SANDS - Sediment Analysis Network for Decision Support Danny Hardin, Marilyn Drewry, Tammy Smith, Matt He the University of Alabama in Huntsville Sandy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 of 50 Optimization of Artificial Neural Networks in Remote Sensing Data Analysis Tiegeng Ren Dept. of Natural Resource Science in URI (401)
Advertisements

GLC 2000 ‘Final Results’ Workshop (JRC-Ispra, 24 ~ 26 March, 2003) GLC 2000 ‘Final Results’ Workshop (JRC-Ispra, 24 ~ 26 March, 2003) LAND COVER MAP OF.
Predicting and mapping biomass using remote sensing and GIS techniques; a case of sugarcane in Mumias Kenya Odhiambo J.O, Wayumba G, Inima A, Omuto C.T,
Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data for Targeting and Evaluating Implementation of Best Management Practices within the Wister Lake Watershed, Oklahoma.
Soil Mapping and Erosion
Major Operations of Digital Image Processing (DIP) Image Quality Assessment Radiometric Correction Geometric Correction Image Classification Introduction.
Impact of Hurricanes on Nutrient Transport from Catchment to Coast: An Integrated Case Study of Mobile Bay and its Watershed Northern Gulf Coastal Hazards.
CORAL REEF MAPPING IN THE RED SEA (HURGHADA, EGYPT) BASED ON REMOTE SENSING Presented by: Justin Prosper s
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
Matthew Wight Pennsylvania State University - Master of Geographic Information Systems - GEOG 596A – Fall 2014 Enhancing Coastal Conservation Planning.
Cristina Carollo & Dave Reed Project Coordinators David Palandro, Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute John Ogden, Florida Institute of Oceanography.
Published in Remote Sensing of the Environment in May 2008.
Module 2.1 Monitoring activity data for forests using remote sensing REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module.
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
Co-authors: Maryam Altaf & Intikhab Ulfat
MODIS Subsetting and Visualization Tool: Bringing time-series satellite-based land data to the field scientist National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Land Cover Classification, Deforestation Patterns Analysis and Field Survey - Deforestation Patterns Analysis of the Baekdudaegan Mountain Range.
The Dying Dead Sea Assessing the decline of the Dead Sea area in relation to irrigated agriculture Noel Peterson and Zach Tagar FR 5262.
Green-1 9/17/2015 Green Band Discussion Satellite Instrument Synergy Working Group September 2003.
Effect of Superstorm Sandy on Forest Health In Hartshorne Woods Park, New Jersey Lauren Gazerwitz, Wildlife & Conservation Biology,
Integrated Ecosystem Restoration and Hurricane Protection: Louisiana’s Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
A METHODOLOGY TO SELECT PHENOLOGICALLY SUITABLE LANDSAT SCENES FOR FOREST CHANGE DETECTION IGARSS 2011, Jul, 27, 2011 Do-Hyung Kim, Raghuram Narashiman,
Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.
ASPRS Annual Conference 2005, Baltimore, March Utilizing Multi-Resolution Image data vs. Pansharpened Image data for Change Detection V. Vijayaraj,
Image Classification Digital Image Processing Techniques Image Restoration Image Enhancement Image Classification Image Classification.
Karnieli: Introduction to Remote Sensing
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA MRC RPC – 11 July 2007 Greg Easson, Ph.D. Robert Holt, Ph.D. A. K. M. Azad Hossain University.
Methods 1. Dune area delineated with GIS before and after storms 2. Calculate total loss and mean loss in dune area for foredunes (N = 26) and secondary.
1 Enviromatics Environmental sampling Environmental sampling Вонр. проф. д-р Александар Маркоски Технички факултет – Битола 2008 год.
SeaWiFS Highlights September 2002 SeaWiFS Views Development of Hurricane Isidore These two SeaWiFS images were collected ten days apart. The first was.
James C. Gibeaut Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Presented to: Coastal Engineering Research.
What is an image? What is an image and which image bands are “best” for visual interpretation?
Stacked Landsat scene Land pixels deleted with polygon mask Stacked Landsat scene minus land Landsat Band 1 Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 are stacked Stacked.
Meteorology 112 Lecture 3: Hurricanes Dr. Craig Clements 11 Sept
AN ENHANCED SST COMPOSITE FOR WEATHER FORECASTING AND REGIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES Gary Jedlovec 1, Jorge Vazquez 2, and Ed Armstrong 2 1NASA/MSFC Earth Science.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ.
1 A Sample of NCDDC's GCOOS-Related Data Management Activities Julie Bosch NOAA/ National Coastal Data Development Center GCOOS DMAC Committee Meeting.
Land Cover Characterization Program National Mapping Division EROS Data CenterU. S. Geological Survey The National Land Cover Dataset of the Multi- Resolution.
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Explosion
Wetlands Investigation Utilizing GIS and Remote Sensing Technology for Lucas County, Ohio: a hybrid analysis. Nathan Torbick Spring 2003 Update on current.
Remotely sensed land cover heterogeneity
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Automatic Generation of Parameter Inputs and Visualization of Model Outputs for AGNPS using GIS.
APPLIED REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY TO ANALYZE THE LAND COVER/LAND USE CHANGE AT TISZA LAKE By Yudhi Gunawan * and Tamás János ** * Department of Land Use.
Data Processing Flow Chart Start NDVI, EVI2 are calculated and Rank SDS are incorporated Integrity Data Check: Is the data correct? Data: Download a) AVHRR.
SeaWiFS Highlights July 2001 SeaWiFS Views Eruption of Mt. Etna On July 24, 2001, SeaWiFS viewed a greenish-orange plume resulting from the ongoing eruption.
High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Development for the Coastal United States Eric Morris (Presenter) Chris Robinson The Baldwin Group at NOAA Office for.
CHANGE DETECTION ANALYSIS USING REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES Change in Urban area from 1992 to 2001 in COIMBATORE, INDIA. FNRM 5262 FINAL PROJECT PRESENTATION.
Landsat Satellite Data. 1 LSOS (1-ha) 9 Intensive Study Areas (1km x 1km) 3 Meso-cell Study Areas (25km x 25km) 1 Small Regional Study Area (1.5 o x 2.5.
LANDSAT EVALUATION OF TRUMPETER SWAN (CYGNUS BUCCINATOR) HISTORICAL NESTING SITES IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK Laura Cockrell and Dr. Robert B. Frederick.
Geog 121 Project 4: Finding LandSat Data
Jakobshavn Isbrae Glacial Retreat
VEGA-GEOGLAM Web-based GIS for crop monitoring and decision support in agriculture Evgeniya Elkina, Russian Space Research Institute The GEO-XIII Plenary.
Mapping of Coastal Wetlands via Hyperspectral AVIRIS Data
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
Assessment of Current Field Plots and LiDAR ‘Virtual’ Plots as Guides to Classification Procedures for Multitemporal Analysis of Historic and Current Landsat.
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
Hurricanes.
By Yudhi Gunawan * and Tamás János **
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
An Image Classification of Khartoum, Sudan
Corn and Soybean Differentiation Using Multi-Spectral Landsat Data
Catastrophic Events Think – What is a catastrophic event?
GEOG-4045 Environmental Remote Sensing Larry Kiage & Naresh K. Sonti
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
ALI assignment – see amended instructions
Geog 121 Project 4: Finding LandSat Data
WP05: Turkey Land Use Change Model
Image Classification of the Upper South Fork Eel River Watershed
Presentation transcript:

SANDS - Sediment Analysis Network for Decision Support Danny Hardin, Marilyn Drewry, Tammy Smith, Matt He the University of Alabama in Huntsville Sandy Ebersole Geological Survey of Alabama OS33G-08

Objectives Help resolve the GOMA priority issues by providing sediment related decision support products to groups involved in coastal management, conservation, planning, recovery, and mitigation Provide end users the opportunity to better analyze, detect, and identify compositions and patterns of suspended sediment and sediment deposits.

Influence of Sediment Disturbance Since the year 2000, eastern Louisiana, coastal Mississippi, Alabama, and the western Florida panhandle have been affected by 28 tropical storms, seven of which were hurricanes. These tropical cyclones have significantly altered normal coastal processes and characteristics in the Gulf region through sediment disturbance. In fact, tropical storm-induced sediment disturbance is a factor in four of the five Gulf of Mexico Alliance (GOMA) priority issues: water quality for beaches and shellfish beds, wetland and coastal conservation restoration, characterization of Gulf habitats, and reduction of nutrient inputs to coastal systems.

SAND’S Storms Helene 2000 Barry 2001 Allison 2001 Cindy 2005 Gustav 2008 Isidore 2002Ivan 2004Arlene 2005 Dennis 2005 Katrina 2005Fay 2008

Landfall Locations for Storms in SANDS Study Area

SANDS Source Data Landsat 7 ETM+ all bands for 2000 through 2002 Landsat 5 TM all bands for 2003 through 2008 MODIS Aqua surface reflectance bands 8 through 16 SeaWiFS data, all bands, covering the region SRTM elevation data NDVI and EVI vegetation indices derived from MODIS

System Architecture Regional Geospatial Information Systems SANDS Data Portal Alabama View GHRC PHINS Regional DSS Virtual Alabama

Product Generation Methodology All bands combined to make a stacked image Clouds and land removed Traditional enhancements applied Supervised classification Results combined and edited Final image showing enhanced suspended sediment FGDC metadata produced for final image Final image, metadata, and original stacked image uploaded to ITSC ftp site Original Landsat bands downloaded from ITSC ftp site

All bands combined to make a stacked image Clouds and land removed Traditional enhancements applied Supervised classification Results combined and edited Final image showing enhanced suspended sediment FGDC metadata produced for final image Final image, metadata, and original stacked image uploaded to ITSC ftp site Original Landsat bands downloaded from ITSC ftp site Product Generation Methodology

All bands combined to make a stacked image Clouds and land removed Traditional enhancements applied Supervised classification Results combined and edited Final image showing enhanced suspended sediment FGDC metadata produced for final image Final image, metadata, and original stacked image uploaded to ITSC ftp site Original Landsat bands downloaded from ITSC ftp site Product Generation Methodology

All bands combined to make a stacked image Clouds and land removed Traditional enhancements applied Supervised classification Results combined and edited Final image showing enhanced suspended sediment FGDC metadata produced for final image Final image, metadata, and original stacked image uploaded to ITSC ftp site Original Landsat bands downloaded from ITSC ftp site Product Generation Methodology

All bands combined to make a stacked image Clouds and land removed Traditional enhancements applied Supervised classification Results combined and edited Final image showing enhanced suspended sediment FGDC metadata produced for final image Final image, metadata, and original stacked image uploaded to ITSC ftp site Original Landsat bands downloaded from ITSC ftp site Product Generation Methodology

All bands combined to make a stacked image Clouds and land removed Traditional enhancements applied Supervised classification Results combined and edited Final image showing enhanced suspended sediment FGDC metadata produced for final image Final image, metadata, and original stacked image uploaded to ITSC ftp site Original Landsat bands downloaded from ITSC ftp site Product Generation Methodology

All bands combined to make a stacked image Clouds and land removed Traditional enhancements applied Supervised classification Results combined and edited Final image showing enhanced suspended sediment FGDC metadata produced for final image Final image, metadata, and original stacked image uploaded to ITSC ftp site Original Landsat bands downloaded from ITSC ftp site Product Generation Methodology

Visual inspection and documentation of features discovered in enhancement and processing of imagery Oil sheen off shore of Louisiana two days after Katrina. This oil was washed out from the oil spills onland. Patterns of the sheen help indicate flow and transport direction. Southeasterly pointing wisps of suspended sediment showing normal (pre-Arlene) sediment transport patterns. These wisps correlate with sand ridges on the seafloor.

Data Product Distribution

Related Coastal Projects NASA Tropical Storm Field Campaigns SERVIR GoMRC SCOOP

Backup Charts

Stacked Landsat scene Land pixels deleted with polygon mask Stacked Landsat scene minus land Landsat Band 1 Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 are stacked Stacked 7-band Landsat scene Landsat Band 2 Landsat Band 3 Landsat Band 4 Landsat Band 5 Landsat Band 7 Identification and deletion of cloud pixels via unsupervised classification Stacked Landsat scene minus land and minus clouds (cloudless water) Step 1: Stacking bands for a given Landsat scene (path, row, day) Step 2: Deleting land and clouds to reduce pixel confusion

Stacked 7-band cloudless water pixels Band ratio B3/B1 Output grid of B3/B1 Step 3: Running and comparing enhancement techniques Stacked 7-band cloudless water pixels Band ratio B2/B1 Output grid of B2/B1 Stacked 7-band cloudless water pixels Clay enhancement Output grid of clay enhancement Stacked 7-band cloudless water pixels Iron oxide enhancement Output grid of Iron oxide enhancement Visual comparison of enhancement techniques Good output. Save Output grid of B3/B1 Good output. Save Output grid of B2/B1 Good output. save clay enhancement grid

Step 4: Extraction of suspended sediment from enhancements Output grid of B3/B1 Output grid of B2/B1 Output grid of clay enhancement Extraction of suspended sediment pixels based on high pixel values Extraction of suspended sediment pixels based on high pixel values Extraction of suspended sediment pixels based on high pixel values Grid of pixels representing varying intensities of suspended sediment for B3/B1 Grid of pixels representing varying intensities of suspended sediment for B2/B1 Grid of pixels representing varying intensities of suspended sediment for clay enhancement Suspended sediment pixels mosaicked Grid of combined suspended sediment from enhancements

Step 5: Supervised classification (performed twice – once for the western side and once for the eastern side of the image due to pixel confusion from sunglint) Stacked 7-band cloudless water pixels Supervised classification of western side of image Supervised grid with classes representing suspended sediment, clear water, and cloud fringes Extraction of suspended sediment pixels in western side of image Grid of pixels representing varying intensities of suspended sediment in western part of image Stacked 7-band cloudless water pixels Supervised classification of eastern side of image Supervised grid with classes representing suspended sediment, clear water, and cloud fringes Extraction of suspended sediment pixels in eastern side of image Grid of pixels representing varying intensities of suspended sediment in eastern part of image

Step 6: Final products (metadata was also written to accompany the final image) Grid of pixels representing varying intensities of suspended sediment in western part of image Grid of pixels representing varying intensities of suspended sediment in eastern part of image Grid of combined suspended sediment from enhancements Suspended sediment pixels mosaicked Grid of combined suspended sediment pixels Clean-up of error pixels (mainly cloud pixels and image edges) Final image of the Landsat scene enhanced to show suspended sediment