau.
Advertisements

Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Kyle Withers University of Arizona Acknowledgements: James Callegary USGS Space Grant Symposium April 18, 2009 Using Geophysical and GIS Methods to Develop.
Imaging Furniture, Graves, and Stone Rings at Depth: Recent Magnetic and Radar Results from the Northern Rockies Steve Sheriff Professor of Geophysics,
Permafrost Organic Matter Study in the Lower Kolyma Lowland (Eastern Siberia) Based on Drilling Record Valentin Spektor 1, Alexander L Kholodov 2, Seth.
Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW)
International Conference on Environmental Observations, Modeling and Information Systems ENVIROMIS July 2004, Akademgorodok, Tomsk, Russia Modeling.
Multi-Proxy Reconstructions of Environmental Change for a Small Glacial Lake in Northern Manitoba, Canada Pooja Shakya 1, Erin York 2, Mark Kruger 3 Faculty.
PERIGLACIAL PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS
Introduction to Ground Penetrating Radar
Global Warming  The Evidence  Potential for change?  Can anthropogenic change be separated from natural change?  Can the world collectively.
Testing survey resolution using Spectral Analysis Authors: Markham, S.L., Kivior, I., Vaughan, F.V., Yates, S. and Barnden S. EAGE Workshop on The Future.
Increasing Wetland Emissions of Methane From A Warmer Artic: Do we See it Yet? Lori Bruhwiler and Ed Dlugokencky Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder,
1 Climate feedback from wetland methane emissions GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 31, L20503, doi: /2004GL020919, 2004 N. Gedney Hadley Centre,
Pirita O. Oksanen, University of Bristol, School of Geographical Sciences Searching for wetlands since the Last Glacial Maximum Acknowledgements Most basal.
Use of Ground Penetrating Radar to Review MN Roads
Summary of Geophysical Results From the NSF Funded Biocomplexity Project: Chris Hawkins, MS Thesis: Imaging the Shallow Subsurface Using Ground Penetrating.
Reflection Processing and Analysis Bryce Grimm Mayo Thompson Shallow Subsurface Investigation across many areas of the V-line and Truckee Canal Fallon,
Anatomy of Anomalies Total Field Magnetics and Ground Penetrating Radar at a Potential Archaeological Site.
Holocene Climate Change Interpreted from Lake-level Reconstructions, Bighorn Mountains, WY Marc Serravezza December 3, 2010 Fundamentals of Research.
Spring GPR GPS Figure 3: Example of a 100-m GPR line across the main transect line at each of the 4 grid sites showing the GPR characteristics of 3 different.
Application of Near-Surface Geophysics to Agricultural Drainage Pipe Detection.
Investigation of Perennial Cave Ice in Lava Beds National Monument Nicole Rocco, Geology undergraduate & Dr. Ed Brook, Project Advisor, CEOAS Introduction.
Global Climate Impacts of Thawing Permafrost National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado Tingjun Zhang Kevin Schaefer Tim Schaefer Lin Liu.
Cycling of Molecular Hydrogen in Subarctic Sweden Victoria Ward¹, Ruth K. Varner¹, Kaitlyn Steele¹, Patrick Crill² ¹Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans,
Mercury Dynamics In Sub-Arctic Lake Sediments Across A Methane Ebullition Gradient Lance Erickson 1, M. Florencia Meana-Prado 2.
SOME ASPECTS OF ACCUMULATED CARBON IN FEW BRYOPHYTE- DOMINATED ECOSYSTEMS: A BRIEF MECHANISTIC OVERVIEW Mahesh Kumar SINGH Department of Botany and Plant.
Bathymetry Controls on the Location of Hypoxia Facilitate Possible Real-time Hypoxic Volume Monitoring in the Chesapeake Bay Aaron J. Bever 1, Marjorie.
Biogeochemical Research At Lake Baikal Beat Müller, Lawrence Och EAWAG Federal Institute of Science and Technology of the Environment, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.
Summary of Research on Climate Change Feedbacks in the Arctic Erica Betts April 01, 2008.
Heat Field Deformation (HFD) Research The HFD method has been in use by scientists since the 1990’s. Over the years many scientific studies have been published.
“Frequency domain” EM“Time domain” EM. Measurement of signal decay – sample the decaying amplitudes in a number of time windows, or “channels” As the.
Effects of ploughing on land- atmosphere exchange of greenhouse gases in a managed temperate grassland in central Scotland. C. Helfter 1, J. Drewer 1,
Preserving the Scientific Record: Case Study 2 – Arctic Temperature Variability Matthew Mayernik National Center for Atmospheric Research Version 1.0 Review.
Ground Penetrating Radar for Utilities mapping and Detection ์
RA-228 AND RA-226 FROFILES FROM THE NORTHERN SOUTH CHINA SEA Hsiu-Chuan Lin, Yu-Chia Chung and Chi-Ju Lin Institute of Marine Geology and Chemistry, National.
1Hannu Luodes Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating radar (GPR) The 15th Meeting of the Association of European Geological Societies.
Evolution of northern wetlands since the Last Glacial Maximum Pirita Oksanen, University of Bristol, School of Geographical Sciences Contact
Effects of Climate Change on Ecosystems and Natural Resources of the Yukon River Basin.
Physical Properties of Permafrost: The Impact of Ice in the Ground to Geophysical Surveys Brian Moorman Department of Geology and Geophysics and.
Preserving the Scientific Record: Case Study 2 – Arctic Temperature Variability Data Matthew Mayernik National Center for Atmospheric Research Version.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 28 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
Methane in the atmosphere; direct and indirect climate effects Gunnar Myhre Cicero.
ESYS 10 Introduction to Environmental Systems February 28
Climate Change Overview – Pieces of the Argument.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March Arctic Aircraft Altimeter (AAA) Experiment Envisat and ICESat underflights.
Hydro-Thermo Dynamic Model: HTDM-1.0
Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost Contributions to cryospheric and climate monitoring Sharon Smith Geological Survey of Canada Kananaskis, March.
Designing a Ground Penetrating Radar Experiment You need to determine: 1.Amount of time to record the signal 2.Antenna frequency 3.Line spacing While thinking.
Continuous wavelet transform of function f(t) at time relative to wavelet kernel at frequency scale f: "Multiscale reconstruction of shallow marine sediments.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 29 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
M. Iorio 1, F. Fois 2, R. Mecozzi 1; R. Seu 1, E. Flamini 3 1 INFOCOM Dept., Università “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy, 2 Thales Alenia Space Italy, Rome,
An Accuracy Assessment of a Digital Elevation Model Derived From an Airborne Profiling Laser Joseph M. Piwowar Philip J. Howarth Waterloo Laboratory for.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
Leaf litter thickness, but not plant species, can affect root detection by ground penetrating radar Toko Tanikawa a, Hidetoshi Ikeno, Masako Dannoura,
Dissolved Gas Concentrations in Two Reservoir Systems Kyle Hacker, Christopher Whitney, Drew Robison, Wilfred Wollheim Introduction/Background Methods.
Samuel T. Dunn 1, 2, Andrew G. Bunn 3, John D. Schade 1
Ground-Penetrating Radar
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 15 Mar 2016 Lab 5 GPR
Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)
Technologies to model Ground water
The role of aquatic vegetation in methane production
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Model-Based Estimation of River Flows
Glaciation What creates glaciers and the process of glaciation (being covered by glaciers)?
The radar band is loosely taken to extend from approximately 0
Model-Based Estimation of River Flows
Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Satellite
Ground-Penetrating Radar
Estimation of Subsurface Moisture Variation in Layered Sediments Using Ground Penetrating Radar By Matthew Charlton King’s College London Ground Penetrating.
Presentation transcript:

Estimates of Arctic Wetland Extent Using Ground Penetrating Radar Stefan Schultheiss 1 ; Christoph E. Geiss 2 ; Phil Camill 5 ; Mark B. Edlund 4 ; Charles E. Umbanhowar 3 1 TRICON Geophysik und Systemtechnik GmbH, München, Germany; 2 Dept of Physics, Trinity College, Hartford, CT; 3 Dept of Biology, St.Olaf College, Northfield, MN; 4 St. Croix Watershed Res. Station, Science Museum of Minnesota, Marine on St. Croix, MN; 5 Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME Fig. 3: Transect 1 – depth to permafrost, base of peatland as well as some deeper structures are indicated. The depth to glacial till is approximately 1 m. Fig. 4: GPR data for Transect 2 Fig. 5: GPR data for Transect 3 Fig. 6: GPR data for Transect 4 Fig. 7: GPR data for Transect 6 Abstract Arctic wetlands are an important terrestrial carbon reservoir, a potential sink for atmospheric CO 2 as well as a significant source of CH 4. We collected approximately 2 km of ground-penetrating-radar profiles across nine wetlands to supplement or borehole-based study of Holocene wetland formation in northern Manitoba. Data were acquired using a SIR-3000 radar unit (Geophysical Survey Systems Incorporated) and analyzed using ReflexW (Sandmeier Scientific Software). All radar profiles clearly show the position of the permafrost horizon between 25 and 50 cm depth as well as the boundary between organic sediment and the underlying glaciofluvial deposits at depths between 1 and 1.5 m. Based on our GPR profiles most wetlands exhibit a simple basin geometry which allows for interpolation between our widely spaced peat cores. Introduction Arctic wetlands play a significant role in the global carbon cycle, but little is known about their response to climate change throughout the Holocene. Our study of Arctic wetlands employs ground-penetrating radar to extend existing borehole data and constrain the geometry of small wetlands. Here we focus on our analyses of five transects from Lake 396, a small glacial lake in northern Manitoba, Canada (59.58°N., °W). Fig. 1: Location of Lake 396 in northern Manitoba, insert shows location of GPR transects in wetland on NE shore of Lake 396. Fig. 2: The studied wetland, looking south from the northwestern end of profile T1. Methods Ground Penetrating Radar Profiles were measured using a SIR-3000 instrument (GSSI Inc.) equipped with 400 MHz and 200 MHz antennas. Most profiles were collected at 10 cm step size and each trace represents a stack of 256 measurements. For two profiles (T1 and T2) we did not employ stacking, but used a horizontal step size of 2 cm. Data were processed using ReflexW software (Sandmeier Scientific Software, v. 5.6). The processing steps for all files included: Trace header editing Static correction DC-shift removal background removal spatial filter Mean-subtraction, using a time window of 4 ns Results Figs. 3 – 7 show the processed GPR profiles and include the identification of the permafrost horizon (blue) as well as the base of the peat deposits (gray). In all profiles the transition from unfrozen peat to permafrost is clearly visible, but does not obscure the transition from organic (frozen) sediment to glacial till. GPR velocities were estimated from comparisons between borehole data and GPR profiles. Our analyses show that the studied wetland is relatively shallow with an average depth of approximately 1 m and has a relatively simple geometry with a relative level base. Further studies to determine the relation between the observed signal strength (amplitudes) and the water contend should be done. Due to the thickness of the measured layers,higher frequencies might show more clearly the identified boundaries. However, the increased attenuation of this GPR signal at higher frequencies might limit penetration depth. Fig. 7 summarizes our depth estimates for all analyzed profiles. Fig. 8: Depth to glacial sediment for all analyzed profiles. NS23A-1452