2 www.heartandstroke.ca/profed Canadian Neurological Scale: Training for Trainers Workshop An Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
Advertisements

Psychological Assessment
Improving Psychological Care After Stroke
Cognitive Impairment in Patients Admitted to the Inpatient Unit: do we screen patients for it? Dr Clare Kendall Dr Rebecca Bhatia St Peter’s Hospice, Bristol.
Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical.
InterProfessional Common Assessment Tools in Stroke Care An Introduction to: InterProfessional Common Assessment Tools in Stroke Care Within the Central.
Richard Shih, MD, FACEP Stroke Patient and ED Stroke Therapy Assessments: What Does Every Emergency Physician Need to Know About the NIHSS & Other Stroke.
Acute Stroke Management Resource: Neurological Assessment 2007.
Research with clinical populations: Cardiac rehabilitation Shawn N Fraser University of Alberta.
Screening By building screening for symptoms of VCI into regular workflows or practice, health care providers are participating in Taking Action to address.
Emotional Well Being on an Acute Stroke Unit Implementation of a Mood Screening Pathway Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust Dr Amanda Campbell - Clinical Psychologist.
Introduction to Evidence-Based Athletic Training Practice MATA 2015 Mark Weber, PhD, ATC, PT, SCS.
Assessment and Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury within the ECHCS Polytrauma System of Care Estela Bogaert-Martinez, Ph.D. Director, Traumatic Brain.
The Nature of Disease.
Harmonizing Cardiovascular Risk Intervention Guidelines in Canada – The C-CHANGE Initiative February 6, 2013 Montreal, Quebec Harmonizing Cardiovascular.
New guidelines for CABG
Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre 5 July 2013 NIHR Programmes and topic identification Alison Ford, Senior Programme Manager.
Using stroke scales to assess the patient – Rankin and NIHSS
Outline  The Evidence  Program overview  Local Initiatives.
Improving pain management in children and young people with complex disabilities, resulting from acquired brain injury and neurological conditions, at.
Environmental/behavioural interventions aimed at preventing falls in older people with visual impairment: Effectiveness and experiences Fiona Neil Claire.
Perceived Recovery as a Predictor of Physical Activity after Mild Stroke Jessica Koster, BA, MSOTS 1, & Timothy J. Wolf, OTD, MSCI, OTR/L 1,2 Washington.
Introduction: Medical Psychology and Border Areas
Mental Health, Mental Illness and Chronic Disease Policy CMHA National Conference August 2008 Barbara Neuwelt, CMHA, Ontario.
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group.
Screening for Stroke and Cognitive Impairment Chapter 1: Introduction.
RISK STRATIFICATION. Established by the CACR in Sept National Guidelines Committee The committee acknowledged the support of the Canadian Cardiovascular.
2 Canadian Neurological Scale: Training for Trainers Workshop Implementing the CNS in Your Organization.
1 Overview of Fellowship Projects. Project to depend on what is available in host institution with strong mentorship Should address activities and tasks.
The Occupational Therapist and Huntington’s Disease
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Communication in Ventilator-Dependant Tracheostomy patients utilising Above Cuff Vocalisation: The ICU Functional Communication.
Screening. By building screening for symptoms of VCI into regular workflows or practice, health care providers are participating in Taking Action to address.
Developing a Dysphagia Management Strategy What’s next?
©2015 Seattle/King County EMS Glasgow Coma Scale BLS-2016-GCS EMS Online.
Brittle N 1, Mant J 2, McManus R 1, Lasserson D 3, Sackley C 1 Are TIAs as transient as the name suggests?
Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care Recommendation 1: Public Awareness and Patient Education (Updated 2008)
METHODOLOGICAL STUDIES
R.Ibar, C.Soratti, M.Torres. A Quality Assurance Program in the procurement process that includes the monitoring of neurocritical patients with GCS ≤7.
NICU Communication Improvement University of San Francisco Mater of Science of Nursing Clinical Nurse Leader Joy Lawley “The single biggest problem in.
EARLY REHABILITATION SIG REPORT IN ABU DHABI H. Binder K. Diserens D. Boering.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
Demography TEMPiS Control group No patients Sex 49%53% Age [Mean, years] 72,772,9 Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 742–48.
Context and Problem Effects of Changes Strategy for Change Aim: To reduce the length of handover by standardising the quality of information transmitted.
Predicting Hospice Appropriateness for Alzheimer’s Patients Gene W. Marsh, RN, PhD Professor, Acute & Critical Care Nursing University of Sheffield School.
Keystone Heart Reflect Neurology
for Overall Prognosis Workshop Cochrane Colloquium, Seoul
LOCATION, MODALITY AND DEGREE OF EXERCISE OVER
Table 1: Table 2: Non Therapeutic Angiograms in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Being Considered for Endovascular Treatment Does not Adversely Affect Patient.
Commissioning Quality Stroke Rehabilitation Event
Target: Stroke Honor Roll
GLASGOW COMA SCALE (GCS) GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE (GOS) Presentant: dr. Dewie Susan Supervisor: dr. H.A.R. Toyo, Sp.S(K) dr. Masita, Sp.S.
Statin Selection in the Elderly
What is the MoCA? Screening for VCI should be conducted using a validated screening tool, such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test. Additional screening.
Frailty identification and management
Panelists. Secondary Prevention of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Can We Improve Outcomes?
Assessing the Risk for Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Study: Outcomes and Evaluation Act: Conclusions and Planning
Are We Closer to Personalized Medicine in MS?
Improving Appropriate Access to PCSK9 Inhibitors
Assessing Bias 1.
Taking the "Cryptogenic" Out of Cryptogenic Stroke
Early Scandinavian Stroke Scale Scores as a Predictive Tool for Rehabilitation and Discharge Planning Brett Jones1, Ronak Patel2,3, Christian Lueck1,3.
Identifying High-Risk AF Patients
New ELN Recommendations
NOAC Studies in VTE AF Studies Superior Outcomes.
Disease Burden of VTE Phases of VTE Treatment.
Taking the "Cryptogenic" Out of Cryptogenic Stroke
5 Good Minutes on Atrial Fibrillation-related Stroke
Eric Mauri Michael Marquis Matthew Kasztejna Advised by: Dr. Wes Ely
Improving Management of Acute HTN in Patients With Stroke
Presentation transcript:

2 Canadian Neurological Scale: Training for Trainers Workshop An Introduction

3 Thanks The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario gratefully acknowledges the contribution of Rhonda McNicoll, R.N., BSc.N., CNN(c), Hamilton Health Sciences, in the development of this presentation.

4 Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS) Performing ongoing neurological assessment provides a standardized method to detect neurological deterioration that can lead to early intervention Canadian Neurological Scale is a tool that has been recommended by the HSFO Best Practice Guidelines for Stroke Care, 2003 as a valid and reliable standardized measure for assessment of neurological deficits in the acute stroke period Developed in 1985 in Montreal Focuses on assessment of patients with acute stroke Measures impairment

5 Canadian Neurological Scale, cont… Glasgow Coma Scale assesses patients with acute neurological nervous system dysfunction resulting in coma CNS provides a complementary scale to assess conscious and aphasic patients Well tested for reliability and validity Suitable for prognostic stratification in trials and planning rehabilitative measures for patients Higher CNS scores (>11) tended to be associated with favourable outcome – lower risk of poor outcome at 6 months Lower CNS scores (<9) tended to be associated with increased death, morbidity

6 Advantages of the CNS Standardized Reliability and validity well described Sensitive to relevant changes in patients Can be done repeatedly at bedside for acute patients Uses simple and non-ambiguous definitions for each modality tested Uses a minimum number of grades per modality Addresses issue of aphasia

7 Frequency of Neurological Assessment Using CNS The Heart and Stroke Best Practice Guidelines for Stroke Care outlines the frequency of assessing neurological status based on different clinical situations to assist organizations to set individual protocols based on specific patient needs: Individuals with acute ischemic stroke receiving t-PA (pg 76, ) – Monitor vital signs and CNS q15 minutes during drug administration Post infusion care (24 hours) – Monitor CNS q1hour for 24hours OR – More frequently as ordered, e.g. q15 minutes for 2 hours, q30 minutes for 6 hours, q1hour for 16 hours

8 Frequency of Assessment Using CNS cont… Based on Heart and Stroke Best Practice Guidelines for Stroke Care: Individuals with acute ischemic stroke not receiving t-PA (pg 78) – Monitor vital signs and CNS q1hour for 24 hours or more frequently if ordered Definitive or Suspected TIA Care Pathway and Plan (pg 114) – Monitor vital signs and CNS q2hours and prn Acute Care Guides: First 24 hours (pg 82) – Follow t-PA protocol if indicated – Assess vital signs and CNS q4hours

9 Frequency of Assessment Using CNS cont… Based on Heart and Stroke Best Practice Guidelines for Stroke Care: Acute Care Guide: Day 2 (pg 84) – Assess vital signs and CNS q4hours Acute Care Guide: Day 3 (pg 86), Day 4-6 (pg 88) – Assess vital signs and CNS as required due to patient status These care guides that are meant to provide recommendations based on the best evidence, however, always follow physician orders or clinical pathway guidelines for your organization

10 Canadian Neurological Scale 11.5 point scale that has three components: Section A Mentation (LOC, Orientation, Speech) Section A1Motor function -- no comprehension deficit Section A2Motor function -- with comprehension deficit

11 Getting Started Assess Pupils Size and light reaction Vital Signs (BP, T, P, R, Oximetry) Assess Level of Consciousness Alert or drowsy  CNS Stuporous/comatose  GCS Assess Orientation Assess Speech Assess Motor No receptive deficit With receptive deficit

12 Definition of Terms Alert: awake and alert, normal level of consciousness Drowsy: rouses when stimulated verbally, remains awake and alert for short periods but tends to doze Stuporous: responds to loud verbal stimuli and/or strong touch; may vocalize, but does not completely wake up Comatose: responds to deep pain: purposeful movement, non-purposeful movement, no response

13 Section A: Mentation Level of Consciousness Alert or drowsy: – If patient is Alert – score 3.0 – If patient is Drowsy – score 1.5 Orientation Where are you (city and hospital)? What is the month and year? Patient can write answers to questions of orientation If the patient cannot state both place and time – score Disoriented or not applicable – score - 0.0

14 Section A: Speech Assess for Receptive Deficit Ask patient to close eyes Point to ceiling Does a stone sink in water? If patient does not complete all three, score receptive deficit 0.0, do not assess Expressive Deficit and go to Section A2: Motor Response – Receptive Deficit Present If no receptive deficit – Assess for Expressive Deficit

15 Section A: Speech If no receptive deficit – Assess for Expressive Deficit Assess for Expressive Deficit Name 3 objects and the use of each: key, pencil, watch If cannot name all 3 objects and the use of each – Score Expressive Deficit – 0.5 If the patient writes the responses, this is NOT acceptable as speech is being assessed If the patient is slurred but intelligible, that is acceptable for normal speech. Indicate “SL” when scoring normal speech If no Expressive Deficit, score Normal Speech – 1.0 If the patient has an Expressive Deficit or Normal Speech go to Section A1 - Motor Response (No Receptive Deficit)

16 Section A1: Motor Response (No Receptive Deficit) Complete this section if patient has an Expressive Speech Deficit or Normal Speech Face: Ask patient to smile or show teeth or gums Note asymmetry of mouth and nasal labial folds Scores for Face: No weakness – score None – 0.5 Weakness – score Present – 0.0 Note: Record the side exhibiting the WORST deficit, using “R” or “L”

17 Section A1, Proximal Arms Note: Submit both arms to the same testing. Record the side exhibiting the WORST deficit, using “R” or “L” Arm (proximal) If patient is sitting: lift arms to shoulder level (90 º ) and apply resistance just above elbows bilaterally If patient is in lying in bed: elevate arms to 90 º and apply resistance above elbows bilaterally

18 Section A1, Proximal Arms Scores for Arms (proximal) None= no weakness Mild= movement to 90 º, unable to oppose pressure Significant= movement <90 º Total= absence of motion

19 Section A1, Distal Arms Arms (distal): Patient sitting or lying Submit both arms to the same testing. Record the side exhibiting the WORST deficit, using “R” or “L” Arms outstretched with wrists “cocked-back”(dorsiflex hands) Support patient’s arms while applying pressure between wrist and knuckles

20 Section A1, Distal Arms Scores for Arms (distal) None= no weakness Mild= can “cock-back” wrist, unable to oppose pressure Significant= some movement of fingers Total= absence of movement

21 Section A1, Proximal Legs Legs (proximal): Patient lying in bed Submit both arms to the same testing. Record the side exhibiting the WORST deficit, using “R” or “L” Thighs brought toward body Keeping knees flexed to 90 º Push down on each thigh one at a time Scores for Legs (proximal) None= no weakness Mild= can lift leg, unable to oppose pressure Significant= lateral movement but no power to lift leg Total= absence of movement

22 Section A1, Distal Legs Legs (distal): Patient lying in bed Submit both arms to the same testing. Record the side exhibiting the WORST deficit, using “R” or “L” Toes and feet pointed upward Push down on each foot, one at a time Scores for Legs (distal) None=1.5 - no weakness Mild=1.0 - can point foot & toes upward, unable to oppose pressure Significant=0.5 - some movement of toes, but cannot lift toes or foot Total=0.0 - absence of movement

23 Section A2: Motor Response (Receptive Deficit Present) Complete this section if patient has a Receptive Speech Deficit only Face: Have patient mimic your own grin, show his teeth or gums Note asymmetry of mouth and nasal labial folds If patient is unable to cooperate, observe facial response when pressure is applied to sternum Note: Record the side exhibiting the WORST deficit, using “R” or “L” Scores for Face Symmetrical = 0.5 Asymmetrical = 0.0

24 Section A2, Arms Arms: Demonstrate and/or place patient’s arms outstretched in front of patient at 90 º If patient is unable to cooperate, apply finger nail bed pressure bilaterally and compare response Note: Submit both limbs to the same testing. Record the side exhibiting the WORST deficit, using “R” or “L” Scores for Arms Equal= equal motor response Unequal= unequal motor response

25 Section A2, Legs Legs : thighs toward trunk with knees flexed to 90º If patient is unable to cooperate, apply toenail bed pressure bilaterally and compare response Note: Submit both limbs to the same testing. Record the side exhibiting the WORST deficit, using “R” or “L” Scores for Legs Equal= maintain position or withdraw equally Unequal= cannot maintain position or unequal withdrawing

26 Scoring the CNS Score Mentation Section -Section A for all patients Score Section A1 OR Section A2 Do not score both A1 & A2 Add Section A + A1 OR A + A2 Maximum Score = 11.5 Decrease of more than 1 point from previous CNS scores is indicative of a change in patient status and requires notification of the physician. Changes in vitals signs and pupil size and reaction would also warrant a change in status and also require notification of the physician.