OVC Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Strategy (“the MER”)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elements of Survey Methodology Documentation MICS3 Data Analysis and Report Writing Workshop.
Advertisements

The Africa Action Plan An IEG Evaluation CSO Forum April 15, 2011.
The MERG Where do we go from here? l Current context for M&E –Global level –Country level l Proposed Scope of Work l Proposed Composition l Next steps.
Content of an M&E Matrix
February Dakar, Senegal
Overview M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011.
PEPFAR’s Approach to Maximize Efficiency, Effectiveness and Impact
Presentation at The Conference for Family Literacy Louisville, Kentucky By Apter & O’Connor Associates April 2013 Evaluating Our Coalition: Are We Making.
Introduction to PEPFAR 3.0 and DATIM.
OUTCOME INVESTING (OI) Results-based approach to designing and managing investments Strategy, Measurement & Evaluation © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The state of the art: DHS and MICS
Healthy Child Development Suggestions for Submitting a Strong Proposal.
Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA) FHI Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC Tel: Fax:
S-STEM Program Evaluation S-STEM PI Meeting Arlington, VA October 2012.
1 WSSD Global Partnership for Capacity Building to Implement the Globally Harmonized System of Chemical Classification and Labelling Meeting of Partners.
Evaluating impact of OVC programs: standardizing our methods Jenifer Chapman, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
Cognitive development among young children in Cambodia: Implications for ECED programs.
Global Initiative to Improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics October 22/23, 2008 Expert meeting.
PEPFAR OVC Survey Toolkit Janet Shriberg, EdD Senior Evaluation Advisor Office of HIV/AIDS USAID **please note that slides were created with work done.
The President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Next Generation Indicators.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Parliamentary Portfolio Committee for Basic Education 4 May 2010 Development of Workbooks.
PARIS21 Partnership in Statistics for Development in the 21 st Century From data to policy action in low income countries: how can innovation help? Matjaz.
Towards improved health workforce performance: The World Bank’s Approach & Work Program Christoph Kurowski and Yuki Murakami VIII. Regional Meeting of.
Debbi Birx, MD PEPFAR/CDC WORKSHOP - Mini Room 7 Center for Global Health Division of Global HIV/AIDS Getting to Six Million PEPFAR Track 1.0 Treatment.
2010 Framework for Action on ICT For Development in the Pacific (FAIDP) Review Sakaio Manoa ICT Outreach Coordinator USP.
Learning about learning The GEC approach to M&E UKFIET Conference Joseph Holden & Jason Calvert 15 th September 2015 © PEAS.
GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM GMS CEP-BCI Phase II Results Monitoring Framework GMS Environment Operations Center.
Case management versus M&E in the context of OVC programs: What have we learned? Jenifer Chapman, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
Nutrition Cluster Initiative on Assessment in Emergencies including Infant Feeding in Emergencies Bruce Cogill, Ph.D. Global Cluster Coordinator IFE Meeting.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Towards a More Effective Production of Gender Sensitive Data in African Countries:
The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.
Monitoring global progress towards education goals Issues for the future Manos Antoninis Global EFA Meeting Muscat, 12 May 2014.
Framework and Toolkit for UN Coherence, Effectiveness and Relevance at Country Level: Step 7 – Monitor & Evaluate.
Outcomemapping.ca Complexity and Outcome Harvesting.
Evaluating the Indonesia Early Childhood Education and Development Project.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Children Affected by AIDS: Update Save the Children Highlights Presented to IATT Steering Committee Washington, DC September 2009.
Progress on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) September 2012.
Monitoring Paediatric Trends in a High Prevalence Setting within KwaZulu Natal Ravikanthi Rapiti OVC IN AFRICA 01 Nov 2010.
PEPFAR/SAG Collaboration Strengthening Information Systems and Streamlining Reporting Ozius Dewa, USAID: Strategic Information PEPFAR South.
Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center
Regional Workshop on Cash Transfers (CT) in Southern Africa, Johannesburg, 9-10th October 2006 Experiences of MCDSS/CARE.
Evaluating a PreK-3 rd Grade Approach. Evaluation is not a one-size-fits-all undertaking. Because PreK-3 rd reforms look different in different places,
Data Quality Assessment of PEPFAR ART Sites In Nigeria Final Report February 17, 2006 Nigeria/Monitoring and Evaluation Management Services in collaboration.
Aims Produce an overview of: – existing quality guidelines and criteria for guidance services and products –the principles and assumptions underlying the.
A Unified Theory of Data, Evaluation, & Everything.
IMPROVING THE HIV, SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH OF SEX WORKERS TURNING GOOD POLICY INTO GOOD PRACTICE Module 5: Measuring Outcomes.
Supporting measurement & improvement of primary health care (PHC) at the facility and community levels Dr. Jennifer Adams, Deputy Assistant Administrator,
Integrated Project Management Information System (PMIS) for Partner Capacity Strengthening Dangana Chibuzo (Database Manager) CRS Nigeria Country Program.
An OVC Survey Toolkit Jenifer Chapman, PhD February 2, 2015.
Strategic Information on ART Scale up Kevin O'Reilly Department of HIV/AIDS WHO.
MER Essential Survey Indicators Jenifer Chapman, PhD & Lisa Parker, PhD February 2, 2015.
PEPFAR 3.0 Controlling the epidemic & delivering on the promise of an AIDS-free generation through Geographic Prioritization Implications for OVC Programming.
Office of Global Health and HIV (OGHH) Office of Overseas Programming & Training Support (OPATS) Health The Global Response to Caring for Orphans and Vulnerable.
Global Perspectives on Child Care Reforms
OVC Monitoring & Reporting Ozius Dewa: USAID, Strategic Information PEPFAR South Africa OVC Partners M&E Meeting Pretoria February.
RHIVA and IQ SROI Introduction
FP2020 Reference Group Priority actions for 2016
Presenting an Information Needs Framework for PEPFAR OVC Programs
FY 16 Refine and Implement
South East Europe 2020 indicators
Accelerating the response for children affected by AIDS
Literacy Twilight 2 March 2017
Module 1 Introduction Orphans and Vulnerable Children
Module 5 Data use Orphans and Vulnerable Children
Pediatric HIV Case Finding Strategies
The Role of Implementing Partners in Measurement of OVC Programs
OVC_HIVSTAT HIV Risk Assessment Prototype.
Siân Curtis, PhD OVC Evaluation Dissemination Meeting,
Presentation transcript:

OVC Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Strategy (“the MER”) Feb 20-21, 2014 Pretoria, South Africa OVC HQ Technical Working Group ©USAID/ Tash McCarroll

OVC MER Strategy – Moving Towards Outcomes New OVC MER strategy is a critical and positive shift toward a comprehensive, outcomes based strategy for showing impact USG investments in OVC programs substantial, but impact mostly undocumented. Challenges to understanding impact: lack of standardized measures and tools tailored to OVC population & child well-being OVC TWG & Measure developed set of core quantitative child outcomes and caregiver/ household outcomes tools Toolkit formed strong foundation to build a new set of indicators and global strategy when OGAC commissioned a new MER strategy. Pilot-tested in Zambia and Nigeria; Translations to French in progress

Specific Shifts in Data Collected Emphasize program effectiveness & outcomes Reflects 2012 PEPFAR OVC Guidance- developmental milestones across ages/stages Track coverage: active beneficiaries for OVC Track contribution to Continuum of Response Elevate core indicators from OVC Survey toolkit Emphasize program effectiveness and outcomes—child, caregiver, household There are 3 output indicators and all the rest are outcome indicators Systems Indicators For workforce, social protection, finance)

OVC Indicators in the MER MER Code NGI Code Indicator Description Reporting Level FY 14 Targets and results FY 15 OVC_SERV New. Replacing C1.1.D <18 Number of active beneficiaries served by PEPFAR OVC programs for children and families affected by HIV/AIDS 1 √ OVC_ACC N/A –new indicator Number of active beneficiaries receiving support from PEPFAR OVC programs to access HIV services OVC Outcome Indicators Package (special studies) OVC_HIVST N/A- new indicators Percent of children whose primary caregiver knows the child’s HIV status 2 Budget and Plan No Targets required OVC_NUT Percent of children <5 years of age who are undernourished OVC_SICK Percent of children too sick to participate in daily activities OVC_BCERT Percent of children who have a birth certificate OVC_SCHATT Percent of children regularly attending school OVC_PRGS Percent of children who progressed in school during the last year OVC_STIM Percent of children <5 years of age who recently engage in stimulating activities with any household member over 15 years of age Child Protection Indicator OVC_CP % eligible households able to access money to meet important family needs

REPLACED C1.1.D- OVC_SERV Number of active beneficiaries served by PEPFAR OVC programs for children and families affected by HIV/AIDS Indicator REPLACES Umbrella CARE starting in FY14 Implications: Overall intent is comparable to old indicator: Measures coverage More specific: uniquely OVC-related vs. overlap with clinical care Defines “active beneficiary” as receiving quarterly contact-aligns with criteria needed to meet direct support definition Clarification of who is counted is anticipated to improve quality of data Targets will still be set at country level to ensure good coverage (i.e. there will be an expected consistency of numbers going forward) however they will not be tracked against a global number. -          New indicator is comparable to old - refined rather than retired fully. Will highlight - tracking coverage rather than looking for global number -          This is a positive shift for OVC programs since this allows for an emphasis on outcomes rather than ultimately meaningless outputs (numbers) as well as a shift toward systems strengthening and country ownership without concerns over achieving a target based only on head count.

OVC Level 1 Indicators-OVC_SERV Indicator code: OVC_SERV 1 Number of active beneficiaries served by PEPFAR OVC programs for children and families affected by HIV/AIDS NGI Mapping: C1.1.D <18 disaggregation continuing – significant modification in definition; trend analysis will be impacted PEPFAR Support Target/Result Type: Both Direct Service Delivery (DSD) and Technical Assistance-only (TA-only) targets and results should be reported to HQ Numerator: 1 Number of active beneficiaries served by PEPFAR programs for children and families affected by HIV/AIDS Denominator: N/A Disaggregation(s): Sex: Male, Female Age: <1, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-17, 18+ Data Source: Registers, organization records, or other program monitoring tools Data Collection Frequency: Data should be collected continuously as part of service delivery. Data analysis and review should be done semi-annually, in time for PEPFAR reporting cycles to monitor progress towards achieving the targets and to identify and correct any data quality issues. PEPFAR MER Introduction 2013_11_21

PEPFAR MER Introduction 2013_11_21 OVC Level 1 Indicators Indicator code: OVC_SERV 1 Number of active beneficiaries served by PEPFAR OVC programs for children and families affected by HIV/AIDS Method of Measurement:   The indicator is generated by counting the number of active beneficiaries (children or caregivers) who received at least one PEPFAR service from facilities and/or community -based organizations (see definition of an ‘active beneficiary’ below). To reduce the burden of counting on organizations providing services, registers with names of children who meet the criteria for “active beneficiary” are sufficient for generating the number included in this indicator. The types of OVC programs required to report on this indicator are outlined in the 2012 PEPFAR OVC Guidance and are those designed to address critical care needs. Explanation of Numerator: Active beneficiary is defined as an individual who has received program services in the last three months and who is scheduled to receive program services at least once every three months, as outlined in program guidelines or standards of practice. New beneficiaries who only registered in the last quarter will be counted as active even if they have not yet received services. Partners will report on the number of beneficiaries on their “active” registries. Partners will not be required to count the number of individuals receiving services at each reporting period. PEPFAR MER Introduction 2013_11_21

OVC Level 1 Indicator: OVC_ACC Number of active beneficiaries receiving support from PEPFAR OVC programs to access HIV services This is a direct output indicator that measures the number of children and/or caregivers who are referred to and enabled to access HIV-related services. The data obtained from this indicator can inform cross-program planning including PMTCT, pediatric and adult HIV testing, and treatment programs.  Learning year-2014; Report starting in FY15 PEPFAR OVC programs serve children who are at high risk of becoming HIV infected, either through mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) or sexual transmission. It is important for OVC programs to link potentially HIV-exposed infants and/or their caregivers to PMTCT programs and to connect those at risk of acquiring HIV, particularly adolescents, to HIV testing and counseling. Furthermore, it is critical for OVC programs to connect HIV-infected children with treatment, counseling and support services.   This is a direct output indicator that measures the number of children and/or caregivers who are referred to and enabled to access HIV-related services. The data obtained from this indicator can inform cross-program planning including PMTCT, pediatric and adult HIV testing, and treatment programs. This indicator will enable PEPFAR headquarters to: Gain a basic, but essential, understanding of the support OVC programs provide to their beneficiaries to enable them to access HIV-related services. Provide important information to stakeholders about the OVC contribution to the clinical goals of the PEPFAR continuum of response. Triangulate data with other OVC output indicators to track levels of OVC services provided across all PEPFAR countries over time. At the country level, this indicator will enable PEPFAR country teams, governments, implementing partners, and other in-country counterparts to: Help assess whether OVC support services are being delivered. Identify programmatic gaps by analyzing the number and ages of people receiving support to access clinical services, as well as the reach of services in particular geographic areas. Advocate for greater resources and technical assistance to enable OVC programs to contribute to the continuum of response.

PEPFAR MER Introduction 2013_11_21 Level 2 Indicators PEPFAR MER Introduction 2013_11_21

Reminder: Distilling core indicators Our starting point: 6+1 domains of PEPFAR OVC programming Step 1: Extensive literature search Step 2: Gaps (HES, PSS) filled through targeted research  Result: >600 child/HH wellbeing questions/indicators Step 3: Analysis against 8 criteria  Result: shorter list of questions for discussion

Biennial (every two years) Greater Age Disaggregation – all indicators Highlights of MER Outcomes Package: Data Collection for Improved Quality Biennial (every two years) Greater Age Disaggregation – all indicators Utilize trained data collections external to service delivery Relieve burden of front line service providers Build on capacity of local research institutions

OVC OUTCOMES PACKAGE – LEVEL 2 Outcomes Package- Quality* % <15 whose primary caregiver knows their HIV status % children <5 who are undernourished % children who are too sick to participate in daily activities % children who have a birth certificate % children regularly attending school % children who progressed in school during the last year % eligible children <5 years who engaged in stimulating activities with household members over 15 years of age Child Protection indicator (in development) % eligible households able to access money to meet important family needs * See Survey Toolkit: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/our-work/ovc/ovc-program-evaluation-tool-kit

PEPFAR MER Introduction 2013_11_21 Added MER Level 2 indicators (not in current version of Survey Toolkit) Percent of children whose primary caregiver knows the child’s HIV status Child Protection Indicator (in development) PEPFAR MER Introduction 2013_11_21

STAY TUNED FOR… OVC SPECIFIC MER SUPPLEMENTAL: TECHNICAL GUIDANCE FOR PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING SPECIAL STUDIES (Forthcoming, May 2014) * See Survey Toolkit: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/our-work/ovc/ovc-program-evaluation-tool-kit

Indicator Reference Sheet (Level 2) Indicator: NC.1 Percent of < 15 whose primary caregiver knows their HIV status Indicator Type Outcome Numerator: Number of active beneficiaries <15 years of age whose primary caregiver knows the child’s HIV status Denominator: Number of active beneficiaries surveyed Disaggregation(s): Required: Sex: male, female Age group: <1, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14 years, 15-17 Data Source: Special Study Data Collection Frequency: Biennially

Indicator Reference Sheet (Level 2) Indicator: CW.1 Percent of children <5 years of age who are undernourished Indicator Type Outcome Numerator: Number of active beneficiaries <5 years of age with physical growth below international growth standards Denominator: Number of active beneficiaries <5 years of age surveyed Disaggregation(s): Required: Sex: male, female Age group: 6-11 months, 1-4 years of age Data Source: Special Study Data Collection Frequency: Biennially

Indicator Reference Sheet (Level 2) Indicator: CW.4 Percent of children too sick to participate in daily activities Indicator Type Outcome Purpose:   Numerator: Number of active beneficiaries who are too sick to participate in daily activities Denominator: Number of active beneficiaries surveyed Disaggregation(s): Required: Sex: male, female Age group: <5 years, 5-9 years, 10-14, 15-17 years Data Source: Special Study Data Collection Frequency: Biennially

Indicator Reference Sheet (Level 2) Indicator: CW.9 Percent of children who have a birth certificate Indicator Type Outcome Numerator: Number of active beneficiaries who have a birth certificate Denominator: Number of active beneficiaries surveyed Disaggregation(s): Required: Sex: male, female Age group: <1, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-17 Data Source: Special Study Data Collection Frequency: Biennially

Indicator Reference Sheet (Level 2) Indicator: CW.11 Percent of children regularly attending school Indicator Type Outcome Numerator: Number of active beneficiaries aged 5-17 years of age regularly attending school Denominator: Number of active beneficiaries aged 5-17 years surveyed Disaggregation(s): Required:   Sex: male, female Age group: 5-9 years, 10-14 years, 15-17 years Optional: Further disaggregation by age, particularly within the 5-9 age group may be useful at the national level as often children do not begin school until the age of 6 or 7. Data Source: Special Study Data Collection Frequency: Biennially

Indicator Reference Sheet (Level 2) Indicator: CW.12 Percent of children who progressed in school during the last year Indicator type Outcome Numerator: Number of active beneficiaries aged 5-17 years of age who progressed in school during the last year Denominator: Number of active beneficiaries surveyed who were enrolled in school during the previous year Disaggregation(s): Sex: male, female   Age group: 5-9 years, 10-14 years, 15-17 years Optional: Further disaggregation by age, particularly within the 5-9 age group may be useful at the national level as often children do not begin school until the age of 6 or 7. It may also be useful to disaggregate by primary and secondary school. Data Source: Special Study Data Collection Frequency: Biennially

Indicator Reference Sheet (Level 2) Indicator: CW.13 Percent of children <5 years of age who recently engage in stimulating activities with any household member over 15 years of age Indicator Type Outcome Numerator: Number of active beneficiaries <5 years who have engaged in stimulating activities with any household member over 15 years of age during the last 3 days, as reported by an adult Denominator: Number of active beneficiaries <5 surveyed Disaggregation(s): By sex: Male, Female By age group: 0-11 months, 12-23 months, 2-4 years Data Source: Special Study Data Collection Frequency: Biennially

Indicator Reference Sheet (Level 2) Indicator: HW.2 Percent of households able to access money to meet important family needs Indicator Type Outcome Numerator: Number of active beneficiary households able to access money to meet important family needs Denominator: Number of households surveyed that contain at least one active beneficiary Disaggregation(s): Optional: Location: urban, rural Data Source: Special Study Data Collection Frequency: Biennially

Indicator Reference Sheet (Level 2) Indicator: CW.14 Child Protection Indicator (to be defined) Indicator Type Outcome Numerator: Denominator: Disaggregation(s): Data Source: Special Study Data Collection Frequency: Biennially

LET’S KEEP DISCUSSING!