1 Constraint operations: Simplification, Optimization and Implication.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 14, 2002 Putting Linear Programs into standard form
Advertisements

1 Chapter 2: Simplification, Optimization and Implication Where we learn more fun things we can do with constraints.
Operation Research Chapter 3 Simplex Method.
1 Constraint Programming Maurizio Gabbrielli Universita’ di Bologna Slides by: K. Marriott.
1 Chapter 1: Constraints What are they, what do they do and what can I use them for.
5.6 Maximization and Minimization with Mixed Problem Constraints
Sebastian Bitzer Seminar Constraint Logic Programming University of Osnabrueck November 11 th 2002 The Simplex Algorithm.
MIT and James Orlin © Chapter 3. The simplex algorithm Putting Linear Programs into standard form Introduction to Simplex Algorithm.
HAWKES LEARNING SYSTEMS math courseware specialists Copyright © 2010 Hawkes Learning Systems. All rights reserved. Hawkes Learning Systems: College Algebra.
HAWKES LEARNING SYSTEMS math courseware specialists Copyright © 2010 Hawkes Learning Systems. All rights reserved. Hawkes Learning Systems: College Algebra.
3-6 Solving Systems of Linear Equations in Three Variables Objective: CA 2.0: Students solve systems of linear equations and inequalities in three variables.
Linear Systems The definition of a linear equation given in Chapter 1 can be extended to more variables; any equation of the form for real numbers.
7.1 Systems of Linear Equations: Two Equations Containing Two Variables.
Adapted from Walch Education Proving Equivalencies.
Math Pacing Graphing Inequalities in Two Variables.
Systems of Equations and Inequalities
Identifying Solutions
Solving Linear Systems Substitution Method Lisa Biesinger Coronado High School Henderson,Nevada.
Algebra 2 Chapter 3 Notes Systems of Linear Equalities and Inequalities Algebra 2 Chapter 3 Notes Systems of Linear Equalities and Inequalities.
SYSTEM OF EQUATIONS SYSTEM OF LINEAR EQUATIONS IN THREE VARIABLES
1 Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 2-1 Equations and Inequalities Chapter 2.
Simplex Algorithm.Big M Method
Topic III The Simplex Method Setting up the Method Tabular Form Chapter(s): 4.
Section 4-1: Introduction to Linear Systems. To understand and solve linear systems.
Goal: Solve linear equations.. Definitions: Equation: statement in which two expressions are equal. Linear Equation (in one variable): equation that.
 System of Equations › Solutions to a two equation system › Solutions to a three equation system › Solutions to a system of inequalities  Break Even.
Linear Equations in Two Variables A Linear Equation in Two Variables is any equation that can be written in the form where A and B are not both zero.
Objective SWBAT solve absolute value equations.. ABSOLUTE VALUE –The distance a number is away from ZERO. Distance is always positive
Bell Work: Simplify: √500,000,000. Answer: 10,000√5.
Do Now (3x + y) – (2x + y) 4(2x + 3y) – (8x – y)
Lesson 2.8 Solving Systems of Equations by Elimination 1.
MATH 416 Equations & Inequalities II. Solving Systems of Equations Apart from the graphic method, there are three other methods we could use to solve.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Systems of Linear Equations and Inequalities in Two Variables 7.
Systems of Equations: Substitution
SOLVING SYSTEMS USING ELIMINATION 6-3. Solve the linear system using elimination. 5x – 6y = -32 3x + 6y = 48 (2, 7)
Solving Systems by Elimination 5.4 NOTES, DATE ____________.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Systems of Equations in Three Variables Identifying Solutions Solving Systems.
CHAPTER THREE: SYSTEMS OF LINEAR EQUATIONS AND INEQUALITIES ALGEBRA TWO Section Solving Systems of Linear Equations in Three Variables.
STROUD Worked examples and exercises are in the text 1 STROUD Worked examples and exercises are in the text Programme F5: Linear equations PROGRAMME F5.
1 Chapter 1: Constraints What are they, what do they do and what can I use them for.
Use the elimination method
Chapter 2: Simplification, Optimization and Implication
What are they, what do they do and what can I use them for.
Section 2.3 Solving Linear Equations Involving Fractions and Decimals; Classifying Equations.
Solving Systems of Equations Using Matrices
Optimization Problems
Chapter 2: Simplification, Optimization and Implication
Solving Systems of Linear Equations By Elimination
Example: Solve the equation. Multiply both sides by 5. Simplify both sides. Add –3y to both sides. Simplify both sides. Add –30 to both sides. Simplify.
Chapter 2 Equations and Inequalities in One Variable
Warm Up Simplify each expression. 1. 3x + 2y – 5x – 2y
Solving Systems using Substitution
Matrices and Systems of Equations
Solving Systems Equations in Three Variables
Logarithmic and exponential equations
Systems of Equations and Inequalities
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Objectives Solve systems of linear equations in two variables by elimination. Compare and choose an appropriate method for solving systems of linear equations.
12 Systems of Linear Equations and Inequalities.
Equations and Inequalities
Solving Systems of Equations by the Substitution and Addition Methods
Solve an inequality using subtraction
PROGRAMME F5 LINEAR EQUATIONS and SIMULTANEOUS LINEAR EQUATIONS.
Section Solving Linear Systems Algebraically
2 Equations, Inequalities, and Applications.
6.3 Using Elimination to Solve Systems
Example 2B: Solving Linear Systems by Elimination
Simplex method (algebraic interpretation)
Logarithmic and exponential equations
The Substitution Method
Presentation transcript:

1 Constraint operations: Simplification, Optimization and Implication.

2 Simplification, Optimization and Implication u Constraint Simplification u Projection u Constraint Simplifiers u Optimization u Implication and Equivalence

3 Constraint Simplification u Two equivalent constraints represent the same information, but u One may be simpler than the other Removing redundant constraints, rewriting a primitive constraint, changing order, substituting using an equation all preserve equivalence

4 Redundant Constraints u One constraint C1 implies another C2 if the solutions of C1 are a subset of those of C2 u C2 is said to be redundant wrt C1 u It is written

5 Redundant Constraints u We can remove a primitive constraint which is redundant with respect to the rest of the constraint. Definitely produces a simpler constraint

6 Solved Form Solvers u Since a solved form solver creates equivalent constraints it can be a simplifier For example using the term constraint solver Or using the Gauss-Jordan solver

7 Projection It becomes even more important to simplify when we are only interested in some variables in the constraint Simplified wrt to V and I

8 Projection u The projection of a constraint C onto variables V is a constraint C1 such that u C1 only involves variables V u Every solution of C is a solution of C1 u A solution of C1 can be extended to give a solution of C

9 Fourier’s Algorithm u Eliminates variable y from linear ineqs C u Write each ineq with y on one side of ineq u For each pair u produce a new ineq u The result is all new ineqs and those ineqs in C which do not involve y

10 Fourier’s Algorithm Example Projecting out Y Result only involving X

11 Projecting Term Constraints u We can also project term constraints u projected onto {X,Z} is u But what is X = cons(Y,Z) projected onto X? u Answer: there is no such constraint!

12 Constraint Simplifiers u constraints C1 and C2 are equivalent wrt variables V if u taking any solution of one and restricting it to the variables V, this restricted solution can be extended to be a solution of the other u Example X=succ(Y) and X=succ(Z) wrt {X}

13 Simplifier Definition u A constraint simplifier is a function simpl which takes a constraint C and set of variables V and returns a constraint C1 that is equivalent to C wrt V u We can make a simplifier for real inequalities from Fourier’s algorithm

14 Tree Constraint Simplifier u apply the term solver to C obtaining C1 u if C1 is false then return false u foreach equation x=t in C1 u if x is in V then u if t is a variable not in V u substitute x for t throughout C1 and result u else add x=t to result u return result

15 Tree Simplification Example Tree constraint to be simplified wrt {Y,T} Equivalent constraint from tree solver Discard the first two equations, keep the third and use the last to substitute for U by T

16 Simplifier Properties u Desirable properties of a simplifier are: u projecting: u weakly projecting: for all constraints C2 that are equivalent to C1 wrt V u a weakly projecting solver never uses more variables than is required u Both properties allow a simplifier to be used as a solver (How?)

17 Optimization u Often given some problem which is modelled by constraints we don’t want just any solution, but a “best” solution u This is an optimization problem u We need an objective function so that we can rank solutions, that is a mapping from solutions to a real value

18 Optimization Problem u An optimization problem (C,f) consists of a constraint C and objective function f u A valuation v1 is preferred to valuation v2 if f(v1) < f(v2) u An optimal solution is a solution of C such that no other solution of C is preferred to it.

19 Optimization Example An optimization problem Find the closest point to the origin satisfying the C. Some solutions and f value Optimal solution

20 Optimization u Some optimization problems have no solution. u Constraint has no solution u Problem has no optimum u For any solution there is more preferable one

21 Simplex Algorithm u The most widely used optimization algorithm u Optimizes a linear function wrt to linear constraints u Related to Gauss-Jordan elimination

22 Simplex Algorithm u A optimization problem (C, f) is in simplex form: u C is the conjunction of CE and CI u CE is a conjunction of linear equations u CI constrains all variables in C to be non- negative u f is a linear expression over variables in C

23 Simplex Example An optimization problem in simplex form An arbitrary problem can be put in simplex form by replacing unconstrained var X by new vars replacing ineq by new var s and

24 Simplex Solved Form u A simplex optimization problem is in basic feasible solved (bfs) form if: u The equations are in solved form u Each constant on the right hand side is non- negative u Only parameters occur in the objective u A basic feasible solution is obtained by setting each parameter to 0 and each non- parameter to the constant in its equation

25 Simplex Example An equivalent problem to that before in bfs form We can read off a solution and its objective value

26 Simplex Algorithm starting from a problem in bfs form repeat Choose a variable y with negative coefficient in the obj. func. Find the equation x = b + cy +... where c<0 and -b/c is minimal Rewrite this equation with y the subject y = -b/c + 1/c x +... Substitute -b/c + 1/c x +... for y in all other eqns and obj. func. until no such variable y exists or no such equation exists if no such y exists optimum is found else there is no optimum solution

27 Simplex Example Choose variable Y, the first eqn is only one with neg. coeff Choose variable Z, the 2nd eqn is only one with neg. coeff No variable can be chosen, optimal value 2 is found

28 Another example An equivalent simplex form is: An optimization problem showing contours of the objective function

29 Another example Basic feasible solution form: circle Choose S3, replace using 2nd eq Optimal solution: box

30 The Missing Part u How do we get the initial basic feasible solution? u Solve a different simplex problem u Add artificial variables to make equations in basic feasible solved form u Minimize the sum of the artificial variables u If the sum is zero we can construct a bfs for the original problem

31 The Missing Part Example Original simplex form equations With artificial vars in bfs form: Objective function: minimize

32 Missing Part Example II Problem after minimization of objective function Removing the artificial variables, the original problem

33 Implication and Equivalence u Other important operations involving constraints are: u implication: test if C1 implies C2 u impl(C1, C2) answers true, false or unknown u equivalence: test if C1 and C2 are equivalent u equiv(C1, C2) answers true, false or unknown

34 Implication Example For the house constraints CH, will stage B have to be reached after stage C? For this question the answer if false, but if we require the house to be finished in 15 days the answer is true

35 Implication and Equivalence u We can use impl to define equiv and vice versa u We can use a solver to do simple impl tests u e.g.

36 Simplification, Optimization and Implication Summary u Equivalent constraints can be written in many forms, hence we desire simplification u Particularly if we are only interested in the interaction of some of the variables u Many problems desire a optimal solution, there are algms (simplex) to find them u We may also be interested in asking questions involving implication