Supplementary figure S3. Diagram showing the effects of removing data from particular organ types on the relative percentage of gene pairs showing reciprocal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genomic Rearrangements CS 374 – Algorithms in Biology Fall 2006 Nandhini N S.
Advertisements

Genome Evolution: Duplication (Paralogs) & Degradation (Pseudogenes)
Assessment of sequence alignment Lecture Introduction The Dot plot Matrix visualisation matching tool: – Basics of Dot plot – Examples of Dot plot.
Fig. S1 A622 1 MVVSEKSKILIIGGTGYIGKYLVETSAKSGHPTFALIRESTLKNPEKSKLIDTFKSYGVT 60 A622L V V A622.
Supplementary Figure 1. Somatic mutation spectrum # Substitutions # Substitutions per Mb b c a Repeats Pseudogenes Whole genome Splice sites Non-coding.
© Wiley Publishing All Rights Reserved.
Comparative genomics provides new insights into protein degradation in plants Contact: Xiaohan Yang, DOE/Office of Science/Biological.
EXPLORING DEAD GENES Adrienne Manuel I400. What are they? Dead Genes are also called Pseudogenes Pseudogenes are non functioning copies of genes in DNA.
Figure S1_Yao Qin et al. Figure S1 Occurrence and distribution of trihelix family in different plant species. Red branches in the cladogram indicate that.
Figure S1. Effects of AVG, DIECA, DPI, NMMA, STA, and OKA on IbRPK expression in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas cv. Tainung 57). Leaves with petiole cuts.
Mutations Chapter 12-4.
Paper Review on Cross- species Microarray Comparison Hong Lu
Asymmetric Sequence Divergence of Duplicate Genes Experimented By: Gavin Conant and Andreas Wagner Presented By: Jennifer Case and Jonathan Hobbs.
Molecular Evolution. Study of how genes and proteins evolve and how are organisms related based on their DNA sequence Molecular evolution therefore is.
Fig. 1. — The life cycle of S. papillosus. (A) The life cycle of S
Supporting Information Figs S1-S5
Supplementary Materials
Figure 1. Effect of acute TNF treatment on transcription in human SGBS adipocytes as assessed by RNA-seq and RNAPII ChIP-seq. Following 10 days in vitro.
Mutations Chapter 12-4.
Figure S1. Sequence alignment of Arabidopsis NodGS with other plant and fungal orthologues. Abbreviations are as follows: Populus trichocarpa (Ptr), Ricinus.
Growth rate‐dependent gene expression under glucose limitation.
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Behaviorally dependent allele-specific expression.
Amino‐acid sequence of the heterogeneous nuclear RNP G protein family and RNA‐binding SELEX consensus sequence obtained for human RBMY. (A) Sequence alignment.
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages e6 (July 2017)
Molecular Evolution.
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Comparative Genomics.
Stem Cell Regulation by Arabidopsis WOX Genes
The Evolution of Venom by Co-option of Single-Copy Genes
Identification of genes associated with a gain of prion susceptibility Increased susceptibilities of revertant cell clones R2, R5 and R7 after retinoic.
Hox genes and the phylogeny of the arthropods
Genetic and Epigenetic Determinants of Neurogenesis and Myogenesis
Lucas J.T. Kaaij, Robin H. van der Weide, René F. Ketting, Elzo de Wit 
Effect of First-Line Treatment on Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells’ Subpopulations in the Peripheral Blood of Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer 
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Margarita V. Chibalina, Dmitry A. Filatov  Current Biology 
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (July 2018)
Volume 151, Issue 2, Pages e6 (August 2016)
Shyam S. Jayaraman, David J. Rayhan, Salar Hazany, Michael S. Kolodney 
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Figure 1. Position and number of NLS improves genome editing by AsCas12a, LbCas12a and FnoCas12a. (A) General schematic ... Figure 1. Position and number.
Parallel evolution of coding sequences above neutral expectation.
Figure 4. Differentially expressed miRNAs and isomiRNAs between different pairs of tissues The differentially expressed miRNAs and their isomiRNAs are.
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Michal Levin, Tamar Hashimshony, Florian Wagner, Itai Yanai 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages e12 (September 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (June 2018)
György Abrusán, Joseph A. Marsh  Cell Reports 
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Coupled Caspase and N-End Rule Ligase Activities Allow Recognition and Degradation of Pluripotency Factor LIN-28 during Non-Apoptotic Development  Benjamin.
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Simon Laurin-Lemay, Henner Brinkmann, Hervé Philippe  Current Biology 
Origins and Evolution of tetherin, an Orphan Antiviral Gene
VH usage of cross-reactive B cells induced by H5N1 or H7N9 vaccination
Statistical chart of significantly differentially expressed genes
Benjamini & Hochberg-corrected p < 0.05 Bonferroni-corrected
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Qian Cong, Dominika Borek, Zbyszek Otwinowski, Nick V. Grishin 
Volume 21, Issue 24, Pages (December 2011)
Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of cnidarian stinging cells
Joana Pinto Vieira, Julien Racle, Vassily Hatzimanikatis 
Driver pathways and key genes in OSCC
Presentation transcript:

Supplementary figure S3. Diagram showing the effects of removing data from particular organ types on the relative percentage of gene pairs showing reciprocal expression. Removal of data from siliques showed the largest effect (ca. 20%; x 2, P= ).

WGDsTandems A B * ** * * * * * Relative %: Color key Supplementary figure S4. Expression gains and losses by different organ type, developmental stage, and cell type. Summary of Fisher’s exact tests between expression gain and expression loss from MRCA analysis in each condition (i.e., organ type, developmental stage, or cell type). A statistically significant difference after 5% false discovery rate correction is labeled with a star (*: Q < 0.05; **: Q < 0.01). (a) A comparison of the relative percentage between expression gain and expression loss in 63 different developmental stages and organ types in both WG duplicates and tandem duplicates. The 63 different developmental stages and organ types are listed in supplementary table S5. (b) A comparison of the relative percentage between expression gain and expression loss in 20 different developmental stages and cell types in roots. The 20 different developmental stages and cell types of roots are listed in supplementary table S6.

A) WGDs B) Tandems Supplementary figure S5. Box plots showing a comparison of the synonymous substitution rate (Ks) between gene duplicates with asymmetric sequence evolution and those without asymmetric sequence evolution (i.e., symmetric sequence evolution). (a) WG duplicates (t-test: P = ; Wilcoxon signed-rank test: P = ). (b) Tandem duplicates (t-test: P = ; Wilcoxon signed-rank test: P = ).

Supplementary figure S6. Boxplots showing a comparison of the synonymous substitution rate (Ks) between the WG duplicates and the tandem duplicates (t-test: P = 1.659e-05; Wilcoxon signed-rank test: P = 3.221e-13).

Supplementary figure S7. Amino acid alignment of a pair of duplicated genes, BSU1 and BSL1, and their orthologs from three outgroup species, Carica papaya, Populus trichocarpa, and Vitis vinifera. Red dots indicate the positively selected sites of BSU1 that were detected based on the branch-site test of positive selection using the program Codeml in PAML. The blue box indicates the Kelch-repeat domain and the red box indicates the phosphatase domain.