Solar Neutrinos in Super-Kamiokande July

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande on Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration ICHEP 2004,
Advertisements

Neutrino oscillations/mixing
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.
Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo Nufact05, Frascati, June 2005.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
CP-phase dependence of neutrino oscillation probability in matter 梅 (ume) 田 (da) 義 (yoshi) 章 (aki) with Lin Guey-Lin ( 林 貴林 ) National Chiao-Tung University.
1 Evidence of Neutrino Oscillation from Super-Kamiokande and K2K Neutrino physics at Super-Kamiokande –Detector overview –Atmospheric neutrinos –Solar.
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
Energy Reconstruction Algorithms for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope J.D. Zornoza 1, A. Romeyer 2, R. Bruijn 3 on Behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 1.
8/5/2002Ulrich Heintz - Quarknet neutrino puzzles Ulrich Heintz Boston University
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Super-Kamiokande – Neutrinos from MeV to TeV Mark Vagins University of California, Irvine EPS/HEP Lisbon July 22, 2005.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR) for Super-Kamiokande Collaboration December 9, RCCN International Workshop Effect of solar terms to  23 determination in.
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
H.Sekiya, Jul 30 th 2008, Philadelphia, ICHEP2008 Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR, University of Tokyo on behalf of the Super-Kamiokande.
Solar Neutrinos Perspectives and Objectives Mark Chen Queen’s University and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)
M.Nakahata Kamioka Observatory, ICRR, Kavli IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo for Super-K collaboration Recent results from Super-Kamiokande Neutrinos and Dark Matter.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
The Elementary Particles. e−e− e−e− γγ u u γ d d The Basic Interactions of Particles g u, d W+W+ u d Z0Z0 ν ν Z0Z0 e−e− e−e− Z0Z0 e−e− νeνe W+W+ Electromagnetic.
Solar neutrino measurement at Super Kamiokande ICHEP'04 ICRR K.Ishihara for SK collaboration Super Kamiokande detector Result from SK-I Status of SK-II.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
Present status of oscillation studies by atmospheric neutrino experiments ν μ → ν τ 2 flavor oscillations 3 flavor analysis Non-standard explanations Search.
Present and Future of Super-Kamiokande Experiment Chen Shaomin Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University.
Michael Smy UC Irvine Solar and Atmospheric Neutrinos 8 th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams & Betabeams Irvine, California, August.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Methods and problems in low energy neutrino experiments (solar, reactors, geo-) I G. Ranucci ISAPP 2011 International School on Astroparticle physics THE.
KamLAND : Studying Neutrinos from Reactor Atsuto Suzuki KamLAND Collaboration KEK : High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
M.Nakahata Kamioka observatory, ICRR, Kavli IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo for Super-K collaboration Recent results from Super-Kamiokande XVI International Workshop.
Solar Neutrino Experiments A Review The CAP'09 Congress Moncton, 7-10 June, 2009 Alain Bellerive On behalf of the SNO Collaboration Carleton University,
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Bruno Pontecorvo Pontecorvo Prize is very special for us: All the important works done by Super- Kamiokande point back to Bruno Pontecorvo – 1957 First.
Results from Super-Kamiokande Inside of SK detector (April 2006) Super-Kamiokande detector Atmospheric neutrino results Solar neutrino results Yasuo Takeuchi.
TAUP Searches for nucleon decay and n-n oscillation in Super-Kamiokande Jun Kameda (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration Sep.
GADZOOKS! project at Super-Kamiokande M.Ikeda (Kamioka ICRR, U.of Tokyo) for Super-K collaboration 1 Contents GADZOOKS! project Supernova.
SNO and the new SNOLAB SNO: Heavy Water Phase Complete Status of SNOLAB Future experiments at SNOLAB: (Dark Matter, Double beta, Solar, geo-, supernova.
Solar neutrino results from Super-Kamiokande Satoru Yamada for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration Institute of cosmic ray research, University of Tokyo.
Tests of non-standard neutrino interactions (NSI) Cecilia Lunardini Institute for Nuclear Theory University of Washington, Seattle.
Study of solar neutrino energy spectrum above 4.5 MeV in Super-Kamiokande-I 1, Solar Neutrino Oscillation 2, Super-Kamiokande detector 3, Data set for.
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
J. Goodman – January 03 The Solution to the Solar Problem Jordan A. Goodman University of Maryland January 2003 Solar Neutrinos MSW Oscillations Super-K.
Data Processing for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Aksel Hallin Queen’s, October 2006.
N eutrino O scillation W orkshop Conca Specchiulla, September 11 th 2006 Michael Smy UC Irvine Low Energy Challenges in SK-III.
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Random Matter Density Perturbations and LMA N. Reggiani Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - Campinas SP Brazil M.
Birth of Neutrino Astrophysics
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
P Spring 2002 L18Richard Kass The Solar Neutrino Problem M&S Since 1968 R.Davis and collaborators have been measuring the cross section of:
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
Supernova Relic Neutrinos (SRN) are a diffuse neutrino signal from all past supernovae that has never been detected. Motivation SRN measurement enables.
APS/JPS Joint Meeting Kapalua, Maui, September 2005 Michael Smy UC Irvine Relic Neutrino Detection in Large Water Cherenkov Detectors.
Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK2  Imaging Water Cherenkov detector  50kt Pure Water  32kt Inner Detector viewed by.
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
Review of experimental results on atmospheric neutrinos Introduction Super-Kamiokande MACRO Soudan 2 Summary Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory.
Hiroyuki Sekiya ICHEP2012 Jul 5 The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment -Neutrino Physics Potentials- ICHEP2012 July Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR,
News from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Simon JM Peeters July 2007 o SNO overview o Results phases I & II o hep neutrinos and DSNB o Update on the III.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Constraint on  13 from the Super- Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data Kimihiro Okumura (ICRR) for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration December 9, 2004.
30th International Cosmic Ray Conference in Merida, Mexico Michael Smy UC Irvine Low Energy Event Reconstruction and Selection in Super-Kamiokande-III.
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
Toward realistic evaluation of the T2KK physics potential
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
DUNE as the Next-Generation Solar Neutrino Experiment
Presentation transcript:

Solar Neutrinos in Super-Kamiokande ICHEP2014 @Valencia July 4 2014 Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR, University of Tokyo for the Super-K Collaboration 1

Super-Kamiokande 50kton pure water Cherenkov detector 1km (2.7km w.e) underground in Kamioka 11129 50cm PMTs in Inner Detector 1885 20cm PMTs in Outer Detector Physics targets of Super-Kamiokande Proton decay Relic SN ν Solar ν WIMPs Atmospheric ν ~3.5 MeV ~20 ~100 ~1 GeV TeV 2

Solar neutrinos observation Super-K n + e-  n + e- 3,4はいらないな。。この会議では。。 ne Solar neutrinos observation

The results: Solar global fit This SK update and other latest results are combined. Combined solar fit with KamLAND Without reactor θ13 constraint Solar KamLAND Solar+KamLAND Reactor preliminary sin2θ13=0.0242±0.0026 KamLAND Solar+KamLAND Solar I would like to show the results at first ~2σ tension in Δm221 between solar and KamLAND Non-zero q13 at 2s from solar+KamLAND Good agreement with Daya Bay, RENO & DC (Neutrino2014) sin2θ13=0.0221±0.0012

Regenerate ne by earth matter effect Motivation Search for the direct signals of the MSW effect Solar matter effect Energy spectrum distortion Earth matter effect Flux day-night asymmetry Neutrino survival probability Regenerate ne by earth matter effect JHEP 0311:004(2003) Vacuum oscillation dominant Solar+KamLAND sin2θ12=0.308 Δm221=7.50x10-5eV2 up-turn! Solar sin2θ12=0.311 Δm221=4.85x10-5eV2 Matter oscillation dominant

Improvements in SK-IV SK-III SK-IV New analysis in low energy bins Reduced 222Rn BG New analysis in low energy bins Remaining BG-electrons from 214Bi should have more multiple-scatterings than signal-electrons have: MSG 4.0-4.5 MeV bin SK-III SK-IV 3.5-4.0MeV MSG < 0.35 0.35<MSG<0.45 0.45<MSG 4.0-4.5MeV SK is 17 years old, but sill improving Reduced systematic error 1.7% for flux cf. SK-I: 3.2% SK-III: 2.1% Achieved 3.5 MeV(kin.) energy threshold 8.6s signal is observed with MSG

8B solar n in SK-I+II+III+IV 8B n signals preliminary FSK(8B) =2.344±0.034 x 106 cm-1s-1 FSK+SNO(8B) =5.30 x 106 cm-1s-1 +0.17 -0.11 preliminary ~70k solar neutrino events 8B n could be the BG for DM search through NC coherent scattering.

Recoil electron spectra Data/MC(unoscillated) preliminary Kinetic energy (MeV)

SK-I+II+III+IV spectrum N.B. All SK phase are combined without regard to energy resolution or systematics in this figure (total # of bins of SKI - IV is 83) χ2 Solar+KamLAND 70.13 Solar 68.14 quadratic fit 67.67 exponential fit 66.54 Solar+KamLAND sin2θ12=0.308 Δm221=7.50x10-5eV2 Solar sin2θ12=0.311 Δm221=4.85x10-5eV2 Neutrino energy spectrum is convoluted in the electron recoil spectrum. For de-convolution, generic functions are used as a survival probability; f8B=5.25 x 106/(cm2∙sec) fhep=7.88 x 103/(cm2∙sec) SK recoil electron spectrum constrain the fit parameters (ci,ei) of the function and the allowed Pee(En) is derived using the allowed (ci,ei).

Allowed Pee(En) for SK preliminary Solar+KamLAND sin2θ12=0.308 Δm221=7.50x10-5eV2 SK Solar sin2θ12=0.311 Δm221=4.85x10-5eV2 MSW (solar+KamLAND) is consistent at ~1.6σ MSW (solar) fits better (at ~0.7σ)

Allowed Pee(En) for SK+SNO preliminary Solar+KamLAND sin2θ12=0.308 Δm221=7.50x10-5eV2 SK SK+SNO SNO Solar sin2θ12=0.311 Δm221=4.85x10-5eV2 SK and SNO are complementary for the shape constraint MSW is consistent at 1σ

Global view of Pee(En) preliminary all solar (pp) Borexino (pep) Borexino (8B) Borexino (7Be) SK+SNO we see somehow upturn curve, but the significance level is 1sigma Homestake +SK+SNO (CNO)

Flux zenith angle distribution SK-I - IV combined (Eth=4.5 MeV for SK-I,III,IV 6.5 MeV for SK-II) Solar best fit sin2θ12=0.311 Δm221=4.85x10-5eV2 Earth θz Solar+KamLAND sin2θ12=0.308 Δm221=7.50x10-5eV2 Sun preliminary

Day/Night asymmetry amplitude preliminary Energy-dependence of the variation Rate/Rateaverage expected Δm221=4.84x10-5 eV2 sin2θ12=0.311 sin2θ13=0.025 Fitted asymmetry amplitude Δm221=4.84x10-5 eV2 Δm221=7.50x10-5 eV2 SK-I -2.0±1.8±1.0% -1.9±1.7±1.0% SK-II -4.4±3.8±1.0% -4.4±3.6±1.0% SK-III -4.2±2.7±0.7% -3.8±2.6±0.7% SK-IV -3.6±1.6±0.6% -3.3±1.5±0.6% combined -3.3±1.0±0.5% -3.1±1.0±0.5% non-zero significance 3.0σ 2.8σ First observation of day/night asymmetry at 3s significance level

Δm221 dependence Solar region KamLAND region preliminary sin2θ12=0.311, sin2θ13=0.025 1σ Solar 1σ KamLAND Solar region differ from zero by 2.9~3.0σ agree with expect by 1.0σ 3.0σ 2.9σ 2.8σ expected SK-I,II,III,IV best fit KamLAND region differ from zero by more than 2.8σ agree with expect by 1.3σ Let me explain More precisely

Summary SK has observed ~70000 solar n interactions, by far the largest sample of solar neutrino events in the world. SK data provide the first indication (at 2.8~3.0 s) of terrestrial matter effects on 8B solar n oscillation. SK gives the world’s strongest constraints on the shape of the survival probability Pee(Eν) in the transition region between vacuum oscillations and MSW resonance. SK spectrum results are consistent with MSW up-turn prediction within ~1s. SK measurements strongly constrain neutrino oscillation parameters: SK gives world’s best constraint on Δm212 using neutrinos. There is a 2s tension between SK’s neutrino and KamLAND’s anti- neutrino measurement of Δm212. Last month SK started taking data at ~2.5 MeV at ~100% trigger efficiency. Stay tuned for very low energy SK neutrino.

Extra slides

Full summary SK has observed ~70000 solar neutrino interactions in ~4500days (1.5 solar cycles), by far the largest sample of solar neutrino events in the world. SK data provide the first indication (at 2.8~3.0 sigma) of terrestrial matter effects on 8B solar neutrino oscillation. This is the first observation using a single detector and identical neutrino beams that matter affects neutrino oscillations. SK has successfully lowered the analysis threshold to ~3.5 MeV kinetic recoil electron energy. SK gives the world’s strongest constraints on the shape of the survival probability Pee(Eν) in the transition region between vacuum oscillations and MSW resonance. SK spectrum results slightly disfavor the MSW resonance curves, but are consistent with MSW prediction within 1-1.7 sigma. SK measurements strongly constrain neutrino oscillation parameters: SK uniquely selects the Large Mixing Angle MSW region by >3sigma, gives world’s best constraint on solar Δm2 using neutrinos, and significantly contributes to the measurement of the solar angle. There is a 2 sigma tension between SK’s neutrino and KamLAND’s anti-neutrino measurement of the solar Δm2. Last month SK started taking data at ~2.5 MeV at ~100% trigger efficiency. Stay tuned for very low energy SK solar neutrino

Wide-band Intelligent Trigger Reconstruction and Reduction just after Front-end 100% trigger efficiency above 2.5MeV(kin.) Just started

Oscillation parameter

Event rate becomes low and stable in SK-IV Improvements in SK-IV Reduced BG Event rate becomes low and stable in SK-IV 4.0-4.5 MeV bin SK-III SK-IV Reduced systematic error 1.7% for flux cf. SK-I: 3.2% SK-III: 2.1% SK is 17 years old, but sill improving achieved 3.5 MeV(kin.) energy threshold 7.5s level signal is observed at 3.5MeV bin

significance of the signal The MSG non-zero signal significance is 8.6 sigma (2.4129/0.2811) 3.5- 4.0 MeV Data/SSM=0.4596+0.0546-0.0535 Flux=2.4129+0.2866-0.2811

SK+SNO 8B total flux For each oscillation parameter set there is a minimum chi2 and a 8B error term describing the parabolic increase of the chi2 with deviations from the best chi2. The reduced chi2 vs. 8B flux is below. The jump is due to the relatively coarse grid in theta12. 5.30+0.17-0.11x10^6/(cm2 sec), which is a (+3%,-2%) error on the total 8B for SK+SNO compared to the 1.5% error of SK's ES flux by itself.

Systematic errors Total 1.7 % Source SK-IV flux (3.5-19.5MeV) SK-III flux (4.5-19.5MeV) energy scale +1.14, -1.16% ±1.4% energy resolution +0.14, -0.08% ±0.2% B8 spectrum +0.33, -0.37% trigger efficiency ±0.1% ±0.5% angular resolution +0.32, -0.25% ±0.67% vertex shift ±0.18% ±0.54% BG event cut ±0.36% ±0.4% hit pattern cut ±0.27% ±0.25% another vertex cut removed ±0.45% spallation cut gamma cut ±0.26% cluster hit cut +0.45, -0.44% BG shape signal extraction ±0.7% cross section Systematic errors Total 1.7 %

8B solar n in SK-I+II+III+IV 8B n signals

Data set for global solar analysis The most up-to-date data are used SK: SK-I 1496 days, spectrum 4.5-19.5 MeV(kin.)+D/N:Ekin>4.5 MeV SK-II 791 days, spectrum 6.5-19.5 MeV(kin.)+D/N: Ekin>7.0 MeV SK-III 548 days, spectrum 4.0-19.5 MeV(kin.)+D/N: Ekin>4.5 MeV SK-IV 1669 days, spectrum 3.5-19.5 MeV(kin.)+D/N: Ekin>4.5 MeV SNO: Parameterized analysis (c0, c1, c2, a0, a1) of all SNO phased. (PRC88, 025501 (2013)) Same method is applied to both SK and SNO with a0 and a1 to LMA expectation Radiochemical: Cl, Ga Ga rate: 66.1±3.1 SNU (All Ga global) (PRC80, 015807 (2009)) Cl rate: 2.56±0.23 SNU(Astrophys. J.496, 505 (1998) ) Borexino: Latest 7Be flux (PRL 107, 141302 (2011)) KamLAND reactor : Latest (3-flavor) analysis (PRD88, 3, 033001 (2013)) 8B spectrum: Winter 2006 (PRC73, 73, 025503 (2006)) 8B and hep flux f8B=5.25 x 106/(cm2∙sec) fhep=7.88 x 103/(cm2∙sec)

Day/Night Amplitude fit Straight calc. combined -3.3±1.0±0.5% (sin2θ12=0.311, sin2θ13=0.025) Amplitude fit Straight calc. (D-N)/((D+N)/2) Δm221=4.84x10-5 eV2 Δm221=7.50x10-5 eV2 SK-I -2.0±1.8±1.0% -1.9±1.7±1.0% -2.1±2.0±1.3% SK-II -4.4±3.8±1.0% -4.4±3.6±1.0% -5.5±4.2±3.7% SK-III -4.2±2.7±0.7% -3.8±2.6±0.7% -5.9±3.2±1.3% SK-IV -3.6±1.6±0.6% -3.3±1.5±0.6% -4.9±1.8±1.4% combined -3.3±1.0±0.5% -3.1±1.0±0.5% -4.1±1.2±0.8% non-zero significance 3.0σ 2.8σ preliminary expected time variation as a function of cosθz Rate/Rateaverage α : day-night asym. scaling factor

exponential parameterization Solar+KamLAND sin2θ12=0.308 Δm221=7.50x10-5eV2 Solar sin2θ12=0.311 Δm221=4.85x10-5eV2 SK spectrum, red : exponential, green : quadratic preliminary

SK-I+II+III+IV spectrum N.B. All SK phase are combined without regard to energy resolution or systematics in this figure (total # of bins of SKI - IV is 83) χ2 Solar+KamLAND 70.13 Solar 68.14 quadratic fit 67.67 Solar+KamLAND sin2θ12=0.308 Δm221=7.50x10-5eV2 Solar sin2θ12=0.311 Δm221=4.85x10-5eV2 Neutrino energy spectrum is convoluted in the electron recoil spectrum. For de-convolution, a generic quadratic function is used as a survival probability; f8B=5.25 x 106/(cm2∙sec) fhep=7.88 x 103/(cm2∙sec) SK recoil electron spectrum constrain the fit parameters (ci) of the function and the allowed Pee(En) is derived using the allowed (ci).

Multiple scattering goodness 3.5-4.0MeV Induced multiple scattering goodness(MSG) in SK-IV analysis. Although the 214Bi decay-electrons (majority of low energy BG) fluctuate up above 5.0MeV, they truly have energy less than 3.3MeV and should have more multiple scattering than true 5.0MeV electrons. MSG > 0.45 MSG < 0.35 4.0-4.5MeV MSG > 0.45 MSG < 0.35

MSG For each PMT hit pair, the vectors to the Chrenkov ring cross points are the direction candidates MSG = vector sum of the candidates/ scalar sum of the candidates MSG of multiple scattering events should be small

Comparison with others BOREXINO SNO KamLAND Super-K Comparing to other experiments, Super-K spectrum has the most precise results. Super-K spectrum is the most precise!

Solar Neutrinos BOREXINO MSW (solar&KL) MSW (solar) BORE- XINO Pee p+p➝d+e++νe (99.77%) p+e-+p➝d+νe (0.23%) all solar BOREXINO BORE- XINO pep pp MSW (solar&KL) d+p➝3He+γ MSW (solar) SK & SNO 3Ηe+α➝7Be+γ 15.08% 3Ηe+3Ηe➝α+2p 84.92% 3He+p➝α+e++νe Cl BORE- XINO 7Be+e-➝7Li+νe 99.9% 8B 7Be 7Be+p➝8B+γ 0.1% Hep 8B+➝8Be*+e++νe 7Li+p➝α+α; 8Be*➝α+α

Super-K water transparency @ Cherenkov light wavelength Measured by decay e-e+ from cosmic m-m+ SK-III SK-IV Started automatic temperature control anti-correlated with Supply water temperature

Convection suppression in SK Very precisely temperature-controlled (±0.01oC) water is supplied to the bottom. 3.5MeV-4.5MeV Event distribution Temperature gradation in Z Return to Water system The difference is only 0.2 oC Purified Water supply r2