Superconductors. Gor’kov and Eliashberg found the time- dependent G-L equations using microscopic theory: These equations are solved numerically Model.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
-Magnetic Flux -Gauss’s Law for Magnetism -“Ampere-Maxwell” Law
Advertisements

1 Numerical study of critical state to investigate magnetization and pinning properties of the Yb211-doped bulk Sm123 superconductor Dr. Kemal ÖZTÜRK K.
Two Major Open Physics Issues in RF Superconductivity H. Padamsee & J
High T c Superconductors in Magnetic Fields T. P. Devereaux.
Probing Superconductors using Point Contact Andreev Reflection Pratap Raychaudhuri Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai Collaborators: Gap anisotropy.
Superconductivity and Superfluidity The Meissner Effect So far everything we have discussed is equally true for a “perfect conductor” as well as a “superconductor”
Solving Equations = 4x – 5(6x – 10) -132 = 4x – 30x = -26x = -26x 7 = x.
Gauge Field of Bloch Electrons in dual space First considered in context of QHE Kohmoto 1985 Principle of Quantum Mechanics Eigenstate does.
Kitaoka lab Itohara Keita
Nelson Research, Inc – N. 88 th St. Seattle, WA USA aol.com Magnetic Fields of an Electric Guitar Pickup Craig E.
1 In a vortex system a force applied on a vortex by all the others can be written within London appr. as a sum: IV. FLUX LINE LATTICE The total energy.
1 Most of the type II superconductors are anisotropic. In extreme cases of layered high Tc materials like BSCCO the anisotropy is so large that the material.
“… at each new level of complexity, entirely new properties appear, and the understanding of this behavior requires research which I think is as fundamental.
Small-Angle Neutron Scattering & The Superconducting Vortex Lattice
RF Superconductivity and the Superheating Field H sh James P. Sethna, Gianluigi Catelani, and Mark Transtrum Superconducting RF cavity Lower losses Limited.
1 L.D. Landau ( 1937 ) A second order phase transition is generally well described phenomenologically if one identifies: a). The order parameter field.
ORGANIC SUPERCONDUCTORS by Eugenio Gutierrez Joe Nowell Physics 335.
Chapter 32 Maxwell’s Equations # “Magnetism of Matter” skipped.
Vortex Dynamics in Type II Superconductors Yuri V. Artemov Yuri V. Artemov Ph.D. Student in Physics Brian B. Schwartz Mentor: Brian B. Schwartz Professor.
Constructing and Studying a Levitating Frictionless Bearing Ruth Toner Senior Project Speech
Conservation of momentum also known as: Cauchy’s equation Relation between stress and strain rate 4 equations, 12 unknowns; need to relate flow field and.
Flux pinning in general Adrian Crisan School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham, UK and National Institute of Materials Physics, Bucharest,
Superconductivity and Superfluidity The London penetration depth but also F and H London suggested that not only To which the solution is L is known as.
3 SUPERCONDUCTIVITY.
By: Shruti Sheladia, Garrett M Leavitt, Stephanie Schroeder, Christopher Dunn, Kathleen Brackney Levitation of a magnet above a high temperature superconductor.
A image of the flux line lattice in the magnetic superconductor TmNi2B2C The hexagonal arrangement of magnetic flux lines in pure Nb imaged using neutrons.
SQUIDs (Superconducting QUantum Interference Devices)
Type I and Type II superconductivity
Chapter 27 Current and Resistance Scalar Sense determined by the movement of the positive charge carrier Average Electric Current Instantaneous Electric.
Superconducting vortex avalanches D. Shantsev Åge A. F. Olsen, D. Denisov, V. Yurchenko, Y. M. Galperin, T. H. Johansen AMCS (COMPLEX) group Department.
Michael Browne 11/26/2007.
L.Ya. Vinnikov   L.A, Emelchenko ISSP RAS, Chernogolovka, RUSSIA
IRGAC 2006 COLOR SUPERCONDUCTIVITY and MAGNETIC FIELD: Strange Bed Fellows in the Core of Neutron Stars? Vivian de la Incera Western Illinois University.
목원대학교 전자정보통신공학부 전자기학 5-1 Chapter 5. Conductors, Dielectrics, and Capacitance 1.Current and Current Density Current(A) : a rate of movement of charge passing.
Current Density Consider current flowing in a homogeneous wire with cross sectional area A.
Fingering, Fronts, and Patterns in Superconductors
Numerical Ginzburg-Landau studies of J c in 2D and 3D polycrystalline superconductors G.J.Carty and D P Hampshire Superconductivity Group, Department of.
P. M. Grant Superconductivity 101 Superconductivity Workshop Charlotte, 24 May 1999 Superconductivity 101 A Primer for Engineers Paul M. Grant
Vortex avalanches in superconductors: Size distribution and Mechanism Daniel Shantsev Tom Johansen andYuri Galperin AMCS group Department of Physics, University.
2.3 – Solving Multi-Step Equations. Note: REVERSE Order of Operations! Ex. 1 -7(p + 8) = 21.
Peak effect in Superconductors - Experimental aspects G. Ravikumar Technical Physics & Prototype Engineering Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai.
Critical state controlled by microscopic flux jumps in superconductors
R OLE OF D ISORDER IN S UPERCONDUCTING T RANSITION Sudhansu S. Mandal IACS, Kolkata HRI 1.
Electrodynamics of Superconductors exposed to high frequency fields Ernst Helmut Brandt Max Planck Institute for Metals Research, Stuttgart Superconductivity.
Vortex Solution in Holographic Two-Band Superconductor
Induced current produces a secondary magnetic field that is always opposed to the primary magnetic field that induced it, an effect called Lenz’s law.
Superconductivity and Superfluidity Flux line motion In principlea Type II superconductor should be “better” than a Type I for most applications - it remains.
Gregory Gabadadze (NYU, CCPP) with R. A. Rosen, JCAP, JHEP 08,09 D. Pirtskhalava, JCAP 09.
Why Make Holes in Superconductors? Saturday Morning Physics December 6, 2003 Dr. Sa-Lin Cheng Bernstein.
Anomalous Local Transport in MicrofabricatedSr 2 RuO 4 -Ru Eutectic Junction Univ. AISTHiroshi Kambara Satoshi Kashiwaya Tokyo.
Superconductivity and Superfluidity The Pippard coherence length In 1953 Sir Brian Pippard considered 1. N/S boundaries have positive surface energy 2.
Chapter 7 in the textbook Introduction and Survey Current density:
Superconductivity Basics
Ginzburg-Landau-Abrikosov Theory of Type II Superconductors - Phase diagram of vortex matter 李定平 北京大学物理学院理论物理研究所 , 台湾,台北 在Hc2附近, 可假設 B是constant.
Dipole magnets A dipole magnet gives a constant B-field.
Ginzburg Landau phenomenological Theory
Toward a Holographic Model of d-wave Superconductors
Super Conductivity/ Quantum Locking
BCS THEORY BCS theory is the first microscopic theory of superconductivity since its discovery in It explains, The interaction of phonons and electrons.
Electrical Properties of Materials
11/13/2018.
Today’s agenda: Induced emf. Faraday’s Law. Lenz’s Law. Generators.
Theoretical Work On Superconductivity Up to 1956* A.J. Leggett
100 YEARS of SUPERCONDUCTIVITY: ANCIENT HISTORY AND CURRENT CHALLENGES
Surface Impedance of Metals
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Thermodynamics of a Type I superconductor
(Graduation thesis at Nihon University)
Magnetic properties of superconductors
Ginzburg-Landau theory
Presentation transcript:

Superconductors

Gor’kov and Eliashberg found the time- dependent G-L equations using microscopic theory: These equations are solved numerically Model superconductors

Fluxons moving into a Superconductor Coated With a Normal Metal,  = 5 as the applied magnetic field increases H = 0.05 H c2 The material is in the Meissner state

H = 0.10 H c2 The material is in the Meissner state Magnetization Loop

H = 0.15 H c2 The material is in the mixed state

Magnetization Loop H = 0.20 H c2 The material is in the mixed state

Magnetization Loop H = 0.25 H c2 The material is in the mixed state

Magnetization Loop H = 0.30 H c2 Note the nucleation of fluxons at the superconductor- normal boundary

Magnetization Loop H = 0.35 H c2 Note the nucleation of fluxons at the superconductor- normal boundary

Magnetization Loop H = 0.40 H c2 Note the nucleation of fluxons at the superconductor- normal boundary

Magnetization Loop H = 0.45 H c2 Note the nucleation of fluxons at the superconductor- normal boundary

Magnetization Loop H = 0.50 H c2 Note the nucleation of fluxons at the superconductor- normal boundary

Magnetization Loop H = 0.55 H c2 In the reversible region, one can determine 

Magnetization Loop H = 0.60 H c2 In the reversible region, one can determine 

Magnetization Loop H = 0.65 H c2 In the reversible region, one can determine 

Magnetization Loop H = 0.70 H c2 In the reversible region, one can determine 

Magnetization Loop H = 0.75 H c2 In the reversible region, one can determine 

Magnetization Loop H = 0.80 H c2 The core of the fluxons overlap and the average value of the order parameter drops

Magnetization Loop H = 0.85 H c2 The core of the fluxons overlap and the average value of the order parameter drops

Magnetization Loop H = 0.90 H c2 The core of the fluxons overlap and the average value of the order parameter drops

Magnetization Loop H = 0.95 H c2 The core of the fluxons overlap and the average value of the order parameter drops

Magnetization Loop H = 1.00 H c2 Eventually the superconductivity is destroyed

Magnetization Loop H = 0.95 H c2 Superconductivity nucleates

Magnetization Loop H = 0.90 H c2 Superconductivity nucleates

Magnetization Loop H = 0.85 H c2 Superconductivity nucleates

Magnetization Loop H = 0.80 H c2 Note the Abrikosov flux-line-lattice with hexagonal symmetry

Magnetization Loop H = 0.75 H c2 Note the Abrikosov flux-line-lattice with hexagonal symmetry

Magnetization Loop H = 0.70 H c2 Note the Abrikosov flux-line-lattice with hexagonal symmetry

Magnetization Loop H = 0.65 H c2 Note the Abrikosov flux-line-lattice with hexagonal symmetry

Magnetization Loop H = 0.60 H c2 Note the Abrikosov flux-line-lattice with hexagonal symmetry

Magnetization Loop H = 0.55 H c2 Note the Abrikosov flux-line-lattice with hexagonal symmetry

Magnetization Loop H = 0.50 H c2 Note the Abrikosov flux-line-lattice with hexagonal symmetry

Magnetization Loop H = 0.45 H c2 The flux-line-lattice is defective

Magnetization Loop H = 0.40 H c2 The flux-line-lattice is defective

Magnetization Loop H = 0.35 H c2 The flux-line-lattice is defective

Magnetization Loop H = 0.30 H c2 The flux-line-lattice is defective

Magnetization Loop H = 0.25 H c2 The flux-line-lattice is defective

Magnetization Loop H = 0.20 H c2 The flux-line-lattice is defective

Magnetization Loop H = 0.15 H c2 The flux-line-lattice is defective

Magnetization Loop H = 0.10 H c2 The magnetisation is positive because of flux pinning

Magnetization Loop H = 0.05 H c2 The magnetisation is positive because of flux pinning

Magnetization Loop H = 0.00 H c2 A few fluxons remain as the inter-fluxon repulsion is lower than the surface pinning