Required training for 2014-2015 Professional Learning SECTIONS OF THE ESC- 99.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use the date (six digit number – 00/00/00) for when services are to begin. This should be implemented as soon as possible following the meeting – but.
Advertisements

Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Seven: Determining the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) Standards-based IEP State-Directed.
Best Practices in IEP writing September 26, 2012.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Connecticut State Department of Education
SEIS – IEP Changes & Compliance
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
Finalizing the IEP Process Consent for Initial IEP PWN following the IEP Copies to Parent IEP Amendments Revocation of Consent West Virginia Department.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Notice: An Overview Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS August 4,
Revised by Holland Public Schools Using the Search tab: After logging in on Infinite Campus click on the Search Tab. Then type in the Student.
Amy A. Peterman ADMS 625 Summer days notice to parents prior to meeting School and parents must agree on time and place of meeting. School can.
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
October 14,  BUT you still need to participate in IEP meetings in a well-documented, meaningful manner.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
Surrogate Parent Training
Early Childhood Transition Presenters: Kimberly Mitchell Ginger Sheppard Jessica Spataro NOVEMBER 2011.
October 10, The Texas Education Agency has recently clarified and expanded the use of Prior Written Notice (PWN) in Special Education.
BOY Training: Conference Summary Ginger Meade, KDE October 3, 2014.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
I T ’ S J UST A L ITTLE C HANGE ; O H AND I T ’ S T IME TO R ENEW ! H OW TO SUBMIT AMENDMENTS AND RENEWALS Human Investigation Committee Human Research.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
New York State Education Department (NYSED) Prior Written Notice (Notice of Recommendation) This presentation is presented using Power Point with an.
At least one month before the annual review date contact your coordinator to schedule the date of the meeting. Let’s get started!
7 Major Principles Under IDEA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Week 4 September 26th IEP Amendments, Exit, Written Notice, meeting notes Determining ESY, Special transportation, Alt-Assess, our paperwork, Cum files,
The Top Ten Things You Should Know About The IEP Process
SPED Referral and IEP Process Guide Ginger Alonzo & Emily Disbennett.
Bibb County School District Program for Exceptional Children Paired Zone Meeting November 7 and 9, 2011.
Transition Assess Interests, Preferences, Strengths and Needs by age 14*** Add Post Secondary Goals and Transition Activities by age 16 At age 16 advise.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Amendment to IEP Colorado Charter School Institute Donna M. Day West Slope Regional Coordinator April, 2015.
1 Welcomes You To It’s Those Wonderful Rights! Welcome To read the script that goes with each slide, click on the Notes tab (to the left of this screen).
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT ©PACER Center, Inc., 2005.
Assessment Definition Pre-referral Decisions: Attempt to ameliorate the problem prior to referral (classroom based assessment) Entitlement Decisions:
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
SECTION 504 A TUTORIAL. YOUR HOSTS Dr. Rod LuceroColorado State University Ms. Darcie VotipkaPoudre School District.
Notice: An Overview Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS April 29,
What is an IPRC? Regulation 181/98 of Education Act
EC Compliance Kristin Haigler and Kris Earl November 2009.
Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement
Prior Written Notice (PWN) Under the IDEA Presented by Jose Martín, Attorney Richards Lindsay & Martín, L.L.P. Austin, Texas.
The New IDEA in Special Education
Manifestation Determinations Review of Suspension Meetings And Review of Placement Meetings.
Free Appropriate Public Education. The FAPE Mandate IDEA Substantive requirements- special education and related services through the IEP Procedural-
The Top Ten Things You Should Know About The IEP Process POAC-NoVA-2008.
Special Education Meeting November 5, 2013 ASC 3:30 TENNESSEE ROOM.
Prior Written Notice of Action & Notice of Conference March 2014 ADE-SEU.
INFINITE CAMPUS EVALS & REEVALS WHAT TO EXPECT FOR SLPS.
WEEK 8 The final Week! Pre-Placement Evaluation, Transfer Students, Progress reports and grades, Assistive Technology 7 Deadly Sins by Melinda Baird.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Top Ten Policy Tips for Special Education Carol Ann M. Hudgens, Ed.S Section Chief: Policy, Monitoring and Audit Exceptional Children Division April 2015.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Week 3 The IEP Process.
SEK INTERLOCAL #637 INTERNAL FILE REVIEW
Compliance Monitoring
Special Education Student Record Review Protocol
12/9/2018 Notice: An Overview The MDE released documentation and a new requirement last year for districts to utilized Notices to “finalize” IEPs rather.
It All Starts with the Student Study Team
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Seven: Determining the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) SBIEP Module Seven: Determining the.
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Seas-web Training Elementary February 25, 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Required training for Professional Learning SECTIONS OF THE ESC- 99

LEDM NOTIFICATION If you notice there is only one LEDM listed on the 99, be sure to check Consent Form 2 for another LEDM. Both LEDMs must be notified even though only one signature is required.

LEDM NOTIFICATION If you notice there is only one LEDM listed on the 99, be sure to check Consent Form 2 for another LEDM. Both LEDMs must be notified even though only one signature is required.

DATES This is the date the 99 was completed (cannot be prior to the meeting date). This is the date(s) the IEP team met.

METHOD OF ATTEMPTS BOX (This box is commonly mistaken for documenting meeting notification.) The purpose of this box is to document at least 3 attempts (using at least 2 different delivery methods) to provide the ESC-99 to the LEDMs. This is completed for both LEDMs (if separate addresses).

TOP CHECKBOXES The checkboxes at the top of the 99 should not be left blank. Only psychs and/or SLPs (for speech-only) will check the top box. The bottom 3 checkboxes can be checked in any combination as long as they represent the team discussion.

IDENTIFICATION/ELIGIBILITY SECTION A This section is only completed by the psych or an SLP (for a speech-only IEP). Psychs and SLPs should always remember to fill in the exceptionality.

INITIAL SERVICES & PLACEMENT SECTION B Section B is only checked by a psych or an SLP. This section is checked when a student is determined to be eligible for special education, and the team develops and IEP for the student.

CHANGE IN SERVICES &/OR PLACEMENT SECTION C & D Check section C when there is any change in service. C1 for changes in service C2 for material change in services Check section D when there is any change in placement. D1 for changes in placement D2 for substantial change in placement

SECTIONS E AND F This is ALWAYS checked unless it is an initial IEP/Eligibility/Evaluation meeting. Examples include changes to: Goals PLEPS This box is used by psychs and SLPs (speech-only) when a student referred for an initial eval is NOT eligible for services -or- when working with Coop admin as a result of the district refusing to initiate or change an item requested by the LEDM.

PROPOSED/REFUSED ACTION SECTION 1 If you checked B, C2, and/or D2, explain it here and include frequency, location, and duration for each action/service. If you checked C1, D1, E, and/or F, explain it here and include frequency, location, and duration for each action/service.

EXPLANATION OF ACTION SECTION 2 Indicate here the reason for why the team determined the proposed/refused action was appropriate/not appropriate.

OPTIONS CONSIDERED SECTION 3 Teams must always consider LRE as an option. Explain here LRE discussion/options here, as well as any other options considered. If options were discussed, but the team decided against some of the options, then indicate why they were rejected.

DESCRIPTION OF DATA SECTION 4 Examples can include data such as evaluation, local assessments, IEP team discussion, progress reports, etc.

OTHER RELEVANT FACTORS SECTION 5 What other factors did the team consider that were related to the proposed/refused action? For example: “The team determined the benefits of special education services outweigh any potentially, harmful effects such as time away from peers.”

REQUEST FOR CONSENT This box is only checked/signed by LEDM(s) if you marked B, C2, and/or D2. If a LEDM checks this box, an administrator should be notified. Parent/LEDM may check/sign both boxes.