Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) 2014-2015 Circle Survey Training November 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Liaison Meeting Thursday – April 10, 2008 Wilson Middle School.
Advertisements

Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title I, Part A Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) Summative Assessment and Professional Growth Goals Conferences June 2014 Webinar.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Compass Information System – Information for LSASPA Members
Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) Circle Survey Training November
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Randall Kirk, WVEIS Programmer Extraordinaire (Shawn L. Hawkins, Teacher Quality Coordinator June 23, 2011)
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
PRINCIPAL AND TEACHER EVALUATION OVERVIEW What’s Next for Counselors? Lois Kappler Project Manager.
Division of Special Education
Central Office Administrator Development and Evaluation Adaptations for Central Office Administrators.
Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.
TSDL Teacher Student Data Linkage Data Collection Review: 3 General Collections 1 Special Ed Collection 2 Early Childhood Collections 2 CTE Vocational.
MPES: The Circle Survey Conference March 27,
Hacienda La Puente Unified School District Early Assessment Program Parent Notification Practices Celebrating Student Success.
Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES): Goal-Setting and Quantification August 2014.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Stanford Employee Survey. Topics Background, Purpose of Employee Satisfaction Surveys –Survey Specifics –Survey Participants, Spring and Fall 2010 Fall.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Agenda Teacher Certification Overview New Human Capital Profile System
Equitable Services for Private School Students March, 2012 Consultation Process & Meeting Agenda’s Marcia Beckman, Director Elementary & Secondary Education.
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda February 6, 2014  AchieveNJ  Official Waiver Process…  Assessing and Adjusting SGOs (see attachment)  Marzano.
Copyright © 2011 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved.Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Indiana” ? The TELL Indiana.
SGOs for Educators Providing Educational Services March 12, 2014 AchieveNJ Website Wireless connection at DOE Guest – doeit/wireless.
Creating a Movement Creating a Movement. Secondary Mathematics News and Next Steps Staff Development Day March 18, 2011.
© 2013 K12 Insight Central Office Climate Survey Results Las Cruces Public Schools March , 2013.
Why/Purpose Instructional Support Services Program Review The purpose of the review is to create a well-articulated, high quality, financially sustainable.
Mississippi Student Services Coordinators Appraisal Rubric (M-SSAR)
BEST Standards in Teaching Rubric.  Overview  State Legislation  District Policy  Key Components and Rating Percentiles  Outline the Evaluation Process,
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
EPotential ICT Capabilities Resource. The ePotential ICT Capabilities Resource (ePotential) is designed to: Assist teachers to develop their own ICT Professional.
Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Orientation Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System LaRue County.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Why are we here? All Title I schools are required to hold an annual meeting for Title I parents* for the purpose of informing you of: our school’s participation.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
School Improvement Activities Accreditation (AdvancED) Process Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Superintendent Report September 22, Ground rules  Every challenge is real & unique  The experts are in the room  We absolutely can find solutions.
Climate Survey Training Training for Planning and Administration Leader Keys Effectiveness System 1.
PARCC Spring,  Testing Window for ELA and Math: 4/24-5/27  MCAS Grade 8 Science Testing Window: 5/10-5/24  TMMS Testing Dates: TBD PARCC OVERVIEW.
TELL Floyd Frequently Asked Questions Copyright © 2016 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Floyd” ? TELL Floyd is an additional.
Copyright © 2011 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved.Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Indiana” ? The TELL Indiana.
2016 TELL ACPS Survey Frequently Asked Questions Updated January 13, 2016.
DESE District Review Center for District and School Accountability Site Visit: April 11-14, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
ELA/Math Standards Review Panel Presentation to the BESE Assessment Oversight Committee Brooke Clenchy, Sr. Associate Commissioner March 22, 2016.
Student Perception Survey: Survey Coordinator Training Office of Policy and Evaluation April 2016.
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System. DECISION REQUIRED BY MARCH 2013 Current Evaluation and PD Models The current evaluation plan was last revised.
Compass Information System (CIS)
PSSA Parent University
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
Fall Parent Input Meeting MARCH 2017 BOTH SESSIONS
Multi Rater Feedback Surveys FAQs for Participants
Multi Rater Feedback Surveys FAQs for Participants
Title I, Part A - Parent & Family Engagement Compliance Monitoring Review Training The Federal Programs Department September 26, 2018.
Approved Evaluator Training Provider Application Process
Staff Assignment Codes
11/30/2018 Approved Evaluator Training Provider on the Colorado State Model Evaluation System Application Process November 2016.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
Alternate Assessment Updates
Evaluation Information
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) Circle Survey Training November 2014

1.What is the MPES? 2.Circle Survey overview 3.How to access and complete the survey 4.Circle Survey results Goals for Today’s Training 2

The Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) is a measure of principal performance: Overseen by the MDE’s Office of Educator Quality Developed to meet federal requirements as part of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Waiver Mandated for all head principals, CTE directors, assistant principals, alternative-school principals, and special-school principals What Is the MPES? 3

Administrators are rated on: Two schoolwide goals – ELA and mathematics (for CTE directors, goals are set based on Year 1 students and Year 2 students) Two organizational goals – determined at the local level Circle Survey MPES, Cont. 4

5 Circle Survey 30%

The Circle Survey is: A multi-rater tool administered by MSU’s Research & Curriculum Unit for the MDE Provided to all districts free of charge 3 equally weighted components 1)Certified staff feedback (33% of overall survey score) 2)Principal self evaluation (33% of overall survey score) 3)Supervisor evaluation (33% of overall survey score) Circle Survey Overview 6

Survey contains 30 leadership indicators divided into 6 categories Each indicator is equally weighted Indicators were developed and screened by multiple focus groups consisting of educators throughout the state Indicators align with the MS Standards for School Leaders Indicators are available on the MDE’s website Average survey response time was 8 minutes last year Circle Survey Overview, Cont. 7

The Circle Survey is REQUIRED by the MDE for all districts in Other tools, such as the VAL-ED, may NOT be used in place of the Circle Survey for the MPES. Your district may ask you to complete a tool such as the VAL-ED in ADDITION to the Circle Survey. Circle Survey Overview, Cont. 8

Key Dates Dec. 1: Districts receive Circle Survey codes Dec. 1: Circle Survey opens Jan. 31: Circle Survey closes Mar. 31: Circle Survey reports issued Apr. 30: Circle Survey Conference completed, Circle Survey Conference report and MPES form filed in personnel file, and Circle Survey Conference date reported in ELMS Circle Survey Overview, Cont. 9

Your district will be issued a website address and a list of randomly generated key codes for distribution to certified staff –Full- and part-time certified staff (e.g., teachers, counselors, librarians) are eligible to participate Certified staff members will go to the website provided by MDE and type in their key codes Survey requires only a computer with Internet access To Access the Survey

Survey requires respondents to acknowledge that they must be certified staff members Survey requires respondents to verify their district and the name of the administrator being evaluated This year’s survey does NOT have “save and continue” functionality. If you begin a survey and cannot finish it, just close it and start again using the same key code. Your first completed survey response will be kept; incomplete surveys and duplicates will be automatically discarded. To Access the Survey, Cont. 11

You will NOT be asked to provide artifacts when completing the survey. Survey tools of this nature are inherently qualitative and, therefore, subjective—with or without artifacts. However, at the end of the survey, you will be able to type in feedback for the administrator. These comments are optional and not included in an administrator’s score. To Access the Survey, Cont. 12

A certified staff member should complete the Circle Survey for the school administrator(s) who oversees the staff member’s performance.* *E.g., All certified staff should complete the Circle Survey for the head principal. Additionally, if an assistant principal oversees a certain grade (e.g., 7-8 th grade teachers only) or a select subgroup of teachers (e.g., math and science teachers only), then those certified staff should complete his/her Circle Survey. If the assistant principal’s role is schoolwide, then all certified staff in the school should complete the Circle Survey for the assistant principal. *E.g., All CTE teachers should complete the Circle Survey on the CTE director. To Access the Survey, Cont. 13

Certified staff members evaluating multiple administrators (e.g., head principal and asst. principal) will be given multiple access codes (one code per administrator) To Access the Survey, Cont.

The MDE’s expectation is that all certified staff overseen by an administrator will participate in the administrator’s Circle Survey. The MDE recognizes that some certified staff may wish to “opt out” of the survey (e.g., certified staff who have been employed at the school for fewer than 60 calendar days), and the MDE recommends that these staff members be permitted to “opt out,” if requested. However, all staff must be given the opportunity to participate. No minimum staff n-count No minimum staff participation rate, but the number of staff who complete the survey for each MPES participant will be reported to the MPES participant To Access the Survey, Cont. 15

Principals will have no way of knowing (based on the survey results) if you completed the survey or not No identifying information is requested in the survey—consider that comments you type will be reported exactly as they are typed and may be identifiable depending on what you type To Access the Survey, Cont.

The RCU takes Circle Survey confidentiality very seriously. To Access the Survey, Cont.

District officials (not MPES participants themselves) should assist schools in distributing the codes to certified staff members. Certified staff data are filtered automatically by each administrator and reported to the MDE and district administrators in aggregate only. A certified staff member’s individual responses are never reported by the RCU to districts or the MDE. Names corresponding with key codes are never received by the RCU. Schools are encouraged to use the fishbowl method to ensure random distribution of key codes. To Access the Survey, Cont.

District superintendents will receive detailed reports with Circle Survey scores in March. District superintendents are responsible for ensuring these reports are distributed to MPES participants. Let’s view a sample report. Circle Survey Reports 19

Circle Survey Questions 20 Please direct Circle Survey questions to the RCU. RCU Helpdesk

evaluations/mpes General MPES Questions 21 Lisa White, Ed.S