 Theoretically no problem is there but practically many problems are there.  All the suggestions given are intermingled.

 Improving legal literacy.  To have effective control over ministerial staff and over Bar.  Accountability of ministerial staff.  Centralised recruitment of ministerial staff  Inter-district transfer of ministerial staff.  To improve Efficiency of ministerial staff.  Training of ministerial staff.

 PPs are appointed by govt with meagre remuneration,  Accountability of PPs and investigation agency.  Lack of protection of witness. Govt should accord them protection  Improper service of process.  Improvement of investigation: video  Lack of human resources.  Sometimes, system does not act in consonance with the zeal of the Presiding officer.  Presiding officer cannot performing fearlessly. Higher authority should repose trust and confidence in district judiciary and should support it in case of need.

 Process automation.  IT enabled services of process.  Control over hostile witnesses.  Video shooting of entire investigation process.

 Quality is less appreciated than quantity.  By becoming legal-scientific enabled.  No proper evolution test for appreciating judge.  Efficient judge cannot get any special benefit for his work.  There is no objective method of assessing a judicial officer.  Judgement should be supported by law and judgements.  Enhance quota system.  Enhancing the norms of quota system

 Rural courts are less equipped.  Non availability of good advocates at rural area’s court.  Judges of Fast Track courts are directed to decide 14 session cases every month. which sometimes seems unreasonably high.  Emphasizing on disposal not on justice rendering.  Proper balance should be struck between quality and quantity by rationalizing the norms of disposal.

 Infrastructure.  Due course system.  Inadequacy of staff: steno, clerks.  Implementation of recommendation of Jain commission’s report. On every 500 cases there should be one clerk. One steno and 2 PA  Training in every 6 months. In which Presiding officer can attend training programme without tension.  There should be specialised training for special types of cases.  Ask judges as to his or her inclination.  Feedback of judgment. Appreciation of judgments in the meeting. So that he can improve his efficiency.  There should be less paper work in the court proceeding.  Computer trained staff.

 Theoretically no problem but practically many problems are there.  There should be yearly examination of judges as to latest judgments.  There should be one non sitting day in a week, for judgment writing and going through latest judgments.  Judges should be given the feedback of their judgments and orders.

THANKS!