Biospheric Process Models: The Challenge of Integrating Ecosystem Dynamics and Land Cover Change A. David McGuire USGS and University of Alaska.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effects of Land Use Change on Forest Carbon Budgets Throughout the Southern USA from 1900 to 2050 Peter B. Woodbury Crop and Soil Sciences Department,
Advertisements

Assessing the Influences of Urbanization on Terrestrial Carbon Pools and Fluxes Andy B. Reinmann and Lucy R. Hutyra Boston University, Department of Earth.
National Assessment of Ecological C Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes – the USGS LandCarbon Project Zhiliang Zhu, Project Chief, What.
Land-use effects on spatial and temporal patterns of carbon storage and flux in PNW forests David Wallin Department of Environmental Sciences Huxley College.
Carbon Information Needed to Support Forest Management Bob Davis, Director Of Planning, Watershed And Air, USDA Forest Service 0.
A MONASH UNIVERSITY PERSPECTIVE Musa Kilinc and Danielle Martin School of Geography and Environmental Science.
A Synthesis of Terrestrial Carbon Balance of Alaska and Projected Changes in the 21 st Century: Implications for Climate Policy and Carbon Management To.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy North American Carbon Balance – Results from the Regional Synthesis Project of the North America Carbon.
US Forest Disturbance Trends observed with Landsat Time Series Samuel N. Goward 1 (PI), Jeffrey Masek 2, Warren Cohen 3, Gretchen Moisen 4, Chengquan Huang.
An Assessment of the Carbon Balance of Arctic Tundra: Comparisons among Observations, Models, and Atmospheric inversions A. David McGuire and Co-authors.
Estimating the contribution of agricultural land use to terrestrial carbon fluxes in the continental US Keith Paustian 1,2, Steven Ogle 2, Scott Denning.
US Carbon Trends March 17, USDA Greenhouse Gas Symposium1 Spatial and Temporal Patterns of the Contemporary Carbon Sources and Sinks in the Ridge.
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
GISP 2003 / Khon Keaen, Thailand1 Summary and Follow on of GAME- Siberia Activity Takeshi OHTA Nagoya University, JAPAN FORSGC, JAPAN.
Niall P. Hanan 1, Christopher A. Williams 1, Joseph Berry 2, Robert Scholes 3 A. Scott Denning 1, Jason Neff 4, and Jeffrey Privette 5 1. Colorado State.
GERFS1 Top-down approach to estimation of the regional carbon budget in West Siberia S. Maksyutov (1) T. Machida, K. Shimoyama, N.Kadygrov, A. Itoh (1)
Carbon sequestration in China’s ecosystems, Jingyun Fang Department of Ecology Peking University Feb. 14, 2008.
Combination of mechanisms responsible for the missing carbon sink using bottom-up approach Haifeng Qian March 29, A Carbon Cycle and Climate Past,
Carbon Cycle Basics Ranga Myneni Boston University 1/12 Egon Schiele ( ) Autumn Sun 1.
Biosphere Modeling Galina Churkina MPI for Biogeochemistry.
Carbon dioxide cycling through the snowpack, implications of change Gareth Crosby.
NESTED GLOBAL INVERSION WITH A FOCUS ON NORTH AMERICA: COMPARISON WITH BOTTOM-UP RESULTS IN CANADA Jing M. Chen, University of Toronto Main Contributors:
Outline Background, climatology & variability Role of snow in the global climate system Indicators of climate change Future projections & implications.
BIOGEOSPHERIC CHANGE RESPONSE OF ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE AND DISTRIBUTION TO ALTERED FORCING © 2007 T. Kittel Clarice Bassi - Anavilhanas.
Climate Change Impacts on Georgia’s Natural Resources Steven McNulty, Ph.D. Research Ecologist USDA Forest Service Raleigh, NC.
Global Carbon Cycle Feedbacks: From pattern to process Dave Schimel NEON inc.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 Carbon Cycle Modeling Terrestrial Ecosystem Models W.M. Post, ORNL Atmospheric Measurements.
Forest Inventory Methods and Carbon Analysis Linda S. Heath Richard A. Birdsey USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station In Support of the United.
References 1. Zhang F.M., J.M. Chen, Y. Pan, R. A. Birdsey, S.H. Shen, W.M Ju, and L.M. He, Attributing carbon sinks in conterminous US forests to disturbance.
Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Carbon Exchanges between the Atmosphere and Terrestrial Ecosystems of China Hanqin Tian Ecosystem and Regional Studies.
Effects of Land Cover Change on local and regional climate Ann Thijs Physical Climatology December 1, 2005 Tropical deforestation, Borneo.
Climate Sensitivity of Boreal Forest Ecosystem Carbon Dynamics A. David McGuire and Colleagues BNZ LTER Annual Symposium 5 March 2009.
Plant Ecology - Chapter 14 Ecosystem Processes. Ecosystem Ecology Focus on what regulates pools (quantities stored) and fluxes (flows) of materials and.
Paul R. Moorcroft David Medvigy, Stephen Wofsy, J. William Munger, M. Dietze Harvard University Developing a predictive science of the biosphere.
Climate Feedback Research: Consequences of climate and disturbance changes for the Carbon feedback in Interior Alaska Patrick Endres, AK photographics.
Climate change and the carbon cycle David Schimel National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder Colorado.
Improving the Representation of Fire Disturbance in Dynamic Vegetation Models by Assimilating Satellite Data E.Kantzas, S.Quegan & M.Lomas School of Maths.
Page 1© Crown copyright WP4 Development of a System for Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation Richard Betts.
Changes and Feedbacks of Land-use and Land-cover under Global Change Mingjie Shi Physical Climatology Course, 387H The University of Texas at Austin, Austin,
Summary of Research on Climate Change Feedbacks in the Arctic Erica Betts April 01, 2008.
BIOME-BGC estimates fluxes and storage of energy, water, carbon, and nitrogen for the vegetation and soil components of terrestrial ecosystems. Model algorithms.
Results from the Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) 3 FastOpt 4 2 Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 1 Heinrich Widmann 3, Thomas.
An Assessment of the Carbon Balance of Arctic Tundra in North America: Comparisons among Observations, Models, and Atmospheric inversions A. David McGuire.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Land carbon cycle managed ecosystems and climate Galina Churkina Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam, Germany.
Scott Goetz Changes in Productivity with Climate Change at High Latitudes: the role of Disturbance.
Spatial and temporal patterns of CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes from North America as estimated by process-based ecosystem model Hanqin Tian, Xiaofeng Xu and other.
Modeling Modes of Variability in Carbon Exchange Between High Latitude Ecosystems and the Atmosphere Dave McGuire (UAF), Joy Clein (UAF), and Qianlai.
Importance of Recent Shifts in Soil Thermal Dynamics on Growing Season Length, Productivity, and Carbon Sequestration in Terrestrial High-Latitude Ecosystems.
Growing season dynamics in high-latitude ecosystems: relations to soil thermal regimes, productivity, carbon sequestration, and atmospheric heating Bonanza.
LUCID Land-Use and Climate: IDentification of robust impacts Nathalie de Noblet, Andy Pitman
The Effects of Historical Changes in Global Agricultural Land on the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle Navin Ramankutty [ Center for.
Variations in Continental Terrestrial Primary Production, Evapotranspiration and Disturbance Faith Ann Heinsch, Maosheng Zhao, Qiaozhen Mu, David Mildrexler,
Land cover & fire at high latitudes: model-data comparison and model modification NCEO Land Science Meeting, February 2012, Sheffield, UK E.Kantzas,
1 A Global-Scale Biofuels Program and its Environmental Consequences J. Melillo 1, A. Gurgel 2, D. Kicklighter 1, J. Reilly 2, T. Cronin 1, S. Paltsev.
CarboEurope: The Big Research Lines Annette Freibauer Ivan Janssens.
Simulating global fire regimes & biomass burning with vegetation-fire models Kirsten Thonicke 1, Allan Spessa 2 & I. Colin Prentice
Scientific Plan Introduction –History of LBA Background –Definition of Amazon –7 Themes with achievements Motivation for Phase II –Unresolved questions.
A comparison of recent model- and inventory- based estimates of the continental-scale carbon balance of North America A. David McGuire USGS / University.
Ecosystem carbon storage capacity as affected by disturbance regimes: a general theoretical model Introduction Disturbances can profoundly affect ecosystem.
Whats new with MODIS NPP and GPP MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting May 20, 2015 Steven W. Running Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group College of Forestry.
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 18: Nitrogen Cycle Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Illinois,
THE FUTURE CLIMATE OF AMAZONIA Carlos Nobre 1, Marcos Oyama 2, Gilvan Sampaio 1 1 CPTEC/INPE, 2 IAE/CTA LBA ECO São Paulo / 2005 November.
2015 RPA Update: Forest Carbon Projections for the United States
Community Land Model (CLM)
Western Mensurationists Meeting 2016
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
Adam Butler & Glenn Marion, Biomathematics & Statistics Scotland •
Presentation transcript:

Biospheric Process Models: The Challenge of Integrating Ecosystem Dynamics and Land Cover Change A. David McGuire USGS and University of Alaska

Historically Two Approaches CO 2 and Climate Process-Based Ecosystem Models Landuse and Disturbance Book-keeping Models

Modeling Integration for Investigating Global Change in Terrestrial Ecosystems CLIMATE DISTURBANCE Physical Properties Ecosystem Structure Ecosystem Function Human Dimensions

McGuire and CCMLP Participants Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the twentieth century: Analyses of CO 2, climate and land use effects with four process-based ecosystem models Global Biogeochemical Cycles 15: Dargaville and CCMLP Participants Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models with atmospheric CO 2 measurements: Results from transient simulations considering increasing CO 2, climate, and land-use effects. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16, 1092, doi: /2001GB Dargaville, R., A.D. McGuire, and P. Rayner Estimates of large-scale fluxes in high latitudes from terrestrial biosphere models and an inversion of atmospheric CO 2 measurements. Climatic Change 55: Process Models and Atmospheric Constraints

Goal of Study: … to simulate the concurrent effects of cropland establishment and abandonment, increases in atmospheric CO 2, and interannual climate variability on terrestrial carbon storage between 1920 and 1992.

Simulating the Effects of CO 2, Climate, and Cropland Establishment and Abandonment by Terrestrial Biosphere Models (TBMs) CO 2 Concentration Climate (Temperature, Precipitation) Landuse Map TBM Carbon Pools NPP R H Conversion Flux Product Pools NET Fire Disturbance Product Decay Flux 1 yr 10 yr 100 yr

Driving Data Sets Historical CO 2 : based on Etheridge et al. (1996) and Keeling et al. (1995) Temperature: based on Cramer and Leemans climatology and Jones et al. (1994) temperature anomalies Precipitation: based on Cramer and Leemans climatology and Hulme et al. (1992, 1994, updated) precipitation anomalies Solar Radiation: based on Cramer and Leemans climatology Historical Landuse: based on Ramankutty and Foley (1998) Relative Agricultural Productivity: based on Esser (1990) Other Data Sets: vegetation and soils - model specific

Comparison between net fluxes simulated by terrestrial biosphere models with a long- term inversion analysis of terrestrial C exchange with the atmosphere Modeled terrestrial exchange is consistent (within the uncertainty) with the long-term inversion analysis.

Partitioning effects of CO 2, climate, and cropland establishment and abandonment on global terrestrial carbon storage for HRBM,IBIS,LPJ and TEM The models indicate that the effects of CO 2 and cropland establishment/abandonment play important roles in terrestrial carbon storage. The models agree that the effects of climate are small relative to the effects of CO 2 and land use, but disagree about whether climate variability tends to cause net uptake or release of CO 2.

gC m 2 yr HRBMIBIS LPJTEM Mean Annual Net Carbon Exchange for the 1980s (CO 2, Climate, and Land Use)

gC m 2 yr HRBMIBIS LPJTEM Mean Annual Net Carbon Exchange for the 1980s (Land Use)

McGuire et al Canada and Alaska. Csiszar, I., et al Land use and fires. Chapters 9 and 19 in Land Change Science: Observing, Monitoring, and Understanding Trajectories of Change on the Earth’s Surface. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Zhuang et al Carbon cycling in extratropical terrestrial ecosystems of the Northern Hemisphere during the 20th Century: A modeling analysis of the influences of soil thermal dynamics. Tellus 55B: McGuire et al Environmental variation, vegetation distribution, carbon dynamics, and water/energy exchange in high latitudes. Journal of Vegetation Science 13: Regional Changes in Carbon Storage may be Caused by Responses that affect Ecosystem Physiology, Disturbance, and Land Cover Change

Biomass of Boreal Forest Ecosystems has been Changing in Recent Decades From Myneni et al. (2001)

Courtesy of K. McDonald Growing seasons are occurring earlier

8.0 –18.0 Weeks – Region – 28.0 Weeks – Region –37.0 Weeks – Region 3 Duration of Snow Free Period Snow Free Duration Anomaly (weeks) Weeks of Snow Free Duration ( ) MeanSDCV Region 1 TEM Dye* Region 2 TEM Dye Region 3 TEM Dye *D. Dye, Hydrol. Process., 2002 Based on TEM simulation for north of 30 o N

Observed and simulated atmospheric CO 2 concentrations at Mould Bay Station, Canada ( o W, o N) during the 1980s g C m -2 yr -1 Sink Source 90° 60° 30° Spatial patterns of change in vegetation carbon over the twenty year period spanning from as simulated by the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM) Strategy to evaluate seasonal exchange of carbon dioxide simulated by terrestrial biosphere models Incorporation of freeze-thaw dynamics into the Terrestrial Ecosystem model improves the simulation of the seasonal and decadal exchange of carbon dioxide exchange with the atmosphere (Zhuang, Euskirchen, McGuire, Melillo, Romanovsky)

After crown fires, boreal conifer forests are often replaced by less flammable deciduous broad-leaved vegetation

Fire in Canada has became more frequent after 1970

[CO 2 ] and [O 3 ] and N Deposition Climate (Temperature, Precipitation) TEM Carbon Pools NPP R H NCE Fire Emissions Fire regime (Severity, History) Simulation of the effects of changes in [CO 2 ], [O 3 ], N deposition, Climate, and Disturbance by the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM)

Long-term Fire Return Interval for Alaska

* Pre-historical Fire Return Interval (before 1950) ** Fire Return Interval ( ) Uptake Release JSC 7/23/02

The high latitude transects span significant variation in several environmental variables and provide a network for improving our understanding of controls over vegetation dynamics, carbon dynamics and water/energy exchange in high latitudes

Percent Area Burned in IGBP Transects

Ground fires are typical in fire regime of Scots Pine Forests in Central Siberia Courtesy of Doug McRae

Crown fires are typical in fire regime of Boreal Forests in Far East Siberia and North America Courtesy of Doug McRae

Comparison of the average change in Seasonal Severity Rating (SSR) for Canada and Russia using the Canadian General Circulation Model (GCM) under left) a 1 x CO2, and right) a 2 x CO2 climate (from Stocks et al. 1998). Severity rating ranges from extreme (red), high (orange), moderate (yellow) to low (green).

Joyce et al. Harvesting disturbances on U.S. forestland from 1600 to present. In preparation. McGuire et al. Historical changes in carbon storage of the eastern United States: Uncertainties associated with forest harvest and agricultural activities. In preparation. Regional Processes: The Challenge of Multiple Disturbances

Overall Goals Develop land use model that allows native ecosystems to convert to agriculture, harvest occurrence in forests, and the creation the age cohorts following harvest and cropland abandonment. Compare modeled age class distribution with independent inventory data on stand age distributions Use data sets on forest disturbance to drive the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM) and evaluate how assumptions about CO2 fertilization and depletion of soil N by agricultural activities influence estimates of changes in carbon storage of the eastern US

Methods to Estimate Harvest Area Anecdotal information prior to 1952 Used inventory data summarized by state/region from 1952, 1962, 1977, 1987, 1992, 1997, and to 1952 –Trend extrapolation based on state population –Assume no harvest disturbance prior to European settlement 1952 to 2002 –Model harvested area using inventory data (volume, removals, timberland and forest area) and the limited data available on actual harvested area –Linear interpolation between inventory years

Development of the Land Use Model Agricultural Land Use –If cropland increases, conversion draws from oldest native vegetation, with a preference for secondary growth. –If cropland decreases, the oldest cropland is converted back to native vegetation Forest Harvest –Harvest oldest native vegetation first, with a preference for primary forest

Modeled estimates of total forestland area follow the temporal dynamics of inventory forestland estimates and are within 6 to 10%.

Forest Harvest Area by Region and US FIA Data and Modeled Estimates

Summary: Estimating Harvested Area Development of a method to obtain nationally consistent estimates of harvested area from 1600 to 2002 Linked forest land use change with agricultural land use; resulting projections of forest land are within 6 to 10 percent of recent inventory Comparison with independent data on stand age is good where harvest is the major disturbance Where other disturbances such as fire, comparison of stand-age distributions are weak

Simulating the Effects of CO 2, Climate, Forest Harvest, and Cropland Establishment and Abandonment by TEM CO 2 Concentration Climate (Temperature, Precipitation) Landuse Map TEM Carbon Pools NPP R H Conversion Flux Product Pools NET Fire Disturbance Product Decay Flux 1 yr 10 yr 100 yr

Comparison of forest growth curves between TEM and Birdsey (1995)

Effects of Cropland Establishment and Abandonment on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Storage

Northeast Region Forest growth as a function of stand age in the TEM simulations is sensitive to assumptions about the effects of agriculture on the depletion of ecosystem nitrogen stocks through time. When nitrogen lost in agricultural production is not replaced (maximum N loss), forest regrowth after agricultural abandonment is not able to achieve the biomass of forests that were never harvested. When the lost nitrogen is replaced immediately after lost (minimum N loss), forest regrowth after agricultural abandonment is able to achieve the biomass of forests that were never harvested.

Average annual vegetation C flux (Tg C) maximum N loss $ Birdsey and Heath* minimun N loss $ transient CO 2 $ Northeast Southeast constant CO 2 $ Northeast Southeast $ TEM simulations (forest cells only) * Birdsey and Heath posted on the web the carbon estimates in forest land for 1987, 1992, and 1997 by state at

Biospheric process models provide a mechanistic means of evaluating the relative role of different drivers of changes in regional carbon storage, but are poorly constrained by extant atmospheric data. At the regional scale, changes in carbon storage may be affected by responses to drivers that affect ecosystem physiology (e.g., CO 2, climate, O 3, N deposition) as well as changes that affect ecosystem structure (e.g., disturbance and land use). It is important to account for historical legacies associated with disturbance regimes like fire. Age class distributions are generally the outcome of multiple disturbances, and it is a challenge to identify all of the disturbances that need to be considered. Comparison with inventory analyses is useful, but may not resolve controversies about the relative role of different drivers of changes in regional carbon storage. Conclusions