MTS Working Group San Francisco F2F Agenda Aram Shumavon and Alan Becker Kevala Dec. 9, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Advertisements

DISPUTES & INVESTIGATIONS ECONOMICS FINANCIAL ADVISORY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING Early Lessons Learned from DOE-EPRI Framework Experience Melissa Chan MA DPU.
Planning, optimization and regulatory issues
California GHG policy and implications for the power sector APEX Sydney Conference October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin, PhD.
Making Clean Local Energy Accessible Now Storage Bid Evaluation Protocols Role of CEP, Quantifiable Benefits Stephanie Wang Policy Director Clean Coalition.
California Energy Commission Retail Electric Rate Scenarios: Key Drivers and Structure 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report California Energy Commission.
CPUC Procurement Policies Robert L. Strauss California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division - Procurement Section.
Capacity Valuation.
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project TDV Economic Update Brian Horii and Snuller Price Energy & Environmental Economics,
OVERVIEW OF RPS CALCULATOR FUNCTIONALITY 1. Model Specification Model developed to provide plausible portfolios to CPUC LTPP and CAISO TPP to facilitate.
California Energy Commission Draft Rate Scenario Model Methodology DAWG Forecasting Subgroup Sept. 11, 2014 Lynn Marshall Supply Analysis.
MTS Working Group Webinar Mtg
More Than Smart Overview of Discussions Q thru Q Volume 2 of 2
California Energy Commission Workshop Nuclear Power Plant Issues
System Reliability Procurement: Non-wires Alternatives in Rhode Island Tim Roughan National Grid.
Smart Integrated Infrastructure The Progression of Smart Grid Presentation to National League of Cities Martin G. Travers – President, Telecommunications.
The Policy Voice for Energy Storage Bulk Energy Storage for the Nation’s Electricity Grid Jason Makansi, Executive Director President, Pearl Street Inc.
Laura Doll Deputy Executive Director, CPUC October 18, 2006 Platt’s CA Power Market Forum C ALIFORNIA P UBLIC U TILITIES C OMMISSION Fulfilling Resource.
1 Connecting the Dots Edward Randolph Director, Energy Division California Public Utilities Commission Date (example: April 26, 2012)
AT Benefit Cost Analysis Model Highway Design, Project Management and Training Section Technical Standards Branch Presented by Bill Kenny, Director: Design,
Energy Action Plan “Report Card” and the AB32 “Umbrella” CFEE ROUNDTABLE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY Julie Fitch California Public Utilities Commission Director.
Avoided Costs of Generation
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
1 CPUC Avoided Cost Workshop Introduction and Overview.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 4, 2005.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Joint Agency Workshop on the Governor’s Energy Efficiency Goals CEC IEPR Workshop on 2030 Efficiency Goals Panel Topic Codes and Existing Buildings Monday.
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency eeactionplan The Role of Energy Efficiency in Utility Energy Planning Snuller Price Partner Energy.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
California Public Utilities Commission CPUC Climate Change Activities Paul Clanon Executive Director August 28, 2007 Presentation to the Senate Energy,
SDG&E’s Proposal to Implement AB 920 July 9, 2010.
By Erik Takayesu, PE Director, Electric System Planning Southern California Edison More Than Smart Webinar August 4, 2015 Distribution Resources Plan.
MTS Working Group September 8, Introduction More Than Smart Mission – Enabling state integrated distribution grid efforts 1.Continue the work.
OPOWER CONFIDENTIAL : DO NOT DISTRIBUTE 1 Energy Policy Innovation Outside VA: Views from NY and CA November 12, 2015.
Future Expectations of TEPPC: Products, Users, and Values Maury Galbraith Presentation to TEPPC Review Task Force January 11,
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Integrated Energy Policy Report Workshop Landscape-Scale Environmental Evaluations for Energy Infrastructure.
Long Term Study Transmission Results May 21 st, 2013.
More Than Smart – A Distribution System Vision © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. Dave Geier – VP Electric.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
MTS Working Group October 8, Introduction More Than Smart Mission – Enabling state integrated distribution grid efforts 1.Continue the work of.
Institutional Support Vladimir Koritarov Argonne National Laboratory April 2016.
PG&E’s Distribution Resources Planning READ AND DELETE For best results with this template, use PowerPoint 2003 Planning the “Networked Grid“ Integrated.
MTS Working Group San Francisco F2F Agenda Mar. 23, 2015.
0 LMP+D RATE FOR DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES IN NEW YORK AEEI – ACENY – NECEC* Proposal to NY Public Service Commission *Developed with support from Clean.
Locational Net Benefit Analysis Working Group June 9, pm – 3:30 pm CPUC Golden Gate Room, San Francisco drpwg.org.
Integrated Capacity Analysis Working Group June 1, am – 12 pm CPUC Hearing Room E drpwg.org.
4/16/2010 Regional Planning Group Meeting Long-Term Planning Study of the ERCOT Interconnection Warren Lasher Manager, System Assessment.
MTS Working Group DER Value Components (draft rev 2) Jan. 20, 2015.
Integrated Capacity Analysis Working Group June 9, am – 12 pm CPUC Golden Gate Hearing Room drpwg.org.
Locational Net Benefit Analysis Working Group
LNBA Subgroup: Avoided Transmission Value
MTS Working Group January 28, 2016
Transmission-Distribution Interface Working Group Meeting
Locational Net Benefit Analysis Working Group
Locational Net Benefit Analysis Working Group
August ICA Agenda Time Topic 8:00 – 8:15
SEIA Perspective on Marginal/Avoided CAISO Transmission Costs
Mike Jaske California Energy Commission
Preliminary Electricity Rate and Time of Use Rate Scenarios
Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
August LNBA Agenda Time Topic 1:00 – 1:15
Rick Umoff, SEIA Sean Garren, Vote Solar
Can DER Defer Traditional Distribution Capital Investments?
Scenario Scoping Process
Integrated Distribution Planning Process
Introduction to Growth Scenario Working Group
Inter-Staff Collaboration Summit
More Than Smart Framework Focus on Lifecycle Process Changes to Achieve Objectives
Scenario Scoping Process
DECISION
Presentation transcript:

MTS Working Group San Francisco F2F Agenda Aram Shumavon and Alan Becker Kevala Dec. 9, 2014

2 2 Revisions to Valuation of DER: Walking, Jogging, Running WalkJogRun Q1, 2015 – H and beyond Improved VisibilityUtility Plans and ProductsMature Markets Heatmaps, Test AreasStatewide Rollout of Proven Analytical Framework Market Integration

3 3 Walking - Short Term Revisions to Valuation of DER Focus on granularity and visibility. Methodology Outline: 1) Reduce friction by leveraging existing platforms January 2015 deliverables? 2) Publicly available inputs, assumptions Preference for public prices, etc. – there is not time for anything else. 3)Geospatial quantification Ability to differentiate between the value of the same resource in two locations. 4)Circuit level granularity, where possible; substation where not Combination of feeder and busbar granularity 5)Integrate of bulk power system and end user customer market signals Opex reduction, Capex avoidance, DR benefits, reliability improvement, etc. 6)Start to include a more comprehensive set of benefits Societal, environmental, health, jobs, etc.

4 4 Integrate Disparate Elements Existing Avoided Cost tool has serious limitations Static & blunt, but pervasive Inadequate, but familiar New valuation options are difficult to implement in a quickly e.g. Jobs benefits are likely to be highly contentious Policy makers need a tool to compare across alternatives e.g. Is a dollar spent avoiding a capacitor bank on one substation more valuable than load reduction elsewhere?

5 5 How Then to Bring the Pieces Together? We propose to modify the RMI/E3 DERACT as the basis for AB 327 DRP evaluation by: 1)Increasing the geographic granularity 2)Adding additional benefit cost data 3)Improving ease of use, accuracy, visibility, and speed 4)Providing a framework for developing Jog and Run phase tools 5)Establishing a mechanism for signaling probable evaluation mechanisms to other PUC proceedings

6 6 DRP Avoided Cost: Potential Granularity Upgrades Component Current Granularity (RMI/E3 DERACT)Potential DRP GranularityData Source E3 Framework Energy ZonalLMP NodeCAISO Losses Utility Utilities, GRC Ancillary Services Statewide CASIO Emissions Statewide RMI/E3 DERACT Capacity System value (no use of LRA values)LRA-specificCPUC RA program T&D Capacity (non-CAISO) Utility (SCE, SDGE), climate zone (PGE), (substation data was in NEM report, but not made public) Substation, LRAUtilities, GRC Avoided RPS Statewide RMI/E3 DERACT

7 7 DRP Avoided Cost: Potential Analysis Expansion ComponentCurrentPotential DRP GranularityData Source For WG Consideration Transmission Capacity N/A LRA, Zone(Utility Capacity Projects 5-10 Yr Plans + CPUC assumption on >Yr 10 planning) Energy savings from transmission unloading N/ACRR path, LMP nodesIndustry assumptions (i.e. Sandia NL) Capacity savings from LRA unloadingN/ALRALRA vs. System CAISO prices Fuel Price Hedge  physical hedgeN/AUtility, TEVAR modelNREL assumptions, TEVAR model, GRCs Market-Price Suppression  reduced wholesale energy prices N/AStatewide, CAISONREL assumptions Reliability  Routine OutagesN/AUtility SAIDI statistics + Value of Service assumptions (Brattle Report, etc) Resiliency  Major Event OutagesN/AIndustry assumptions (i.e. DOE) Emissions  Health impactsN/AAir Basin, combination of air basin and LRA Industry assumptions Societal  jobs, etcN/AStatewideIndustry assumptions Additional A/S  Volt/VAr, ramp(?)N/ACircuitIndustry assumptions (i.e. NL)

8 8 Low Hanging Fruit for Localized Valuation Improvements e.g. LMP Node Level analysis is currently integrated for EE avoided cost and various DER investment

9 9 …And the Expansion of New Cost Categories e.g. Air quality geographies are known and market prices are transparent

10 Allowing Us to Leverage Multiple Datasets into a New Avoided Cost Tool Initial incorporation of RMI/E3 DERACT completed. Next steps include sample data integration

11 Leveraging the Familiar : Improved Granularity and Transparency Combining OpEx vs. CapEx breakdown, cost/benefit product, avoided cost tool (if applicable), geography and data source