q=q V +q sea q=q sea so: total sea (q+q): q sea = 2 q Kresimir Kumericki, Dieter Mueller, Nucl.Phys.B841:1-58,2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Polarized positive + and negative - polarized positive + and negative - muon to perform DVCS measurements for GPD study for GPD study Nicole dHose,
Advertisements

Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg Two scales of the hadronic structure Search for clean signatures in the data Bogdan Povh.
Introduction Glasgow’s NPE research Group uses high precision electromagnetic probes to study the subatomic structure of matter. Alongside this we are.
Target Fragmentation studies at JLab M.Osipenko in collaboration with L. Trentadue and F. Ceccopieri, May 20,SIR2005, JLab, Newport News, VA CLAS Collaboration.
 0, ,  + exclusive electroproduction on the proton at CLAS on the proton at CLAS.
DVCS at JLab Como, 11/06/2013. JLab published 6 GeV results JLab 6GeV analysis in progress JLab 12 GeV program.
Integral and derivative dispersion relations, analysis of the forward scattering data J.R. Cudell *, E. Martynov *+, O.V.Selyugin *# * Institut de Physique,
 0, ,  + exclusive electroproduction on the proton at CLAS on the proton at CLAS.
1 Pierre Marage Univ. Libre de Bruxelles On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Diffraction at HERA CIPANP 2006 Puerto-Rico 29/5-4/6/2006.
Brahim MorenoStudents' seminar at Bosen Workshop ΔVCS and Generalized Parton Distributions
1 Exclusive electroproduction of the    on the proton at CLAS  Outline: Physics motivations: GPDs CLAS experiment: e1-dvcs Data analysis:   cross.
Nov 13, 2007Aharon Levy - Oxford seminar1 Gluons in the proton and exclusive hard diffraction Aharon Levy Tel Aviv University and DESY Introduction soft,
Backward meson production at CLAS Alex Kubarovsky (RPI/Uconn) Kyungseon Joo (Uconn) Valery Kubarovsky (Jlab) Paul Stoler (RPI) Exclusive Meson Production.
The angular dependence of the 16 O(e,e’K + ) 16  N and H(e,e’K + )  F. Garibaldi – Jlab December WATERFALL The WATERFALL target: reactions on.
THE DEEP INELASTIC SCATTERING ON THE POLARIZED NUCLEONS AT EIC E.S.Timoshin, S.I.Timoshin.
Inclusive Jets in ep Interactions at HERA, Mónica V á zquez Acosta (UAM) HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, July 19, Mónica Luisa Vázquez.
M.Garçon, M. Guidal, C. Hadjidakis, K. Lukashin, L. Morand, S. Morrow, J. Santoro, E. Smith Exclusive  0,  electroproduction on the CLAS on.
Generalized Parton Distribution JLab Franck Sabatié CEA Saclay On behalf of the Hall A and Hall B collaborations APS-DNP mini workshop Newport.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering and Pseudoscalar Meson Electroproduction with CLAS Valery Kubarovsky Jefferson Lab XII Workshop on High Energy Spin Physics.
Deeply Virtual Exclusive Reactions with CLAS Valery Kubarovsky Jefferson Lab ICHEP July 22, 2010, Paris, France.
Sixth International Conference on Perspectives in Hadronic Physics Hard Photodisintegration of a proton Pair May 2008 (Miramare - Trieste, Italy)
Possibilities to perform DVCS measurement at COMPASS E. Burtin CEA-Saclay Irfu/SPhN On Behalf of the COMPASS Collaboration DIS Madrid - 29 April,
Chiral Symmetry Restoration and Deconfinement in QCD at Finite Temperature M. Loewe Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Montpellier, July 2012.
Factorization Breaking in Diffractive Photoproduction of Dijets Motivation Diffractive parton densities Multipomeron exchanges Direct and resolved photoproduction.
Finite Subtractions for Meson Electroproduction and Exclusive Drell-Yan O.V. Teryaev, I.R. Gabdrakhmanov Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics,
M. Barbi Exclusive Vector Meson Production and Inclusive K 0 S K 0 S Final State in DIS at HERA Outline: ¥ Exclusive vector meson production ¥ Summary.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.
K.Hiller ISMD 2003 Cracow 1 Introduction Vector Mesons DVCS Diffractive DIS Final States: Charm & Jets Charm & JetsSummary K.Hiller DESY Zeuthen on behalf.
Jump to first page Quark-Hadron Duality Science Driving the 12 GeV Upgrade Cynthia Keppel for Jefferson Lab PAC 23.
June 25, 2004 Jianwei Qiu, ISU 1 Introduction to Heavy Quark Production Jianwei Qiu Iowa State University CTEQ Summer School on QCD Analysis and Phenomenology.
Inclusive Diffraction at HERA Marcella Capua – INFN and Calabria University Small X and Diffraction FNAL Chicago (USA) 17 – 20 September 2003 on behalf.
Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Aug 15, 2003 Lepton-Photon 2003.
Seminários GFPAE – 02/ Diffractive heavy quark production at the LHC Mairon Melo Machado
Deeply Virtual Meson Production and Transversity GPDs Valery Kubarovsky Jefferson Lab 1 Exclusive Meson Production and Short-Range Hadron Structure January.
Daniel S. Carman Page 1 Hadron Sep , 2015 Daniel S. Carman Jefferson Laboratory N* Spectrum & Structure Analysis of CLAS Data  CLAS12 N*
Marta Ruspa, "Inclusive diffraction", DIS Inclusive diffraction Diffractive cross section and diffractive structure function Comparison with colour.
Jan 4, 2008Aharon Levy - Hosza seminar1 Gluons in the proton and exclusive hard diffraction Aharon Levy Tel Aviv University and MPI Introduction soft,
Probing Generalized Parton Distributions
Exotic baryon resonances in the chiral dynamics Tetsuo Hyodo a a RCNP, Osaka b ECT* c IFIC, Valencia d Barcelona Univ. 2003, December 9th A.Hosaka a, D.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann DIS 2007 Charm production in diffractive DIS and PHP at ZEUS Charm production in diffractive DIS and PHP at ZEUS Isabell-Alissandra.
1 Diffractive heavy quark production in AA collisions at the LHC at NLO* Mairon Melo Machado GFPAE – IF – UFRGS
A. Bertolin on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Charm (and beauty) production in DIS at HERA (Sezione di Padova) Outline: HERA, H1 and ZEUS heavy.
JLab, October 31, 2008 WACS in 12 GeV era 1 GPDs Wide-Angle Compton Scattering pi-0 photo-production in 12 GeV era B. Wojtsekhowski Outline WACS and other.
Analytic properties of DPE amplitudes or Collinear Factorization for Central Production EDS’09, CERN, July Oleg Teryaev JINR, Dubna.
Costas Foudas, Imperial College, Jet Production at High Transverse Energies at HERA Underline: Costas Foudas Imperial College
Deeply Virtual ω Production Michel Garçon & Ludyvine Morand (SPhN-Saclay) for the CLAS collaboration MENU 2004, Beijing e-e- e -’ pp’ ω **
Transition region (1) Transition region (2) Scaling (s-, Q 2,…) (3) Generalized Parton Distribution (4) Transition Distribution Amplitude (5) …
June 13, 2008Aharon Levy - Torino seminar1 Gluons in the proton and exclusive hard diffraction Aharon Levy Tel Aviv University Introduction data on exclusive.
Exclusive Vector Meson Electroproduction at 12 GeV Paul Stoler Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
General introduction to GPDs From data to GPDs General introduction to GPDs From data to GPDs.
Extending forward scattering Regge Theory to internediate energies José R. Peláez Departamento de Física Teórica II. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Results on Diffractive Vector Meson Production in ZEUS Joachim Tandler Bonn University DIS 03 St. Petersburg, March 2003 Motivation Experimental.
April 18, 2007A. Levy: Exclusive VM, DIS07, Munich1 Exclusive ρ 0 electroproduction Aharon Levy DESY/Tel Aviv University on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration.
Envisioned PbWO4 detector Wide-Angle Compton Scattering at JLab-12 GeV with a neutral-particle detector With much input from B. Wojtsekhowski and P. Kroll.
A  scale,  ’ and b in diffractive vector meson production A.Rostovsev (ITEP, Moscow) Low-x 2007 August 31.
High-t Exclusive Reactions With Real Photons Gerald A. Miller, UW.
June 10, 2008A. Levy: Exclusive VM, GPD08, Trento1 Exclusive VM electroproduction Aharon Levy Tel Aviv University on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations.
Meson Form Factors and Reaction Mechanism Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 4 August 2008.
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
Exclusive electroproduction of the r+ on the proton at CLAS
Wide Angle Compton Scattering
Can We Learn Quark Orbital Motion from SSAs?
Selected Physics Topics at the Electron-Ion-Collider
Polarized Structure Function of Nucleon and Orbital Angular Momentum
Electroproduction of φ Mesons in CLAS
Single Diffractive Higgs Production at the LHC *
New Results on 0 Production at HERMES
Hall C Summer Meeting 4 August 2008
Scaling Study of the L-T Separated p(e,e’π+)n Cross Section at Large Q2 Tanja Horn Jefferson Lab APS/DNP meeting 2007 DNP07 October 2007.
Factorization in some exclusive B meson decays
Presentation transcript:

q=q V +q sea q=q sea so: total sea (q+q): q sea = 2 q Kresimir Kumericki, Dieter Mueller, Nucl.Phys.B841:1-58,2010.

Belitsky A V, Mueller D and Kirchner A 2002 Nucl. Phys. B –392

H Im H Re H Im H Re HERMES x B =0.09,Q 2 =2.5 JLab (Hall A) x B =0.36,Q 2 =2.3 t (GeV 2 )

x b(GeV -1 ) H u (x,b ) y x z

VGG prediction Fit with 7 CFFs (boundaries 5xVGG CFFs) Fit with 7 CFFs (boundaries 3xVGG CFFs) Fit with ONLY H and H ~ t-dependence at fixed x B of H Im & H Im ~ Axial charge more concentrated than electromagnetic charge ?

In the non-perturbative regime the interaction of quarks and gluons is highly non-linear

 (more data existing) L.O calculation with running  s calculation with k perp effects One example:

,

Regge theory: Exchange of families of mesons in the t-channel

Regge theory: Exchange of families of mesons in the t-channel M(s,t) ~ s  (t) where  (t) (trajectory) is the relation between the spin and the (squared) mass of a family of particles M->s  (t)  tot ~1/s x Im(M(s,t=0))->s  (0)-1 [optical theorem]  tot d  /dt s t d  /dt~1/s 2 x |M(s,t)| 2 ->s  (t)-2 ->[e  (t)lns(s) ]

Each time a reaction proceeds via the exchange of a charged (meson) in the t-channel, the cross-section decreases (  (0)~0.5) However, when a reaction proceeds via the exchange of vacuum quantum numbers, the cross section doesn’t decrease (even slightly increases).

However, in contrast with meson trajectories, there is no physical particles which has been identified very Conclusively for such trajectory. [QCD:glueballs] =>Introduction of a trajectory with intercept  (0) ~1 : the Pomeron [  (0) ~1.08] Each time a reaction proceeds via the exchange of a charged (meson) in the t-channel, the cross-section decreases (  (0)~0.5) However, when a reaction proceeds via the exchange of vaccuum quantum numbers, the cross section doesn’t decrease (even slightly increases).

The theory of Regge poles has been very popular a few decades ago because it could describe the main characteristics of numerous processes with a limited number of parameters Difficulty to connect Regge with quantum field theory (QCD) and the fundamental degrees of freedom (quarks, gluons)=> hadronic theory. However, relative loss of interest after: describe with precision the data and refine the theory means to go beyond the basic hypothesis and becomes very quickly complicated. For instance, other singularities than simple poles (cuts…) =>first approximation

,

,

, Q 2 >>

,

Some signatures of the (asymptotic) « hard » processes:  L /  T ~Q 2  J  ~9/1/2/8  L ~1/Q 6  T ~1/Q 8  ~|xG(x)| 2 Q 2 dependence: W dependence: (for gluon handbag) Ratio of yields: (for gluon handbag) Saturation with hard scale of  P (0), b, … SCHC : checks with SDMEs

LO (w/o kperp effect) Handbag diagram calculation needs k perp effects to account for preasymptotic effects LO (with kperp effect) Same thing for 2-gluon exchange process

H1, ZEUS, Q 2 >>

H1, ZEUS, Q 2 >> H1, ZEUS CLAS HERMES COMPASS

H1, ZEUS, Q 2 >> H1, ZEUS CLAS HERMES COMPASS + « older » data from: E665, NMC, Cornell,…

H1, ZEUS, Q 2 >> H1, ZEUS CLAS HERMES COMPASS + « older » data from: E665, NMC, Cornell,…

Steepening W slope as a function of Q 2 indicates « hard » regime (reflects gluon distribution in the proton) W dependence

Two ways to set a « hard » scale: *large Q 2 *mass of produced VM W dependence Steepening W slope as a function of Q 2 indicates « hard » regime (reflects gluon distribution in the proton) Universality :  at large Q 2 +M 2 similar to J/ 

 P (0) increases from “soft” (~1.1) to “hard” (~1.3) as a function of scale  2 =(Q 2 +M V 2 )/4. Hardening of W distributions with  2

Approaching handbag prediction of n=6 (Q 2 not asymptotic, fixed W vs fixed x B,  tot vs  L, Q 2 evolution of G(x)…) Q 2 dependence  L ~  /Q 6 => Fit with  ~1/(Q 2 +M V 2 ) n Q 2 >0 GeV 2 => n=2+/ Q 2 >10 GeV 2 => n=2.5+/ Q 2 >0 GeV 2 => n= / /  J  (S. Kananov) Q 2 dependence is damped at low Q 2 and steepens at large Q 2

t dependence b decreases from “soft” (~10 GeV -2 ) to “hard” (~4-5 GeV -2 ) as a function of scale  2 =(Q 2 +M V 2 )/4

Ratios  J  ~ 9/1/2/8 (SU(4) universality)    1/sqrt(2){|uu>-|dd>}  1/sqrt(2){|uu>+|dd>}   Ratio  =9

L/TL/TL/TL/T (almost) compatible with handbag prediction (damping at large Q 2 )

SDMEs HERMES H1 (almost) no SCHC violation

At high energy (W>5 GeV), the general features of the kinematics dependences and of the SDMEs are relatively/qualitatively well understood Good indications that the “hard”/pQCD regime is dominant for for  2 =(Q 2 +M V 2 )/4 ~ 3-5 GeV 2. Data are relatively well described by GPD/handbag approaches

H1, ZEUS, Q 2 >> H1, ZEUS CLAS HERMES COMPASS

Exclusive  0,   electroproduction on the CLAS6 on the CLAS6 S. Morrow et al., Eur.Phys.J.A39:5-31,2009 (  J. Santoro et al., Phys.Rev.C78:025210,2008 ( L. Morand et al., Eur.Phys.J.A24: ,2005 ( C. Hadjidakis et al., Phys.Lett.B605: ,2005 (  GeV) K. Lukashin et al., Phys.Rev.C63:065205,2001 ( GeV) } e1-b (1999) } e1-6 ( ) A. Fradi, Orsay Univ. PhD thesis (  GeV) } e1-dvcs (2005)

e1-6 experiment (E e =5.75 GeV) (October 2001 – January 2002)

ep  ep  + (  - ) Mm(epX) Mm(ep  + X) e p ++  - )

1) Ross-Stodolsky B-W for  0 (770), f 0 (980) and f 2 (1270) with variable skewedness parameter, 2)  ++ (1232)  +  - inv.mass spectrum and  +  - phase space. Background Subtraction

   (  * p  p  0 ) vs W

L. Morand et al., Eur.Phys.J.A24: ,2005 ( C. Hadjidakis et al., Phys.Lett.B605: ,2005 (  GeV) K. Lukashin, Phys.Rev.C63:065205,2001 ( GeV) J. Santoro et al., Phys.Rev.C78:025210,2008 ( S. Morrow et al., Eur.Phys.J.A39:5-31,2009 (      A. Fradi, Orsay Univ. PhD thesis, 2009 ( 

GK  L LL ep->ep     

GPDs parametrization based on DDs (VGG/GK model) Strong power corrections… but seems to work at large W…

VGG GPD model +

GK GPD model

H, H, E, E (x,ξ,t) ~~ x+ξx-ξ t γ, π, ρ, ω… -2ξ x ξ-ξ-ξ +1 0 Quark distribution q q Distribution amplitude Antiquark distribution “ERBL” region“DGLAP” region W~1/  ERBLDGLAP

DDs + “meson exchange” DDs w/o “meson exchange” (VGG) “meson exchange”

VMs (  0,  ) the only exclusive process [with DVCS] measured over a W range of 2 orders of magnitude (  L,T, d  /dt, SDMEs,…) At high energy (W>5 GeV), transition from “soft” to “hard” (  2 scale) physics relatively well understood (further work needed for precision understanding/extractions) At low energy (W<5 GeV), large failure of “hard” approach. This is not understood. Is the GPD/handbag approach setting at much larger Q 2 or is the widely used GPD parametrisation in the valence region completely wrong ? A lot of new data expected soon from COMPASS (transv. target), HERA new analysis,…

Interpretation “a la Regge” : Laget model  *p  p  0  *p  p   *p  p  Free parameters: *Hadronic coupling constants: g MNN *Mass scales of EM FFs: (1+Q 2 /  2 ) -2

Regge/Laget  L (  * L p  p  L 0 ) Pomeron ,f 2

Comparison with   