Gene by environment effects. Elevated Plus Maze (anxiety)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The genetic dissection of complex traits
Advertisements

Analysis of imputed rare variants
Planning breeding programs for impact
Why this paper Causal genetic variants at loci contributing to complex phenotypes unknown Rat/mice model organisms in physiology and diseases Relevant.
Experimental crosses. Inbred Strain Cross Backcross.
Combined sequence based and genetic mapping analysis of complex traits in outbred rats Baud, A. et al. Rat Genome Sequencing and Mapping Consortium Presented.
Basics of Linkage Analysis
QTL Mapping R. M. Sundaram.
A multi-phenotype protocol for fine scale mapping of QTL in outbred heterogeneous stock mice LC Solberg, C Arboledas, P Burns, S Davidson, G Nunez, A Taylor,
1 QTL mapping in mice Lecture 10, Statistics 246 February 24, 2004.
Statistical association of genotype and phenotype.
Lecture 9: QTL Mapping I:
Genetic Traits Quantitative (height, weight) Dichotomous (affected/unaffected) Factorial (blood group) Mendelian - controlled by single gene (cystic fibrosis)
Quantitative Genetics
Introduction to Linkage Analysis March Stages of Genetic Mapping Are there genes influencing this trait? Epidemiological studies Where are those.
Reconstructing Genealogies: a Bayesian approach Dario Gasbarra Matti Pirinen Mikko Sillanpää Elja Arjas Department of Mathematics and Statistics
Linkage Analysis in Merlin
HMGP Genetic Determinants of Orofacial Shape and Relationship to Cleft Lip/Palate Richard A. Spritz, M.D. Professor and Director, Human Medical Genetics.
Lecture 5: Segregation Analysis I Date: 9/10/02  Counting number of genotypes, mating types  Segregation analysis: dominant, codominant, estimating segregation.
QTL mapping in animals. It works QTL mapping in animals It works It’s cheap.
From QTL to QTG: Are we getting closer? Sagiv Shifman and Ariel Darvasi The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
LXS RI PANEL: LARGEST EXTANT RI SERIES 78 STRAINS BETH BENNETT T.E. JOHNSON UNIV OF COLORADO BOULDER, CO.
Fine mapping QTLs using Recombinant-Inbred HS and In-Vitro HS William Valdar Jonathan Flint, Richard Mott Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics.
Non-Mendelian Genetics
Introduction to Linkage Analysis Pak Sham Twin Workshop 2003.
Lecture 5: Major Genes, Polygenes, and QTLs
Bayesian MCMC QTL mapping in outbred mice Andrew Morris, Binnaz Yalcin, Jan Fullerton, Angela Meesaq, Rob Deacon, Nick Rawlins and Jonathan Flint Wellcome.
Zoology 2005 Part 2 Richard Mott. Inbred Mouse Strain Haplotype Structure When the genomes of a pair of inbred strains are compared, –we find a mosaic.
Experimental Design and Data Structure Supplement to Lecture 8 Fall
Quantitative Genetics. Continuous phenotypic variation within populations- not discrete characters Phenotypic variation due to both genetic and environmental.
Complex Traits Most neurobehavioral traits are complex Multifactorial
Quantitative Genetics
QTL Mapping in Heterogeneous Stocks Talbot et al, Nature Genetics (1999) 21: Mott et at, PNAS (2000) 97:
INTRODUCTION TO ASSOCIATION MAPPING
Lecture 12: Linkage Analysis V Date: 10/03/02  Least squares  An EM algorithm  Simulated distribution  Marker coverage and density.
Association between genotype and phenotype
Population structure at QTL d A B C D E Q F G H a b c d e q f g h The population content at a quantitative trait locus (backcross, RIL, DH). Can be deduced.
Practical With Merlin Gonçalo Abecasis. MERLIN Website Reference FAQ Source.
Chapter 22 - Quantitative genetics: Traits with a continuous distribution of phenotypes are called continuous traits (e.g., height, weight, growth rate,
Why you should know about experimental crosses. To save you from embarrassment.
Using Merlin in Rheumatoid Arthritis Analyses Wei V. Chen 05/05/2004.
Types of genome maps Physical – based on bp Genetic/ linkage – based on recombination from Thomas Hunt Morgan's 1916 ''A Critique of the Theory of Evolution'',
Fixed Parameters: Population Structure, Mutation, Selection, Recombination,... Reproductive Structure Genealogies of non-sequenced data Genealogies of.
Efficient calculation of empirical p- values for genome wide linkage through weighted mixtures Sarah E Medland, Eric J Schmitt, Bradley T Webb, Po-Hsiu.
Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in outbred mice William Valdar, Leah C. Solberg, Dominique Gauguier, Stephanie Burnett, Paul Klenerman,
Systems Genetics Approach to the Study of Brain Iron Regulation Byron C. Jones Professor of Biobehavioral Health & Pharmacology The Pennsylvania State.
Association Mapping in Families Gonçalo Abecasis University of Oxford.
Introduction We consider the data of ~1800 phenotype measurements Each mouse has a given probability distribution of descending from one of 8 possible.
Allan Balmain, Hiroki Nagase  Trends in Genetics 
Complex Trait Genetics in Animal Models
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;52(6): doi: /iovs Figure Legend:
upstream vs. ORF binding and gene expression?
Mapping variation in growth in response to glucose concentration
Gene mapping in mice Karl W Broman Department of Biostatistics
Recombination (Crossing Over)
Statistical issues in QTL mapping in mice
Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci
Statistical Methods for Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Mapping II
Genome-wide Associations
Genetic architecture of behaviour
Genome-wide Association Studies
Seattle SISG: Yandell © 2006
Elizabeth Theusch, Analabha Basu, Jane Gitschier 
Genetic variation in the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway affects contact hypersensitivity responses  Julien.
Genome-wide analysis of hepatic fibrosis in inbred mice identifies the susceptibility locus Hfib1 on chromosome 15  Sonja Hillebrandt, Claudia Goos, Siegfried.
Mean C-to-U editing ratios for most editing sites map to a region on chromosome 6 at 122 Mb. (A) Genome scan of mean C-to-U editing for 70 editing sites.
The first two principal components for the islet gene expression data for the 181 microarray probes that map to the chromosome 6 trans-eQTL hotspot with.
Cancer as a Complex Genetic Trait
A: QTL analysis of genotyping data on chromosome 12 revealed a locus linked to glucose levels in F2 mice at 6 months of age at marker D12Mit231 with a.
Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) Mapping
Presentation transcript:

Gene by environment effects

Elevated Plus Maze (anxiety)

Modelling E, G and GxE H 1 : phenotype ~ covariate H 2 : phenotype ~ covariate + LocusX H 3 : phenotype ~ covariate + LocusX + covariate:LocusX H 0 : phenotype ~ 1

PRACTICAL: Inclusion of gender effects in a genome scan To start: 1. Copy the folder faculty\valdar\FridayAnimalModelsPractical to your own directory. 2. Start R 3. File -> Change Dir… and change directory to your FridayAnimalModelsPractical directory 4. Open Firefox, then File -> Open File, and open “gxe.R” in the FridayAnimalModelsPractical directory

H 0 : phenotype ~ sex H 1 : phenotype ~ sex + marker

scan.markers(Phenotype ~ Sex + MARKER, h0 = Phenotype ~ Sex,... etc) H 0 : phenotype ~ sex H 1 : phenotype ~ sex + marker

scan.markers(Phenotype ~ Sex + MARKER, h0 = Phenotype ~ Sex,... etc) H 0 : phenotype ~ sex H 1 : phenotype ~ sex + marker

scan.markers(Phenotype ~ Sex + MARKER, h0 = Phenotype ~ Sex,... etc) H 0 : phenotype ~ sex H 1 : phenotype ~ sex + marker

head(ped.gender0) anova(lm(Phenotype ~ Sex + m1 + Sex:m1, data=ped.gender0)) head(ped.gender1) anova(lm(Phenotype ~ Sex + m1 + Sex:m1, data=ped.gender1)

New approaches Advanced intercross lines Genetically heterogeneous stocks

F2 Intercross x Avg. Distance Between Recombinations F1 F2 F2 intercross ~30 cM

Advanced intercross lines (AILs) F0 F1 F2 F3 F4

Chromosome scan for F12 position along whole chromosome (Mb) goodness of fit (logP) 0 100cM significance threshold QTL Typical chromosome

PRACTICAL: AILs To start: 1. Open Firefox, then File -> Open File, and open “ail_and_ghosts.R” in the FridayAnimalModelsPractical directory

Genetically Heterogeneous Mice

F2 Intercross x Avg. Distance Between Recombinations F1 F2 F2 intercross ~30 cM

Pseudo-random mating for 50 generations Heterogeneous Stock F2 Intercross x Avg. Distance Between Recombinations: F1 F2 HS ~2 cM F2 intercross ~30 cM

Pseudo-random mating for 50 generations Heterogeneous Stock F2 Intercross x Avg. Distance Between Recombinations: F1 F2 HS ~2 cM F2 intercross ~30 cM

Genome scans with single marker association

High resolution mapping

Relation Between Marker and Genetic Effect Observable effect QTL Marker 1

Relation Between Marker and Genetic Effect Observable effect QTL Marker 2 Marker 1

Relation Between Marker and Genetic Effect No effect observable Observable effect QTL Marker 2 Marker 1

Hidden Chromosome Structure Observed chromosome structure Multipoint method (HAPPY) calculates the probability that an allele descends from a founder using multiple markers

Haplotype reconstruction using HAPPY chromosome genotypes haplotype proportions predicted by HAPPY

HAPPY model for additive effects

Genome scans with single marker association

Genome scans with HAPPY

Results for our HS

Many peaks mean red cell volume

How to select peaks: a simulated example

Simulate 7 x 5% QTLs (ie, 35% genetic effect) + 20% shared environment effect + 45% noise = 100% variance

Simulated example: 1D scan

Peaks from 1D scan phenotype ~ covariates + ?

1D scan: condition on 1 peak phenotype ~ covariates + peak 1 + ?

1D scan: condition on 2 peaks phenotype ~ covariates + peak 1 + peak 2 + ?

1D scan: condition on 3 peaks phenotype ~ covariates + peak 1 + peak 2 + peak 3 + ?

1D scan: condition on 4 peaks phenotype ~ covariates + peak 1 + peak 2 + peak 3 + peak 4 + ?

1D scan: condition on 5 peaks phenotype ~ covariates + peak 1 + peak 2 + peak 3 + peak 4 + peak 5 + ?

1D scan: condition on 6 peaks phenotype ~ covariates + peak 1 + peak 2 + peak 3 + peak 4 + peak 5 + peak 6 + ?

1D scan: condition on 7 peaks phenotype ~ covariates + peak 1 + peak 2 + peak 3 + peak 4 + peak 5 + peak 6 + peak 7 + ?

1D scan: condition on 8 peaks phenotype ~ covariates + peak 1 + peak 2 + peak 3 + peak 4 + peak 5 + peak 6 + peak 7 + peak 8 + ?

1D scan: condition on 9 peaks phenotype ~ covariates + peak 1 + peak 2 + peak 3 + peak 4 + peak 5 + peak 6 + peak 7 + peak 8 + peak 9 + ?

1D scan: condition on 10 peaks phenotype ~ covariates + peak 1 + peak 2 + peak 3 + peak 4 + peak 5 + peak 6 + peak 7 + peak 8 + peak 9 + peak 10 + ?

1D scan: condition on 11 peaks phenotype ~ covariates + peak 1 + peak 2 + peak 3 + peak 4 + peak 5 + peak 6 + peak 7 + peak 8 + peak 9 + peak 10 + peak 11 + ?

Peaks chosen by forward selection

Bootstrap sampling subjects

Bootstrap sampling subjects sample with replacement bootstrap sample from 10 subjects

Forward selection on a bootstrap sample

Bootstrap evidence mounts up…

In 1000 bootstraps… Bootstrap Posterior Probability (BPP)

Results

Tea Break

Study design 2,000 mice 15,000 diallelic markers More than 100 phenotypes each mouse subject to a battery of tests spread over weeks 5-9 of the animal’s life

101 Phenotypes Anxiety (conditioned and unconditioned tasks) [24] Asthma (plethysmography) [13] Biochemistry [15] Diabetes (glucose tolerance test) [16] Haematology [15] Immunology [9] Weight/size related [8] Wound Healing [1]

High throughput phenotyping facility

Photo ID

Open Field

Anxious mouse Non anxious mouse

Elevated Plus Maze (anxiety)

Food hyponeophagia (reluctance to try new food)

“Home Cage” activity

Startle & Conditioning

Plethysmograph

Glucose Tolerance Test (diabetes)

Wound healing

PRACTICAL:

END

An individual’s phenotype follows a mixture of normal distributions

m Maternal chromosome Paternal chromosome

m Chromosome 1 Chromosome 2 ABCDEFABCDEF Strains

Markers m ABCDEFABCDEF Strains

Markers m ABCDEFABCDEF Strains

Markers m 0.5 cM

Markers m 0.5 cM 1 cM

Markers m 0.5 cM 1 cM

Analysis Probabilistic Ancestral Haplotype Reconstruction (descent mapping): implemented in HAPPY

M1 Q M2 m1 q m2 M1 ? m2 recombination

M1 Q M2 m1 q m2 m1 Q M2 M1 q m2 M1 q m2

M1 Q M2 m1 q m2 M1 Q m2 M1 Q m2 m1 q M2 m1 Q M2 M1 q m2 M1 q m2

M1 Q M2 m1 q m2 M1 m2 M1 m2 m1 m2 m1 M2 M1 m2 M1 m2 Qq Qqq Q

M1 ? m2 m1 ? m2 cM distances determine probabilities

M1 ? m2 m1 ? m2 cM distances determine probabilities Eg,

Interval mapping M1 M2 m1 m2 M1 m1 M2 m2 LOD score

Interval mapping M1 M2 m1 m2 M1 m1 M2 m2 LOD score Q q

Interval mapping M1 M2 m1 m2 M1 m1 M2 m2 LOD score Q q

Interval mapping M1 M2 m1 m2 M1 m1 M2 m2 LOD score Q q