MINT study Principal Investigator: Charles E. Cox, M.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TOP2A IS AN INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR OF SURVIVAL IN UNSELECTED BREAST CANCER Amit Pancholi Molecular Profiling of Breast Cancer: Predictive Markers of Long.
Advertisements

Pimp Session: Breast By James Lee, MD.
Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
516 (32723) Phase III trial comparing AC (x4)taxane (x4) with taxane (x8) as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: Results of N-SAS-BC02.
Breast Cancer. Introduction Most common female cancer Accounts for 32% of all female cancer 211,300 new cases yearly and rising 40,000 deaths yearly.
Breast Cancer in Pregnancy
Carolina Breast Cancer Study: Breast cancer subtypes and race Robert Millikan University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC.
Julie R. Gralow, M.D. Director, Breast Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Professor, Medical Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine.
Principal Investigator: Charles E. Cox, M.D. Co Investigators: Stefan Glück, M.D.
Expression profiles for prognosis and prediction Laura J. Van ‘t Veer The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
Breast Cancer 101 Barbara Lee Bass, MD, FACS Professor of Surgery
AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Breast Case #3
BIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES OF BREAST CANCER TREAMENT Benjamin O. Anderson, M.D. Director, Breast Health Clinic Professor of Surgery and Global Health, University.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ca Breast CY Choi UCH.
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Breast Case #2 Contributors: Stephen B. Edge, MD Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York David.
Study Of Letrozole Extension
ACRIN 6657/CALGB Consent for Research Study Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI and MRS: A Correlative Science Studies to Characterize Tumor Response in.
Breast conservation in Locally advanced breast cancer Department of Endocrine Surgery College of Medicine Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences Kochi, Kerala.
Breast Cancer Clinical Cases Daniel A. Nikcevich, MD, PhD SMDC Cancer Center April 20, 2009.
2 years later, she noticed multiple cm
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Breast Case #1 Contributors: Stephen B. Edge, MD Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York David.
The 70 gene Mammaprint ™ signature: a comparison with traditional clinico-pathological parameters. Patrizia Querzoli 1, Massimo Pedriali 1, Gardenia Munerato.
SYB Case 2 By: Amy. History 63 y/o female History of left breast infiltrating duct carcinoma s/p mastectomy in 1996 and chemotherapy ER negative, PR negative,
 Determining the Nature of a Breast Abnormality  It is a procedure that may be used to determine whether a lump is a cyst (sac containing fluid) or a.
Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy has been recently introduced in the clinical setting because it is highly accurate in predicting the lymph node status.
Breast Carcinoma. Anatomy Epidemiology: 10% 17.1/10 28/10 46/ m world wide 6% develop cancer of the breast in their lifetime. 50,000 to 70,000.
Stem Cells In Clinical Practice: STELLA Experience Manolo D’Arcangelo Department of Oncology Ospedale Civile di Livorno.
Breast Cancer: The Profile Ma. Belen E. Tamayo,M.D. Medical Oncologist Makati Medical Center The Medical City.
EVALUATION OF LYMPH NODES & PATHOLOGIC EXAMINATION FOR BREAST CASES Tonya Brandenburg, MHA, CTR Kentucky Cancer Registry.
IBCSG 22-00: Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a low- dose chemotherapy regimen, hypothesized to have anti- angiogenic activity, administered following.
Quality Assurance Report TTUHSC Breast Center of Excellence January 1, 2013 – December 31, 2013 Compiled by Uzma Nazim, M.D.
Changes in Breast Cancer Reports After Second Opinion Dr. Vicente Marco Department of Pathology Hospital Quiron Barcelona. Spain.
TREATMENT Mastectomy -traditionally, treatment of breast ca has been surgical -19 century, surgical treatment : local excision ~ total mastectomy : radical.
Pathology Reports Nicole Draper, MD.
Radical Mastectomy is no longer the standard Improved adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy Chemotherapy Endocrine therapy Radiation treatment Reconstruction.
Snyder D, Heidel RE, Panella T, Bell J, Orucevic A University of Tennessee Medical Center – Knoxville Departments of Pathology, Surgery, and Medicine BREAST.
Prognostic Value of Genomic Analysis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Mayer EL et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Breast Cancer. Breast cancer is a disease in which malignant cells form in the tissues of the breast – “National Breast Cancer Foundation” The American.
Quality Assurance Report TTUHSC Breast Center of Excellence January 1, 2014 – December 31, 2014 Compiled by L.Day, RN BSN CCM CCRP OCN 1.
Quality Assurance Report TTUHSC Breast Center of Excellence January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2009.
Quality Assurance Report TTUHSC Breast Center of Excellence January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2011 Compiled by Lynn Day, RN BSN CCM CCRP.
Radiotherapy Protocols Bristol protocol version 12.
Pathology.
Quality Assurance Report TTUHSC Breast Center of Excellence January 1, 2012 – December 31, 2012 Compiled by Uzma Nazim, M.D.
Quality Assurance Report TTUHSC Breast Center of Excellence January 1, 2010 – December 31, 2010 Compiled by Lynn Day, RN BSN CCM CCRP.
Response-Guided Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Gunter von Minckwitz, Jens Uwe Blohmer, Serban Dan Costa, Carsten Denkert, Holger Eidtmann Journal.
Annals of Oncology 24: 2206–2223, 2013 R3 조영학
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Case 6 A 49 year old female was found to have a 1.3 cm spiculated mass on screening mammogram Ultrasound revealed a 1.2 cm hypoechoic mass with posterior.
Case Discussion. Case #1 64 year-old postmenopausal, no PMHx Routine MMG: 2cm nodule in RUQ, with microcalcifications Biopsy: IDC grade 2 with areas of.
The New trends in the Management of Breast Cancer 謝渙發 桃園縣醫師公會監事 怡仁綜合醫院副院長 教育部部定助理教授 國防醫學院外科學系臨床教授.
Università di Napoli Federico II
Slamon D et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 62.
Advanced loco regional Regional breast cancer
Dr Amit Gupta Associate Professor Dept Of Surgery
HER2 and estrogen receptor status drive decisions regarding the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy Neil Love, MD1, Kimberly L Blackwell, MD2, Eleftherios.
Case scenario- Breast Lump
Picture 3. Higher grade tumors are more frequently Ki67 positive
Case scenario- Breast Lump
Audit Update LUNG-MAP Rose Ermete, Rn, bsn, ocn, ccrp
Biomarker Screening Pilot
Thanh Nhan Hospital MALE BREAST CANCER: CASE REPORT
Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
徐慧萍1 羅竹君1,2 郭耀隆1 李國鼎1 國立成功大學醫學院附設醫院外科部1 國立成功大學醫學院臨床醫學研究所2
Treatment Overview: The Multidisciplinary Team
Handling and Evaluation of Breast Cancer Biopsy
MITO CERV …3…(?) Phase II study on Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Pembrolizumab in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.
MITO CERV …3…(?) Phase II study on Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Pembrolizumab in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.
C11 Breast cancer Treatments
Presentation transcript:

MINT study Principal Investigator: Charles E. Cox, M.D. Co Investigators: Stefan Glück, M.D.

MINT MINT I: Multi-Institutional Neo-adjuvant Therapy MammaPrint Project I Principal Investigator: Charles E. Cox, M.D. USF, Tampa FL Co Investigator: Stefan Glück, M.D. UM/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine FL Total of 226 patients; up to 10 institutes in the US Full genome gene expression profiling Agendia Inc Central pathology review at USF pathology FL Timelines; Oct 2011- Oct 2013

Breast Cancer Symphony Suite MammaPrint: 70-gene profile prognostic and predictive tumor analysis Will patient benefit from chemotherapy? TargetPrint: Gene expression of ER/PR/HER2 Centralized lab confirmation of receptor status Will patient benefit from hormonal treatment? BluePrint: 80-gene molecular subtyping profile Basal, Luminal, and HER2 subtypes Which therapy works best? TheraPrint: Gene expression of 56 genes Potential markers for prognosis and therapeutic response Potential therapy options saved for the future

pCR rate of MammaPrint and BluePrint in previous neo-adjuvant studies

MINT; Study Objectives To determine the predictive power of chemosensitivity of the combination of MammaPrint and BluePrint as measured by pCR. To compare TargetPrint single gene read out of ER, PR and HER2 with local and centralized IHC and/or CISH/FISH assessment of ER, PR and HER2. To identify and/or validate predictive gene expression profiles of clinical response/resistance to chemotherapy. To identify possible correlations between the TheraPrint Research Gene Panel outcomes and chemoresponsiveness. To compare the three BluePrint molecular subtype categories with IHC- based subtype classification.

MINT; Eligibility Criteria Inclusion criteria: Women with histologically proven invasive breast cancer; T2(≥3.5cm)-T4, N0,M0 or T2-4N1M0 DCIS or LCIS are allowed in addition to invasive cancer at T2 or T3 level. Age ≥ 18 years. Measurable disease in two dimensions Adequate bone marrow reserves, adequate renal function, and hepatic function Signed informed consent Exclusion criteria Patients with inflammatory breast cancer. Tumor sample shipped to Agendia with ≤ 30% tumor cells or that fails QA or QC criteria. Patients who have had any prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or endocrine therapy for the treatment of breast cancer. Any serious uncontrolled inter current infections, or other serious uncontrolled concomitant disease.

MINT; Nodal staging

Study Design Flowchart Central slide pathology review Patient information & informed consent Core Needle Biopsies TAC Surgery including nodal staging HER2- Sample placed in RNA Retain, send to Agendia Full Genome Array* successful TC HER2- Central slide pathology review ddAC/FEC100, paclitaxel or docetaxel HER2- TCH HER2+ Full Genome Array* not successful T H/FEC H HER2+ CRF 1 baseline CRF 2 surgery Patient ineligible * (Including diagnostic commercial testing for Symphony Breast cancer Suite)

Neo-adjuvant therapy For HER2 negative patients: TAC chemotherapy TC chemotherapy Dose Dense AC or FEC100 followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel chemotherapy For HER2 positive patients: TCH chemotherapy T H followed by FEC H Dose adjustments Hematological and non-hematological toxicities should be managed by treating oncologist as per routine clinical practice.

Future Research – Remaining Tissue Agendia will store remaining tissue from patient samples This tissue can be used for future scientific research Patients are asked in the patient consent form to provide consent for storage and future research Please note: If a patient does not wish to allow their tissue to be used for future research, it is the responsibility of the site to communicate this with Agendia

Tissue Collection Tissue should be collected by incisional biopsy (when placing port) or via core needle biopsy. If the tissue is obtained by incisional biopsy then the tissue sample should be no greater than 3 to 4 mm in thickness and between 8 to 10 mm in diameter. Core needle biopsies should be obtained with a 14 gauge or larger needle. If a 14 gauge needle is used: 5 cores If a 11 gauge needle is used: 4 cores If a 9 gauge needle is used: 3 cores   

Sending Sample to Agendia Remove large specimen tube from kit and open it. Place large screw cap with small specimen vial on table and open small specimen vial. Place a barcode label from the completed requisition form on to the vial. Place the small specimen vial into the large specimen tube and place the tube into the specimen safety bag. Place the sealed specimen bag into the shipping kit along with the requisition form. IMPORTANT: ensure that the study sticker is affixed to the requisition form. Package the kit into the FedEx shipping pack and attach the pre printed label for shipment to Agendia Inc. Please call Fed Ex for pickup.

Central Pathology Review Central pathology review for RCB score will be done at USF Pathology FL Representative slides of core needle biopsy, sentinel lymph node biopsies and surgical sample should be send to: USF Pathology Attn: MINT Trial 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd MDC 11 Tampa, FL 33612 Lisette to review and adjust as needed

Procedures for Sending Slides APPENDIX III Pathology Worksheet for Core/Incisional Biopsy Please send the following, and complete the form below: One H&E section of tumor ER immunohistochemical stain PR immunohistochemical stain HER2 immunohistochemical stain or FISH/CISH/SISH report 10 unstained sections on positively-charged glass slides (If ER, PR, and/or HER2 studies not available, please send an additional 10 unstained sections on positively-charged glass slides) Questions to be completed on worksheet: 1. Laterality a. Left breast b. Right breast 2. Location a. UOQ b. LOQ c. UIQ d. LIQ 3. Time in formalin a. ≥ 6 to ≤ 48 hours b. Other

Procedures for Sending Slides APPENDIX IV Pathology Worksheet for Post-Neoadjuvant Specimens Please send the following, and complete the form below: Two representative blocks of tumor, or 15 unstained slides on positively charged glass slides Copy of final pathology report (including gross description) 1. Specimen a. Lumpectomy/partial mastectomy b. Total mastectomy c. Skin-sparing, nipple-sparing total mastectomy d. Nipple-sparing total mastectomy e. Modified radical mastectomy f. Other 2. Residual tumor a. Grossly identified i. Dimensions: ____ x ____ x ____ cm ii. Percent gross necrosis: b. Not grossly identified * Fibrotic tumor bed dimensions: ____ x ____ x ____ cm Distance from closest margin: ____ *NOTE: If no definitive tumor grossly identified, please submit entire tumor bed sequentially

Pathology Guidelines Note: additional guidelines for your pathology are outlined in Appendix II of the protocol.

Clinical Report Form Web based data collection/electronic CRF CRF1; Baseline information CRF2; After surgery Relatively easy to complete compared to drug trial 15-20 minutes for CRF1 and 2

Accessing the Database There is one hyperlink to access all the electronic Case Report Forms (CRFs) https://trials.agendia.com/MINT You will receive an institution specific site number and password from your Agendia Clinical Research Manager. Institution:

CRF Overview Administrative page Detailed Data Entry Instructions will be sent to site. Samples will appear in the database if they are found to be eligible.

CRF 1: Questions Pathology Date of histologic diagnosis Histopathologic tumor type   Histological grade ER, PR and Her2-neu status Vascular invasion TNM Nodal staging Date nodal staging If sentinel lymph node  Number of sentinel nodes removed  Number of counts Blue dye Histology of SLN:  Concordance of nodal histology to primary tumor Baseline Patient characteristics Age at diagnosis Ethnicity/ origin Menopausal status  Date of biopsy Specimen type Tumor measurements Kind of imaging used Primary tumor size Size largest metastatic lymph node

CRF 2: Questions Sentinel Lymph Node Procedure (SLNP) If yes Neo-adjuvant treatment Regimen given  Was specified number of cycles completed? Any grade 4 or 5 CTC for Adverse Events observed? Surgery information Date breast carcinoma surgery Type of surgery Lymph node assessments Pathology Nodal status ypTN Tumor measurements What kind of imaging has been used ? Primary tumor size Size largest metastatic lymph node Treatment response Lymph node assessments Sentinel Lymph Node Procedure (SLNP) If yes Number of sentinel nodes examined Number of positive sentinel nodes Number of negative sentinel nodes Blue dye Concordance of nodal histology to primary tumor  Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND) If yes Number of axillary nodes examined Number of positive axillary nodes Number of negative axillary nodes SLNP and ALND if yes:

Contacts: Jessica Gibson, Clinical Research Manager (619)316-1416 jessica.gibson@agendia.com