17. April 2015 Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Application of a multiscale transport model for magnetized plasmas in cylindrical configuration Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
Advertisements

Member of the Helmholtz Association C. Salmagne 1, D. Reiter 1, P. Börner 1, M. Baelmans 2, W. Dekeyser 1,2 M. Reinhart 1, S. Möller 1, M. Hubeny 1, B.
6th Japan Korea workshop July 2011, NIFS, Toki-city Japan Edge impurity transport study in stochastic layer of LHD and scrape-off layer of HL-2A.
Conference on Computational Physics 30 August 2006 Transport Simulation for the Scrape-Off Layer and Divertor Plasmas in KSTAR Tokamak S. S. Kim and S.
1 CENTER for EDGE PLASMA SCIENCES C E PS Status of Divertor Plasma Simulator – II (DiPS-II) 2 nd PMIF Workshop Sep. 19, 2011 Julich, Germany H.-J. Woo.
PIII for Hydrogen Storage
SUGGESTED DIII-D RESEARCH FOCUS ON PEDESTAL/BOUNDARY PHYSICS Bill Stacey Georgia Tech Presented at DIII-D Planning Meeting
Physics of fusion power Lecture 4: Cylindrical concepts.
EFFECTS OF CHAMBER GEOMETRY AND GAS PROPERTIES ON HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of California.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
HEAT TRANSPORT andCONFINEMENTin EXTRAP T2R L. Frassinetti, P.R. Brunsell, M. Cecconello, S. Menmuir and J.R. Drake.
5. Simplified Transport Equations We want to derive two fundamental transport properties, diffusion and viscosity. Unable to handle the 13-moment system.
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions G M McCracken Hefei, October 2007.
F.M.H. Cheung School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Chapter 5 Diffusion and resistivity
N EOCLASSICAL T OROIDAL A NGULAR M OMENTUM T RANSPORT IN A R OTATING I MPURE P LASMA S. Newton & P. Helander This work was funded jointly by EURATOM and.
ITPA, DivSOL, May 2007: Coster et al Coster, Bonnin, Corrigan, Wiesen, Chankin, Zagorski, Owen, Rognlien, Kukushkin, Fundamenski, … With contributions.
Nam-Sik Yoon (Chungbuk National University of Korea) A Dust Charging Model under Tokamak Discharge Conditions 6 th Japan-Korea Workshop on Theory and Simulation.
Simulation Study on behaviors of a detachment front in a divertor plasma: roles of the cross-field transport Makoto Nakamura Prof. Y. Ogawa, S. Togo, M.
HT-7 ASIPP Density Modulation Experiment within Lithium coating on HT-7 Tokamak Wei Liao,Yinxian Jie, Xiang Gao and the HT-7 team Institute of Plasma Physics,
PIC simulations of the propagation of type-1 ELM-produced energetic particles on the SOL of JET D. Tskhakaya 1, *, A. Loarte 2, S. Kuhn 1, and W. Fundamenski.
1 Simulation of energetic-particle behavior in Spherical Tokamak Mou Maolin Supervisor : Z.T. Wang, C.J.Tang The Second A3 Foresight Workshop on Spherical.
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Introduction to the Particle In Cell Scheme for Gyrokinetic Plasma Simulation in Tokamak a Korea National Fusion Research Institute b Courant Institute,
Excitation of ion temperature gradient and trapped electron modes in HL-2A tokamak The 3 th Annual Workshop on Fusion Simulation and Theory, Hefei, March.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP E ~ 0 V/m in Locked Discharges Average potential ~ 580 V  ~ V less than in standard rotating plasmas Drop in potential.
Why plasma processing? (1) UCLA Accurate etching of fine features.
1 ELEC 3105 Basic EM and Power Engineering Start Solutions to Poisson’s and/or Laplace’s.
第16回 若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 JAEA
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions Lecture 3 Atomic and Molecular Processes.
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
RF simulation at ASIPP Bojiang DING Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Workshop on ITER Simulation, Beijing, May 15-19, 2006 ASIPP.
1 Non-neutral Plasma Shock HU Xiwei (胡希伟) 工 HU Xiwei (胡希伟) HE Yong (何勇) HE Yong (何勇) Hu Yemin (胡业民) Hu Yemin (胡业民) Huazhong University of Science and.
1 of 22A.V.Chankin & D.P.Coster, 18 th PSI Conference, Toledo, Spain, 29 May 2008 Comparison of 2D Models for the Plasma Edge with Experimental Measurements.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 9 : The tokamak continued.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
Nonlinear interactions between micro-turbulence and macro-scale MHD A. Ishizawa, N. Nakajima, M. Okamoto, J. Ramos* National Institute for Fusion Science.
Two problems with gas discharges 1.Anomalous skin depth in ICPs 2.Electron diffusion across magnetic fields Problem 1: Density does not peak near the.
Plasma-wall interactions during high density operation in LHD
SLM 2/29/2000 WAH 13 Mar NBI Driven Neoclassical Effects W. A. Houlberg ORNL K.C. Shaing, J.D. Callen U. Wis-Madison NSTX Meeting 25 March 2002.
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
Gas inlet position References Experiment 1) W sputtering experiment Aim: study of W erosion for different plasma conditions by aim of spectroscopy reference.
STUDIES OF NONLINEAR RESISTIVE AND EXTENDED MHD IN ADVANCED TOKAMAKS USING THE NIMROD CODE D. D. Schnack*, T. A. Gianakon**, S. E. Kruger*, and A. Tarditi*
Radial Electric Field Formation by Charge Exchange Reaction at Boundary of Fusion Device* K.C. Lee U.C. Davis *submitted to Physics of Plasmas.
FREE CONVECTION 7.1 Introduction Solar collectors Pipes Ducts Electronic packages Walls and windows 7.2 Features and Parameters of Free Convection (1)
of magnetized discharge plasmas: fluid electrons + particle ions
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
1 SIMULATION OF ANOMALOUS PINCH EFFECT ON IMPURITY ACCUMULATION IN ITER.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
1 Recent Progress on QPS D. A. Spong, D.J. Strickler, J. F. Lyon, M. J. Cole, B. E. Nelson, A. S. Ware, D. E. Williamson Improved coil design (see recent.
Presented by Yuji NAKAMURA at US-Japan JIFT Workshop “Theory-Based Modeling and Integrated Simulation of Burning Plasmas” and 21COE Workshop “Plasma Theory”
Radiation divertor experiments in the HL-2A tokamak L.W. Yan, W.Y. Hong, M.X. Wang, J. Cheng, J. Qian, Y.D. Pan, Y. Zhou, W. Li, K.J. Zhao, Z. Cao, Q.W.
= Boozer g= 2*1e -7 *48*14*5361 =.7205 =0 in net current free stellarator, but not a tokamak. QHS Mirror Predicted Separatrix Position Measurements and.
Plan V. Rozhansky, E. Kaveeva St.Petersburg State Polytechnical University, , Polytechnicheskaya 29, St.Petersburg, Russia Poloidal and Toroidal.
2014/03/06 那珂核融合研究所 第 17 回若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 SOL-divertor plasma simulations with virtual divertor model Satoshi Togo, Tomonori Takizuka a, Makoto Nakamura.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Member of the Helmholtz Association Meike Clever | Institute of Energy Research – Plasma Physics | Association EURATOM – FZJ Graduiertenkolleg 1203 Dynamics.
Neoclassical Predictions of ‘Electron Root’ Plasmas at HSX
Mechanisms for losses during Edge Localised modes (ELMs)
Numerical investigation of H-mode threshold power by using LH transition models 8th Meeting of the ITPA Confinement Database & Modeling Topical Group.
Recycling and impurity retention in high-density,
Finite difference code for 3D edge modelling
First Experiments Testing the Working Hypothesis in HSX:
Influence of energetic ions on neoclassical tearing modes
Mikhail Z. Tokar and Mikhail Koltunov
Instability and Transport driven by ITG mode
Presentation transcript:

17. April 2015 Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Application of a multiscale transport model for magnetized plasmas in cylindrical configuration Workshop on Plasma Material Interaction Facilities | Christian Salmagne 1, Detlev Reiter 1, Martine Baelmans 2, Wouter Dekeyser 2 1 Institute of Energy and Climate Research - Plasma Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH 2 Dep. of Mechanical Engineering, K.U.Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300 A, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium

17. April Outline 0. Motivation 1.Using the ITER divertor code B2-EIRENE for PSI-2 2.Simulation of PSI-2 3.Extension of the numerical model 4.Summary & Outlook

17. April Motivation  Linear plasma device PSI-2 has been transferred from Berlin to FZJ last year.  The modeling activities carried out in Berlin are not usable anymore and are rebuild in Jülich, using the ITER divertor code B2-EIRENE.  Modeling of PSI-2 creates the possibility of an additional analysis of a plasma that resembles the edge plasma of a Tokamak in important points.  That gives the opportunity to verify and improve the Code with another type of experiment.

17. April Using the ITER divertor code B2-EIRENE for PSI-2  PSI-2 Jülich  Using the B2-EIRENE code for a linear device  Governing equations  Boundary conditions, grid and used parameters

17. April PSI-2 Jülich  Six coils create a magnetic field B < 0.1 T.  Plasma column of approx. 2.5 m length and 5 cm radius  Densities and temperatures: m -3 < n < m -3, T e < 30 eV  MFP of electrons indicate that fluid approximation is likely to be valid

17. April Use of B2-EIRENE code for a linear device Midplane Target Plasma source Aspect ratio: a/R=∞ topol. equiv. Direct use of B2- EIRENE (SOLPS) for PSI-2 is possible, but the coordinates have to be adapted polar (toroidal) coordinates are neglected (symmetry is assumed) Tokamak MAST lineartoroidal radial polartoroidal axialpoloidal PSI-2

17. April  First aim: Reproduction of radial profiles using all existing information about the simulation from Berlin [1]  Boundary conditions:  Walls perpendicular to the field lines: Sheath conditions  Axis of the cylinder: vanishing gradients in T e,T I and n  „Vacuum-boundary“ and anode: 1cm decay length in T e,T I and n  Parameters:  Pumping rate: 3500l/s  Neutral influx(D 2 ): 6.32 x s -1  Anomalous diffusion: D in = 3.0m 2 /s; D out = 0.2 m 2 /s  Perpendicular heat conduction: κ e,in = 5.0 m 2 /s; κ e,out = 11.0 m 2 /s  Source next to anode at given temperature (T e = 15 eV; T I = 5 eV) Boundary conditions, grid and used parameters [1] Kastelewicz, H., & Fussmann, G. (2004). Contributions to Plasma Physics, 44(4),

17. April Simulation of PSI-2  Summary of existing results:  [1] Kastelewicz, H., & Fussmann, G. (2004). Contributions to Plasma Physics, 44(4),  [2] Vervecken, L. (2010). Extended Plasma Modeling for the PSI-2 Device. Master thesis. KU Leuven  Reproduction of existing numerical and experimental results  Dependency on kinetic flux limiter

17. April Summary of existing results  Modeling activities in Berlin with former B2-EIRENE Version SOLPS4.0, 1995, Summary can be found in [1]  In [2] the model was rebuild, old results could already be partially reproduced.  Figures: Radial profiles at two different positions, Coefficients for anomalous transport adapted to fit experiment [1]

17. April  First results did not match old results  „flux limiter“ was introduced into B2 to compensate kinetic effects  Parallel heat conductivity is limited to: with parameter FLIM  Different values of FLIM found in old input  It is not possible to reconstruct, which value was used in [1] Reproducing existing results FLIM = 0,8

17. April Dependency on kinetic flux limiter  Dependency on the flux limiter indicates the importance of kinetic effects  Additional free parameter influencing the parallel transport  Experimental values at at least two axial positions needed  Values for the flux limiter can be obtained using the comparison with experimental data or a complete kinetic model of PSI-2

17. April Extension of the numerical model  Extension of the neutral particle model using a collisional radiative model an metastable states  Incorporation of parallel electric currents

17. April Extension of the neutral model  Model [1]: neutral model as used in [1]  Model I: Collisional radiative model for H 2 + and H 2  Model II: Vibrationally excited states treated as metastable  Particle and heat fluxes on the neutralizer plate strongly depend on the used model  Plasma density and temperature also change strongly Heatflux [W]Particle flux [s -1 ] Model [1] x Model I x Model II x Refinement

17. April Extension of the neutral Model: Recombination  Reaction rates show that H 2 + -MAR is the most important recombination channel  Most recombination takes place at neutralizer and cathode  3 body recombination and radiative recombination are unimportant in the model

17. April  H 2 + -MAR rates also depend on the used model  With Model I rates are overestimated in the target chamber and underestimated at the anode  Vibrationally excited states have to be modeled as metastable Extension of the neutral Model: MAR Model [1] Model I Model II Ratio Model I / Model II

17. April Incorporation of parallel electric currents  The plasma potential is not calculated and the potential drop is only important for the heat flux, and thus for the boundary condition for the electron energy.  For equal electron and ion temperatures it can be approximated as:  Since the variation with the temperatures is small, the potential drop is provided as a constant input parameter

17. April Incorporation of parallel electric currents  In “extended B2” [3] currents are incorporated. Then, the potential drop depends on the current and changes to:  That also changes the electron energy flux  In this version the possibility to set the wall potential for each wall differently exists.  That makes it possible to bias the neutralizer wall [3] Baelmans, M. (1993). Code Improvements and Applications of a two-dimensional Edge Plasma Model for toroidal Fusion Devices. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.

17. April  Normalized current density:  Normalized heat flux density:  Heat flux and electric current behave exactly as expected when the potential is changed Incorporation of parallel electric currents: Code verification

17. April Incorporation of parallel electric currents  When no potential is applied, the direction of the current is depending on the radial position  The direction of the electric currents can be influenced by changing the potential at the neutralizer plate  Direct influence of strong current densities on the electron temperature can be seen

17. April Incorporation of parallel electric currents  Ion temperature and plasma density do not change significantly  Electric current on the neutralizer plate changes and reaches a saturation for negative potentials of the neutralizer  Heat flux on the wall also changes and has a minimum near the floating potential  Minimal heat flux still larger than in case of disabled currents  Heatflux not minimal, if total current vanishes

17. April Summary & Outlook  Summary  Numerical model was rebuild and old numerical and experimental results were reproduced using the ITER divertor code B2-EIRENE.  A dependency on the kinetic flux limiter was found.  The neutral particle model was improved and it was shown that the correct treatment of the vibrationally excited states is crucial in the model.  B2-EIRENE can account for parallel electric currents in a linear machine  Outlook:  Classical drifts and diamagnetic currents will be introduced.  Experimental data is needed to compare target biasing effects and to cope with the dependency on the kinetic flux limiter.  Neutral particle simulation can be further extended. The model of the reactions at the walls has to be checked.  Impurities will be introduced.

17. April Thank you for your attention!

17. April  Continuity equation:  Parallel momentum equation:  Radial momentum equation: Governing equations

17. April  Electron and ion energy equations: Governing equations