HPD Labeling: EPA Rulemaking and an Updated ANSI S12.42 NHCA Conference, Orlando, 2/27/10 Elliott H. Berger, Senior Scientist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM: A BRIEFING FOR FORCES AFLOAT
Advertisements

ANSI/ASQ E Overview Gary L. Johnson U.S. EPA
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
An Overview of Federal Agency Rulemaking Meeting of The Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October 27, 2008 Christian C. Mahler,
U.S. EPA Regulations Review Update: Subpart W NESHAPS (40 CFR 61) Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings (40 CFR Part 192) Andrea Cherepy, Phil Egidi, Reid.
Hearing Conservation Agenda Objectives and Responsibilities The Effects of Noise Factors Affecting Hearing Loss Hearing Conservation Program Noise Hazard.
1. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Presentation to RCC Stakeholders - Webinar Session January 14 th, 2014.
Impulsive Noise Control Strategies. A noise that occurs at intervals of greater than one per second; for example, the noise made by a metal shear, jackhammer,
2009 Performance Assessment Member Representatives Committee Meeting October 28, 2008.
Real Estate Workshop May 19 – 21, 2014 Office of Program Management Mamie Smith-Fisher.
Development of a Standardized Acoustic Shock Tube
a look at noise on the farm
Hearing Conservation Theresa Y. Schulz, PhD. Lt. Col. USAF (ret.)
Occupational Noise Exposure and Hearing Conservation
Food Safety and Inspection Service 1.  In 1993, a small team was tasked to identify information that would be included in a safe handling instruction.
Noise and Vibration Hazards
R3.6.4 Improved Hearing Assessment in Noisy Environments – Parts 1 & 2 Project Leader: Michael Fisher Principal Researcher (Part 1): the late Ben Rudzyn.
The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Interagency Testing Committee (ITC)
VeriPRO® Ear Plug Fit Testing August 2010
Presented by Brad Witt STOPPING NOISE-INDUCED HEARING LOSS.
HEARING PROTECTION DEVICES
Hearing Conservation Theresa Y. Schulz, PhD, LtCol, USAF (ret.)
Hearing Conservation Ann Grevenkamp FECA Committee Meeting August 23 rd, 2012.
Capital Safety – Confidential Central & West Texas Sales Territory Manager Ryan Anguiano.
ALN about NRR - A Little Noise about Noise Reduction Ratings Presented at the 2007 “Tidewater LS AIHA Fall PDC” on Nov 16, 2007 by Christopher D. Jones,
OSHA Regulation 29 CFR , Occupational Noise Exposure Hearing Conservation 1.
Sonomax 1 - Sales Presentation 2004 copyright ©. All rights reserved. Intelligent Hearing Protection.
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
Regulations and Administrative Law. Roadmap What is Administrative Law? What is the rulemaking process? How do you find and update regulations? How do.
Hearing Conservation Program Administration Part 2: Hearing Protection Thomas W. Rimmer, ScD, CIH Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health University of.
Restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast David Peterson – La. AG’s Office – Asst. Attorney General - AG Designee to CPRA Ken Ortego – Vilar and Elliott.
Hearing Conservation Theresa Y. Schulz, PhD. Lt. Col. USAF (ret.)
Noise Control In Highway Construction Kwangseog Ahn, MS and Susan Moir, MS Department of Work Environment University of Massachusetts Lowell
“Real world” noise exposure beneath hearing protectors : a scattered international practice Pierre Canetto, Nicolas Trompette Institut National de Recherche.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
Hearing Conservation Theresa Y. Schulz, PhD. Lt. Col. USAF (ret.)
Getting “Real” about Hearing Protection A. Gregg Moore, CCC-A Senior Occupational Audiologist The EI Group.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
Reducing the Risk of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Through Best Practices Theresa Y. Schulz, PhD, LtCol, USAF (ret.)
30 CFR Part 62: Health Standards for Occupational Noise Exposure Final Rule Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 176 September 13, 1999.
FDA Regulatory and Compliance Symposium
Tools for optimizing the installation of warning sounds in noisy workplaces Chantal Laroche, Christian Giguère, Rida Al Osman and Yun Zheng 2010 NHCA Conference.
Current Issues in Hearing Loss Prevention
Sonomax 1 - Sales Presentation 2004 copyright ©. All rights reserved. Intelligent Hearing Protection.
Administrative Rules 101 A Presentation for the 2013 New Board Member Orientation 1/8/2013.
Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) Theresa Y. Schulz, PhD, LtCol, USAF (ret.)
Sound Intensity Level – Learning Outcomes
CSA STANDARD ON HEARING PROTECTION DEVICES Z A. Behar – Ryerson University D. Shanahan - CSA NHCA
Performance of Sound Restoration Hearing Protectors in Impulsive Noise William J. Murphy, Ph.D. Commander, U.S. Public Health Service National Institute.
Toolbox presentation: How can we stop noise damaging hearing.
THE NEW CLEAN WATER ACT E-REPORTING RULE: WHAT ELECTRONIC DATA REPORTING AND SHARING MEAN FOR YOUR OPERATIONS By: Damien M. Schiff Principal Attorney Pacific.
Final Rule on OTI Licenses - Docket NCBFAA Conference, Tucson AZ – April 19, 2016.
MSHA Rule Making Process Terry L. Bentley Acting Deputy Administrator Coal Mine Safety and Health.
CSA STANDARD ON HEARING PROTECTION DEVICES
Chantal Laroche, Christian Giguère, Rida Al Osman and Yun Zheng
Pesticide Labels & Safety Data Sheets
Hearing Conservation Program P2S-EHS-003
Noise By Dr. Ali Saleh.
Peak Reductions of Nonlinear Hearing Protection Devices
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
Preparing for Permit Review
Determining Protected Exposures for Noise-Exposed Workers Theresa Y
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Radiation Safety Standards
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
Statewide Accountability
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Review plan of the nature reporting – update 6
Presentation transcript:

HPD Labeling: EPA Rulemaking and an Updated ANSI S12.42 NHCA Conference, Orlando, 2/27/10 Elliott H. Berger, Senior Scientist

U.S. HPD-Related Regulation and Standards EPA Hearing protector labeling regulation 40 CFR Part 211 ANSI S – REAT with optimum experimenter fit ANSI S – REAT with two methods: A and B ANSI S – Number ratings: NRS A, NRS G, OB ANSI S – MIRE and ATF methods, includes procedures for impulse noise testing

EPA Labeling: Background Why does not OSHA, MSHA, NIOSH, FDA, or CPSC regulate HPD labeling? Noise Control Act of 1972 authorized noise labeling Original EPA labeling rule promulgated in 1979 Work began on revisions in 2003 and heated up in 2009 Proposed rule issued August 5, 2009 with close of comments on November 4, 2009 Informal invitation-only meeting on January 13, 2010

Key Issues Identified by EPA Applicability to a broader range of devices including electronic and level-dependent devices Development of a more useful NRR that does not need derating Update the test methodology to replace S with reference to ANSI S Require larger subject populations for earplug testing Require periodic retesting

Principal Proposed Changes  Multiple labels for different types of products such as HPDs that are electronic and/or level-dependent  Rating will still be NRR, but computed like NRS A from ANSI S (two-number rating)  Intention was to provide realistic data, but …  Will replace ANSI S3.19 with ANSI S (Method A)  Will incorporate ANSI S  Rating will be usable with dBA  Effective date is not yet determined  Periodic retesting will be required (5 yrs. proposed)

One Label Becomes Three

One Label Becomes Three Five (?)

New Materials in ANSI S12.42 Still specifies MIRE and ATF procedures but … New standard is more comprehensive and includes Detailed description of MIRE and enhanced ATF Method applicable to active sound cancellation devices (combination of MIRE and REAT) Description of specific test noises, including generation of impulse test noises

How to Position MIRE Microphones

Acoustical Test Fixtures (ATFs) in Current Use

Institut de St. Louis (ISL) - Impulse Test Set-up Range in SPLs 110 – 195 dBP

National Institute for Occupation Safety and Health – Shock Tube Range in SPLs 130 – 164 dBP

Next Steps  EPA considering input from public hearings, docket submissions, and the informal labeling-discussion meeting  A draft final rule will be prepared this year, then circulated for internal agency approval and external OMB review  Final rule to appear sometime after August 2010?  New labeling will begin about 12 months after promulgation, and will be complete ~ 30 months or more thereafter  ANSI S12/WG11 developing a standard for FAMS (S12.71), with a target publication date of late 2011

Basic Acoustical Test Fixture (ATF) ANSI S (R2004) Suitable only for earmuffs Lacks refinements called for in the new S12.42

ANSI S Corresponds to prior ANSI standards 2008 version more explicit in fitting instructions Will likely be required in updated EPA rules Method A – Trained-Subject Fit Method B – Inexperienced-Subject Fit Approximates upper limits of attenuation for groups of workers – best real-world estimate 2008 version has only minor updates May not provide sufficient reproducibility

Gain at Eardrum (dB) Frequency (Hz) k2k4k8k16k TFOE = A - B Transfer Function of the Open Ear Hazard measured here Earphones measured here