Systems/Methodologies for Monitoring and Evaluation of National Food Security Mission by National Productivity Council.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 UN Coherence: High level monitoring and evaluation approach.

Advertisements

Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the Africa Fit for Children.

Results and Impact Management System (RIMS) Implementation Workshop Bamako 8-11 March 2005.

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation

Towards a model M&E system for AIDS programs Kampala April

M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools

Overview M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011.

Training for Participants Date, Location, Venue 1 Welcome! Welcome to PEM 2 Module!

Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.

POLICY AND PLANNING BRANCH (PPB) Proposed M&E action plan Charles Mvula IAC WAGENINGEN UR February 9 –

1 Module BASICS OF PLANNING. 2 Content Overview Planning principles Gantt charts.

Overview of UNDAF process and new guidance package March 2010 u nite and deliver effective support for countries.

National Food Security Mission Adaptive Strategic Research Projects.

Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.

IRRIGATION, RURAL LIVELIHOODS AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1 MONITORING AND EVALUATION: GOOD PRACTICES REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP FOR IFAD-

TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.

This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.

Lesson 5 – Logical Framework Approach (LFA)

May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.

Improving Results Reporting Operations Managers Workshop Kiev, October 2008 Bratislava Regional Center Management Practice.

Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.

Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations

1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.

Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.

Parliamentary Portfolio Committee for Basic Education 4 May 2010 Development of Workbooks.

Developing Indicators

Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.

Preparation of update data set and information for Agriculture Sector Moe Moe Than Myanmar.

Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.

MARKETS II M&E FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES Joseph Obado.

UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.

Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.

Promising Ideas and Issues to Consider in Reaching Reading and Literacy Goals Logistics of supervision, training, support to teachers Sakil Malik Director.

SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)

Narrative reporting: good practices. Joint Technical Secretariat Seminar for Beneficiaries February 2012 Narva, Estonia.

TANZANIA’S MONITORING SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AND WAY FORWARD BY EKINGO MAGEMBE POVERTY MONITORING OFFICER (MoF-TANZANIA )

Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.

A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.

Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.

MAINSTREAMING ICT FOR NFSM KISSAN KI UNNATI -- DESH KI PRAGATI.

Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.

Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.

Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: Insight into internal stakeholder learnings Beth Ferguson AES Conference Sydney 2 September 2011.

ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.

HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE MONITORING. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION This presentation contains a complete overview of all aspects of Response Monitoring Presenting.

Results Oriented Monitoring & Evaluation Model (ROMEM) Presented by Shawn Grey Ministry of Transport and Works Jamaica. Model developed by MTW and DPMI.

IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.

Devon Enhanced C&I Programme. © Babcock Integration LLP, No unauthorised copying permitted. 2 Priorities To.

Monitoring and Evaluation for UNDP/GEF projects MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF UNDP/GEF PROJECTS Inception Workshop, Baikal Lake Watershed Project,

Dr. Anubha Rajesh, Early Education Services, ICF January 13, 2016 Invest in Young Children: National Conference on Mother- tongue Based Multilingual Early.

Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.

M and E in Multilingual Mother Tongue Based ECCE Dr. Jayanti Prakash.

SUNY Maritime Internal Control Program. New York State Internal Control Act of 1987 Establish and maintain guidelines for a system of internal controls.

Building an ENI CBC project

Project monitoring and evaluation

UNEP/Global Mechanism support for UNCCD reporting

Monitoring and Evaluation

TechStambha PMP Certification Training

Tracking development results at the EIB

The role of the Passport Indicators in Monitoring PFM Strategy

Monitoring and Evaluation using the

Measuring Data Quality and Compilation of Metadata

Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations

Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation

Monitoring programs and projects

Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs

How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?

Presentation transcript:

Systems/Methodologies for Monitoring and Evaluation of National Food Security Mission by National Productivity Council

Consultancy to NPC Strengthening Monitoring and Evaluation of NFSM –Setting up monitoring systems to cover the entire project cycle of the Mission –Develop templates in conducting concurrent and other evaluations –Designing dynamic methods for ease of use at various levels for sustainability

Report Formats Monitoring Formats Concurrent Evaluation Mid-term Evaluation Performance assessment for awards Record Formats LFA matrix Planning Implementatio n MonitoringEvaluationNFSM TASKS ASSIGNED TO NPC UNDER NFSM contd.

 Analysis and appraisal of:-  Quarterly physical and financial progress reports (QPRs);  Annual physical and financial progress reports (APRs);  PMT tour reports;  CDD’s tour reports;  NLMT reports; and  Concurrent evaluation reports.  Preparation of league tables of the NFSM districts for categorizing/quantifying district performance for State/National level awards.  Preparation of impact evaluation report based on secondary data. Continuous activities

LFA based PPM Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means of Verification Records Concurrent Evaluation Impact Evaluation Mid-term Evaluation Terminal Evaluation PlanningPlanning Implementatio n EvaluationEvaluation Performance Recognition NFSM Awards MonitoringMonitoring Reporting & monitoring Process specific interrelation of documents of NFSM

A modern tool used in planning, monitoring and evaluation of development projects. Provides insight towards project aims and aspects upon which success depends. A handy summary to inform project staff, benefactor, beneficiaries and stakeholders throughout the lifecycle of the project. Better supervision based on intended outcomes rather than intended expenditure. Key Concepts - Logical Framework Approach

Key Concepts - Logical Framework Approach contd.. Identification of the Objectively Verifiable Indicators (OVIs) and Means of Verification (MOVs) at goal, purpose & activity levels; Reckoning of external factors and the risks; and Keeping track on the mission activities.

Levels of formats for record keeping Panchayat level District level State level Level of formats for progress reporting District level State level

State Level Quarter, component & Intervention specific physical & financial progress Reporting Structure under NFSM National Level Panchayat Level Beneficiary, Component & Intervention specific records District Level Quarter, component & Intervention specific physical & financial progress QPRs/ APRs QPRs/ APRs

Level of formats for monitoring reports National Level:  NALMOT  National Consultant /PMT  CDDs State Level:  SLMT  State Consultant /PMT District Level:  DLMT  District Consultant  Baseline survey

Monitoring Structure under NFSM at National Level NALMOTNational PMT National Consultants StateDistrict Panchayat Level Vill-1: (B1, B2)Vill-2: (B1, B2)Vill-3: (B1, B2)

Monitoring Structure under NFSM at State Level SLMTState PMT State Consultants District-1District-2 Panchayat Vill-1: (B1, B2)Vill-2: (B1, B2)Vill-3: (B1, B2) Panchayat

Monitoring Structure under NFSM at District Level DLMT District PMT District Consultants Panchayat-1Panchayat-2 Vill-2: (B1, B2) Vill-1: (B1, B2) Vill-2: (B1, B2) Vill:-1 (B1, B2)

Key features of formats for records, reports & monitoring Standardization - devoid of duplicity Empowering with information across the levels Uniformity Precision in data capturing Interoperability across the program Easy to fill, maintain & report Adequate checks & balances Data Integrity True projection of performance Ensuring credibility & wider acceptance of the output IT enabled

Handbook on concurrent evaluation Key concepts: Understanding of concept Uniformity in methodology Comprehension of process related bottlenecks, difficulty and problems Timely mid-course correction Sharing of best practices related to processes rather than results Understanding of concept Uniformity in methodology Comprehension of process related bottlenecks, difficulty and problems Timely mid-course correction Sharing of best practices related to processes rather than results

Formats devised for concurrent evaluation by states Collection of information from State NFSM Agency Season/Intervention wise updated physical & financial Progress Report of NFSM Rice Season/Intervention wise updated physical & financial Progress Report of NFSM Wheat Season/Intervention wise updated physical & financial Progress Report of NFSM Pulses Collection of information from District NFSM Agency. Beneficiary specific common observation sheet for all the interventions Intervention specific observation Sheet for Beneficiary-FFS Intervention specific observation Sheet for Beneficiary- Demonstration Intervention specific observation Sheet for Beneficiary-Seed Distribution Intervention specific observation Sheet for Beneficiary-Seed Minikit Intervention specific observation Sheet for Beneficiary-INM & Soil Ameliorants Intervention specific observation Sheet for Beneficiary-Farm Mechanization Intervention specific observation Sheet for Beneficiary-IPM Intervention specific observation Sheet for Beneficiary-Pilot Project & Local Initiatives Non-beneficiary Specific observation Sheet Report Structure

State Level District Level PRI level BeneficiaryBeneficiary Non-beneficiary level Concurrent Evaluation Report Study flow chart - Concurrent Evaluation

Methodology on performance assessment of districts for State/National level awards Awards’ parameters  Outcome based parameters:  Performance will be assessed in relation to baseline data.  Intervention related parameters:  Performance will be assessed in relation to achievements against the targets.  In case of the interventions for which baseline data is available, performance will be assessed in relation to baseline data.  Process oriented parameters :  Performance will be assessed based on documentary evidence relating to activities envisaged vis-à-vis carried out.

NFSM Award Scheme – Key concepts Quantifiable parameters Objective assessment of relative performance Transparency in assessment Recognition of merit Sharing of best practices Enhancement of acceptability & ownership

Way forward Circulation of the documents to the stakeholders Comprehension workshops of master trainers on documentation at regional level for devising training curriculum in 1 st week of January, 2010 Organization of training for field staff on documentation at SAMETI level during 2 nd fortnight of January, 2010 Translation of documents in the regional languages for internalization across levels in the states w.e.f. 1 st April, 2010 Review workshops on documents at SAMETI level in November, 2010 Review workshops on documents at regional level in December, 2010 Modification of documents, if any, for continuous adoption.

Thank You