OThree Chemistry Modeling of the 16-20 Sept ’00 CCOS Ozone Episode: Diagnostic Experiments—Round 2 Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ozone and nitrogen deposition from Colorados Craig powerstation.
Advertisements

NASA AQAST 6th Biannual Meeting January 15-17, 2014 Heather Simon Changes in Spatial and Temporal Ozone Patterns Resulting from Emissions Reductions: Implications.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Base B and Emissions Sensitivities Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
First results and simulations plan with CHIMERE for NATAIR (WP5) Gabriele Curci, LISA Matthias Beekman, LISA, CNRS Robert Vautard, LSCE/IPSL, CNRS NATAIR.
CENRAP Modeling Workgroup Mational RPO Modeling Meeting May 25-26, Denver CO Calvin Ku Missouri DNR May 25, 2004.
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
Talat Odman and Yongtao Hu, Georgia Tech Zac Adelman, Mohammad Omary and Uma Shankar, UNC James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim, Georgia DNR.
October 17, 20065th Annual CMAS Conference1 Photochemical Modeling Investigation of an Extended Winter PM Episode in Central California 1. Air Resources.
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
New York City Case Study: Methods of Analysis David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station Syracuse, NY.
OThree Chemistry MM5 Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 1 T. W. Tesche Dennis McNally.
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
Ams/awma_ PROCESS-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF THE GULF BREEZE IN SIMULATING OZONE CONCENTRATIONS ALONG THE EASTERN GULF COAST Sharon G. Douglas.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Continued Diagnostics and PA Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Recent Diagnostics and PA Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Soontae Kim and Daewon W. Byun Comparison of Emission Estimates from SMOKE and EPS2 Used for Studying Houston-Galveston Air Quality Institute for Multidimensional.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Uncertainty Analysis of Ozone Formation and Emission Control Responses using High-order Sensitivities Di Tian,
1 CCOS Update November 3, 2006 PC Meeting Project Status –Completed Projects Results –On-Going Projects Status Plan for CCOS Final Phase –Guiding Principles.
Determining Alternative Futures - Urban Development Effects on Air Quality Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin and Darko Koracin May 2007 Zagreb, Croatia.
Annual Simulations of Models-3/CMAQ: Issues and Lessons Learned Pat Dolwick, Carey Jang, Norm Possiel, Brian Timin, Joe Tikvart Air Quality Modeling Group.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Ozone SIP Schedule and CCOS Products Policy Committee Meeting John DaMassa April 18, 2002.
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 2 T. W. Tesche Dennis.
Western States Air Quality Study Background Air Quality Modeling University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) May.
Sensitivity of Air Quality Model Predictions to Various Parameterizations of Vertical Eddy Diffusivity Zhiwei Han and Meigen Zhang Institute of Atmospheric.
January 24, Update to CCAQS PC Final Projects for CCOS & CRPAQS.
October 1-3, th Annual CMAS Meeting1 Effects of Liquid Water on Secondary Inorganic Aerosol in Central California During a Winter Episode 1 Planning.
1 Understanding Relationships Between Changes in Ambient Ozone and Precursor Concentrations and Changes in VOC and NOx Emissions from 1990 to 2004 in Central.
Template Simulation of Wintertime High Ozone Concentrations in Southwestern Wyoming Ralph E. Morris, Susan Kemball-Cook, Bonyoung Koo, Till Stoeckenius.
OThree Chemistry Modeling of the Sept ’00 CCOS Ozone Episode: Diagnostic Experiments--Round 3 Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
Evaluation and Application of AMSTERDAM: Focus on Plume In Grid Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen and Rochelle Balmori Atmospheric.
1. How is model predicted O3 sensitive to day type emission variability and morning Planetary Boundary Layer rise? Hypothesis 2.
1 Understanding Relationships Between Changes in Ambient Ozone and Precursor Concentrations and Changes in VOC and NOx Emissions from 1990 to 2004 in Central.
Diagnosing the sensitivity of O 3 air quality to climate change over the United States Moeko Yoshitomi Daniel J. Jacob, Loretta.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Pilot Project Modeling Overview University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON.
WRAP Stationary Sources Joint Forum Meeting August 16, 2006 The CMAQ Visibility Model Applied To Rural Ozone In The Intermountain West Patrick Barickman.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Template A screening method for ozone impacts of new sources based on high-order sensitivity analysis of CAMx simulations for Sydney Greg Yarwood
JANUARY 12, 2016 DENVER 2011 MPE PRELIMINARY OZONE MODEL EVALUATION FOR THE DENVER KM BASE CASE RAMBOLL ENVIRON AND ALPINE GEOPHYSICS JANUARY 12,
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Modeling for the Sept ’00 Episode: Process Analysis Problem Definition Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) WAQS Workplan and Modeling Update University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) Ramboll-Environ.
Response of fine particles to the reduction of precursor emissions in Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China Juan Li 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yang Gao 1, Yun-Fat Lam.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
The Role of Background O 3 in the NAAQS Review George T. Wolff Air Improvement Resource, Inc.
Nancy J. Brown, LBNL Kick-off of the CEC Seasonal Modeling Study Sacramento, August A Seasonal Perspective on Regional Air Quality in Central California.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CCOS 2000 Model Intercomparison: Summary of.
Dynamic Model Performance Evaluation Using Weekday-Weekend and Retrospective Analyses Air Quality Division Jim Smith and Mark Estes Texas Commission on.
OThree Chemistry Development of the Sept ’00 Modeling Episode: Emissions Inventory Comments Central California Ozone Study: Modeling Support for.
BAY AREA MODELING Status of Modeling Work Technical Committee Meeting November 18, 2003 Bay Area Air Quality Management District and Environ Corp.
Comparisons of the Response of Simulated Ozone Concentrations to Changes in Emissions Using the Carbon Bond IV and SAPRC99 Chemical Mechanisms Bruce Jackson,
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
OThree Chemistry Refinement of the Sept ‘00 Modeling Episode: Part I--Status of Current Simulation Central California Ozone Study: Modeling Support.
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency CCOS STATUS REPORT Policy Committee Meeting Saffet Tanrikulu, Ph.D. October 25, 2002.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx Sensitivity Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency March 13, 2003Presentation to the Policy Committee1 Ozone SIP Modeling and Data Analysis:
Ozone Transport Analysis Using Back-Trajectories and CAMx Probing Tools Sue Kemball-Cook, Greg Yarwood, Bonyoung Koo and Jeremiah Johnson, ENVIRON Jim.
FUTURE PREDICTION OF SURFACE OZONE OVER EAST ASIA UP TO 2020
VISTAS Grid Resolution Sensitivity
Sensitivity Analysis of Ozone in the Southeast
The relationship between summertime ozone peak hour and NOx and VOC emissions Jianfeng Li April 21, 2016.
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

OThree Chemistry Modeling of the Sept ’00 CCOS Ozone Episode: Diagnostic Experiments—Round 2 Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 4 T. W. Tesche Dennis McNally 15 December 2003

OThree Chemistry CAMx Diagnostic Runs: Rounds 1-2 CAMx Diagnostic Runs: Rounds 1-2  Round 1 Diagnostic Sensitivity Runs (across-the-board scalar changes) [presented at 3 Dec ’03 Bi-Weekly Call]  Run B (interim base case)  Run Bn3 (anthropogenic NOx emissions increased by factor of 3)  Run Bv3 (anthropogenic VOC emissions increased by factor of 3)  Run Bn3v3 (anthro VOC & NOx emissions increased by factor of 3)  Round 2 Diagnostic Sensitivity Runs (across-the-board scalar changes) [new for 23 Dec ’03 Bi-Weekly Call]  Run Bnp3v3 (NOx decreased, VOC increased by factors of 3)  Run B No Dry Deposition (dry deposition zeroed-out)  Objectives  ‘Bounding’ simulations to assess model response (overall and in SJV) to precursor emissions and key process changes.  Pertinent emissions sensitivity and process change simulations performed in previous (e.g., SARMAP) and ongoing CCOS (e.g., Bay Area) modeling studies examined also.

OThree Chemistry CAMx4 Diagnostic Experiments: Round 2

OThree Chemistry 18 Sept ’00 Ozone Peaks in the SJV

OThree Chemistry 19 Sept ’00 Ozone Peaks in the SJV

OThree Chemistry 20 Sept ’00 Ozone Peaks in the SJV

OThree Chemistry Spatial Mean Ozone Time Series: SJV Domain Base B Sens Bn3: (NOx up x3)

OThree Chemistry Spatial Mean Ozone Time Series: SJV Domain Sens Bv3: (VOC up x3) Sens Bn3v3: (VOC, NOx up x3)

OThree Chemistry Spatial Mean Ozone Time Series: SJV Domain Sens Bnp3v3: (VOC up x 3, NOx down x3) Sens B No Dry Dep:

OThree Chemistry Hourly Ozone on 18 Sept ’00: 1500 PST Base B Max Obs: ppb Max Pred: 96.1 ppb

OThree Chemistry Hourly Ozone on 18 Sept ’00: 1500 PST Sens Bn3 Max Obs: ppb Max Pred: 93.3 ppb Anthropogenic NOx Emissions Increased by Factor of 3

OThree Chemistry Hourly Ozone on 18 Sept ’00: 1500 PST Sens Bv3 Max Obs: ppb Max Pred: ppb Anthropogenic VOC Emissions Increased by Factor of 3

OThree Chemistry Hourly Ozone on 18 Sept ’00: 1500 PST Sens Bn3v3 Max Obs: ppb Max Pred: ppb Anthropogenic NOx & VOC Emissions Increased by Factor of 3

OThree Chemistry Hourly Ozone on 18 Sept ’00: 1500 PST Base Bnp3v3 Max Obs: ppb Max Pred: ppb Anthropogenic NOx Decreased, VOCs Increased by Factors of 3

OThree Chemistry Hourly Ozone on 18 Sept ’00: 1500 PST Base B No Dry Dep Max Obs: ppb Max Pred: ppb Base B with Dry Deposition Set to Zero

OThree Chemistry Ozone Time Series: Parlier (045) Base B Sens Bn3: (NOx up x3)

OThree Chemistry Ozone Time Series: Parlier (045) Sens Bv3: (VOC up x3) Sens Bn3v3: (VOC, NOx up x3)

OThree Chemistry Ozone Time Series: Parlier (045) Sens Bpn3v3: (VOC up x3; NOx dn x3) Sens B No Dry Dep:

OThree Chemistry Ozone Time Series: Arvin (029) Base B Sens Bn3: (NOx up x3)

OThree Chemistry Ozone Time Series: Arvin (029) Sens Bv3: (VOC up x3) Sens Bn3v3: (VOC, NOx up x3)

OThree Chemistry Ozone Time Series: Arvin (029) Sens Bpn3v3: (VOC up x3; NOx dn x3) Sens B No Dry Dep:

OThree Chemistry Findings of Round 2 Diagnostic Runs  Runs are diagnostic only; not intended to imply California inventories possess factor of 3 systematic errors across all categories.  Scalar increases (by factor of 3) in anthropogenic VOC and/or NOx inventories yield much greater ozone changes compared with MM5 sensitivity experiments.  Factor of 3 increase in NOx emissions substantially degrades model performance in the SJV and across the 4 km domain.  Factor of 3 increase in VOC emissions improves model performance statistically and graphically in the SJV; improvements across the 4 km domain are less.

OThree Chemistry Findings (cont.)  Factor of 3 VOC & NOx increases do not yield significant model performance improvement  Factor of 3 increase in VOC and decrease in NOx systematically degrades model performance  Removal of dry deposition process systematically degrades model performance  Of all the runs performed thusfar in Rounds 1 and 2, the VOC x3 scaleup run (Bv3) offers the most insight into the potential reasons for the current systematic underprediction of ozone in the Sept ’00 episode; particular focus is being placed in the ongoing Process Analysis activities on the role of VOC emissions in producing ozone in the SJV.