Target Separation and Classification using Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Matthias Bauer-Pfundstein, METEK GmbH Ulrich Görsdorf, Meteorologisches Observatorium.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Nicolas Gaussiat Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds.
Advertisements

Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Damian Wilson Malcolm Brooks Evaluation statistics of cloud fraction and water content.
KIT – die Kooperation von Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH und Universität Karlsruhe (TH) 5.3 Advantages of a coordinated scanning Doppler lidar and cloud.
Future Radar and Satellite Technology Daniel C. Miller National Weather Service Columbia, SC.
Application of Cloudnet data in the validation of SCIAMACHY cloud height products Ping Wang Piet Stammes KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands CESAR Science day,
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
X-band About the CSU-CHILL Radar The CSU-CHILL National Weather Radar Facility, located in Greeley, CO, is an advanced, transportable dual-polarized, dual-wavelength.
Water vapor estimates using simultaneous S and Ka band radar measurements Scott Ellis, Jothiram Vivekanandan NCAR, Boulder CO, USA.
TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.
Wesley Berg, Tristan L’Ecuyer, and Sue van den Heever Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Evaluating the impact of aerosols on.
Operational Weather Radar Featuring: WSR-88D Doppler Radar
Dual-Doppler Wind Retrieval from two operational Doppler radars Yong Kheng Goh, Anthony Holt University of Essex, U. K. for ERAD04, Visby.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
COPS-GOP-WS3 Hohenheim 2006_04_10 Micro- Rain- Radar Local Area Weather Radar Cloud Radar Meteorological Institute University Hamburg Gerhard Peters.
RHB C-band radar scan strategy constraints Cloud top height less than 1.5 km altitude Features of interest < 5 km in scale Rapid evolution of cells  fast.
1 Radar Displays PPI - Plan position Indicator Maps the received signals on polar coordinates in plan view. The antenna scans 360° at fixed elevation angle.
What can Dual-Polarization Doppler Radar Do for You? Neil Fox Department of Atmospheric Science University of Missouri - Columbia.
Dual-Doppler Wind Retrieval from two operational Doppler radars Yong Kheng Goh, Anthony Holt University of Essex, U. K. for CARPE DIEM, Bologna 29 Nov.
Volcanic Ash Sensing EECS 823 Radar Remote Sensing Project Presented by Susobhan Das.
RPG Radiometer Physics GmbH µRAD 06 – San Juan, Puerto Rico, Feb./March 2006 Ground Based Tropospheric Profiling With the RPG- HATPRO 14 Channel Filterbank.
Basic RADAR Principles Prof. Sandra Cruz-Pol, Ph.D. Electrical and Computer Engineering UPRM.
Radar equation review 1/19/10. Radar eq (Rayleigh scatter) The only variable is h, the pulse length Most radars have a range of h values. Rewrite the.
Remote-sensing of the environment (RSE) ATMOS Analysis of the Composition of Clouds with Extended Polarization Techniques L. Pfitzenmaier, H. Russchenbergs.
Spaceborne Radar for Snowfall Measurements
Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff & Dave Donovan Comparing ice-cloud microphysical properties using Cloudnet & ARM data.
A Doppler Radar Emulator and its Application to the Detection of Tornadic Signatures Ryan M. May.
NARVAL South Lutz Hirsch, Friedhelm Jansen Sensor Synergy While Radars and Lidars provide excellent spatial resolution but only ambiguous information on.
European Cooperation in Science and Technology COST is supported by the EU RTD Framework Programme ESF provides the COST Office through an.
HAMP The Microwave Package on the upcoming HALO (high altitude and long range) research aircraft Mario Mech 1,2, Susanne Crewell 1, Gerhard Peters 2, Lutz.
Drizzle, Shallow Events Martin Hagen with the help from Elena Saltikoff, Paul Joe and others Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) Oberpfaffenhofen,
National Weather Service Dual-Polarization Radar Technology Photo courtesy of NSSL.
Study Design and Summary Atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) observations were conducted in Sapporo, Japan from April 2005 to July Three-dimensional.
Validation of TRMM rainfall products at Gadanki T. Narayana Rao NARL, Gadanki K. Nakamura, HyARC, Nagoya, Japan D. Narayana Rao, NARL, Gadanki National.
Boundary layer temperature profile observations using ground-based microwave radiometers Bernhard Pospichal, ISARS 2006 Garmisch-Partenkirchen AMMA - Benin.
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
The new DWD polarimetric weather radar network: a new radar data processing framework and new products Michael Frech 1, Nils Rathmann 2, Jörg Steinert.
Charles L Wrench RCRU FMCW radar performance and cost.
Ship-Based Measurements of Cloud Microphysics and PBL Properties in Precipitating Trade Cumuli During RICO Institutions: University of Miami; University.
Dual-Polarization and Dual-Wavelength Radar Measurements Vivek National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado I.Polarization and dual- wavelength.
Reflectivity and Radial Velocity
Robin Hogan Ewan O’Connor The Instrument Synergy/ Target Categorization product.
What to make of this new radar technology Luke Madaus, UW Atmospheric Sciences 11/2/2011.
III) CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ADDED CLUTTER RAIN MeteoSvizzera, 6605 Locarno, Switzerland Simulation.
Radiometer Physics GmbH
1 Spectral identification & suppression of ground clutter contributions for phased array radar Spectral identification of ground clutter Spectral identification.
KNMI 35 GHz Cloud Radar & Cloud Classification* Henk Klein Baltink * Robin Hogan (Univ. of Reading, UK)
PR-2 Radar in Aguadilla Ricardo Ríos Olmo Advisor: Dr. José Colom.
Technical Interchange Meeting – ROC / NSSL / NCAR ROC / NSSL / NCAR TIM Boulder CO 11 May 2005 Real-time time-series implementation of the Radar Echo Classifier.
Infilling Radar CAPPIs
Radar Requirements David J. Stensrud NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory 2013 Warn-on-Forecast Workshop and Technical Guidance Meetings.
Initial Evaluation of the HIAPER Cloud Radar Doppler Velocity Measurements S. M. Ellis, J. Vivekanandan, P. Tsai, E. Loew, C. Burghart, M. Dixon, J. Emmett,
Validation of Cloud Top Temperature with CLOUDNET cloud radar data during the BBC2 Period Erwin Wolters (D. Donovan Presenting)
A Combined Radar-Radiometer Approach to Estimate Rain Rate Profile and Underlying Surface Wind Speed over the Ocean Shannon Brown and Christopher Ruf University.
Atmospheric profile and precipitation properties derived from radar and radiosondes during RICO Louise Nuijens With thanks to: Bjorn Stevens (UCLA) Margreet.
Target Separation and Classification using Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Matthias Bauer-Pfundstein, METEK GmbH Ulrich Görsdorf, Meteorologisches Observatorium.
1 A conical scan type spaceborne precipitation radar K. Okamoto 1),S. Shige 2), T. Manabe 3) 1: Tottori University of Environmental Studies, 2: Kyoto University.
Charles L Wrench RCRU Status of Observations at Chilbolton (CFARR) October 2004.
Ship-Based Measurements of Cloud Microphysics and PBL Properties in Precipitating Trade Cumuli During RICO Institutions: University of Miami; University.
A Moment Radar Data Emulator: The Current Progress and Future Direction Ryan M. May.
Structure of the general part
Gesture Recognition Inside a Car Using IR-UWB Radar
Iwan Holleman (KNMI) Hans van Gasteren (RNLAF,UvA) Willem Bouten (UvA)
the University of Oklahoma
Developed by Eastwood Im Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Satellite
Radiometer Physics GmbH
Henk Klein Baltink Atmospheric Research Section
Chap II. Radar Hardware (PART 1)
Spaceborne Radar for Snowfall Measurements
Presentation transcript:

Target Separation and Classification using Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Matthias Bauer-Pfundstein, METEK GmbH Ulrich Görsdorf, Meteorologisches Observatorium Lindenberg DWD Germany 11B.2

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra MIRA36 Band Cloud Radar Vertically pointing (ground based, no scanning unit) Ka-Band 35.5 GHz  8.6 mm Magnetron, 30 kW Pulse Power 1/1000 Rang resolution 30 m (w.o. pulse comp.) Dual polarization receiver km and 10 s Averaging PRF = 5 kHz  +/- 11 m/s

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Water Cloud Plankton Maybe Clouds Rain Ice Cloud

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Mix Melting Layer High LDR Rain Low LDR Different LDR High LDR in Plankton LDR Un-Detetable

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Structure of the Algorithms Multi Peak Moment Estimation: spcs2dmp Remove Noise + Ground Clutter Find Peaks, Separate in doubt Calculate for each Peak: SNR, VEL, RMS, LDR Classification: mmclx Per peak Classification if possible based on: –Individual Moments SNR, VEL, RMS, LDR –General Weather + Melting Height 3-D Cluster for Classification of the rest Melting height detection from hydro meteor data (more details in the extended abstracts)

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Detection Threshold Co-Spectrum Cross-Spectrum Small LDR Big LDR RainPlankton Vertical Doppler-Velocity [m/s] SNR-Spectrum [dB] Range Gate 20 (840 m) 12:54:40 – 12:54:50 July Lindenberg

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Vertical Doppler-Velocity [m/s] SNR-Spectrum [dB] Range Gate 94 (3060 m) 12:54:40 – 12:54:50 July Lindenberg Rain Drizzle

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Vertical Doppler-Velocity [m/s] SNR-Spectrum [dB] Range Gate 103 (3330 m) 12:54:40 – 12:54:50 July Lindenberg Big LDR Melting LayerDrizzle Small LDR

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Clean Rain Cloud not Plankton Melting Height External Detected not Detected

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Cloud Base seen by Ceilometer Cloud Top seen by Cloud Radar

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Super-Cooled Water

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Conclusions / Outlook Plankton detection works good (in most cases). Melting layer detection has to be improved. Separation between rain and cloud has to be improved. More target types. Investigate double peaks with different LDR Governmentally founded 2 year research project by METEK and the ZIB in Berlin.

Target Separation and Classification using 11.B2 Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra Thanks for attention and Thanks for all who have contributed to this contribution