Local and Community Development Programme 2011 Goal 2 Output Analysis Aileen Gilchrist 4 th October 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Excellence in Corps Operations CNCS Executive Directors Meeting September 23, 2008.
Advertisements

Where do FETAC learners go? Presentation to CSO 3 rd Admin Data Seminar 20 th February 2014 Rhona Dempsey Berni Dunne.
Self-employed Evidence base Purpose This slide-pack aims to provide a broad evidence-base on self- employment in the UK. Drawn predominantly from.
2011 Census Information Summary | May 2013 – Health of Carers & Unpaid Care Profile HEADLINES PRODUCED BY POLICY, IMPACT AND INTELLIGENCE |
Support for Micro-enterprise in the Border, Midland and Western Region of Ireland 9 th October, 2003 Kieran Moylan, BMW Regional Assembly.
Monitoring and Indicators in WORKSHOP 30 APRIL 2013 Ines Hartwig Impact Assessment & Evaluation Unit DG EMPL 1.
Evaluation at The Prince’s Trust Fire Service Prince's Trust Association meeting 18 th February 2010 Subtitle.
 Works in both parts of the island  Member of NYCI & as a member of the European Alliance of YMCAs also members of European Youth Forum  We work with.
What Midwest Study Data Tell Us About Youth as Young Adults April 7, 2010 Mark E. Courtney Ballmer Chair for Child Wellbeing School of Social Work University.
A. Support for key statutory services Grants ProgrammesFunding CategoriesCriteria 2. Youth Work Chart of Grant Programmes, Funding Categories and Priority.
Trutz Haase RESOURCE ALLOCATION MODEL FOR LOCAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 7 th February 2013 LCDP National Event, F2 Rialto, Dublin v04.
The contribution of ACFE for a more inclusive Australia Rowena Allen Chairperson Adult Community and Further Education (ACFE) Board.
Presentation to Aontas Community Education Network By Nora Fahy Roscommon Women’s Network Community Project 24 th March 2015.
August 2014 Widening Participation It Matters. Workforce Planning Attracting and recruiting the right people to the posts we have identified.
Providing Inspection Services for Department of Education Department for Employment and Learning Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure Evaluation of.
Presentation Outline Background Program Requirements Orange County HPRP Plan HPRP Timeline Action Requested.
12 th National PESO Congress October Baguio Country Club, Baguio City Helping Filipino Youth to a Good Start : Design of a youth employment.
Ryan White CARE Act Dental Reimbursement Program (DRP) 2000 Data.
What happens after leaving care? – Preliminary Findings from an Irish sample EUSARF CONFERENCE Copenhagen 3-5 sept Conor Mc Mahon - TUSLA Robbie.
Local Planners and Modernisation Networks Judith McGregor Head of Programmes Skills for Health Academy North West.
NHS Health Checks in the community pharmacy : a profile of the Islington experience Chrystal Greenwood Project Officer, NHS Health Checks.
Social Policy : Trends in spending, recipiency and policy focus Seminar presentation: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs 11 October, 2007, Seoul,
Steering a course in turbulent waters RCLDS initiated Victorian Residential Care Workforce Census ACWA Conference August 2012 Presented by: Glenys Bristow.
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
Needs Analysis National Report Presentation United Kingdom April 2014 EuroPartnership Agency Ltd This project has been funded with support from the European.
NWT Labour Supply Bureau of Statistics July 5, 2006.
New Zealand Union of Students’ Associations Education by numbers: A picture of tertiary education through statistics January Conference.
FRAMEWORK FOR COMBATING HIV/AIDS By THE LEAN AND MEAN GREEN TEAM.
TRANSITION PROJECT LEARNING NETWORK WORKSHOP 3 AISLING PROJECT: TRANSITION PROJECT.
Building Better Opportunities Building Better Opportunities in New Anglia Jonathan Clark Policy & Learning Manager Big Lottery Fund April 2015.
ISMG ~ Interventions and Substance Misuse Group Data challenges & opportunities: offenders in custody and the community Caroline Bonds (Head of Strategic.
What is Gender Responsive Budgeting?. What is GRB? GRB analyses the government budget for impact on women & men, girls & boys Ideally, GRB goes beyond.
2 DATA AND ESTIMATION 3 4 CONCLUSIONS AND WAY FORWARD 1 MALAYSIAN DEMOGRAPHIC PATTERNS FINDINGS AND IMPLICATIONS.
Merton Youth Partnership Youth Transformation threats and resilience.
Integrity: M&E Aims. Integrity: M&E outline DesignConsequenceImplementation.
National Adult Literacy Agency, Ireland May 8th 2006
Delaware Community Health Access Program (CHAP): Evaluation of Referrals and Health Outcomes James M. Gill, MD, MPH Christiana Care Health Services August.
1 Current Funding Streams in New York State The 2008 Equity Symposium Comprehensive Educational Equity: Overcoming the Socioeconomic Barriers to School.
Comparing SPI and SSI Data Formats The case of Sri Lanka Ruwanthi Elwalagedara Joint ADB / ILO / OECD Korea Policy Centre Technical Workshop on Social.
Supporting Mothers into Successful Employment. Overview Longitudinal research project with 80 mothers in London exploring –impact of motherhood on employment.
Impact of Elimination of non-QRIS Programs Fiscal Committee March 4, 2013.
Disability Activation Project MONITORING AND EVALUATION.
From Output to Outcome: Quantifying Care Management Kelly A. Bruno, MSW and Danielle T. Cameron, MPH National Health Foundation Background Objectives Methods.
Salford Futures 2013/14 Evaluation John Reehill Dave Timperley.
Cross Border Connections Project A Project supported by Peace III Programme managed for the Special EU Programmes Body by Donegal County Council How we.
CSV2115 Leadership & Management in Community Service Organisations Week 8 Funding Submission Writing.
Youth Labor Training Program PROJoven Teodoro Sanz (Planning Unit) Juanpedro Espino (Evaluation of Impacts Area) October 4, 2004.
Transition of NCV students from TVET colleges to the Labour Market Presentation to Bridge Post School Access Focus Group 22 October 2015.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones.
PROMOTING YOUTH EMPLOYMENT Mrs. T.V. Blinova, Director of the Department of Employment and Labor Migration Ministry of Health and Social Development of.
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND ACTION SUPPORT UNIT. MISSION STATEMENT The Community Participation and Action Support Unit is responsible for provision of.
2009 Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) – emerging data Presentation to Carers NSW Biennial Conference 17 March 2011 Steve Gelsi Assistant.
Presented by: Darren Plant Healthy Lifestyles Commissioner NHS Worcestershire November 2010 Health Trainers.
FE to HE PROGRESSION PROJECT Report to Welsh Government and HEFCW.
C LODAGH M C D ONNELL S OCIAL I NCLUSION AND C OMMUNITIES U NIT  SICAP  C ONTRACT WITH P OBAL  T IDY T OWNS  C ONTROL OF D OGS  M ANAGEMENT OF BURIAL.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
YOUTHPASS. YOUTHPASS IS… Tool of validation and recognition and official certificate validiting and recognising gained key competences within the non-formal.
Ontario Works Participant Profile December 31, 2013.
Youth employment policies, programmes and …. SMALL COUNTRY, BIG CHALLENGES UNEMPLOYMENT (2014):  Unemployment rate: 24.6 % in 2015 (Q4)  Activity rate.
Social Care Survey 2015, analysis of “Support worker” question David Scott, April 2015.
Connecting with young women ?
An exploration of (area-based) social inclusion and community development training programmes in Ireland Seamus McGuinness Research Professor Pobal Conference:
SICAP & LCDP An overview for LCDC members
How to rate success of a Business
Social Policy : Trends in spending, recipiency and policy focus
KEY INDICATORS OF THE LABOUR MARKET - KILM
Uses and tabulation of data United Nations Statistics Division
Social Policy : Trends in spending, recipiency and policy focus
Figures adapted from the TIEDI Analytical Report #9: Labour outcomes of immigrants by education or training undertaken in Canada Report available at:
Social Inclusion and Community Activation Programme (SICAP)
Presentation transcript:

Local and Community Development Programme 2011 Goal 2 Output Analysis Aileen Gilchrist 4 th October 2012

Outline of presentation General Overview Goal 2 & LCDP Caseload Profile of Goal 2 Beneficiaries Interventions Analysis of ETIs (Courses) Accreditation/Funding/Outcomes Other Adults /Youth Work provision Data Recording Summary Points

GOAL 2 AIM To increase access to formal and informal educational, recreational and cultural activities.

Overview - Goal 2 IRIS data up to date as of April 2012 €50.5m allocated to 53 LDCs in €11.09 million spent on Goal 2 actions. €3.7m spent on direct action costs €7.39m spent on salary and support costs 37% was allocated to Goal 2 as a percentage of the total of the four goals 667 actions across 53 LDC plans

OVERVIEW - LCDP CASELOAD 2010 LCDP Caseload: 30,140 Individuals 2011 LCDP Caseload: 40,292 Individuals 34% increase in 2011 from Individuals on Goal 2 Case load Gender - 61% Female and 39% male Goal Two Individuals account for 24% of the total number of LCDP clients across all goals (40,292)

Goal 2 Individual Interventions Caseload Individuals 15,314 interventions 5,975 individuals received only one intervention (62%) 2,919 individuals received more than one intervention (31%) No intervention was recorded for 611 individuals 5

6 Goal 2 Individual Beneficiaries by Age Band

There are six ‘age band’ groups The largest group ‘26-35 Group’ (23.5 %) 2,237 This was followed by ‘36-45 Group’(20.3%) 1,934 The fourth largest group of individuals was occupied by the ‘Over 55 Group’ which comprises of 18.4% or 1752 individuals. This is 5% higher than the overall programme caseload for this category. 7

8 Goal 2 Individuals by Education Status

Education Status of Goal 2 Caseload 3311/ 35% of individual beneficiaries had Leaving Cert education NFQ4/5.(Standard/Vocational/Applied) 2141/ 22.5% of individual beneficiaries had Junior/Intermediate/ Group Cert education NFQ /15.5% of individual beneficiaries had a primary school education only or no formal education. 1150/12 % of individual beneficiaries had HETAC Third Level education NFQ 6-10 qualification. 9

10 Goal 2 Individuals by Employment Status

The largest category were those individuals that were on the live register for more than 1 year, 1785 individuals (18.7%) 29% of individuals were Long Term Unemployed (2796) If you also include those less than 1 year Unemployed and those Unemployed and Not on the live register this figure increases to 56% of the caseload. 11% of the case load considered themselves from a ‘Low Income Family Unit’ (1073) 11

12 Goal 2 Individuals by Beneficiary Group

Goal 2 caseload by Beneficiary Group The largest groups –‘Low Income Families’ –‘Unemployed for more than 1 Year’ –‘Disadvantaged Women Group’ 2 of these beneficiary groups i.e. Low income families & unemployed more than 1 year are also in the top 3 beneficiary groups/programme caseload. Exception is Disadvantaged women which accounts for 6% of the overall programme caseload but is double that in Goal 2. ‘Older People over 55 Years ’ accounts for 8 % of the Goal 2 caseload. Programme caseload (3.8%) -nearly double 13

14 Individuals Referred From

Goal 2 Caseload - Referral sources Referred fromCount% Self Referral2,80029 % Local Community Groups1,96521 % Publicity/information Campaigns 1, % Outreach7668 % State agencies/Dept’s % 15

16 Individuals Referred to non LCDP services

17 Individuals uptake of other services/non LCDP

6388 individuals participated on Goal 2 related ETI’s. Gender breakdown 66% Female - 33 % Male Variety of courses- Education/Employment/Comm Dev 18 Goal 2-Summary of ETIs( Courses)

19 Goal 2 ETIs by Sector ( Courses )

Individuals participating on ETIs by Education Status

Education status of Goal 2 ETIs Similar pattern to the overall LCDP Caseload & Goal 3 The largest category are those individuals with a starting educational status of Leaving Certificate standard (NFQ 4-5) 26.3%, -Followed by ‘Junior Certificate Group’ (NFQ 3) 23.4%, -Those with HETAC level education (NFQ 6-10) 14.7%. 16% of those entering courses had either ‘Primary Education only’ or ‘No Formal Education’’ 21

22 Individuals participating on ETIs by Employment Status

The largest category were ‘Unemployed but not on Live Register’ (18%). Followed by those on ‘Live Register > 1 year’ ( 16%) Followed by those on the ‘Live Register (< 1 year)’ (10%) This mirrors the overall programme caseload as they both have similar categories in the top three. 28% were long term unemployed 55% were unemployed whether on the live register or not 23

24 Individuals participating on Courses by Beneficiary Group

25

26 Individuals participating in Goal 2 courses by level of Accreditation (NFQ)

Level of Accreditation- Goal individuals participated on courses in % individuals participated on Accredited courses (2210 ) 87% were at the NFQ level 3-5 –Includes Junior/Leaving Cert, through to 3,4 & 5 FETAC level. –NFQ level 3-5 are minor, supplementary and special purpose awards, an example of which includes ‘Safepass’ and ‘Driving Heavy Goods Vehicles’ Most popular courses –‘IT and Telecommunications’ - 53% were accredited. –‘Education Skills/Studies’ -23% were accredited. –‘Personal Development’ -19% were accredited –‘Care and Health Services’ -35% were accredited. p61 27

28 Individuals participating in Goal 2 courses by funding source

Funding source of Courses under Goal 2 41% of individuals on courses were 100% funded by others with LCDP collaboration (2595 ) 37% of individuals on courses were fully funded by LCDP (2395) 22 % of individuals on courses were partly funded by LCDP Of the 2395 individuals fully funded by LDCP, 33 % were participating on accredited courses. 29

30 Course outcome for Individuals who have completed a Goal 2 course

Goal 2 Course outcome 2210 individuals participated on Accredited courses, 56% successfully completed the course (1239 ) 31% require follow up to establish the outcome 4178 individuals that participated on Unaccredited courses 80% successfully completed the course (3338) 16% require follow up to establish the actual outcome 31

Goal 2 ‘Other Adults’ 25,676 ‘Other Adults’ were supported in 2011 Not on the Goal 2 caseload, as no personal details are recorded of the individuals. Gender 68% Female and 32 % Male. ‘Other Adults’ category participate in community, recreational & cultural and educational activities 52% in Recreational and Cultural activities (13,466). 24% in Educational activities-excludes courses (6,280 ) 18% on Unaccredited Education ( 4,542) 4% on Youth Work provision (925) 2% on Accredited education (463) 32

33 Goal 2 Numbers of ‘Other Adults’ by Action outputs

Goal 2 Young People 2011 Over 57,000 Young people supported under Goal 2 Gender 52% Female 48% Male €467,000 expenditure for actions targeting ESL /primary beneficiary group Categories –Recreation and Cultural activities - 29% –Educational activities- 56% –Youth Work provision- 15% 34

35 Number of Young people supported by Goal 2 output

Data Recording Issues IRIS - Working tool/ new monitoring system Accurate and complete data CES Review/clean up data/ 15 th October –Blanks/ assign client to at least one beneficiary group Date of Registration Level of interventions could be considered low/ should reflect the nature of the on going supports provided to individuals (under-reporting) Accreditation –under reported 36

Summary Points Promoting access/gateway Significant number of unaccredited courses LCDP is prioritising the Long Term Unemployed and most disadvantaged Data Recording Issues –Under-reporting of Individual Interventions –Need good quality data –To inform Pobal reports to various stakeholders and facilitate CES review & any future evaluations Significant outputs across Goal 2 37