JUDICIAL CONCURRENCE Preliminary FY2007. Preliminary FY2007 Guideline Worksheets Keyed as of 3/5/07 (N=10,715)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Corrections Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission “Prison Bound Offenders” Appropriations Act Item 387 D September 8, 2008.
Advertisements

Sentencing Structure Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
Project Director: Brian Ostrom, Ph.D. National Center for State Courts Assessing Consistency & Fairness in Sentencing: A Comparative Study in Three States.
A merican C ivicsHOLT HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON1 Chapter 16 Citizenship and the Law Section 1:Crime in the United States Section 2:The Criminal Justice.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 1 Virginia Child Protection Accountability System §
Possible Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions November 5, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Crime Terms Matching Activity. Embezzlement Taking property you have been entrusted with.
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
June 9, 2014 Two Decades of Truth-in-Sentencing in Virginia VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Reported Property Crime and Arrests Reported Property Crime 152, ,677159,814156,833147,684142,384138,899139,438.
Re-validation of the Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instrument: Preliminary Findings.
Larceny and Fraud Study Proposed Methodology.
Proposed Study: Probation/Suspended Sentence Violations Scored on the Felony Sentencing Guidelines.
Chapter 15: Criminal Justice Process ~ Sentencing & Corrections Objective: The student should be able to list the various options to sentencing & identify.
Virginia Sentencing Guidelines Preliminary FY2013 Report June 10, 2013.
September 8, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION Two Decades of Truth-in- Sentencing in Virginia Update.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
The end of the line…. Who decides?  After the jury returns a verdict of guilty either…guilty The judge determines the sentence Or the jury gives a recommendation.
November 5, 2014 New Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instruments – Status Update VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
CRIMINAL LAW SUMMER 2011 TA SESSION NOTES Chapter 1 Punishment and Its Rationales.
Use of Offender Risk Assessment in Virginia Presentation at the 2012 NASC Conference Meredith Farrar-Owens Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions November 6, 2013.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
Disposition Hearing Juvenile Law Cle Oct 17, 2014.
April 14, 2014 Possession of Child Pornography Study – Proposed Methodology – VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Criminal Justice System. Police Have immediate control over who is arrested “Police discretion” Size of U.S. population and number of police officers.
Chapter 2 Sentencing and the Correctional Process Corrections: An Introduction, 2/e Seiter ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle.
Larceny and Fraud Study Update. Background.
Crime and Criminal Justice Trends in Virginia Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission September 21, 2015.
Project Director: Brian Ostrom, Ph.D. National Center for State Courts Assessing Consistency & Fairness in Sentencing: A Comparative Study in Three States.
Juveniles Convicted in Circuit Court FY2001 – FY2008.
What’s New 2011 Virginia’s Sentencing Guidelines.
MINNESOTA SENTENCING GUIDELINES COMMISSION MEETING OUTCOMES: FIRST- AND SECOND-DEGREE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENDERS April 18, 2013.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Judicial Concurrence with Sentencing Guidelines Preliminary FY2009.
Proposed Topics for Possible Guidelines Revisions September 21, 2015 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Training Update| User Comments | Possible Revisions Administration TopicsAdministration Topics.
Review of Guidelines Worksheet Structure – Data Analysis.
The end of the line…. Who decides?  After the jury returns a verdict of guilty either…guilty The judge determines the sentence Or the jury gives a recommendation.
Review of Guidelines Worksheet Structure - Research Proposal.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Virginia Sentencing Guidelines Preliminary FY2014 Report April 14, 2014.
JUDICIAL CONCURRENCE WITH SENTENCING GUIDELINES July 1, 2006 – June 30, 2007 (Preliminary)
THE PENAL SYSTEM AN OVERVIEW. Why do we have a penal system? Incapacitation: remove dangerous people from society so they don’t harm the rest of us. Deterrence:
8.2 Crime. Introduction Effects everybody in the United States  Some are victims, some are criminals, some are both  Majority that are effected are.
Unit Five Criminal and Juvenile Justice Unit Five Crimes are made up of certain elements –The conditions that make up a crime ie Robbery –Taking of goods.
Crime Any act that is labeled as such by those in authority, is prohibited by law, and is punishable by the gov’t.
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
Virginia Sentencing Guidelines Preliminary FY2015 Report June 8, 2015.
Virginia Sentencing Guidelines Preliminary FY2013 Report September 9, 2013.
HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON1 CIVICS IN PRACTICE HOLT Chapter 16 Citizenship and the Law Section 1:Crime in the United States Crime in the United StatesCrime.
Crime and Social Control. Crime Definition: An act that is labeled as such by those in authority, is prohibited by law, and is punishable by the government.
Okaloosa County Department of Corrections. Population Reports.
CRIME. CRIME STATISTICS Crime – any act labeled by those in authority, prohibited by law, and punishable by the government Limits on Formal Filing of.
FLORIDA CRIMINAL LAWS DEPUTY DYE CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLASSES – UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL.
Sentencing and Incarceration
Crime and Punishment.
PART 1 UNIFORM CRIME REPORT
Criminal Justice System Components: Locating Probation and Parole
CHAPTER 7 SECTION 3 CRIME.
Chapter 16 Citizenship and the Law
Chapter 16 Citizenship and the Law
Warm Up (use 5.1) 1. What is deviance?
Sentencing.
Deviance & Social Control
Presentation transcript:

JUDICIAL CONCURRENCE Preliminary FY2007

Preliminary FY2007 Guideline Worksheets Keyed as of 3/5/07 (N=10,715)

General Compliance

Preliminary FY2007 Judicial Agreement with Guideline Recommendations General Compliance: The degree to which judges agree with the overall guidelines recommendation. FY06 80%

Preliminary FY2007 Judicial Agreement with Guideline Recommendations General Compliance: The degree to which judges agree with the overall guidelines recommendation. FY06 80%

Preliminary FY2007 Recommended vs. Actual Disposition Dispositional Compliance: The degree to which judges agree with the type of sanction recommended by the guidelines. ACTUAL DISPOSITION RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION Probation/No Incarceration Incarceration less than 6 months Incarceration over 6 months Probation/No Incarceration73.5%23.0%3.6% Incarceration less than 6 months11.5%75.6%12.9% Incarceration over 6 months5.9%8.3%85.8%

Preliminary FY2007 Recommended vs. Actual Disposition Dispositional Compliance: The degree to which judges agree with the type of sanction recommended by the guidelines. ACTUAL DISPOSITION RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION Probation/No Incarceration Incarceration less than 6 months Incarceration over 6 months Probation/No Incarceration73.5%23.0%3.6% Incarceration less than 6 months11.5%75.6%12.9% Incarceration over 6 months5.9%8.3%85.8%

Preliminary FY2007 Judicial Agreement with Sentence Length Durational compliance: The degree to which judges agree with the sentence length recommended in jail and prison cases.

Preliminary FY2007 Judicial Agreement with Sentence Length Durational compliance: The degree to which judges agree with the sentence length recommended in jail and prison cases.

Departure Reasons

Most Frequently Cited Departure Reasons Mitigation (9.9%) Plea Agreement Cooperative with Authorities Facts of the Case Other Sentence to Serve Recommendation of CA/PO Aggravation (10.5%) Plea Agreement Flagrancy of the Offense Guidelines Recommendation Too Low Poor Potential for Rehabilitation Jury Sentence

Most Frequently Cited Departure Reasons Mitigation (9.9%) Plea Agreement Cooperative with Authorities Facts of the Case Other Sentence to Serve Recommendation of CA/PO Aggravation (10.5%) Plea Agreement Flagrancy of the Offense Guidelines Recommendation Too Low Poor Potential for Rehabilitation Jury Sentence

Compliance by Judicial Circuit

Preliminary FY2007 Compliance by Judicial Circuit

Circuit 29 (Buchanan Co Area) 69% Circuit 15 (Fredericksburg Area) 71% Circuit 9 (Williamsburg Area) 72%

Preliminary FY2007 Compliance by Judicial Circuit

Circuit 27 (Radford Area) 91% Circuit 7 (Newport News Area) 86% Circuit 28 (Bristol Area) 85%

Judicial Concurrence By Type of Offense

Preliminary FY2007 Judicial Concurrence by Type of Offense Nonviolent

Preliminary FY2007 Judicial Concurrence by Type of Offense

Nonviolent Risk Assessment

Drug, Fraud, & Larceny Purpose: –To recommend alternative sanctions for offenders who are statistically less likely to recidivate Type of alternative at discretion of judge

X

Nonviolent Risk Assessment Drug, Fraud, & Larceny Purpose: –To recommend alternative sanctions for offenders who are statistically less likely to recidivate Type of alternative at discretion of judge

Preliminary FY2007 Nonviolent Risk Assessment Not Recommended for Alternative Recommended for Alternative

Preliminary FY2007 Nonviolent Risk Assessment Not Recommended for Alternative Recommended for Alternative

Sex Offender Risk Assessment

Rape & Other Sexual Assault Guidelines Purpose: –To extend the upper end of the guidelines recommendation for sex offenders who are statistically more likely to recidivate Enhancements –Level 1 300% Increase in upper end of guidelines range –Level 2 100% Increase in upper end of guidelines range –Level 3 50% Increase in upper end of guidelines range

Sex Offender Risk Assessment Rape & Other Sexual Assault Guidelines Purpose: –To extend the upper end of the guidelines recommendation for sex offenders who are statistically more likely to recidivate Enhancements –Level 1 300% Increase in upper end of guidelines range –Level 2 100% Increase in upper end of guidelines range –Level 3 50% Increase in upper end of guidelines range

Level 3 50% Level 2 100% Level 1 300%

Preliminary FY2007 Sex Offender Risk Assessment

Other Sexual Assault (n=82 cases) Rape (n=186 cases)

Preliminary FY2007 Sex Offender Risk Assessment Other Sexual Assault (n=82 cases) Rape (n=186 cases)

Jury Sentencing

Jury Sentencing Parole vs. Truth-in-Sentencing Truth-in-Sentencing

Jury Sentencing Parole vs. Truth-in-Sentencing Truth-in-Sentencing

Preliminary FY2007 Jury vs. Non-Jury Sentencing

New Guideline Offenses Effective July 1, 2006

New Guideline Offenses Fraud Worksheet –Uttering public record FRD-2535-F4 –Identity fraud, value >$200 FRD-2509-F6 –False application, public assistanceFRD-2700-F5 Traffic Worksheet –Eluding police with endangerment REC-6624-F6 Miscellaneous Worksheet –Extortion, threat by letter, etc. EXT-2106-F6 –Arson, unoccupied dwelling ARS-2005-F4 –Escape from correctional facility ESC-4921-F6 Weapons Worksheet –Discharge firearm from vehicle WPN-5248-F5 –Possess firearm on school property WPN-5252-F6 –False statement on consent form WPN-5281-F5

New Guideline Offenses Fraud Worksheet –Uttering public record FRD-2535-F4 –Identity fraud, value >$200 FRD-2509-F6 –False application, public assistanceFRD-2700-F5 Traffic Worksheet –Eluding police with endangerment REC-6624-F6 Miscellaneous Worksheet –Extortion, threat by letter, etc. EXT-2106-F6 –Arson, unoccupied dwelling ARS-2005-F4 –Escape from correctional facility ESC-4921-F6 Weapons Worksheet –Discharge firearm from vehicle WPN-5248-F5 –Possess firearm on school property WPN-5252-F6 –False statement on consent form WPN-5281-F5

New Guideline Offenses Fraud Worksheet –Uttering public record FRD-2535-F4 –Identity fraud, value >$200 FRD-2509-F6 –False application, public assistanceFRD-2700-F5 Traffic Worksheet –Eluding police with endangerment REC-6624-F6 Miscellaneous Worksheet –Extortion, threat by letter, etc. EXT-2106-F6 –Arson, unoccupied dwelling ARS-2005-F4 –Escape from correctional facility ESC-4921-F6 Weapons Worksheet –Discharge firearm from vehicle WPN-5248-F5 –Possess firearm on school property WPN-5252-F6 –False statement on consent form WPN-5281-F5

New Guideline Offenses Fraud Worksheet –Uttering public record FRD-2535-F4 –Identity fraud, value >$200 FRD-2509-F6 –False application, public assistanceFRD-2700-F5 Traffic Worksheet –Eluding police with endangerment REC-6624-F6 Miscellaneous Worksheet –Extortion, threat by letter, etc. EXT-2106-F6 –Arson, unoccupied dwelling ARS-2005-F4 –Escape from correctional facility ESC-4921-F6 Weapons Worksheet –Discharge firearm from vehicle WPN-5248-F5 –Possess firearm on school property WPN-5252-F6 –False statement on consent form WPN-5281-F5

Identity Fraud (n=16 cases)

Eluding Police, Endangerment (n=172 cases)

False Statement on Consent Form for Weapon (n=34 cases) Mitigations Most sentenced to probation Most frequent departure reasons: Plea agreement Recommendation of CA

False Statement on Consent Form for Weapon (n=34 cases)