UN 38.3 Lithium-ion Battery Testing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lithium Batteries United Nations Transportation Regulations
Advertisements

1 Washington, Oct. 2nd 2013 Informal working group: Large Lithium batteries testing RECHARGE & SAFT.
Considerations About UN38
UN 38.3 Shock Test Data Collection Rich Byczek, Intertek Oct
1 6th WRBRF 2015 Berlin, March Review of changes voted to Section 38.3 of the UN Manual of Tests & Criteria (INF 11.) UNSCETDG Geneva, Dec.
Setup/Installation/Operation of an Environmental Control Unit (ECU)
An illustration of EVS-GTR Battery System Test Project and Test Methods’ Adaption to Commercial Vehicles Peter Wu, BYD.
New cell technology spurs hybrid batteries: Testing of Lithium Batteries Containing Both Primary and Secondary Cells. Transportation of Lithium Batteries.
Lithium Metal and Lithium-ion Battery Packaging Development 2014.
LITHIUM BATTERIES UPDATED ACCORDING TO THE IATA DGR 54th EDITION
Simple Harmonic Motion
Free fall with air resistance Forces which resist motion play an important part in everyday life: –Brakes in cars; friction in many forms, damped vibrations.
Pipeline and Hazardous Material Administration (PHMSA) Department of Transportation EXPERIMENTAL SHOCK TEST DATA ON LARGE LITHIUM BATTERIES Presented at.
How Can the Confusion About the Battery Definition be Overcome?
UN Informal Working Group Meeting on Lithium Battery Tests Ideas to Address Problems Testing Large and Small Cells and Batteries George A. Kerchner Executive.
UN Transportation Tests and UL Lithium Battery Program
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Intermixing of Cells in Nickel-Cadmium Batteries for Aircraft Usage May 11, Intermixing of Cells in Nickel-Cadmium.
Team 10: Battery Supercapacitor Hybrid System KELD LLC.
Spacecraft Structure Development - Vibration Test - (60 minutes)
Shanghai Research Institute of Chemical Industry
Chapter 14 Oscillations Chapter Opener. Caption: An object attached to a coil spring can exhibit oscillatory motion. Many kinds of oscillatory motion are.
U U 1 Excitation of Structural Resonance Due to a Bearing Failure Robert A. Leishear David B. Stefanko Jerald D. Newton IMECE 2007 ASME, International.
Oscillation.
UN Lithium Battery Tests George A. Kerchner PRBA – The Rechargeable Battery Association 1776 K Street, NW Washington, DC
Lithium Battery Definitions in UN Manual of Tests and Criteria George A. Kerchner PRBA – The Rechargeable Battery Association 1776 K Street, NW Washington,
The Present and Future of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles.
Technical Data Electric engine, reduction belt and complete electronics only 5kg Paramotor weight without batteries: 12,5kg One-piece easy assemble (kit.
Shock and Vibration Testing
Chapter 22 Alternating-Current Circuits and Machines.
IEEE JOINT TASK FORCE ON QUADRENNIAL ENERGY REVIEW Technical Implications of Electric Vehicle (EV) Integration for the Grid, Bulk and Local Distribution.
Research Activities of HFCV Rule-making in Korea Sept. 24 ~ 26, th HFCV-SGS Meeting Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Korea Transportation.
Clean Cities / 1 EAST BAY CLEAN CITIES COALITION Electric Drive Vehicles Overview Richard Battersby Director, East Bay Clean Cities Coalition Date.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration U.S. Proposal on BMS Functionality-In Use Brian T. Park Safety Engineer.
Development of a Technique for HFCV Safey Assessment
Electric Vehicle Teacher : RU-LI,LIN Student : 4A YING-TI,LAI 4A CHIH-TING,WANG.
Chevy Volt. Volt Overview Extended-Range Electric Vehicle Available for mass purchase in 2010 as a 2011 model year Designed to meet the needs of 75% of.
Recent DOT Activities On Lithium Battery Regulations
PRBA – The Rechargeable Battery Association
C. Chanson PPT 17 WRBRF, March 23-24, Berlin New development in Lithium batteries packaging.
Lecture 13: Energy Storage Energy Law and Policy Fall 2013.
Volker Rothe, OICA October 23, 2012 Draft Global Technical Regulation Electric Vehicle Safety Outline of the OICA proposal.
Presented to: Transport Airplane Metallic and Composite Structures Working Group and Airworthiness Authorities By: Walt Sippel and Mike Gruber Date: Sept.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Shock/Vibration/ Thermal Cycling Nha Nguyen NHTSA 1.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 14 Oscillations.
1 Washington, Sept 29th, 2014 Informal working group: Large Lithium batteries testing RECHARGE & SAFT.
1 A Proposed Approach to BCS Energy Regulation AHAM PTI Proposal April 9, 2008.
TF8 work report for 9 th EVS-GTR conference Changchun.
ANCHORAGE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS George Mouchahoir Office of Performance Standards National Highway Traffic Safety Administration May, 2002.
Doc.: IEEE /0064r1 Submission September 2008 Rich Kennedy, OakTree WirelessSlide 1 RR-TAG Liaison Report September 2008 IEEE Date:
STATE ROAD TRANSPORT INSPECTORATE UNDER THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS 2011 m.
1 Marine RV Emergency Vehicles Service Vehicles. 2 SERVICE BATTERY STARTER BATTERY Marine, RV.
Battery Models. EMF and voltage What is EMF? – Electro Motive Force What is the difference between EMF and battery voltage? – The battery has internal.
ERGA'S HYBRID BAKU
Review of EVS 9 th Meeting 1> TF8 catch an agreement on the definition of heavy duty electric vehicles as below: heavy vehicles cover the vehicles belong.
HEV Fundamentals Hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) are vehicles that combine an internal combustion engine (ICE) with an electrical traction system. It usually.
3rd INFORMAL WORKING GROUP MEETING 2015 – 2016 Lithium Batteries and UN Manual of Tests and Criteria March 30 – April 1, 2016 Bordeaux, France Agenda.
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage
Pack Level (End Item Assembly) Testing
Motorola Solutions Internal Information
Special Provision 188 of IMDG Code 38-16
Common Small Pedestal Motor and Bearing Requirements. Introduction
RR-TAG Liaison Report September 2008 IEEE
T4 Shock Test Purpose: “simulate possible impacts during transport”
Motorola Solutions Internal Information
Lithium Ion Battery Safety
RR-TAG Liaison Report September 2008 IEEE
Research on REESS Vibration Test Method
Considerations About UN38
EV Battery A Perspective from the OEM
Presentation transcript:

UN 38.3 Lithium-ion Battery Testing Vibration and Shock Testing Requirements

UN 38.3 Lithium-ion Battery Testing Topics Key points of presentation UN 38.3 test overview UN 38.3 vibration and shock test details Mild and full hybrid electrical vehicle battery systems Vibration and shock issues Vibration test analysis and recommended change Shock test analysis and recommended change Summary Back-up Transportation scenarios Calculations Vibration Isolation Aviation shock specification

UN 38.3 Lithium-ion Battery Testing Requirements KEY POINTS Lithium-ion batteries designed for hybrid electric vehicles (HEV) are large and complicated structures. Lithium-ion HEV batteries are proven to be durable and safe for vehicle usage by extensive testing. Applying the existing vibration and shock requirements to lithium-ion batteries designed for use in HEVs will increase the cost of HEVs and delay the adoption of HEVs in the market. Existing vibration and shock requirements are not valid for heavier lithium-ion HEV batteries. The existing requirements can be modified for large batteries and still assure safe transportation.

UN T1-T8 Tests UN 38.3 Manual Of Tests T1 – Altitude Simulation T2 – Thermal Shock T3 – Vibration T4 – Physical Shock T5 – External Short Circuit T6 – Impact T7 – Overcharge T8 – Forced Discharge Tests were designed primarily for cell phone and laptop cells and batteries. Tests simulate shipping environment and conditions, not the usage environment All tests must be passed Tests are without packaging

UN 38.3 Manual Of Tests T3 Vibration Testing Requirements 16 batteries 8 Fully charged 4 fresh and 4 with 50 cycles usage 8 Discharged 3 hrs in each of 3 mutually perpendicular mounting positions Logarithmic sweep from 7Hz to 200Hz to 7Hz in 15 minutes 7Hz to 18Hz at 1gn; amplitude decreasing 18Hz to ~50Hz with 0.8mm amplitude; acceleration increasing to 8gn ~50Hz to 200Hz at 8gn; amplitude decreasing 200Hz to ~50Hz at 8gn; amplitude increasing ~50Hz to 18Hz with 0.8mm amplitude: acceleration decreasing to 1gn 18Hz to 7Hz at 1gn; amplitude increasing

UN 38.3 Manual Of Tests Current T4 Shock Testing Requirements 16 batteries 8 Fully charged 4 fresh and 4 with 50 cycles usage 8 Discharged 18 shocks: 3 in negative and positive direction of 3 mutually perpendicular mounting positions Shock parameters Normal batteries: Half-sine, 150 gn peak acceleration, 0.006 seconds pulse duration Large batteries: Half-sine, 50 gn peak acceleration, 0.011 seconds pulse duration Note: Large batteries have more than 500 grams ELC

UN 38.3 Manual Of Tests Pass Criteria for Both Tests No mass loss No leakage or venting No disassembly No rupture No fire OCV after test > 90% of OCV before test

HEV Lithium-Ion Batteries Mild and Full Hybrid Applications Mild Hybrid Applications One electric motor Vehicle Functions Assist during launch and acceleration Stop/start engine when vehicle stops Regen braking 120 volts (32-36 cells) Less than 500Wh 14 kg battery assembly 400 x 250 x 150 mm 16 x 10 x 6 inches

HEV Lithium-Ion Batteries Mild and Full Hybrid Applications Multiple electric motors Vehicle Function Allows electric only propulsion Stop/start engine when vehicle stops Regen braking 300-320 volts (approx. 80-88 cells) Less than 2000Wh 45-50 kg battery 1000 x 350 x 300mm 40 x 14 x 12 inches

HEV Lithium-Ion Batteries Typical Usage, Vibration and Shock OEM Vehicle Requirements Useful Life: 15 years/ 150,000 miles Vibration Test Requirements Random vibration 1.28 grms 10 to 2000 Hz 24 hours/axis Shock Test Requirements Mild HEV Battery Assembly 132 shocks/axis at 25g’s, half-sine, 15 ms 6 shocks/axis at 100g’s, 11 ms Mild and Full HEV Package 10 shocks/axis at 50g’s, 6 ms

HEV Lithium-ion Battery Transportation Prototype or Development Stage Air and vehicle modes utilized but mostly vehicle Domestic and international Multiple shipments possible for the same battery (some in the vehicle) Batteries have not passed UN 38.3 testing Competent Authority will be used to allow shipping Production Vessel and vehicle modes normally 5 or less shipments of battery before vehicle installation Starts in 2010 Must pass UN 38.3 tests or obtain special approval

UN 38.3 Vibration and Shock Testing Issues and Impact Per Delphi Analysis and Experience: Current battery pack designs for mild and full hybrid applications are expected to fail the T4 vibration test They may also fail the T3 shock test Redesigning to pass UN vibration and shock tests would add development time, mass and cost to HEV battery systems : That have already met requirements for 15 years of vehicle usage That will be shipped only a limited number of times and rarely be air Impact HEVs will be more costly to the consumer and possibly delayed Adoption of HEVs will be delayed along with their ecological and energy benefits

UN 38.3 Vibration and Shock Testing Test Analysis Mild hybrid lithium-ion battery packs are about 14kg gross. Maximum T3 vibration force will be ~27,000N. T4 shock will be ~41,000N. Full hybrid lithium-ion packs are about 48kg gross. It is not a large battery by current definitions. Maximum T3 vibration force will be ~94,000N. T4 shock will be ~141,000N.

Vibration Test Analysis HEV battery systems are assemblies of electronic controllers, sensors, air flow ducts, cabling, cell mounting fixtures, cells, trays, covers and attachment brackets. They are not “solid” like cells and laptop batteries. They will have several resonant frequencies under 200 Hz. Estimated force exerted on mild HEV batteries due to damping and resonance is approximately 27,000N. Full HEV battery force is approximately 94,000N. With the understanding that vibration test parameters are based on air transportation of small lithium cells and batteries, these parameters do not realistically apply to larger batteries.

Vibration Test Analysis UN T3 testing of HEV batteries at these frequencies and 8gn is unreasonable because: Vibration of the transportation mode is reduced due to the mass of the pack. Test requires vibration to be “faithfully” transmitted to device, yet vibration would not directly pass from the transportation mode to the battery due to the isolation provided by the skid or container and the package. Force levels can not be transmitted by the transportation mode Force required to vibrate a large notebook computer battery (0.5 kg) is ~1000N. 27,000N and 94,000N are very substantial forces 2750kg wrecking ball falling Or stopping a 550kg wrecking ball after falling 1 second (35kph/22mph) in 1 meter 9500kg wrecking ball falling Or stopping a 550kg wrecking ball after falling 1 second in 0.28 meters

Vibration Test Analysis and Recommendation T3 Test Recommendation For batteries > 12kg: Reduce force level from 8gn to 2gn Basis for recommendation Force levels are more realistic and exceed current exerted forces. Force required to vibrate cell and notebook batteries at 8gn~1000N 1000N applied to vibrate a mild hybrid battery is ~0.33g. 2gn is equivalent to 5880N for a 12kg pack 9 hours of swept-sine vibration testing at 2gn is still a severe test for a large battery.

Shock Test Analysis and Recommendation T4 shock forces on mild HEV batteries would exceed 40,000N. Full HEV battery forces would be >140,000N. Again, with the understanding that these shock values are based on air transportation of small lithium cells and batteries, these parameters do not realistically apply to larger batteries. UN T4 testing of HEV battery packs at these forces is unreasonable because: These force levels could not be transmitted by the transportation mode Force required to shock cell phone and notebook batteries at 150gn~1500N 1500N applied to shock a mild HEV battery (~500Wh, 12Kg) is ~6.5gn. There is no source for the additional 38,000N. Aviation specifications (RTCA) test for Crash Shock at 20g maximum. Recommend limiting acceleration to 50gn for all batteries > 12 kg Far exceeds realistic and expected levels 50gn already is used in UN 38.3 for large batteries.

Summary Mild and full HEVs will have lithium-ion batteries that will have to be tested according to UN 38.3 Manual of Tests UN 38.3 T3 vibration and T4 shock tests are unrealistic when applied to large batteries If these tests remain as currently written, conversion of the world vehicle fleet to hybrids will be delayed Proposed T3 modification is to reduce g level from 8 to 2 for batteries 12kg or heavier Proposed T4 modification is to reduce g level from 150 to 50 for batteries 12kg or heavier

Back-up Material Follows

Back-up HEV Lithium-ion Battery Transportation Scenarios Prototype or Development Stage Battery transported from manufacturer to airport by vehicle Airport to airport Airport to distribution center by vehicle Distribution center to HEV system integrator by vehicle HEV system from system integrator to OEM engineering by vehicle HEV (car) from OEM engineering to test site by vehicle HEV (car) back from test site to OEM engineering by vehicle HEV system from OEM engineering back to integrator by vehicle Production Stage Battery transported from manufacturer to marine port by vehicle Marine port to marine port Marine port to distribution center by vehicle HEV system from system integrator to OEM assembly plant by vehicle

Resonant Vibration Force at 8gn Back-up Calculations Resonant Vibration Force at 8gn Force = [mass] x [acceleration]/[ξ, the damping constant] Damping constant is set at .04, empirical value based on testing similar designs Mild Hybrid Force = 14x8x9.8/(.04) N or ~27,000N. Full Hybrid Force = 48x8x9.8/(.04) N or ~94,000N. Shock Force at 150gn Force = [mass] x [acceleration] x Dynamic Amplification Factor Dynamic Amplification Factor is set at 2 Mild Hybrid Force = 14x150x9.8x2N or ~41,000N. Full Hybrid Force = 48x150x9.8x2N or ~141,000N.

Back-up Vibration Isolation

Stopping a wrecking ball examples: Back-up Calculations Stopping a wrecking ball examples: 550kg wrecking ball after falling 1sec in 1 meter Forceavg x distance = mass x velocity2/2 Forceavg = (mass x velocity2 ) / (2 x distance) Forceavg = 550kg x (9.8m/s)2 / (2 x 1m) Forceavg = 26411 kgm/s2 Forceavg = 26411N 550kg wrecking ball after falling 1sec in 0.28 meters Forceavg = 550kg x (9.8m/s)2 / (2 x 0.28m) Forceavg = 94325 kgm/s2 Forceavg = 94325N

Back-up Calculations Vibration force required for a large notebook computer Force = [mass] x [acceleration]/[ξ, the damping constant] Damping constant is set at .04 Force = .5 x 8 x 9.8/(0.04) ~ 1000N. Acceleration resulting from 1000N vibration force on a 12kg battery Acceleration = Force x [ξ, the damping constant]/[mass] Acceleration = 1000N x [.04]/12kg Acceleration = 3.33m/sec2 or ~.33gn 2gn force applied to a 12kg pack Force = 12 x 2 x 9.8/(.04) Force = 5880N

Force required to shock 0.5kg notebook batteries at 150gn Back-up Calculations Force required to shock 0.5kg notebook batteries at 150gn Force = [mass] x [acceleration] x Dynamic Amplification Factor Force = 0.5 x 150 x 9.8 x 2N Force ~ 1500N Acceleration resulting from 1500N shock force on a 12kg battery Acceleration = Force / [mass] / Dynamic Amplification Factor Acceleration = 1500N / 12kg / 2 Acceleration = 62.5m/sec2 or ~6.5gn

Back-up Aviation Equipment Shock Requirements “RTCA, Inc. is a private, not-for-profit corporation that develops consensus-based recommendations regarding communications, navigation, surveillance, and air traffic management (CNS/ATM) system issues. RTCA functions as a Federal Advisory Committee. Its recommendations are used by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as the basis for policy, program, and regulatory decisions and by the private sector as the basis for development, investment and other business decisions.” Source: rtca.org

Back-up RTCA Specification DO-160D: Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment Shock “Saw Tooth” configuration pulses 11ms pulse for standard testing or 20ms for low frequency testing 18 shocks, 3 per orientation 6g Equipment operating Crash Safety Same as above except 1 shock/orientation at 20g