College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI) The NEW Report Card in Georgia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All.
Advertisements

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All of.
THE CARVER EARLY COLLEGE PARENT GUIDE TO ASSESSMENTS, STATE ACADEMIC, AND STANDARDIZED TESTS BY MS. JERICA JONES EARLY COLLEGE PARENT LIAISON.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Achievement Points (70 pts) Progress Points (15 pts ) Achievement Gap (15 pts) Challenge Points (10 pts) CRCTs (28 pts) Readiness (21 pts) Graduation Predictor.
Rhode Island Accountability Process Revisions for School Years 2015 and 2016 A Presentation to the Accountability 3.0 Statewide Webinar March 27, 2015.
Georgia’s College and Career Ready Performance Index Martha R. Reichrath, Ph.D. Deputy State Superintendent Georgia Department of Education Office of Curriculum,
CCRPI Trends and Achievement Gap Details. Pioneer RESA Evaluation & Assessment.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Friday, February 7 th 8:30am. Conversation 8:30-9:30 1. Welcome 2. Where is Georgia in comparison to other states? 3. What is making the difference? 4.
Data Overview and Analysis for the Past Five Years N ORTHWOOD Elementary School Presentation for NWES Faculty on November 12, 2013 Presented by: Megan.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
February 21, /6/ College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School Model Grades DRAFT Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent.
Assessment Update 2008 GACIS Fall Conference. Transition of Assessments to the GPS Two major tasks: 1.Content alignment “What students must know” Make.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
State Charter Schools Commission of Georgia SCSC Academic Accountability Update State Charter School Performance
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
Ware County High School State of the School Address Dr. Tim Dixon Dr. Tim Dixon.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Sonoraville Elementary Parent Meeting February 3, 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Tift County High School ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING SY16 Tap Knowledge – Capture Wisdom - Harness Talents -Sculpt Minds.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
Accountability and School Grades FY 16 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting March 17, 2016 Everglades Preparatory Academy.
“A Caring, Committed, Community” = CHANGE Vision SkillsIncentivesResources Action Plans Results = CONFUSION SkillsIncentivesResources Action.
Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,
Data Overview Faculty Meeting-October 14,2014 Mission Possible: MOTIVATE, EDUCATE, GRADUATE!!!
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Overview of the Georgia Student Growth Model 1.
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
CINS Data Presentation
Overview of the Redesigned CCRPI
Objectives Define what Title I is and why it is important to be a Title I school Highlight your rights as a Title I parent Describe ways you can be involved.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
Secondary Assessment Transition
Federal Programs Conference June 21, 2017
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
ESSA for AFESC Schools 2018 Under the reauthorization of ESEA, the federal government required each state to design an accountability system that met.
Georgia’s College and Career Ready Performance Index
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model
College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades
Irvington Public Schools
Georgia Education Leadership Institute September 9, 2016
Starting Community Conversations
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated
Georgia Education Leadership Institute September 9, 2016
Georgia’s College and Career Ready Performance Index
Presentation transcript:

College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI) The NEW Report Card in Georgia

CONTEXT

THE UGLY lead-to-the-CRCT-cheating-scandal

NCLB Waiver Georgia’s Application is APPROVED!

APPROVED WAIVERS – Round 1

APPROVED WAIVERS – Round 2

In Your Folder 1. CCRPI Overview (yellow and pink) 2. CCRPI Indicators (blue and white) 3. CCRPI Reports (ES, MS, & HS) 4. CCRPI Scores - Tables and Charts 5. Graduation Rates ( ) 5. AYP vs. CCRPI

100 points possible!

60 points

100 points possible! 60 points 25 points

100 points possible! 60 points 25 points 15 points

100 points possible! 60 points 25 points 15 points up to 10 “bonus” points.

100 points possible! 60 points 25 points 15 points up to 10 “bonus” points. New Areas for 2014 – 1 to 5 Star Rating (Poor to Excellent)

ACHIEVEMENT 60 Points! CONTENT MASTERY (40%) READINESS(30%) GRADUATION (30%) Indicators: 10 Points Each (before weights are calculated)

ACHIEVEMENT Elementary and Middle Georgia CRCT Reading English/ Language Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies CONTENT MASTERY

ACHIEVEMENT High School 9 th Grade and American Literature Algebra & Geometry Physical Science and Biology U.S. History and Economics End of Course Tests (EOCTs) CONTENT MASTERY

Achievement - Content Mastery Elementary and Middle School HIGH SCHOOLS End of Course Tests 9 th Grade / American Lit Algebra & Geometry Physical Science and Biology U.S. History and Economics

Achievement (60 points) Indicators: Description of what is being evaluated. Elementary and middle schools have a total of 14 indicators; high schools have __.

Achievement (60 points) Goal: 100% of students to score at the Meets or Exceeds level.

Achievement (60 points) Proficiency: 83.9% of elementary students scored at the Meets or Exceeds level on ELA (English Language Arts).

Achievement (60 points) Indicators: Valued at 10 points each (before weights are applied).

Achievement (60 points) Points Earned are Cumulative! Reading Performance /10 = 8.4.

Achievement (60 points) Average Performance (Points Earned/ Points Possible) (39.5/50) =.79. Elementary schools earned 79% of the points possible in this category.

Achievement (60 points) Average Performance (Points Earned/ Points Possible) (39.5/50) =.79. Elementary schools earned 79% of the points possible in this category.

Achievement (60 points) This section is actually worth 40% of the entire Achievement component.

Achievement (60 points) Elementary schools earned 31.6 points for this section. These points contribute to the total CCRPI score.

ACHIEVEMENT Elementary and Middle English Learners Writing/ Reading Levels Students with Disabilities Career Awareness/Career Portfolios Graduation Plan (IGP) Student Attendance READINESS INDICATORS

Post Readiness Indicators Scoring process is the same as before, but some indicators have a benchmark or expectation < 100%. These benchmarks are adjusted …schools earn additional points. Elementary schools earned 22 points for this section. HIGH SCHOOL READINESS Pathway Completers Career Ready Credentials College-Ready Credentials Reading/ Writing Levels Student Attendance OTHER ACHIEVEMENT OUTCOMES

ACHIEVEMENT Elementary and Middle Passing Core Classes AND CRCT Exceeding CRCT Expectations Graduation Rate Predictor = Grad Rate

Graduation Predictors/ Graduation Rate Equivalent of Graduation Rate, but at the elementary and middle school level Elementary schools earned 16.8 points for this section. The contributions of the three sections are added together and multiplied by 60. Achievement points earned – 42.2 out of 60 possible points. High School Graduation Rate 4 Year Graduation Rate 5 Year Graduation Rate

Progress = Student Growth!

PROGRESS (25 points)

Progress is a term used to describe how well students are growing academically relative to similar achieving students across the State of Georgia. How Progress is Determined: 1)Students are placed into peer groups (based on previous test scores) 2)Current test scores for each peer group are ranked from (SGPs). 3)The SGPS are rated as low (1-33), typical (34-65), or high (66 – 99)

Progress Calculations Step 1: Group Students (Academic Peer Groups) Rubric is subject to change. Georgia Student Growth Percentiles

Georgia Department of Education Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent All Rights Reserved vs. High Performing – Low Growth Low Performing High Growth Hannah John Step 2: R ank student growth from (using SGPs).

Georgia Department of Education Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent All Rights Reserved vs. High Performing – Low Growth Low Performing High Growth Step 3: Rate SGPs as Low, Typical, or High Hannah John LOW GROWTH HIGH GROWTH (counts)

PROGRESS (25 points) 63.7% of students showed growth that was rated by the Georgia Department of Education as Typical or High (credit-worthy).

ACHIEVEMENT GAP (15 points) GAP SIZE - Distance between statewide and lowest performing students (bottom 25%)

GAP SIZE Average Student Performance Lowest 25% (School) Georgia

Gap Size Scale 0123 Extremely Wide Gap Wide Gap Narrow, Minimum Gap No Gap (Performing as well as or better than the state)

ACHIEVEMENT GAP (15 points) GAP SIZE - Distance between statewide and lowest performing students (bottom 25%)

GAP CHANGE 2012 vs.2013

Gap Change Scale 0 Essentially no change (the same Gap still exists or has widened) Has moved in the right direction towards Minimizing the Gap Has really Narrowed the Gap Has practically Closed the Gap (performing as well as or above the State of GA) 123

CHALLENGE POINTS

CHALLENGE POINTS (up to 10) Schools Earn Points Two Areas: High Performance - Exceeding the Bar Indicators High Performance of Subgroups - Performance Targets Schools Earn Points Two Areas: High Performance - Exceeding the Bar Indicators High Performance of Subgroups - Performance Targets

EXCEEDING THE BAR ½ point each

Subgroup Performance

Eligible for 10 Flags Earned 2 Flags (or 20%) Get 20% of the Points!.20 x 7.3 = 1.5

Survey Results Discipline Data Attendance Data Federal Data School Climate

Contact Dr. Rubye Sullivan Director of Research and Evaluation Joy F. Johnson, PhD Research Associate - Accountability Larry Watts Research Associate

60% = 60 pointsESMSHigh Content Mastery = 40% (max of 24 points) Post Readiness = 30% (max of 18 points) Graduation / Grad Rate = 30% (max of 18 points) * ACHIEVEMENT Weighted Point Values of Indicators HS Indicator – 4-Year Grad Rate = 6 pts 5-year Grad rate = 12 pts