Fundamentals of Dempster-Shafer Theory presented by Zbigniew W. Ras University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC College of Computing and Informatics University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The geometry of of relative plausibilities
Advertisements

Department of Engineering Math, University of Bristol A geometric approach to uncertainty Oxford Brookes Vision Group Oxford Brookes University 12/03/2009.
Geometry of Dempsters rule NAVLAB - Autonomous Navigation and Computer Vision Lab Department of Information Engineering University of Padova, Italy Fabio.
On the properties of relative plausibilities Computer Science Department UCLA Fabio Cuzzolin SMC05, Hawaii, October
The Function Concept DEFINITION: A function consists of two nonempty sets X and Y and a rule f that associates each element x in X with one.
Sequential Three-way Decision with Probabilistic Rough Sets Supervisor: Dr. Yiyu Yao Speaker: Xiaofei Deng 18th Aug, 2011.
Modelling uncertainty in 3APL Johan Kwisthout Master Thesis
RSES – reducts and discretization of attributes presented by Zbigniew W. Ras University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC & Warsaw University of Technology,
Applied Informatics Štefan BEREŽNÝ
Dempster-Shafer Theory
Lahore University of Management Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan Dr. M.M. Awais- Computer Science Department 1 Lecture 12 Dealing With Uncertainty Probabilistic.
Chapter 3 : Relational Model
Use of Artificial Intelligent Agents, Multimodal Integration, and Theory of Evidence to Design Software to aid First Grade Level Math Education By: John.
Artificial Intelligence Universitatea Politehnica Bucuresti Adina Magda Florea
DETC06: Uncertainty Workshop; Evidence & Possibility Theories Evidence and Possibility Theories in Engineering Design Zissimos P. Mourelatos Mechanical.
PROBABILITY. Uncertainty  Let action A t = leave for airport t minutes before flight from Logan Airport  Will A t get me there on time ? Problems :
Introduction to Evidential Reasoning Belief Functions.
Fuzzy Measures and Integrals
Dempster-Shafer Theory From Buchanan-Shortliffe-1984/Chapter- 13.pdf.
Pattern Classification. Chapter 2 (Part 1): Bayesian Decision Theory (Sections ) Introduction Bayesian Decision Theory–Continuous Features.
On Data-Centric Trust Establishment in Ephemeral Ad Hoc Networks Maxim Raya, Panos Papadimitratos, Virgil D. Gligor, Jean-Pierre Hubaux INFOCOM 2008.
Dempster/Shaffer Theory of Evidence CIS 479/579 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn.
Signal , Weight Vector Spaces and Linear Transformations
Signal , Weight Vector Spaces and Linear Transformations
The Integration of Processing Components and Knowledge.
Chapter 4 Probability.
© Franz J. Kurfess Reasoning under Uncertainty CPE/CSC 481: Knowledge-Based Systems Dr. Franz J. Kurfess Computer Science Department Cal Poly.
Objectives Explore the sources of uncertainty in rules Analyze some methods for dealing with uncertainty Learn about the Dempster-Shafer theory Learn.
Dempster-Shafer Theory SIU CS 537 4/12/11 and 4/14/11 Chet Langin.
Association Action Rules b y Zbigniew W. Ras 1,5 Agnieszka Dardzinska 2 Li-Shiang Tsay 3 Hanna Wasyluk 4 1)University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC,
Information Fusion Yu Cai. Research Paper Johan Schubert, “Clustering belief functions based on attracting and conflicting meta level evidence”, July.
Simon’s Algorithm Arathi Ramani EECS 598 Class Presentation.
WORKSHOP “Applications of Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic to Engineering Problems". Pertisau, Tyrol, Austria - September 29th, October 1st, 2002 Aggregation.
Geometry CSC 2141 Introduction to Computer Graphics.
1 Geometry. 2 Objectives Introduce the elements of geometry ­Scalars ­Vectors ­Points Develop mathematical operations among them in a coordinate-free.
Counting and Probability. Counting Elements of Sets Theorem. The Inclusion/Exclusion Rule for Two or Three Sets If A, B, and C are finite sets, then N(A.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH DECISION MAKING BY USING THE THEORY OF EVIDENCE STUDENTS: HOSSEIN SHIRZADEH, AHAD OLLAH EZZATI SUPERVISOR: Prof. BAGERI SHOURAKI SPRING.
9.3 Addition Rule. The basic rule underlying the calculation of the number of elements in a union or difference or intersection is the addition rule.
Inexact Reasoning. 2 Objectives Explore the sources of uncertainty in rules Analyze some methods for dealing with uncertainty Learn about the Dempster-Shafer.
Divisibility Rules and Finding Factors
From Rough Set Theory to Evidence Theory Roman Słowiński Laboratory of Intelligent Decision Support Systems Institute of Computing Science Poznań University.
On joint modelling of random uncertainty and fuzzy imprecision Olgierd Hryniewicz Systems Research Institute Warsaw.
Belief-Function Formalism Computes the probability that the evidence supports a proposition Also known as the Dempster-Shafer theory Bayesian Formalism.
Chapter 4 Probability ©. Sample Space sample space.S The possible outcomes of a random experiment are called the basic outcomes, and the set of all basic.
Probability and Measure September 2, Nonparametric Bayesian Fundamental Problem: Estimating Distribution from a collection of Data E. ( X a distribution-valued.
LDK R Logics for Data and Knowledge Representation PL of Classes.
System Architecture The Integration of Processing Components and Knowledge.
Thinking Mathematically Number Theory and the Real Number System 5.5 Real Numbers and Their Properties.
Fuzzy Measures and Integrals 1. Fuzzy Measure 2. Belief and Plausibility Measure 3. Possibility and Necessity Measure 4. Sugeno Measure 5. Fuzzy Integrals.
YMS Chapter 6 Probability: Foundations for Inference 6.1 – The Idea of Probability.
Semantic Web Knowledge Fusion Jennifer Sleeman University of Maryland, Baltimore County Motivation Definitions Methodology Evaluation Future Work Based.
International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, p.p ,July 2011.
Logics for Data and Knowledge Representation ClassL (part 1): syntax and semantics.
Computer Graphics I, Fall 2010 Geometry.
Logics for Data and Knowledge Representation ClassL (part 1): syntax and semantics.
The Probability Calculus.  Divide the number of positive outcomes by the total number of (equally possible) outcomes  Computations are independent of.
Credal semantics of Bayesian transformations Fabio Cuzzolin, Department of Computing, Oxford Brookes University 6 th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IMPRECISE.
REC 2008; Zissimos P. Mourelatos Design under Uncertainty using Evidence Theory and a Bayesian Approach Jun Zhou Zissimos P. Mourelatos Mechanical Engineering.
REVIEW Linear Combinations Given vectors and given scalars
Basic Probabilistic Reasoning
Properties of Exponents
Dealing with Uncertainty
Reasoning with Uncertainty
Logics for Data and Knowledge Representation
Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
Pattern Classification All materials in these slides were taken from Pattern Classification (2nd ed) by R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart and D. G. Stork, John.
Functions Definition: A function from a set D to a set R is a rule that assigns to every element in D a unique element in R. Familiar Definition: For every.
Reasoning with Uncertainty Piyush Porwal ( ) Rohit Jhunjhunwala ( ) Srivatsa R. ( ) Under the guidance of Prof. Pushpak Bhattacharyya.
Mechanical Engineering Department
Zero and Negative Integral Indices
Presentation transcript:

Fundamentals of Dempster-Shafer Theory presented by Zbigniew W. Ras University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC College of Computing and Informatics University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Dempster-Shafer Theory based on the idea of placing a number between zero and one to indicate the degree of belief of evidence for a proposition.

Basic Probability Assignment - function m: 2^X  [0,1] such that: (1) m(  )=0, (2)  [m(Y) : Y  X] = 1 /total belief/. m(Y) – basic probability number of Y. Belief function over X - function Bel: 2^X  [0,1] such that: Bel(Y)=  [m(Z): Z  Y]. FACT 1: Function Bel: 2^X  [0,1] is a belief function iff (1)Bel(  )=0, (2) Bel(X)= 1, (3) Bel(  {A(i): i  {1,2,…,n}) =  [(-1)^{|J|+1}  Bel(  {A(i): i  J}) : J  {1,2,…,n}] for every positive integer n and all subsets A(1), A(2), …, A(n) of X FACT 2: Basic probability assignment can be computed from: m(Y) =  [ (-1)^{|Y – Z|  Bel(Z): Z  Y], where Y  X.

Example: basic probability assignment Xabcd x1x1 0L x2x2 0SL x3x3 P1L x4x4 3R1L x5x5 22L x6x6 P2L x7x7 3P2H m_a({x1,x2,x3,x6})=[2+2/3]/7=8/21 m_a({x3,x6,x5})=[1+2/3]/7=5/21 m_a({x3,x6,x4,x7})=[2+2/3]/7=8/21 Basic probability assignment (given) m({x1,x2,x3,x6})=8/21 m({x3,x6,x5})=5/21 m({x3,x6,x4,x7})=8/21 defines attribute m_a 1) m_a uniquely defined for x1,x2,x4,x5,x7. 2)m_a undefined for x3,x6. m_a(x1)=m_a(x2) =a1, m_a(x5)=a2,…..

Example: basic probability assignment Basic probability assignment – m: X={x1,x2,x3,x4,x5} m(x1,x2,x3)=1/2, m(x1,x2)=1/4, m(x2,x4)=1/4 Belief function: Bel({x1,x2,x3,x5})= ½ + ¼ = ¾, ……….. Focal Element and Core Y  X is called focal element iff m(Y) > 0. Core – the union of all focal elements. Doubt Function - Dou: 2^X  [0,1], Y  X Dou(Y) = Bel(  Y). Plausibility Function – Pl(Y) = 1 – Dou(Y) Pl(Y)=  [m(Z): Z  Y   ]

{1,2} 1/4 {1,2} {2,3} 3/4 {1,2} {1,3} 1/2 {1,2} {1} 0 {1,2} {2} 0 {1,2} {3} 1/2 m({3})=1/2, m({2,3})=1/4, m({1,2})=1/4. Pl({1,2}) = m({2,3})+m({1,2}) = ½, Pl({1,3})= m({3})+m({2,3})+m({1,2}) = 1 Core={1,2,3}

Properties: - Bel(  ) = Pl(  ) = 0 - Bel(X) = Pl(X) = 1 - Bel(Y)  Pl(Y) - Bel(Y) + Bel(  Y)  1 - Pl(Y) + Pl(  Y)  1 - if Y  Z, then Bel(Y)  Bel(Z) and Pl(Y)  Pl(Z) Bel: 2^X  [0,1] is called a Bayesian Belief Function iff 1)Bel(  ) = 0 2)Bel(X) = 1 3)Bel (Y  Z)= Bel(Y) + Bel(Z), where Y, Z  X, Y  Z =  Fact: Any Bayesian belief function is a belief function.

The following conditions are equivalent: 1)Bel is Bayesian 2)All focal elements of Bel are singletons 3)Bel = Pl 4)Bel(Y) + Bel(  Y) = 1 for all Y  X

Dempster’s Rule of Combination Bel1, Bel2 – belief functions representing two different pieces of evidence which are independent. Domain = {x1,x2,x3} Bel1  Bel2 – their orthogonal sum /Dempster’s rule of comb./ m1, m2 – basic probability assignments linked with Bel1, Bel2. {x1,x2} 1/4 {x1,x2,x3} 3/2 {x2,x4} 1/4 {x2} 3/8 {x2} 3/32 {x2} 3/16 {x2} 3/32 {x1,x2,x4} 3/8 {x1,x2} 3/32 {x1,x2} 3/16 {x2,x4} 3/32 {x1,x2,x3} 1/4 {x1,x2} 1/16 {x1,x2,x3} 1/8 {x2} 1/16 m1 m2 (m1  m2)({x1,x2})=3/32+3/16+1/16=11/32 (m1  m2)({x1,x2,x3})=1/8 (m1  m2)({x2})=3/32+3/16+3/32+1/16=7/16 (m1  m2)({x2,x4})=3/32

Thank You Questions?