Immunity & Infection Research Centre Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Rob McMaster, Gabriela Cohen-Freue,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 9 Inferences Based on Two Samples.
Advertisements

Protein Quantitation II: Multiple Reaction Monitoring
Genomic Profiles of Brain Tissue in Humans and Chimpanzees II Naomi Altman Oct 06.
MN-B-C 2 Analysis of High Dimensional (-omics) Data Kay Hofmann – Protein Evolution Group Week 5: Proteomics.
Proteored Multicentric Experiment 8 (PME8) Quantitative Targeted Analysis in Proteomics. An Assesment Study (QTAPAS) ProteoRed WG1-WG2 Meeting Pamplona,
Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Biomarkers in Transplantation A Knowledge Base for Allograft Rejection Benjamin.
Summary 1 l The Analytical Problem l Data Handling.
Metabolomics DNA RNA Protein Biochemicals (Metabolites) Genomics – 25,000 Genes Transcriptomics – 100,000 Transcripts Metabolomics – 2,800 Compounds Proteomics.
Data analytical issues with high-density oligonucleotide arrays A model for gene expression analysis and data quality assessment.
Proteomic, Metabolomic and Lipidomic Research Capability at ICH and ION UCL Label Free Quantitative Proteomics “biomarker discovery”
Biostatistics in Research Practice: Non-parametric tests Dr Victoria Allgar.
Proteomics Informatics Workshop Part III: Protein Quantitation
Proteomics Informatics Workshop Part II: Protein Characterization David Fenyö February 18, 2011 Top-down/bottom-up proteomics Post-translational modifications.
Proteome.
Isolation of N-linked glycopeptides from plasma Yong Zhou 1, Ruedi Aebersold 2, and Hui Zhang 1,3 * 1 Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington.
Validation of Analytical Method
Proteomics Informatics – Data Analysis and Visualization (Week 13)
Jeopardy Hypothesis Testing T-test Basics T for Indep. Samples Z-scores Probability $100 $200$200 $300 $500 $400 $300 $400 $300 $400 $500 $400.
Mass spectrometry and mummies Professor Paul A. Haynes Biomolecular Frontiers Research Centre Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences Macquarie.
Immunity & Infection Research Centre Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Finding Biomarkers for Transplantation.
BIOMARKER STUDIES IN CLINICAL TRIALS Vicki Seyfert-Margolis, PhD.
© 2010 SRI International - Company Confidential and Proprietary Information Quantitative Proteomics: Approaches and Current Capabilities Pathway Tools.
CSCE555 Bioinformatics Lecture 16 Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes from microarray data Meeting: MW 4:00PM-5:15PM SWGN2A21 Instructor: Dr. Jianjun.
Karl Clauser Proteomics and Biomarker Discovery Breast Cancer Proteomics and the use of TCGA Mutational Data - Broad Institute update/issues Karl Clauser.
Laxman Yetukuri T : Modeling of Proteomics Data
Novel Algorithms for the Quantification Confidence in Quantitative Proteomics with Stable Isotope Labeling* Novel Algorithms for the Quantification Confidence.
Quantification of Membrane and Membrane- Bound Proteins in Normal and Malignant Breast Cancer Cells Isolated from the Same Patient with Primary Breast.
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA) BCT 2053 CHAPTER 5. CONTENT 5.1 Introduction to ANOVA 5.2 One-Way ANOVA 5.3 Two-Way ANOVA.
Jeopardy Hypothesis Testing t-test Basics t for Indep. Samples Related Samples t— Didn’t cover— Skip for now Ancient History $100 $200$200 $300 $500 $400.
Dissect the plasma protein markers for Parkinson’s disease Wang Vin-Chi, Lin Ching-Yu, and Chen Han-Min.
Genomics II: The Proteome Using high-throughput methods to identify proteins and to understand their function.
Nos Commanditaires : IRIC 16 avril, h00 Salle S1-151 Pavillon Jean-Coutu Université de Montréal.
June 9th, 2013 Matthew J. Rardin June 9th, 2013 Matthew J. Rardin MS1 and MS2 crosstalk in label free quantitation of mass spectrometry data independent.
Innovative Paths to Better Medicines Design Considerations in Molecular Biomarker Discovery Studies Doris Damian and Robert McBurney June 6, 2007.
Introduction to Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Experimental Design.
Comp. Genomics Recitation 10 4/7/09 Differential expression detection.
Descriptive Statistics
MATB344 Applied Statistics I. Experimental Designs for Small Samples II. Statistical Tests of Significance III. Small Sample Test Statistics Chapter 10.
Lecture 4 Confidence Intervals. Lecture Summary Last lecture, we talked about summary statistics and how “good” they were in estimating the parameters.
Salamanca, March 16th 2010 Participants: Laboratori de Proteomica-HUVH Servicio de Proteómica-CNB-CSIC Participants: Laboratori de Proteomica-HUVH Servicio.
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD: It’s the method you use to study a question scientifically.
What is proteomics? Richard Mbasu and Ben Richards.
Protein quantitation I: Overview (Week 5). Fractionation Digestion LC-MS Lysis MS Sample i Protein j Peptide k Proteomic Bioinformatics – Quantitation.
Using Scaffold OHRI Proteomics Core Facility. This presentation is intended for Core Facility internal training purposes only.
Date of download: 6/24/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Proteomic Strategies in the Search of New Biomarkers.
Shotgun protein identification Creative Proteomics offers iTRAQ protein quantification service suited for unbiased untargeted biomarker discovery. Relative.
Richard Mbasu and Ben Richards
Immune Cell Subsets Fractionated from Whole Blood of Human Subjects
Volume 36, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
David Janz and Lucy Kapronczai
SERUM OR PLASMA TOTAL PROTEIN
By: Aniruddha Deshmukh – M. Sc. Statistics, MCM
2 Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis
i) Two way ANOVA without replication
The discovery and validation of kidney injury-related
M M Additional file 2 - Silver staining of protein extract and tryptic digest run on SDS-PAGE. The figure shows.
Sophie Paczesny, Maribel Diaz-Ricart, Enrique Carerras, Kenneth R
Quantitative proteomics reveals daf‐16‐mediated reduction in protein metabolism in long‐lived daf‐2(e1370) mutants. Quantitative proteomics reveals daf‐16‐mediated.
The Normal Probability Distribution Summary
Mining the human urine proteome for monitoring renal transplant injury
Altered MCM Protein Levels and Autophagic Flux in Aged and Systemic Sclerosis Dermal Fibroblasts  Verónica I. Dumit, Victoria Küttner, Jakob Käppler,
Sophie Paczesny, Maribel Diaz-Ricart, Enrique Carerras, Kenneth R
Analytical Characteristics of Cleavable Isotope-Coded Affinity Tag-LC-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Quantitative Proteomic Studies  Cecily P. Vaughn, David.
4.1 Hypothesis Testing z-test for a single value
Total ion current profiles across the chromatographic peptide separation for digests of undepleted (A, whole) and depleted (B) plasma from experiments.
Hypothesis Testing: The Difference Between Two Population Means
Technical reproducibility and biological variability.
Cluster analysis and pathway-based characterization of differentially expressed genes and proteins from integrated proteomics. Cluster analysis and pathway-based.
Is Proteomics the New Genomics?
Shotgun Proteomics in Neuroscience
Presentation transcript:

Immunity & Infection Research Centre Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Rob McMaster, Gabriela Cohen-Freue, Robert Balshaw, Axel Bergman, Raymond Ng and others in the Biomarker Team (Vancouver, Victoria) Experiment Design for iTRAQ Validation

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Assessment of the Proteome Identifying and quantitating the proteome is one key approach to understanding their roles in biology, and at times in health One specific strategy relies on mass spectrometry, wherein the various proteins are examined on the basis of mass and charge One of the techniques currently used in this regard is ITRAQ, wherein ratios of amounts of different proteins are obtained between control and experimental samples

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health iTRAQ Labeling (Applied Biosystems) + Peptide

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Each depleted plasma sample is digested with trypsin Quantitative 2DLC / MS/MS analysis Protein identification and differential expression analysis Each digested sample is labeled with an iTRAQ reagent 1Pooled plasma control sampleiTRAQ reagent  114 2Baseline (Plasma just before transplant) iTRAQ reagent  115 3Week 1 after the transplantiTRAQ reagent  116 4Week 2 – acute rejection identifiediTRAQ reagent  117 All 4 samples are pooled Plasma Biomarker Discovery: an Application using iTRAQ

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health iTRAQ Validation Experiment Key Questions: How reproducible is the iTRAQ procedure? Is there a channel-specific bias? How reproducible is the quantitation with respect to the concentrations of a specific protein? How similar are the depletion runs with respect to the proteins that are retained?

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Validation Experimental Design Plasma pool composed of 16 healthy individuals. CONTROL Plasma depletion (9x) Bloc A Pool of 3 depletion Bloc B Pool of 3 depletions Bloc C Pool of 3 depletions A1 A2 A3 A4 B1 B2 B3 B4 C1 C2 C3 C4 Experiment replicates

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Experimental bloc A iTRAQ Label Depletion 1 Rep # A1S0S1S2S3 A2S1S2S3S0 A3S2S3S0S1 A4S3S0S1S2 Experimental bloc BiTRAQ Label Depletion 2 Rep # B1S0S2S3S1 B2S2S3S1S0 B3S3S1S0S2 B4S1S0S2S3 Experimental bloc CiTRAQ Label Depletion 3 Rep # C1S0S3S1S2 C2S3S1S2S0 C3S1S2S0S3 C4S2S0S3S1 GenomeBC Proteomic Centre iTRAQ Validation of Experiment

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health iTRAQ Validation Experiment Key Questions: How reproducible is the iTRAQ procedure? Is there a channel-specific bias? How reproducible is the quantitation with respect to the concentrations of a specific protein? How similar are the depletion runs wrt the proteins that are retained?

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Comparing replications: Row analysis Within Variability

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Distribution of means: Not Normalized (NN)

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Distribution of means: Normalized (N)

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Standard Deviations and Within variability: NN

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Standard Deviations and Within variability: N The Effect of Normalization

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health iTRAQ Validation Experiment Key Questions: How reproducible is the iTRAQ procedure? Is there a channel-specific bias? How reproducible is the quantitation with respect to the concentrations of a specific protein? How similar are the depletion runs wrt the proteins that are retained?

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Comparing Ratios: column analysis MeanRatio117 MeanRatio115 MeanRatio116 Total Mean Variance Ratio117 Variance Ratio116 Variance Ratio115 Within Variability

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Distribution of means: NN

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Distribution of means: N

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Standard Deviations and Within variability: NN

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Standard Deviations and Within variability: N

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health iTRAQ Validation Experiment Key Questions: How reproducible is the iTRAQ procedure? Is there a channel-specific bias? How reproducible is the quantitation with respect to the concentrations of a specific protein? How similar are the depletion runs wrt the proteins that are retained?

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Experimental bloc A iTRAQ Label Depletion 1 Rep # A1S0S1S2S3 A2S1S2S3S0 A3S2S3S0S1 A4S3S0S1S2 Experimental bloc BiTRAQ Label Depletion 2 Rep # B1S0S2S3S1 B2S2S3S1S0 B3S3S1S0S2 B4S1S0S2S3 Experimental bloc CiTRAQ Label Depletion 3 Rep # C1S0S3S1S2 C2S3S1S2S0 C3S1S2S0S3 C4S2S0S3S1 Depleted control plasma + S0 = 1x  -gal S1 = 1x  -gal S2 = 2x  -gal S3 = 10x  -gal GenomeBC Proteomic Centre iTRAQ Validation of Experiment

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Ratio Reproducibility and Quantitation of added  -galactosidase  -galactosidase

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health iTRAQ Validation Experiment Key Questions: How reproducible is the iTRAQ procedure? Is there a channel-specific bias? How reproducible is the quantitation with respect to the concentrations of a specific protein? How similar are the depletion runs with respect to the proteins that are retained?

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health BioLibrary Plasma Jack Bell Research Centre, Dr. Robert McMaster Depleted Plasma Column 1: albumin, fibrinogen, IgG, IgA, IgM, a1-antitrypsin, transferrin, haptoglobin, a1-acid glycoprotein, HDL Apolipoprotein A-I, HDL Apolipoprotein A-II, a2-macroglobulin Column 2: Apolipoprotein B, Complement C3 ITRAQ Analysis UVic Genome BC Proteomics Platform Victoria, BC Biomarkers in Transplantation Discovery Strategy: Proteomics Analysis

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Venn Diagram of Identified Proteins C B A

Better Biomarkers in Transplantation. A Genome Canada Initiative for Human Health Summary Platform validation is critical to assess the severity of various bias –The proposed experimental design may be applicable to other platforms Also important to determine various platform parameters –Between and within run experimental variation is approx. 15% to 20% –Counting false positives (>2 fold-change) we estimate approx 0.3% false positive rate Statistical analyses continue…