Update: Run1 vs Run2 CC inc & First look at Water-out/Water-in Erez Reinherz-Aronis and Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) May 9,
Outlook Samples and POTs Bunch structure Run1 vs Run2 Run 1: Data vs MCp4 Run 2: Data vs MCp4 MCp4: Run1 vs Run2 Data: Run1vs Run2 Water-out/Water-in Data: Ratio Water-out/Water-in vs expectation 2
(from files header) TotalDQMCp4 Run1 water3.09x x x10 20 Run2 water6.98x x x10 20 Sum1.00x x x10 20 Samples and POTs 3 DQ sample were used CC Inclusive Selection: Highest momentum negative charge track in a bunch Begins in the P0D (no TPC pulls cut)
Bunch timing 4 Run1: Run 31 → 34 Run 36 Run2: Run 37→38 Run2 has Double-Triple bunch structure 1 st = Run36; 2 nd, 3 rd = Run37/8 Run 2 Run 1
Run1 vs Run2 Run 1: Data vs MCp4 Run 2: Data vs MCp4 MCp4: Run1 vs Run2 Data: Run1vs Run2 5
Run1 Data vs MCp4 CC inc - X, Y, Cosθ, φ 6 Normalized by POT
Run1 Data vs MCp4 Z, Neg Trk Momentum 7 Normalized by POT Start position of Highest momentum Neg. Trk in the P0D The dashed lines represent the water-target limits
Run2 Data vs MCp4 CC inc - X, Y, Cosθ, φ 8 Normalized by POT
Run2 Data vs MCp4 Z, Neg Trk Momentum 9 Normalized by POT Data/MCp4 = 8273/8521 = 0.97±0.02
MCp4 Run1 vs Run2 CC inc - X, Y, Cosθ, φ 10 Run1 water Run2 water Normalized by POT
Mcp4 Run1 vs Run2 Z, Neg Trk Momentum 11 Normalized by POT Run1/Run2 = / = 1.030±0.004 usEcalusWTcWTcEcal Run1/Run Stat. Error
Data Run1 vs Run2 CC inc - X, Y, Cosθ, φ 12 Run1 water Run2 water Normalized by POT
Data Run1 vs Run2 Z, Neg Trk Momentum 13 Normalized by POT Run1/Run2 = 6062/5673 = 1.07±0.02 usEcalusWTcWTcEcal Run1/Run Stat. Error
Z distribution checks: XY 14 X Beam position and direction Run1 water Run2 water Normalized by POT
Water-out/Water-in Data ratio vs expectation 15
(from files header) TotalDQ Run1 water3.09x x10 19 Run2 water6.98x x10 19 Sum1.00x x10 19 Run2 air1.79x x10 19 Samples and POTs 16 DQ sample were used
Data CC inc: X, Y, Cosθ, φ 17 Run1 Run2 water Run2 air Normalized by POT
Data CC inc: Neg Trk Momentum 18 Run1 Run2 water Run2 air Normalized by POT Note: Run2 air is reconstructed as water No TPC pull used
Z position distributions 19 Start position of Highest momentum Neg. Trk in the P0D The dashed lines represent the water-target limits Run13588 Run2 water3358 Run2 air2573 Run1/Run2 = 1.07±0.02
Water-out/Water-in ratio 20 Water-target measured ration 0.70±0.02 Expected ration from material list: 0.68 Dashed lines are the water-target limits 0.94± ± ±0.05
Summary Run1 vs Run 2: MCp4 Run1/Run2 ~3% higher Data Run1/Run2 ~7% higher Maybe there is some Z difference (within limit stat.) Water-out/Water-in ratio measured 70 ± 2 % (expect 68 %) Future plans: Data/MC ratio vs P0Dules MCp4 – study TPC pulls 21
Update: Run1 vs Run2 CC inc & First look at Water-out/Water-in Erez Reinherz-Aronis and Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) May 9,
Backup (General) ND280 Fiducial < X < 1008 [mm] < Y < 1110 [mm] < Z < 5000 [mm] P0D Fiducial < X < 995 [mm] < Y < 1100 [mm] < Z < -980 [mm] 23