GERB SW fluxes: an update (Clear ocean SW radiances and fluxes in the reprocessed V999 June 04 data) Cédric Bertrand GIST 24 14-16 th December, Imperial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GERB/CERES Meeting 2006 Exeter Evaluation of clouds and radiation in the Met Office global forecast model using GERB/SEVIRI data Richard Allan, Tony Slingo.
Advertisements

Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
GERB-2 GEO 22/11/05 J. Hanafin Using IDL coastline information as independent check on L15 and L2 Geolocations Only SW and SWF day time radiances used.
Summary of GEO-CAPE Aerosol Working Group Progress Members: Mian Chin, Pubu Ciren, Hiren Jethva, Joanna Joiner, Shobha Kondragunta, Alexei Lyapustin, Shana.
 nm)  nm) PurposeSpatial Resolution (km) Ozone, SO 2, UV8 3251Ozone8 3403Aerosols, UV, and Volcanic Ash8 3883Aerosols, Clouds, UV and Volcanic.
Xiaolei Niu and R. T. Pinker Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Radiative Flux Estimates from.
CERES-GERB meeting, Boulder, 3/2004 Validation of GERB unfiltered radiances S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Methodology to compare GERB- CERES filtered radiances.
ICSTM, London 14 th - 16 th Dec GIST-24 Meeting Remote Sensing Research Unit Climatology from Satellites Group Low Spatial Resolution Broad-band.
Diurnal asymmetry in the GERB(-like) fluxes: an update Cédric Bertrand Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.
Quantifying aerosol direct radiative effect with MISR observations Yang Chen, Qinbin Li, Ralph Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology,
Lunar Observations of Changes in the Earth’s Albedo (LOCEA) Alexander Ruzmaikin Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology in collaboration.
CERES-GERB Joint Science Teams The Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) experiment GERB Status Imperial College London J E Harries (GERB.
Plans for interim data release J E Russell (Imperial)
GERB2-GERB 1 transition: discussion item J E Russell Imperial College, London
Direct LW radiative effect of Saharan dust aerosols Vincent Gimbert, H.E. Brindley, J.E. Harries Imperial College London GIST 24, 16 Dec 2005, Imperial.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA.
Z. P. Szewczyk GIST 25, Oct Recent Field Campaigns with CERES Instruments Z. Peter Szewczyk Kory J. Priestley Lou Smith Remote Sensing of Clouds.
Introduction Invisible clouds in this study mean super-thin clouds which cannot be detected by MODIS but are classified as clouds by CALIPSO. These sub-visual.
AGU 2002 Fall Meeting NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Validation of GOES-8 Derived Cloud Properties Over the Southeastern Pacific J.
Data Release Requirements, decisions and plans. What we need New machine Implement (and test) all proposed changes from current Provide data quality summary,
USING OF METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION HIGH RESOLUTION VISIBLE DATA FOR THE IMPOVEMENT OF THE RAPID DEVELOPPING THUNDERSTORM PRODUCT Oleksiy Kryvobok Ukrainian.
Overview of the “Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB)” Experience. Nicolas Clerbaux Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB) In collaboration.
On the application of CERES SW ADMs Cédric Bertrand.
RGP geolocation analysis. The geolocation problem We don’t have all the necessary information: –Optical model needs tuning Can prob. do this now but not.
11 Ice Cover and Sea and Lake Ice Concentration with GOES-R ABI Presented by Yinghui Liu Presented by Yinghui Liu 1 Team Members: Yinghui Liu, Jeffrey.
GERB-2 V999 Unfiltering Nicolas Clerbaux & RMIB GERB Team. GIST 24, Imperial College, London 15 december 2005.
Direct LW radiative forcing of Saharan dust aerosols Vincent Gimbert, H.E. Brindley, J.E. Harries Imperial College London GIST 25, 24 Oct 2006, UK Met.
MSG, GERB calibration and data status May ‘07 J E Russell Imperial College, London
Estimating the radiative impacts of aerosol using GERB and SEVIRI H. Brindley Imperial College.
Dust Longwave Forcing from GERB and SEVIRI Vincent Gimbert, H.E. Brindley, J.E. Harries Imperial College London GIST 26, 03 May 2007, RAL, Abingdon Thanks.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Cloud Forcing Studies using CERES and GERB(-like) data Joanna Futyan, Jacqui Russell and John Harries GIST 22 RMIB, Brussels,
Intercomparison of SEVIRI data from MSG1 and MSG2 and implications for the GERB data processing Nicolas Clerbaux & RMIB GERB Team. GIST 26, RAL 3 and 4.
R. T. Pinker, H. Wang, R. Hollmann, and H. Gadhavi Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Use of.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Estimating the radiative effect of mineral dust over ocean The radiance to flux problem Dust retrieval quality Applying.
RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.
METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION FROM FIRST TO SECOND GENERATION METEOSAT
2004/11/10GIST 22, Brussels, LMD, M. Viollier1 POLDER, CERES, GERB flux comparisons and information on AMMA and MeghaTropiques Michel Viollier Laboratoire.
Aerosol Radiative Forcing from combined MODIS and CERES measurements
CM-SAF Board Meeting, Helsinki, September 2006 CM-SAF TOA radiation status report D. Caprion Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Inter-comparisons of monthly mean (and monthly time-step mean) GERB clear sky fluxes Joanna Futyan, Richard Allan and Jacqui.
Estimation of Potential Evapotranspiration from Merged CERES and MODIS Observations Anand Inamdar & A. French Arid Land Agricultural Research Center (ALARC/ARS/USDA)
Generation of TOA Radiative Fluxes from the GERB Instrument Data. Part II: First Results Nicolas Clerbaux and GERB team Royal Meteorological Institute.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Deriving clear-sky fluxes for GERB Jo Futyan Gist 21, CERES-GERB meeting 02/04/04 Boulder, Colorado.
GIST, Boulder, 31/03/2004 RMIB GERB Processing: overview and status S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
Using GERB and CERES data to evaluate NWP and Climate models over the Africa/Atlantic region Richard Allan, Tony Slingo, Ali Bharmal Environmental Systems.
AOS 340 Project #3 Results. High Spectral Resolution Radiance: tau=0.1.
GIST, Abingdon, 5/2007 GERB 1/GERB 2 and GERB/CERES comparisons S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences CERES Instantaneous Clear-sky and Monthly Averaged Radiance and Flux Product Overview David Young NASA.
Bluing of Aerosols near Clouds: Results from a Simple Model and MODIS Observations Alexander Marshak (GSFC) Tam á s V á rnai and Guoyong Wen (UMBC/GSFC)
GERB Ground Calibration Overview and Status J. Rufus
Fourth TEMPO Science Team Meeting
Validation status overivew
Validation status overivew
Best practices for RGB compositing of multi-spectral imagery
Benjamin Scarino, David R
Seung-Hee Ham and B.J. Sohn Seoul National University, Korea
TOA Radiative Flux Estimation From CERES Angular Distribution Models
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
On the use of Ray-Matching to transfer calibration
Eumetsat conference 2004, Praha
Validating CERES calibration and ADMs Using Data from East Antarctica
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
The Aqua-MODIS calibration transfer using DCC
Richard Allan, Tony Slingo ESSC, Reading University
Development of the MTSAT1 visible footprint point spread function
Strawman Plan for Inter-Calibration of Solar Channels
Earth Radiation Budget: Insights from GERB and future perspectives
Presentation transcript:

GERB SW fluxes: an update (Clear ocean SW radiances and fluxes in the reprocessed V999 June 04 data) Cédric Bertrand GIST th December, Imperial College, London, U.K.

RECAP: unfiltering New spectral response function New spectral conversion: where: = wavelength (  m) I = reflected solar radiance (Wm -2.Sr -1.  m -1 ) S =spectral response function (0  S  1) L SEVIRI = a + b 1 L b 2 L b 3 L c 11 L c 21 L 0.8 L c 22 L !!!! fct of SZA ONLY !!!! c 31 L 1.6 L c 32 L 1.6 L c 33 L !!!! fct of SZA ONLY !!!!  = unfilter factor V002

RECAP: unfiltering Database of co-angular CERES and SEVIRI measurements (March, April and July 04 FM2/FM3 ES8 Edition 2 CERES data) L SEVIRI UF (L CERES UF = a + b L c L d L e SZA sza  60°) with a, b, c, d and e surface types dependent L SEVIRI F CAN NOT BE DETERMINED FROM CERES DATA General case: L SEVIRI F = a’ + b’ L c’ L d’ L e’ SZA ( a", b" and c" = f(SZA,VZA,RAA) ) V999: Clear Ocean: L SEVIRI F = L SEVIRI UF /  SBDART

RECAP: angular conversion R adm = clear ocean wind speed dependent CERES-TRMM BB ADM anisotropic correction factor If  (glint angle) < 25°

 F ADM  F DUF  F UF  F ADM FFFF  F DUF  F UF FFFF F l.n – F l.n-2:00 (W.m -2 ) F l.n – F l.n+2:00 (W.m -2 ) ARG JUNE 04

F l.n – F l.n-2:00 (W.m -2 )  F ADM  F S3  F G3 F l.n – F l.n+2:00 (W.m -2 )  F S3 3x3 SEVIRI JUNE 04

RECAP: resolution enhancement (I) Up-sampling of the filtered GERB radiances from the nominal GERB footprint resolution (i, j) to the 3 x 3 SEVIRI pixels resolution (x, y). BUT: rather than L f GERB we use CF = L f GERB /L f SEVIRI FIRST: FIRST: Fluxes at the GERB footprint resolution (i, j) are derived from the 3 x 3 SEVIRI pixels (x, y) based flux estimates F GERB (i, j) = (  x  y PSF(i, j, x, y). F S3 (x, y) ). CF L (i, j)  CF L (i, j) = correction of SEVIRI by GERB SECOND: SECOND: improvement of the spatial resolution of GERB fluxes by use of SEVIRI high resolution information F GERB (i, j) =  x  y PSF(i, j, x, y). CF H (x, y). F S3 (x, y)

RECAP: resolution enhancement (II) FINALLY: FINALLY: GERB flux at the 3 x 3 SEVIRI pixels resolution is given by F G3 (x, y) = CF H (x, y). F S3 (x, y) use of L f ADM (x,y) rather than L f SEVIRI (x,y) in the CF L (i,j) computation. To reduce the impact of the SEVIRI spectral conversion in the estimation of the GERB SW fluxes at the 3x3 SEVIRI pixels resolution: Limitation: while  SBDART is a function of the 3 acquisition angles (sza, vza, and raa) it is still dependent of the assumed GERB spectral response function

F l.n – F l.n-2:00 (W.m -2 )  F S3  F G3  F G3_ADM_L F l.n – F l.n+2:00 (W.m -2 )  F G3 3x3 SEVIRI JUNE 04

L S3 /L ADM L G3 /L ADM SZARAAVZA UNFILTERED RADIANCE RATIO L G3_ADM_L /L ADM

F S3 /F ADM F G3 /F ADM SZARAAVZA FLUX RATIO F G3_ADM_L /F ADM

ARG: L UF /L ADM F UF /F ADM

GERB and SEVIRI images recorded at  times  temporal matching needed Scene types independent Resolution enhancement limitations: GERB pixel 3x3 SEVIRI pixels footprint 100% clear 100% cloudy Clear ocean S3 footprint for which the CF H (x,y) will be cloud contaminated

Conclusions Problems over clear land surfaces which were not found in the V002 version Asymmetry problem in the diurnal evolution of the SW fluxes over clear ocean surface still present.  mainly due to deficiencies in the SEVIRI spectral modeling  but also possible impact of the - GERB spectral response function through its influence on the estimated L f SEVIRI and thus on the CFs - resolution enhancement  reduced clear ocean pixels at the GERB nominal spatial resolution (  temporal matching between GERB and SEVIRI)

ARG Comparison Unscreened Cloudy pixels

ARG Comparison Unscreened Cloudy pixels GERB spectral response function ?

ARG Comparison Unscreened Cloudy pixels

Direct unfiltering Surface type dependent: ocean, vegetation and desert surfaces The normalized unfilter factor is estimated constaint: X = 0  Y = 1 X = 1  Y = 0 Where a, b, c and d are SZA dependent X is the normalized filtered radiance SBDART filtered SW radiance SBDART unfilter factor Mean of the 5% highest values L cld  cld Mean of the 5% lowest values L oc  oc

ARG F F, F DUF and F UF computation  RAL G2_L15A files  L F  SZA, VZA, RAA  RMIB G2_SEV1_L20S files  Surface type   Cloud cover, cloud amount, cloud phase   L UF, F UF   Assuming that the cloud optical depth was retrieved in the VIS 0.8 SEVIRI channel over ocean surface ( less sensitive to the Rayleight scattering) F F and F DUF

ARG F F, F DUF and F UF computation WARNING: The GERB PSF is applied in each of the RMIB G2_SEV1_L20S file fields. Not defined F F F DUF F UF