The Bimodal Solar Wind-Magnetosphere- Ionosphere System George Siscoe Center for Space Physics Boston University ●Vasyliunas Dichotomization Momentum transfer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UAH The Spinning Terrella Experiment: Lab Analog for Earth's Magnetosphere Robert Sheldon 1, Eric Reynolds 2 1 National Space Science and Technology Center,
Advertisements

Generation of the transpolar potential Ramon E. Lopez Dept. of Physics UT Arlington.
Anti-Parallel Merging and Component Reconnection: Role in Magnetospheric Dynamics M.M Kuznetsova, M. Hesse, L. Rastaetter NASA/GSFC T. I. Gombosi University.
Principles of Global Modeling Paul Song Department of Physics, and Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Massachusetts Lowell Introduction Principles.
Formation of the Magnetosphere 1 Solar Wind. Formation of the Magnetosphere 2 Solar Wind Bow Shock Magnetosheath.
DEFINITION, CALCULATION, AND PROPERTIES OF THE Dst INDEX R.L. McPherron Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California Los Angeles.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
The role of solar wind energy flux for transpolar arc luminosity A.Kullen 1, J. A. Cumnock 2,3, and T. Karlsson 2 1 Swedish Institute of Space Physics,
IMF Bx influence on the magnetotail neutral sheet geometry and dynamics E. Gordeev, M. Amosova, V. Sergeev Saint-Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg,
Occurrence and properties of substorms associated with pseudobreakups Anita Kullen Space & Plasma Physics, EES.
SuperDARN Workshop May 30 – June Magnetopause reconnection rate and cold plasma density: a study using SuperDARN Mark Lester 1, Adrian Grocott 1,2,
Comparing the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction at Mercury and Saturn A. Masters Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration.
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling Magnetic reconnection In most solar system environments magnetic fields are “frozen” to the plasma - different plasmas.
Phase Coherence on Open Field Lines Associated with FLRs Abiyu Nedie, Frances Fenrich & Robert Rankin University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 2011.
O. M. Shalabiea Department of Physics, Northern Borders University, KSA.
Ionospheric Electric Field Variations during Geomagnetic Storms Simulated using CMIT W. Wang 1, A. D. Richmond 1, J. Lei 1, A. G. Burns 1, M. Wiltberger.
Reinisch_ Solar Terrestrial Relations (Cravens, Physics of Solar Systems Plasmas, Cambridge U.P.) Lecture 1- Space Environment –Matter in.
Lecture 3 Introduction to Magnetic Storms. An isolated substorm is caused by a brief (30-60 min) pulse of southward IMF. Magnetospheric storms are large,
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
Relation Between Electric Fields and Ionospheric/magnetospheric Plasma Flows at Very Low Latitudes Paul Song Center for Atmospheric Research University.
What DMSP Data Tell us About the Thermosphere Response to Solar Wind Forcing Delores Knipp CU Aerospace Engineering Sciences and NCAR HAO With Assistance.
S. Elkington, June 11, 2009 An overview of Earth’s magnetosphere and its coupling with the solar wind Scot R. Elkington LASP, University of Colorado
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
Benoit Lavraud CESR/CNRS, Toulouse, France Uppsala, May 2008 The altered solar wind – magnetosphere interaction at low Mach numbers: Magnetosheath and.
The Physics of Space Plasmas William J. Burke 14 November 2012 University of Massachusetts, Lowell Magnetic Storms and Substorms.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
The Physics of Space Plasmas William J. Burke 31October 2012 University of Massachusetts, Lowell Magnetic Storms.
Vytenis M. Vasyliūnas Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung,
The Magnetopause Back in 1930 Chapman and Ferraro foresaw that a planetary magnetic field could provide an effective obstacle to the solar-wind plasma.
14 May JIM M. RAINES University of Michigan DANIEL J. GERSHMAN, THOMAS H. ZURBUCHEN, JAMES A. SLAVIN, HAJE KORTH, and BRIAN J. ANDERSON Magnetospheric.
An Atmospheric Vortex as the Driver of Saturn’s Electromagnetic Periodicities: 1. Global Simulations Xianzhe Jia 1, Margaret Kivelson 1,2, and, Tamas Gombosi.
9 May MESSENGER First Flyby Magnetospheric Results J. A. Slavin and the MESSENGER Team BepiColombo SERENA Team Meeting Santa Fe, New Mexico 11 May.
Statistical properties of southward IMF and its geomagnetic effectiveness X. Zhang, M. B. Moldwin Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences,
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Earth’s Magnetosphere NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
Influence of solar wind density on ring current response R.S. Weigel George Mason University.
2001/02/08T E Moore - SW Interactions via LENA1 Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interactions via Low Energy Neutral Atom Imaging T E Moore[1], M R Collier[1],
Main Theme: Three Worlds of Super-CMEs At home
Simultaneous in-situ observations of the feature of a typical FTE by Cluster and TC1 Zhang Qinghe Liu Ruiyuan Polar Research Institute of China
Space Weather in Earth’s magnetosphere MODELS  DATA  TOOLS  SYSTEMS  SERVICES  INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Space Weather Researc h Center Masha Kuznetsova.
Global MHD Simulation with BATSRUS from CCMC ESS 265 UCLA1 (Yasong Ge, Megan Cartwright, Jared Leisner, and Xianzhe Jia)
17th Cluster workshop Uppsala, Sweden , May 12-15, 2009
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
Magnetospheric Current System During Disturbed Times.
The effects of the solar wind on Saturn’s space environment
Particle precipitation has been intensely studied by ionospheric and magnetospheric physicists. As particles bounce along the earth's magnetic fields they.
© Research Section for Plasma and Space Physics UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Daytime Aurora Jøran Moen.
Substorms: Ionospheric Manifestation of Magnetospheric Disturbances P. Song, V. M. Vasyliūnas, and J. Tu University of Massachusetts Lowell Substorms:
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Magnetospheres 1 As the magnetized solar wind flows past the Earth, the plasma interacts with Earth’s magnetic field.
Multi-Fluid/Particle Treatment of Magnetospheric- Ionospheric Coupling During Substorms and Storms R. M. Winglee.
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling: Alfven Wave Reflection, Transmission and Mode Conversion P. Song and V. M. Vasyliūnas Center for Atmospheric Research.
Challenges The topological status of the magnetosphere: open or closed? Driver(s) of ionospheric sunward flow Source(s) of NBZ currents Key problem: are.
Paul Song Center for Atmospheric Research
Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
The Magnetopause Back in 1930 Chapman and Ferraro foresaw that a planetary magnetic field could provide an effective obstacle to the solar-wind plasma.
Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Date Day Topic Instructor Due
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
Introduction to Space Weather
The Bow Shock and Magnetosheath
Principles of Global Modeling
Energy conversion boundaries
Dynamic Coupling between the Magnetosphere and the Ionosphere
Added-Value Users of ACE Real Time Solar Wind (RTSW) Data
Magnetosphere: Structure and Properties
Presentation transcript:

The Bimodal Solar Wind-Magnetosphere- Ionosphere System George Siscoe Center for Space Physics Boston University ●Vasyliunas Dichotomization Momentum transfer via dipole interaction Momentum transfer via atmospheric drag ●Dipole Interaction Regime No effect on neutral atmosphere Transpolar potential proportional to IEF Dayside compression ●Atmospheric Drag Regime Cause of neutral flywheel Transpolar potential saturation Dayside rarefaction Magnetopause “erosion” ●Summary Dichotomization, transpolar potential saturation, dayside compression versus rarefaction, magnetopause erosion, and neutral flywheel all part of one story

 o  P V A ε ~ 1  P = ionospheric Pedersen conductance V A = Alfvén speed in the solar wind ε = magnetic reconnection efficiency Key Point By this criterion, the standard magnetosphere is solar wind dominated; the storm-time magnetosphere, ionosphere dominated. Vasyliunas Dichotomization Vasyliunas (2004) divided magnetospheres into solar wind dominated and ionosphere dominated depending on whether the magnetic pressure generated by the reconnection-driven ionospheric current is, respectively, less than or greater than the solar wind ram pressure. The operative criterion is CMEs CIRs Ionosphere Dominated Solar Wind Dominated Lindsay et al., 1995

Based on the method of momentum transfer between the solar wind and the terrestrial system, they correspond to dipole interaction dominated and atmospheric drag dominated To emphasize their dynamical difference, we choose “dipole interaction” and “atmospheric drag” to distinguish them. Alternative Nomenclature Based on current systems, Vasyliunas’ two cases correspond to Chapman-Ferraro domination and region 1 domination.

Midgley & Davis, 1963 x z Chapman & Ferraro, 1931 Chapman-Ferraro Current System I CF = B SS Z n.p. /  o  3.5 MA Pertinent Properties of Dipole Interaction C-F compression = 2.3 dipole field 2x10 7 N

Ram Pressure Contribution to Dst April 2000 storm Huttunen et al., 2002 GOES 8 A dipole interaction property Psw compresses the magnetosphere and Increases the magnetic field on the dayside. Chapman-Ferraro Compression

V B E Interplanetary Electric Field Determines Transpolar Potential A magnetopause reconnection property ●Magnetopause reconnection ●Equals transpolar potential ●Transpolar potential varies linarly with Ey (Boyle et al., 1997) ●Magnetosphere a voltage source as seen by ionosphere IMF = (0, 0, -5) nT Transpolar Potential (kV) Ey (mV/m)

Dipole Interaction Dominated Magnetosphere Summary ●Psw compresses the magnetospheric field and increases Dst. ●Ey increases the transpolar potential linearly. ●Magnetosphere a voltage source Field compression and linearity of response to Ey hold for only one of the two modes of magnetospheric responses to solar wind drivers—the usual one. Key Point

Then Came Field-Aligned Currents Iijima & Potemra, 1976 Region 1 Region 2 Atkinson, 1978 R 1 C-F Tail Total Field-Aligned Currents for Moderate Activity (IEF ~1 mV/m) Region 1 : 2 MA Region 2 : 1.5 MA 3.5 MA 5.5 MA 1 MA/10 Re Question: How do you self-consistently accommodate the extra 2 MA?

Answer: You Don’t. You replace the Chapman-Ferraro current with it. IMF = (0, 0, -5) nT Chapman-Ferraro System Region 1 System (JxB) x This is the usual case

Pure Region 1 Current System IMF = (0, 0, -20) nT

Region 1 Current System Fills Magnetopause Region 1 Current Contours

X=+25 X= -70 S= ρVV + p I + B 2 /2μ o I - BB/μ o Net Force on Terrestrial System Integrate x-component of momentum stress tensor over a surface containing the terrestrial system Net Force = 1.2x10 8 N IMF = (0, 0, -20) nT Net Force = 2.4x10 7 N IMF = (0, 0, 0) nT

Drag Amplification I 1 xB PC x l = 2x10 8 N/MA I 1 xB MP x l = 1x10 7 N/MA Back of the envelope estimate i.e., roughly an order of magnitude amplification

Region 1 Current Contours Region 1 Current Streamlines Region 1 Force on the Atmosphere 5x10 8 N IMF = (0, 0, -20) nT

Atmospheric Reaction ●Region 1 current gives the J in the JxB force that stands off the solar wind ●And communicates the force to the ionosphere ●Which communicates it (amplified) to the neutral atmosphere as the flywheel effect ●Sometimes more than 200 m/s in the E region Bow Shock Streamlines Region 1 Current Reconnection Current Ram Pressure Cusp Richmond et al., 2003 Goncharenko et al., Sept. 1998

Elementary Dynamics ●The force on the neutral atmosphere is total region 1 current times polar magnetic field strength times length across polar cap: or (qualitatively) I 1 xB P x l ●The mass of the atmosphere in and above the E region over the polar cap ~ kg. ●This gives an acceleration of ~ 7 m/s/hr/MA ●For example, 5 MA region 1 current applied for 10 hours gives a speed of ~350 m/s in the E region for the flywheel Key Point In establishing the neutral flywheel, duration of current might count for more than strength of ram pressure.

Other Properties of Pure Atmospheric Drag Coupling ●Most region 1 current closes on bow shock (Alfvén wings) ●Reason: small field strength difference between tail and magnetosheath ●Low-latitude cusp and equatorial dimple Zero IMF IMF Bz = -20 nT X = 0

0 o 5 nT45 o 5 nT 90 o 5 nT 180 o 2 nT 180 o 10 nT 180 o 20 nT 180 o 30 nT Cahill & Winckler, 1999 Dipole Field Dayside Magnetic Decompression

IMF = 0 Chapman- Ferraro Region 1 IMF Bz = -30 Transpolar Potential Saturation Where:  H is the transpolar potential.  R is the potential from magnetopause reconnection.  I is the potential at which region 1 currents generate. a significant perturbation magnetic field at the reconnection site /1 31  sw E o P P E H /  

IMF = 0 Chapman- Ferraro Region 1 IMF Bz = -30 Baseline (P SW =1.67, Σ=6) Ey (mV/m) Transpolar Potential (kV) P SW =10 Σ=12 Transpolar Potential Saturation Saturation regime Linear regime / sw P E H 

Evidence of Two Coupling Modes Transpolar potential saturation Instead of this You have this Reduced dayside compression seen at synchronous orbit Instead of this You have this Hairston et al., Transpolar Potential (kV) Ey (mV/m) April 2000 storm Huttunen et al., 2002 GOES 8 Mühlbachler et al., 2003 ΔB = “erosion” contribution to B tot

Dipole Interaction Dominant 1.Dominant current system Chapman-Ferraro 2.Magnetopause current closes on magnetopause 3.Magnetopause a bullet-shaped quasi-tangential discontinuity 4.Force transfer by dipole Interaction 5.Transpolar potential proportional to IEF 6.Solar wind a voltage source for ionosphere 7.Compression strengthens dayside magnetic field 8.Minor magnetosphere erosion Atmospheric Drag Dominant 1.Dominant current system Region 1 2.Magnetopause current closes through ionosphere and bow shock 3.Magnetopause a system of MHD waves with a dimple 4.Force transfer by atmospheric drag Drag amplification and neutral flywheel 5.Transpolar potential saturates 6.Solar wind a current source for ionosphere 7.Stretching weakens dayside magnetic field 8.Major magnetosphere erosion Summary Dichotomization, transpolar potential saturation, weak Dst response to ram pressure, magnetopause erosion, neutral flywheel effect all part of one story. The Bimodal SWMIA System