Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

Monterey Branch Line Association of Environmental Professionals and American Planning Association July 28, 2010.
TOD Toolkit: TOD potential at the Hi-Lake Station along Hiawatha Corridor Developed by Support from WORKING DRAFT.
D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
Cost Estimation System Tool
Department of Public Works Public Hearing – FY 2015 – 2019 Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget April 28, 2014.
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
South Coast Rail Project February 28, 2014 Stoughton Town Hall.
Revitalizing Downtown Bryan. The Downtown Master Plan was a collaboration between the public, City staff, and consultants Looney-Ricks-Kiss Inc. The Plan.
VISION FOR A KEARNY TOD February 27, 2008 Rob Lane Regional Plan Association.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
SUBWAY SYSTEM IN NEW YORK CITY The Magical Subway.
© 2003 TranSystems Corporation Advisory Committee Meeting January 19, 2010.
Tucson Modern Streetcar Project Overview July 15, 2011.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
1 Welcome! West Valley-Taylorsville Transit Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public Open House/Hearing July 19, 2006.
SEATTLE LIGHT RAIL STATION AREA PLANNING City of Seattle Station Area Planning in Seattle SEATTLE LIGHT RAIL STATION AREA PLANNING.
Seattle Station Area Planning Milestones & Events Transit-Oriented Development Program Information & Schedule Station Area Atlas Station Area Recommendations.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Greenwood Transit and Sidewalk Project N 90th St to N 105th St Community Open House Sarah Butler, Project Manager September 14, 2015 Presentation begins.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
February 24, “Moving Transit Forward”  A fiscally responsible, community-driven vision for restoring, enhancing, and expanding the Metro Transit.
Metro South Planning MetroLink in South St. Louis County Metro South MetroLink Extension Alternatives Analysis and Draft Environmental.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
TOD Technical Assistance Panel June 21, rd STREET, San Pablo CA.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
- Light Rail Transit Improving mobility Easing congestion Strengthening our communities Central Corridor Committee of the Whole February 20, 2008.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
DC Circulator Transit Development Plan TPB Access for All Advisory Committee October 28, 2010.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Policy and Staff Briefing March 14, 2006 Item No. xx Supp.
Hiawatha Transit Corridor Evaluation June 15, 2005 Mark Fuhrmann Todd Graham.
Central Corridor LRT Review of Washington and Northern Alignments Jan Lysen and John Siqveland December 10, 2009 Image: MPR News Q.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
Mercer Corridor Stakeholder Committee November 4, 2015 Sound Transit.
San Diego Trolley. Current Current/future expansion Propose extension.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
STEERING COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, INTRODUCTIONS 2 WHO IS ON THE PROJECT TEAM?  Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority  Ramsey County Regional.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
PRESENTED AND PREPARED BY CITY OF MISSOULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
Agenda Issues and Concerns Adoption Potential Capital Projects.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY.
Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger Rail Alliance February 24, Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger.
Bottineau Rezoning Study University Neighborhood Network Mary Kaiser, Phil Kelley, Ashley Kobberdahl.
TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expansion and Updated Project and Financing Plans Jay Chapa, Director Housing and Economic Development.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
1 TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expanded and Updated Project and Financing Plans December 8, 2009 Presented to the City Council Jay Chapa Housing & Economic.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
Willow Meadows Civic Club Meeting September 13, 2011
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
6/1/ :36 PM Park Plaza © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be.
Tampa Historic Streetcar, Inc. May 16, 2018
Endorsement of the Recommended Design Concept (Preferred Alternative) for Transforming I-66 Outside the Beltway Board Transportation Committee October.
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
Center City Connector Fall Open House Presenter: Ethan Melone,
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013

Timeline May, 2013: ST Board selected E1 Corridor serving Stadium and MLK districts ST and City staff worked together to identify specific route alignments, and conduct preliminary evaluation of alignments Current: Public review of alignments and preliminary evaluation Upcoming: ST Board, with City Council input, will determine which potential alignments should be advanced for more detailed evaluation through the environmental process 2

Project Goals 1.Improve mobility and transportation access for Tacoma 2.Increase transit ridership 3.Serve underserved neighborhoods 4.Spur economic development 5.Environmentally sensitive, sustainable project 6.Be competitive for federal funding 3

Expansion Design Standards Expansion will be to Tacoma Link vehicle standards Central Link light rail (from Seattle and the Airport) will require a transfer to go downtown/Stadium/Hilltop 4

Alignments for Screening prior to Env. Review

Transfer Alignments 30% Reduction in ridership Passengers perceive penalty due to inconvenience Adds 5 to 10 minutes to travel time Conclusion: Transfer Alignments do not meet purpose and need of project 6

Evaluation Criteria For each route considered, we asked these questions. Would this route: 7

Community & Environmental Impacts -Differentiating Criteria Impact categories: Property acquisitions, potential displacements Parks and community facilities Parking Transportation Utilities Construction Consistency with land use plans Natural resources Historic resources Visual Environmental justice Noise Receptors 8

Community Facilities Broadway Design option A2a and St. Helens A3 and A3a impact Theater Square and may interrupt community events, i.e., Broadway Farmer’s Market All other alignments would have no direct impacts 9

Transportation – On-Street Parking AlignmentNumber of Potentially Impacted Parking Spaces A1 Stadium Way 15 A2 Broadway 15 A2a Broadway with Theater Square Design Option 15 A3 St. Helens 65 A3a St. Helens with Division Only Design Option 65 B1 MLK 25 B2 MLK/J Couplet 30 10

Transportation – Bicycle Operations Reviewed designated bicycle facilities in Mobility Master Plan: Segment A: -Potential conflicts along Broadway, St. Helens between 7 th and 9 th and N 1 st between Stadium and Tacoma Ave. Segment B: -Potential conflict along J street (B2 MLK/J Couplet) 11

Utilities A1 Stadium Way fewer utility conflicts than other alignments due to recent reconstruction All other alignments have potential impacts to sewer, storm drain, telecommunications, water, and electrical utilities 12

Construction A2 Broadway would involve construction of a retaining wall and potential impacts to streets and streetscape A2a Broadway Design Option and A3 St. Helens options would involve construction of a retaining wall, a reconstructed plaza, and potential impacts to the streets and streetscape A3 St. Helens would also involve widening of the street between 7 th St and 9 th St Stadium, Broadway, and a portion of St. Helens have recent street improvements. 13

Markets and Major Destinations Served Transit market is considered 5 minute walk distance from potential station locations Actual station locations to be determined in next phase Potential station locations shown where grades 2% or less 14

Stadium, St. Helens, Hilltop: 5 Min Walk Distance

A1 Stadium: 5 minute walk distance

A2 Broadway: 5 minute walk distance

A3 St. Helens: 5 minute walk distance

Economic Development Potential Transit-Oriented Development “Transit oriented development (TOD) generally refers to higher-density development, with pedestrian priority, located within easy walking distance of a major public transit station or stop(s)” (Transit Cooperative Research Program) “Typically, a TOD project has the following characteristics: planning boundaries within a quarter- to a half-mile radius of a transit facility (a comfortable walking distance)” (Puget Sound Regional Council) 19

Economic Development Potential Methodology: Identified potentially redevelopable parcels within the walk distances (“underutilized” parcels--ratio of current building value to land value less than 150%) –Acres –Percentage of parcels 20

Economic Development Potential AlignmentTotal acres of redevelopable parcels %age of redevelopable parcels A1 Stadium Way3028% A2 Broadway3931% A2a Broadway with Theater Square Design Option 3931% A3 St. Helens4229% A3a St. Helens with Division Only Design Option 4229% B1 MLK8836% B2 MLK/J Couplet8836% 21

Cost Work with the City and the community to identify a project that is the right fit for Tacoma. ST’s cost estimates during the Alternatives Analysis (AA) phase were high-level estimates based on generalized unit costs from other projects AA cost estimates were used to compare corridors Currently, developing cost estimates based on 5% engineering and specific street alignments. However, no survey or field work has been performed yet. 22

Capital Cost Comparison 23

Cost estimates for three of the alignments & Cost Savings Options The project is at 5% engineering and the cost estimates will continue to be refined. Depending on the alignment, the budget and revenue assumptions may need to be revisited. A1-B1 Stadium-MLK A2-B1 Broadway-MLK A3-B1 St Helens-MLK Terminus at 19th$165M$185M$210M Interim Terminus at 11 th $150M$170M$190M Interim Terminus at 6 th $135M$155M$175M Single Track, MLK to 19th $160M$180M$205M 20 min. headway$150M$170M$190M All above are rounded to nearest $5 million. YOE$ assuming midpoint of construction in year All design options impact ridership, 20 minute headways have the most impact on ridership. Single Track would reduce the planned 10-minute headways to minutes. B2 Couplet adds $5M 24

Involving the Community Sound Transit is looking to involve the community through: Neighborhood council and business district briefings Stakeholder Roundtable discussions Online survey Website Mailings, print and online ads Community Open House Jan. 9, 4-7 p.m. at Stadium High School, Auxiliary Gym 25

Questions?Questions?